Multi-period Portfolio Optimization Research Articles

Developing a multi-period robust optimization model considering American style options

The main goal in this study is to introduce a new linear model for multi-period portfolio optimization. The proposed optimization model can take both stocks and their respective American style options into consideration. Moreover, to hedge the resulting portfolio, the robust counterpart of this model is developed in which the level of robustness can be determined using the length and the type of the uncertainty set. The experiments results which are obtained based on the data of Dow Jones stock market verify the performance of the proposed models compared to what has been achieved using Bertsimas et al.’s optimization model.

A new fuzzy programming approach for multi-period portfolio optimization with return demand and risk control

This paper considers a multi-period portfolio selection problem imposed by return demand and risk control in a fuzzy investment environment, in which the returns of assets are characterized by fuzzy numbers. A fuzzy lower semi-deviation is originally defined as the risk control of portfolio. A proportion entropy constraint is added as the divergence measure of portfolio. Based on the theories of possibility and necessity measures, a new multi-period portfolio optimization model with return demand and risk control is proposed. And then, the proposed model is transformed into a crisp nonlinear programming problem by using fuzzy programming approach. Furthermore, an improved differential evolution algorithm is designed for obtaining the optimal strategy. Finally, a numerical example is given to illustrate the practicality and efficiency of the proposed model and the corresponding algorithm.

Multi-period portfolio optimization under possibility measures

A single-period portfolio selection theory provides optimal tradeoff between the mean and the variance of the portfolio return for a future period. However, in a real investment process, the investment horizon is usually multi-period and the investor needs to rebalance his position from time to time. Hence it is natural to extend the single-period fuzzy portfolio selection to the multi-period case based on the possibility theory. In this paper, we propose the possibilistic expected value and variance for the terminal wealth with fuzzy forms after T periods by using the central value operator. Classes of multi-period possibilistic mean-variance models are formulated originally under the assumption that the proceeds of risky assets are fuzzy variables. Besides, we apply a particle swarm optimization algorithm to solve the proposed multi-period fuzzy portfolio selection models. A numerical example is given to illustrate the performance of the proposed models and algorithm.

Multiperiod Portfolio Optimization with General Transaction Costs

We analyze the optimal portfolio policy for a multiperiod mean-variance investor facing a large number of risky assets in the presence of general transaction cost. For proportional transaction costs, we give a closed-form expression for a no-trade region, shaped as a multi-dimensional parallelogram, and show how the optimal portfolio policy can be efficiently computed by solving a single quadratic program. For market impact costs, we show that at each period it is optimal to trade to the boundary of a state-dependent rebalancing region. Finally, we show empirically that the utility loss associated with ignoring transaction costs may be large.

Parameter Uncertainty in Multi-Period Portfolio Optimization With Transaction Costs

We study the impact of parameter uncertainty on the expected utility of a multiperiod investor subject to quadratic transaction costs. We characterize the utility loss associated with ignoring parameter uncertainty, and show that it is equal to the product between the single-period utility loss and another term that captures the effects of the multiperiod mean-variance utility and transaction cost losses. To mitigate the impact of parameter uncertainty, we propose two multiperiod shrinkage portfolios and demonstrate with simulated and empirical datasets that they substantially outperform portfolios that ignore parameter uncertainty, transaction costs, or both.

A multi-period portfolio selection optimization model by using interval analysis

Due to few historical data that can be obtained in an emerging securities market, the future returns, risk and liquidity of securities cannot be forecasted precisely. The investment environment is usually fuzzy and uncertain. To handle these imprecise data, this paper discusses a fuzzy multi-period portfolio optimization problem where the returns, risk, and liquidity of securities are represented by interval variables. By taking the return, risk, liquidity and diversification degree of portfolio into consideration, an interval multi-period portfolio selection optimization model is proposed with the objective of maximizing the terminal wealth under the constraints of the return, risk and diversification degree of portfolio at each period. In the proposed model, a proportion entropy is employed to measure the diversification degree of portfolio. Using the fuzzy decision-making theory and multi-objective programming approach, the proposed model is transformed into a crisp nonlinear programming. Then, we design an improved particle swarm optimization algorithm for solution. Finally, a numerical example is given to illustrate the application of our model and demonstrate the effectiveness of the designed algorithm.

A stochastic programming approach to multicriteria portfolio optimization

We study a stochastic programming approach to multicriteria multi-period portfolio optimization problem. We use a Single Index Model to estimate the returns of stocks from a market-representative index and a random walk model to generate scenarios on the possible values of the index return. We consider expected return, Conditional Value at Risk and liquidity as our criteria. With stocks from Istanbul Stock Exchange, we make computational studies for the two and three-criteria cases. We demonstrate the tradeoffs between criteria and show that treating these criteria simultaneously yields meaningful efficient solutions. We provide insights based on our experiments.

A Stochastic Programming Approach for Multi-Period Portfolio Optimization

presented in this paper. The basic model involves Multi-Period decisions (portfolio optimization) and deals with the usual uncertainty of investment returns and future liabilities. Therefore, is it well suited to a stochastic programming approach. We consider the problem of rebalancing policy to accomplish some investment’s criteria. Transaction costs have also been a subject of concern in this paper. In particular, a large amount of transactions usually make asset price move in an unfavorable direction. Therefore, the first problem neglects transactions cost while the second does not.

A Stochastic Programming Approach For Multi-Period Portfolio Optimization With Transaction Costs

This paper uses stochastic programming to solve multi-period investment problems. We combine the feature of asset return predictability with practically relevant constraints arising in a multi-period investment context. The objective is to maximize the expected utility of the returns the periods to balance the liabilities. Asset returns and state variables follow a first-order vector auto-regression and the associated uncertainty is described by discrete scenario trees. To deal with the long time intervals involved in multi-period problems, we consider short-term decisions, and incorporate a solution for the long, subsequent steady-state period to account for end effects.

An ADMM Algorithm for a Class of Total Variation Regularized Estimation Problems

We present an alternating augmented Lagrangian method for convex optimization problems where the cost function is the sum of two terms, one that is separable in the variable blocks, and a second that is separable in the difference between consecutive variable blocks. Examples of such problems include Fused Lasso estimation, total variation denoising, and multi-period portfolio optimization with transaction costs. In each iteration of our method, the first step involves separately optimizing over each variable block, which can be carried out in parallel. The second step is not separable in the variables, but can be carried out very efficiently. We apply the algorithm to segmentation of data based on changes in mean (l1 mean filtering) or changes in variance (l1 variance filtering). In a numerical example, we show that our implementation is around 10000 times faster compared with the generic optimization solver SDPT3.

Multi-period portfolio optimization for asset–liability management with bankrupt control

In this paper, we investigate a multi-period portfolio optimization problem for asset–liability management of an investor who intends to control the probability of bankruptcy before reaching the end of an investment horizon. We formulate the problem as a generalized mean–variance model that incorporates bankrupt control over intermediate periods. Based on the Lagrangian multiplier method, the embedding technique, the dynamic programming approach and the Lagrangian duality theory, we propose a method to solve the model. A numerical example is given to demonstrate our method and show the impact of bankrupt control and market parameters on the optimal portfolio strategy.

Dynamic CVaR with multi-period risk problems

This paper studies multi-period risk management problems by presenting a dynamic risk measure. This risk measure is the sum of conditional value-at-risk of each period. The authors model it by Markov decision processes and derive its optimality equation. This equation is further transformed equivalently to an analytically tractable one. The authors then use the model and its results to a multi-period portfolio optimization when the return rate vectors at each period form a Markov chain.

A polynomial optimization approach to constant rebalanced portfolio selection

We address the multi-period portfolio optimization problem with the constant rebalancing strategy. This problem is formulated as a polynomial optimization problem (POP) by using a mean-variance criterion. In order to solve the POPs of high degree, we develop a cutting-plane algorithm based on semidefinite programming. Our algorithm can solve problems that can not be handled by any of known polynomial optimization solvers.

Constant Rebalanced Portfolio Optimization Under Nonlinear Transaction Costs

We study the constant rebalancing strategy for multi-period portfolio optimization via conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) when there are nonlinear transaction costs. This problem is difficult to solve because of its nonconvexity. The nonlinear transaction costs and CVaR constraints make things worse; state-of-the-art nonlinear programming (NLP) solvers have trouble in reaching even locally optimal solutions. As a practical solution, we develop a local search algorithm in which linear approximation problems and nonlinear equations are iteratively solved. Computational results are presented, showing that the algorithm attains a good solution in a practical time. It is better than the revised version of an existing global optimization. We also assess the performance of the constant rebalancing strategy in comparison with the buy-and-hold strategy.

Behaviour finance and estimation risk in stochastic portfolio optimization

The objective of this article is twofold. The first is to incorporate mental accounting, loss-aversion, asymmetric risk-taking behaviour and probability weighting in a multi-period portfolio optimization for individual investors. While these behavioural biases have previously been identified in the literature, their overall impact during the determination of optimal asset allocation in a multi-period analysis is still missing. The second objective is to account for the estimation risk in the analysis. Considering 26 daily index stock data over the period from 1995 to 2007, we empirically evaluate our model (Behaviour Resample Adjusted Technique–BRATE) against the traditional Markowitz model.

A Polynomial Optimization Approach to Constant Rebalanced Portfolio Selection

We address the multi-period portfolio optimization problem with the constant rebalancing strategy. This problem is formulated as a polynomial optimization problem (POP) by using a mean-variance criterion. In order to solve the POPs of high degree, we develop a cutting-plane algorithm based on semidefinite programming. Our algorithm can solve problems that can not be handled by any of known polynomial optimization solvers.

Using genetic algorithm to solve a new multi-period stochastic optimization model

This paper presents a new asset allocation model based on the CVaR risk measure and transaction costs. Institutional investors manage their strategic asset mix over time to achieve favorable returns subject to various uncertainties, policy and legal constraints, and other requirements. One may use a multi-period portfolio optimization model in order to determine an optimal asset mix. Recently, an alternative stochastic programming model with simulated paths was proposed by Hibiki [N. Hibiki, A hybrid simulation/tree multi-period stochastic programming model for optimal asset allocation, in: H. Takahashi, (Ed.) The Japanese Association of Financial Econometrics and Engineering, JAFFE Journal (2001) 89–119 (in Japanese); N. Hibiki A hybrid simulation/tree stochastic optimization model for dynamic asset allocation, in: B. Scherer (Ed.), Asset and Liability Management Tools: A Handbook for Best Practice, Risk Books, 2003, pp. 269–294], which was called a hybrid model. However, the transaction costs weren’t considered in that paper. In this paper, we improve Hibiki’s model in the following aspects: (1) The risk measure CVaR is introduced to control the wealth loss risk while maximizing the expected utility; (2) Typical market imperfections such as short sale constraints, proportional transaction costs are considered simultaneously. (3) Applying a genetic algorithm to solve the resulting model is discussed in detail. Numerical results show the suitability and feasibility of our methodology.

A stochastic programming approach for multi-period portfolio optimization

This paper extends previous work on the use of stochastic linear programming to solve life-cycle investment problems. We combine the feature of asset return predictability with practically relevant constraints arising in a life-cycle investment context. The objective is to maximize the expected utility of consumption over the lifetime and of bequest at the time of death of the investor. Asset returns and state variables follow a first-order vector auto-regression and the associated uncertainty is described by discrete scenario trees. To deal with the long time intervals involved in life-cycle problems we consider a few short-term decisions (to exploit any short-term return predictability), and incorporate a closed-form solution for the long, subsequent steady-state period to account for end effects.

Multi-period portfolio optimization with linear control policies

This paper is concerned with multi-period sequential decision problems for financial asset allocation. A model is proposed in which periodic optimal portfolio adjustments are determined with the objective of minimizing a cumulative risk measure over the investment horizon, while satisfying portfolio diversity constraints at each period and achieving or exceeding a desired terminal expected wealth target. The proposed solution approach is based on a specific affine parameterization of the recourse policy, which allows us to obtain a sub-optimal but exact and explicit problem formulation in terms of a convex quadratic program. In contrast to the mainstream stochastic programming approach to multi-period optimization, which has the drawback of being computationally intractable, the proposed setup leads to optimization problems that can be solved efficiently with currently available convex quadratic programming solvers, enabling the user to effectively attack multi-stage decision problems with many securities and periods.

Beyond Sharpe ratio: Optimal asset allocation using different performance ratios

As the assumption of normality in return distributions is relaxed, classic Sharpe ratio and its descendants become questionable tools for constructing optimal portfolios. In order to overcome the problem, asymmetrical parameter-dependent performance ratios have been recently proposed in the literature. The aim of this note is to develop an integrated decision aid system for asset allocation based on a toolkit of eleven performance ratios. A multi-period portfolio optimization up covering a fixed horizon is set up: at first, bootstrapping of asset return distributions is assessed to recover all ratios calculations; at second, optimal rebalanced-weights are achieved; at third, optimal final wealth is simulated for each ratios. Eventually, we make a robustness test on the best performance ratios. Empirical simulations confirm the weakness in forecasting of Sharpe ratio, whereas asymmetrical parameter-dependent ratios, such as the Generalized Rachev, Sortino–Satchell and Farinelli–Tibiletti ratios show satisfactorily robustness.