Multinational Association Of Supportive Care In Cancer Research Articles

Relationship Between Anxiety and Events Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea Vomiting (CINV) Breast Cancer Patients with Chemotherapy in Jember, East Java, Indonesia

In Indonesia and worldwide, breast cancer accounts for the greatest number of cancer patients. Chemotherapy is the treatment used to treat breast cancer patients; however, it might cause One of the psychological adverse effects that chemotherapy usually causes for individuals with breast cancer is anxiety. Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea Vomiting (CINV) is the most common physical adverse effect experienced by breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. This cross-sectional study employs certain research approaches. Patients receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer at the RSD Dr. Soebandi Jember and Baladhika Husada Jember Hospital made up the study's population. This research was conducted for one month, and the number of samples used in this research was 120. Anxiety measurement uses a questionnaire Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) to measure levels of anxiety, and the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) Antiemesis Tool (MAT) to measure Chemotherapy Induces Nausea and Vomiting (CINV). Data analysis with a paired sample t test using the IBM SPSS v.25 for Windows programme. The results of the Pearson correlation test between anxiety and CINV in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy showed a significance value of 0.00 or <0.05, which means there is a correlation between anxiety and CINV experienced by respondents. The higher the level of anxiety, the more CINV complaints the patient will experience. Vice versa, the lower the level of anxiety, the CINV experienced by the patient will be minimal. Keyword: anxiety, CINV, Breast Cancer, Chemotherapy

Supportive care 2030 movement: towards unifying ambitions for global excellence in supportive cancer care—an international Delphi study

Supportive care to ensure optimal quality of life is an essential component of cancer care and symptom control across the lifespan. Ongoing advances in cancer treatment, increasing toxicity from many novel treatment regimes, and variations in access to care and cancer outcomes across the globe and resource settings present significant challenges for supportive care delivery. To date, no overarching framework has been developed to guide supportive care development worldwide. As an initial step of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) Supportive Care 2030 Movement, we developed a targeted, unifying set of ambition statements to envision the future of supportive cancer care. From September 2022 until June 2023, we used a modified Delphi methodology to develop and attain consensus about ambition statements related to supportive cancer care. Leaders of MASCC Study Groups were invited to participate in an Expert Panel for the first two Delphi rounds (and a preliminary round to suggest potential ambition statements). Patient Advocates then examined and provided input regarding the ambition statements. Twenty-seven Expert Panelists and 11 Patient Advocates participated. Consensus was attained on 13 ambition statements, with two sub-statements. The ambition statements addressed global standards for guideline development and implementation, coordinated and individualized care, dedicated supportive oncology services, self-management, needs for screening and actions, patient education, behavioral support, financial impact minimization, comprehensive survivorship care, and timely palliative care, reflecting collaboration, coordination and team-based approach across all levels. This study is the first to develop shared ambitions for the future of supportive cancer care on a global level. These ambition statements can facilitate a coordinated, resource-stratified, and person-centered approach and inform research, education, clinical services, and policy efforts. This project received funding support from Prof Raymond Chan's NHMRC Investigator Grant (APP1194051).

Survey of international pediatric nutritional supportive care practices: a report from the Pediatric Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC)

PurposeMalnutrition is common in children with cancer. While multiple validated malnutrition screens exist, there is no universal, standardized approach to screen or diagnose malnutrition. The Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) Pediatric Study Group is focused on oncologic supportive care for children and young adults. This subgroup designed and administered a pilot study to characterize global malnutrition screening, diagnosis, and treatment practices for pediatric patients with cancer after identifying variations in malnutrition practice patterns within its members.MethodsA novel, exploratory survey was iteratively developed and distributed in early 2020 to 45 MASCC Pediatric Study Group members. The survey included multiple questions with standard patient presentations and nutritional scenarios, and the respondents selected the answer that best reflected the care patients would receive at their institution.ResultsA validated screening tool to assess for malnutrition was routinely used by 15 of 26 respondents (58%). No single validated screen was used by more than 24% of responders, and 11 of 26 (42%) reported not having a standard malnutrition treatment screen. When the same patient was presented with the survey using different malnutrition indicators, patient care plans varied greatly. This was particularly true for z-scores compared to weight percentiles.ConclusionsDevelopment of consensus recommendations for screening practices, preferred malnutrition indicators, and treatment guidelines could help reduce the underdiagnosis of malnutrition and subsequent variation in its management and ought to be a focus of the global pediatric cancer supportive care community.

Global disparities in cancer supportive care: An international survey.

The global cancer burden is rising, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), highlighting a critical research gap in understanding disparities in supportive care access. To address this, the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) Health Disparities Committee initiated a global survey to investigate and delineate these disparities. This study aims to explore and compare supportive care access disparities between LMIC and High-Income Countries (HIC). An online cross-sectional survey was conducted among active members of MASCC. Members, representing diverse healthcare professions received email invitations. The survey, available for 3 weeks, comprised sections covering (1) sociodemographic information; (2) clinical service/practice-related disparities in their region/nation; (3) population groups facing disparities within their region or country. Chi-squared or Fisher's exact test for cross-sectional analyses, and a multivariable logistic regression model was employed for statistical analysis. A total of 218 active members participated, with one-quarter (26.6%) from LMIC and 18.4% ethnic minorities, timely cancer care (43.7%) and timely supportive care (45.0%) emerged as the most pressing disparities globally. Notably, participants from LMIC underscored cancer drug affordability (56.4%) and supportive care guideline implementation (56.4%) as critical issues. Economically disadvantaged populations were noted as more likely to face disparities by both LMIC and HIC (non-US-based) respondents, while US-based respondents identified racial/ethnic minorities as facing more disparities. This global survey reveals significant disparities in cancer supportive care between LMIC and HIC, with a particular emphasis on medication affordability and guideline implementation in LMIC. Addressing these disparities requires targeted intervention, considering specific regional priorities.

Financial Toxicity in Cancer Supportive Care: An International Survey.

The study aims to explore unmet social needs and sources of financial toxicities in patients as noted by health care professionals and researchers in cancer supportive care, shedding light on potential health disparities. In this cross-sectional survey, we anonymously surveyed active members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC). The survey, structured in three sections, included questions regarding the routine assessment of social needs during patient consultations, sociodemographic aspects, factors influencing financial toxicity (FT), perceived support for managing FT, and available/desirable resources. A total of 218 MASCC members were included, predominantly from high-income countries (HIC, 73.4%), with many age 41-60 years (56.5%) and female (56.9%). Drug/treatment cost and insurance coverage were the main sources for FT among the HIC, whereas participants from low-middle-income countries (LMIC) considered transportation cost, loss of employment because of cancer diagnosis, and unavailability of return-to-work services as the top three sources of FT. Respondents from LMIC (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.01 [95% CI, 1.15 to 7.93]) and physicians (aOR, 2.67 [95% CI, 1.15 to 6.21]) were more likely to routinely assess financial coverages. Socioeconomic status was consistently ranked as one of the top three sources of financial toxicities by participants from LMIC (34%), HIC excluding the United States (38%), those who do not self-identify as racial/ethnic minority (36%), and physicians (40%). This global survey of health care professionals and researchers in HIC and LMIC revealed varying approaches to assessing financial coverage and social needs. Socioeconomic status emerged as a consistent concern across countries, affecting financial toxicities. The study highlights the need for tailored approaches and improved resource visibility while emphasizing clinicians' pivotal role in addressing financial aspects of cancer care.

Acupoint Application Combined with Acupressure as an Adjunctive Therapy for Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting.

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) refers to the nausea and vomiting experienced by patients after the application of chemotherapy drugs, significantly affecting their quality of life and physical recovery, as well as increasing the pain of the patients. Basic medicine primarily focuses on acid suppression, gastric protection, and vomiting suppression, but there are still many patients with nausea and vomiting symptoms that cannot be alleviated. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) can effectively alleviate nausea and vomiting through acupoint stimulation and pressure, while also offering advantages such as simplicity, affordability, and fewer side effects. The aim of this article is to introduce the method of using acupoint application combined with acupressure as an adjunctive therapy for CINV, using the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) Antiemesis Tool (MAT) tablet scale as a questionnaire. The article details aspects such as acupoint selection, production, and the use of acupoint application, massage techniques, and operating procedures, all with the goal of ensuring the safety and efficacy of acupoint application combined with acupressure as an adjuvant therapy, thereby improving patients' clinical symptoms and quality of life.

Guidance on mucositis assessment from the MASCC Mucositis Study Group and ISOO: an international Delphi study

Mucositis is a common and highly impactful side effect of conventional and emerging cancer therapy and thus the subject of intense investigation. Although common practice, mucositis assessment is heterogeneously adopted and poorly guided, impacting evidence synthesis and translation. The Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) Mucositis Study Group (MSG) therefore aimed to establish expert recommendations for how existing mucositis assessment tools should be used, in clinical care and trials contexts, to improve the consistency of mucositis assessment. This study was conducted over two stages (January 2022-July 2023). The first phase involved a survey to MASCC-MSG members (January 2022-May 2022), capturing current practices, challenges and preferences. These then informed the second phase, in which a set of initial recommendations were prepared and refined using the Delphi method (February 2023-May 2023). Consensus was defined as agreement on a parameter by >80% of respondents. Seventy-two MASCC-MSG members completed the first phase of the study (37 females, 34 males, mainly oral care specialists). High variability was noted in the use of mucositis assessment tools, with a high reliance on clinician assessment compared to patient reported outcome measures (PROMs, 47% vs 3%, 37% used a combination). The World Health Organization (WHO) and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) scales were most commonly used to assess mucositis across multiple settings. Initial recommendations were reviewed by experienced MSG members and following two rounds of Delphi survey consensus was achieved in 91 of 100 recommendations. For example, in patients receiving chemotherapy, the recommended tool for clinician assessment in clinical practice is WHO for oral mucositis (89.5% consensus), and WHO or CTCAE for gastrointestinal mucositis (85.7% consensus). The recommended PROM in clinical trials is OMD/WQ for oral mucositis (93.3% consensus), and PRO-CTCAE for gastrointestinal mucositis (83.3% consensus). These new recommendations provide much needed guidance on mucositis assessment and may be applied in both clinical practice and research to streamline comparison and synthesis of global data sets, thus accelerating translation of new knowledge into clinical practice. No funding was received.

The predictive value of the MASCC score in patients with febrile neutropenia.

e23059 Background: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a life-threatening complication in patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. Guidelines classify FN as a one-time oral temperature of greater than 38.3°C or sustained temperature greater than 38°C for ≥ 1 hour with an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of less than 500 cells/μL or an ANC expected to decrease to less than 500 cells/μL within a 48-hour period. This condition has a high rate of hospitalization and mortality. Currently, the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) risk score is used to classify patients as high or low risk. The current study outlines the predictive role of MASCC scoring in risk stratifying patients with FN at our institution. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective observational study. IRB approval was obtained for this study. Electronic medical record data was reviewed to record mortality, length of stay (LOS), and antimicrobial use as primary outcomes with age at time of admission, sex, race, type of malignancy, any confirmed infection diagnosis, MASCC risk score, and subspecialist consultation as predictors of outcomes. Results: 220 records of possible FN episodes were screened, 160 were excluded leaving a total of 60 patients for review. The median age was 72.5 with 28 males and 32 females. Overall mortality rate was 10%.33 patients (55%) did not have an identifiable source of infection. Among the 27 patients with confirmed infection, 7 were associated with COVID-19, 12 had gram negative rod (GNR) sepsis and 8 were other bacterial infections. Patients with GNR sepsis had the highest mortality risk in which 4 of the 12 (33%) died. LOS was also significantly longer in patients with GNR sepsis. Lower MASCC scores were associated with identification of GNR sepsis. Of the patients with MASCC score of < 24, significantly more patients 7/20 (35%) developed GNR sepsis compared to 5/40 (12.5%) of those with MASCC score of 24 or greater (p = .004). Patients with GNR sepsis received a mean 5.7 days of broad spectrum antibiotics compared to 3 days in those without, (p < 0.001). Those with no identified infection had significantly lower LOS (4.5 days) compared to the groups with GNR sepsis (11.1 days) or other bacterial infections (10.1 days). Conclusions: Febrile neutropenia is a complication of cytotoxic chemotherapy that warrants special attention due to high mortality rates. We found lower MASCC scores were associated with GNR sepsis and that in the setting of FN these patients had higher mortality rates and longer LOS. This highlights the importance of risk stratification with MASCC index scoring as early recognition and treatment of high risk patients could lead to improved patient outcomes.

Retrospective study on the correlation between MASCC score and the evolution of febrile neutropenia for patients with solid cancer.

e13570 Retrospective study on the correlation between MASCC score and the evolution of febrile neutropenia for patients with solid cancer. Background: The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) score is used to risk-stratify outpatients with febrile neutropenia. Currently, data on the use of the MASCC score are based on studies with a small number of patients. Our primary aim was to determine whether a MASCC score ≥ 21 identifies patients with solid tumors who would evolve without complications. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted with febrile neutropenia and solid cancer at Sherbrooke University Hospital from 2011 to 2022. We collected patients' demographics, type of cancer, current chemotherapy regimen, whether patients were candidates for outpatient treatment, MASCC score, duration of IV antibiotic therapy, complications (intensive care unit admission, hypotension, hypoxemia, acute kidney failure, bacteriemia (persistent or developing after 48h of IV antibiotics) and escalation in antimicrobial regimen after hospital admission), and inpatient deaths. We used chi-square analysis and multivariate analysis to determine factors other than MASCC that predict complications. Results: A total of 290 febrile neutropenia patients with solid tumors were identified. 93 patients had a MASCC score <21 and 196 were identified as low risk (MASCC score ≥ 21). The preliminary results showed that the MASCC score had a specificity of 58,3% [95% CI 48,4%-67,8%], a sensibility of 83,0% [95% CI 76,7%-88,1%], a positive predictive value of 77,0% [95% CI 72,7%-80,9%] and a negative predictive value of 67,0 [95% CI 58,7%-74,4%] to identify complications. A low risk MASCC score showed statistically significative reduction in duration of neutropenia, IV antibiotics, fever and length of hospitalisation. Conclusions: The MASCC score did not demonstrate high enough accuracy to precisely identify patients which would have evolved without complications. However, a low-risk score identified by using the MASCC score was found to have strong association with reduction of duration of hospitalisation burden. Furter data will be collected to increase the strength of the study.

An open-label randomized trial comparing addition of olanzapine 5 mg versus olanzapine 10 mg as anti-emetic to standard anti-emetic regime for doxorubicin or epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in breast cancer.

e12531 Background: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is an important therapy related side effects in the treatment of malignancies. Breast cancer patients receive a highly-emetogenic chemotherapy with Doxorubicin or Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide. The addition of Olanzapine 10 mg is known to reduce acute and delayed CINV, however, Olanzapine 10 mg is associated with somnolence and fatigue. In this study, the proportion of complete response of CINV to Olanzapine 5 mg was compared to Olanzapine 10 mg that was added to standard antiemetic regime. Methods: This was an open-label randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of Olanzapine 5 mg against Olanzapine 10 mg in preventing acute and delayed phases of CINV. This study was conducted at a tertiary care cancer centre in India between 2020 – 2021. The sample size was calculated 118 subjects that were allocated with simple randomization method. The primary outcome of CINV in acute and delayed phase were collected using the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) Antiemesis Tool; the intensity of symptoms of nausea, retching and vomiting were assessed using the Rhodes index; the overall patient experience was assessed using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. The comparison of proportions of CINV in the two groups were compared using Chi-square test while intensity scores were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. All p values <0.05 were considered significant. Ethics approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board. The trial was registered at the Clinical Trials Registry of India. Results: Of the118 patients randomized, 57 received Olanzapine 5 mg and 61 received Olanzapine 10 mg in addition to standard antiemetic regime. The overall complete response rate was 54.2% in acute phase and 72.0% in delayed phase. The complete response rate of Olanzapine 5 mg was 57.9% in acute phase and 91.2% in delayed phase. The complete response rate of Olanzapine 10 mg was 50.9% in acute phase and 54.1% in delayed phase. The nausea intensity score on day 5 after chemotherapy was significantly lower among those receiving Olanzapine 10 mg. However, there were no difference in the reduction retching and overall symptoms between the groups. In terms of side effect profile, those receiving Olanzapine 10 mg reported significantly higher grades of somnolence and fatigue. There was no difference in the occurrence of pain, depression, anxiety, shortness of beath, appetite and wellbeing. Conclusions: There was no difference in the effectiveness of Olanzapine 5 mg compared to Olanzapine 10 mg in the prevention of CINV. However, Olanzapine 10 mg was associated with higher proportions of somnolence and fatigue. Therefore, it is recommended that Olanzapine 5 mg may replace current antiemetic regimes that contain Olanzapine 10 mg. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2020/01/023076.

MASCC 2023 Patient-Centered Antiemetic Guidelines and Education Statements: an evidence-based and consensus resource for patients.

The Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC)/European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) Patient Antiemetic Guideline Committee aimed to (1) adapt the updated evidence-based, clinical guidelines to patient-centered antiemetic guidelines and (2) develop patient education materials and statements. The MASCC 2023 Patient Antiemetic Guidelines were created and reviewed by antiemetic experts and patient advocates by incorporating the 2023 MASCC/ESMO antiemetic guidelines into patient-friendly language. Patient Education Statements were developed based on current literature and by utilizing an expert modified Delphi consensus (≥ 75% agreement). Patient advocate/focus group input and patient survey results were further integrated into Patient-Centered Antiemetic Guidelines and Education Statements. Patient-Centered Antiemetic Guidelines were created using patient-friendly language and visual slides. Patient-friendly language was also utilized to communicate the Educational Statements. Key content categories identified for the Educational Statements included the following: nausea/vomiting definitions, causes, risk factors, categories, complications, accompanying symptoms, prophylactic antiemetic treatment, general management, when to call/what to ask the healthcare team, what caregivers can do, and available resources. All identified content met the ≥ 75% expert agreement threshold. Fifteen (15) items demonstrated 100% agreement, 11 items achieved ≥ 90% agreement, and three content items demonstrated 80 ~ 82% agreement. The inaugural MASCC 2023 Patient Antiemetic Guidelines can help patients and caregivers understand the prevention of nausea and vomiting related to their cancer treatment. Educational Statements provide further patient information. Educating patients on how to utilize guideline antiemetics and the education statements can contribute improvements in the control of anticancer treatment-related nausea and vomiting.

Survivorship Care for People Affected by Advanced or Metastatic Cancer: MASCC-ASCO Standards and Practice Recommendations.

People with advanced or metastatic cancer and their caregivers may have different care goals and face unique challenges compared with those with early-stage disease or those nearing the end of life. These Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC)-ASCO standards and practice recommendations seek to establish consistent provision of quality survivorship care for people affected by advanced or metastatic cancer. A MASCC-ASCO expert panel was formed. Standards and recommendations relevant to the provision of quality survivorship care for people affected by advanced or metastatic cancer were developed through conducting (1) a systematic review of unmet supportive care needs; (2) a scoping review of cancer survivorship, supportive care, and palliative care frameworks and guidelines; and (3) an international modified Delphi consensus process. A systematic review involving 81 studies and a scoping review of 17 guidelines and frameworks informed the initial standards and recommendations. Subsequently, 77 experts (including eight people with lived experience) across 33 countries (33% were low- to middle-resource countries) participated in the Delphi study and achieved ≥94.8% agreement for seven standards, (1) Person-Centered Care; (2) Coordinated and Integrated Care; (3) Evidence-Based and Comprehensive Care; (4) Evaluated and Communicated Care; (5) Accessible and Equitable Care; (6) Sustainable and Resourced Care; and (7) Research and Data-Driven Care, and ≥84.2% agreement across 45 practice recommendations. Standards of survivorship care for people affected by advanced or metastatic cancer are provided. These MASCC-ASCO standards support optimization of health outcomes and care experiences by providing guidance to stakeholders (health care professionals, leaders, and administrators; governments and health ministries; policymakers; advocacy agencies; cancer survivors and caregivers). Practice recommendations may be used to facilitate future research, practice, policy, and advocacy efforts.Additional information is available at www.mascc.org, www.asco.org/standards and www.asco.org/survivorship-guidelines.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infections Presenting with Septic Shock in Neutropenic Cancer Patients: Impact of Empirical Antibiotic Therapy.

This large, multicenter, retrospective cohort study including onco-hematological neutropenic patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infection (PABSI) found that among 1213 episodes, 411 (33%) presented with septic shock. The presence of solid tumors (33.3% vs. 20.2%, p < 0.001), a high-risk Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) index score (92.6% vs. 57.4%; p < 0.001), pneumonia (38% vs. 19.2% p < 0.001), and infection due to multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa (MDRPA) (33.8% vs. 21.1%, p < 0.001) were statistically significantly higher in patients with septic shock compared to those without. Patients with septic shock were more likely to receive inadequate empirical antibiotic therapy (IEAT) (21.7% vs. 16.2%, p = 0.020) and to present poorer outcomes, including a need for ICU admission (74% vs. 10.5%; p < 0.001), mechanical ventilation (49.1% vs. 5.6%; p < 0.001), and higher 7-day and 30-day case fatality rates (58.2% vs. 12%, p < 0.001, and 74% vs. 23.1%, p < 0.001, respectively). Risk factors for 30-day case fatality rate in patients with septic shock were orotracheal intubation, IEAT, infection due to MDRPA, and persistent PABSI. Therapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and BSI from the urinary tract were associated with improved survival. Carbapenems were the most frequent IEAT in patients with septic shock, and the use of empirical combination therapy showed a tendency towards improved survival. Our findings emphasize the need for tailored management strategies in this high-risk population.

Equity, diversity, and inclusion in the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer: a global membership survey.

Equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) are essential for healthcare organizations since they allow for the development of programs and initiatives that bring together diverse perspectives and knowledge. Global multidisciplinary organizations, such as the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC), need to understand the perspective of their members regarding EDI to identify opportunities to enhance diversity and inclusiveness and to better meet the needs of members from different backgrounds and resources. The MASCC Health Disparities Committee designed a survey to identify issues related to disparities faced by MASCC members when providing supportive care to patients with cancer and to examine the EDI landscape within the organization. Here, we report results related to EDI initiatives within the organization. Two-hundred and eighteen MASCC members responded to the survey (response rate 10.2%). The results indicated that respondents were generally satisfied with how MASCC manages leadership, membership, and organization-related EDI issues. Opportunities for improvement noted by respondents included developing strategies to foster a more diverse membership, improving communication regarding diversity in the organization, and increasing EDI content in educational sessions and publications. The results of this survey represent the first attempt at understanding how to improve EDI within MASCC and will be utilized to guide further initiatives and programs.

Serum Albumin as a Prognostic Biomarker for Febrile Neutropenia Outcome and Complications: A Prospective Observational Trial.

Febrile neutropenia (FN) poses a significant challenge in cancer treatment, with a high incidence among patients undergoing standard therapies. Predicting FN complications and outcomes remains crucial for improving patient management strategies. Biomarkers, including procalcitonin and albumin, have garnered attention for their potential prognostic value in FN. We conducted a prospective observational study at a tertiary hospital, enrolling 185 adult cancer patients experiencing FN episodes. We assessed serum albumin levels and incorporated them into the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) risk index to enhance risk stratification. Serum albumin levels displayed promising prognostic utility in febrile neutropenia (FN). They exhibited moderate specificity and sensitivity in predicting mortality during FN and 28-day mortality. Serum albumin levels were significantly associated with gastrointestinal infections, serving as an independent predictor. Integrating serum albumin into the MASCC risk index improved predictive accuracy for FN mortality by 50%, 28-day mortality by 66.67%, and respiratory tract infections by 62.50%, enhancing in this way risk stratification for FN-related complications. Serum albumin emerges as a promising biomarker for prognostication in FN, complementing existing risk assessment frameworks. Its incorporation into the MASCC risk index enhances predictive capabilities, aiding clinicians in identifying high-risk patients promptly. While albumin shows potential in predicting mortality and complications, further research is warranted to optimize sensitivity and specificity, ensuring its clinical utility.

Shedding light on the management of acute radiation dermatitis: insight from the MASCC Oncodermatology study group.

This paper highlights a collection of eleven recently published manuscripts on the prevention and management of acute radiation dermatitis. These meta-analyses provide additional evidence for the updated clinical practice guidelines by the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) Oncodermatology study group for prevention and management of acute radiation dermatitis. The collection of papers elucidate the currently available evidence on acute radiation dermatitis, highlighting consolidated knowledge, effective treatments, and proposed areas for future clinical trials. Overall, a total of 51 randomized controlled trials were retrieved and included for quantitative analysis of an initial systematic review of literature from 1946 to January 2023. Discussion of the clinical impact of various therapeutic interventions include: antiperspirant and deodorant use, barrier films and dressings, natural and miscellaneous agents, photobiomodulation therapy, topical corticosteroids, topical non-steroidal agents, skin hygiene and washing, as well as StrataXRT and Mepitel film in breast cancer patients. The comprehensive nature of the meta-analyses and their related findings may help reduce the discrepancies in in treatment of acute radiation dermatitis and facilitate consistency of therapeutic interventions employed in clinical practice worldwide.

Chinese clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of radiation‐induced dermatitis

AbstractRadiation‐induced dermatitis is one of the most prevalent complications in patients undergoing cancer radiotherapy and poses a significant challenge to cancer therapy. The symptoms include erythema, dry desquamation, and moist desquamation, which are frequently observed in patients with breast, head and neck, anal, and vulvar cancers. Early skin reactions typically manifest within 2–4 weeks following the initiation of radiotherapy. In severe cases, acute dermatitis can cause radiotherapy interruptions, prolong treatment time, and ultimately affect patient outcomes and quality of life. Currently, there are numerous guidelines on radiation dermatitis, including the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC), British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA), Oncology Nursing Society (ONS), and UK Society of Radiographers (SCoR) guidelines. In China, dermatology experts have drafted a consensus. However, due to the differing backgrounds of experts, recommendations among guidelines vary. These guidelines were first developed by Chinese radiation oncologists. The evidence‐based guideline in this paper fully considers and adopts China's national conditions; hence, it can be easily applied in daily practice.

Supportive Care: The "Keystone" of Modern Oncology Practice.

The Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) defines supportive care as "the prevention and management of the adverse effects of cancer and its treatment. This includes management of physical and psychological symptoms and side effects across the continuum of the cancer journey from diagnosis through treatment to post-treatment care. Supportive care aims to improve the quality of rehabilitation, secondary cancer prevention, survivorship, and end-of-life care". This article will provide an overview of modern supportive care in cancer, discussing its definition, its relationship with palliative care, models of care, "core" service elements (multi-professional/multidisciplinary involvement), the evidence that supportive care improves morbidity, quality of life, and mortality in various groups of patients with cancer, and the health economic benefits of supportive care. The article will also discuss the current and future challenges to providing optimal supportive care to all oncology patients.

Application of comprehensive unit-based safety program model to improve chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with ovarian cancer: a retrospective study

BackgroundTo explore the effect of intervention programs constructed under the guidance of the comprehensive unit-based safety program (CUSP) model on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients with ovarian cancer.MethodAccording to the time of admission, 90 ovarian cancer chemotherapy patients in the first affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from June 2019 to September 2020 were divided into an intervention group and a control group with 45 cases each. Both groups of patients received routine intervention, and the intervention group implemented the CUSP program on this basis. The intervention lasted 8 months. Before and after the intervention, the patients in the ward were used the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) Antiemesis Tool, the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for the effect evaluation.ResultsAfter the intervention, the degree of nausea and vomiting frequency in the intervention group were significantly lower than that in the control group, especially the degree of nausea in the delayed phase (P < 0.05). The score of the functional living index-emesis in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05), and the anxiety and depression in the intervention group were significantly relieved compared to the control group (P < 0.05).ConclusionThe intervention program guided by the CUSP model can significantly alleviate patients’ nausea and vomiting, improve the quality of life, and relieve anxiety and depression. The CUSP model is suitable for clinical practice and has guiding significance for clinical work.

Editorial introductions.

Editorial introductions.