GIScience 2016 Short Paper Proceedings Scalability in Participatory Planning: A comparison of online PPGIS methods with face-to-face meetings Piotr Jankowski 1,2 , Michal Czepkiewicz 2 , Marek Mlodkowski 2 Michal Wojcicki 2 Zbigniew Zwolinski 2 San Diego State University, Department of Geography San Diego, CA 92182-4493 Email: pjankows@mail.sdsu.edu Institute of Geoecology and Geoinformation Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poznan, Poland 1. Introduction A traditional approach to participatory planning involves face-to-face engagement of interested public in the tradition of town-hall meetings. A limitation of this approach has been its inability to scale public participation out to involve more people and up to involve participants from a wider geographical area (Nyerges and Aguirre 2011, Innes and Booher 2004). Although online Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) methods are not a panacea for scaling public participation, they offer a potential for collecting views and preferences of some residents who typically do not participate in open planning processes. The questions of who participates and whose views are represented have been at the heart of theorizing about PPGIS (Schlossberg and Shufford 2005, Sieber 2006), and were highlighted as core research questions in a recent review (Brown and Kytta, 2014). This paper contributes to the literature by comparing online PPGIS and face-to-face methods in two aspects of scalability: number of participants (scaling out) and spatial extent (scaling up). Additionally, the demographic representation across the methods is also assessed. The evaluation is based on an empirical study involving four participatory planning processes, which took place between May 2014 and July 2015 in the City of Poznan (pop. 554 thousand), Poland. The processes were focused on local land use plan for a centrally located, multi-functional area in the City of Poznan, including a park, recreational facilities, allotment gardens, single- and multi- family housing, and a public school. Two of the four processes were traditional town-hall meetings (May 2014 and June 2015) whereas the other two (October 2014 and July 2015) employed online PPGIS applications. The dichotomy between the two modes of participatory planning (same-place/same-time and distributed) affords a unique opportunity to compare demographic and spatial scalability of face-to-face meetings with online PPGIS methods. 2. Methods Both of traditional, town-hall style meetings were organized by the municipal planning office in Poznan. The purpose of the first meeting (May 2014) was to familiarize participants with the planning procedure and to facilitate a discussion, during which participants had an opportunity to voice their concerns, opinions, and expectations regarding the planning process. During the