Multidisciplinary Team Group Research Articles

Characteristics and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer Patients Cared for by the Multidisciplinary Team in the Reggio Emilia Province, Italy.

Colorectal cancer emerged as the third most prevalent malignancy worldwide, affecting nearly 2 million individuals in the year 2020. This study elucidates the pivotal role of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) in influencing the prognosis, as measured by relative survival rates, depending upon the stage and age. Cases recorded in an Italian Cancer Registry between 2017 and 2018 were included. Relative survival was reported at 1 and 3 years after diagnosis comparing MDT vs. no-MDT approaches. During the study period, 605 CRCs were recorded while 361 (59.7%) were taken care of by an MDT. Compared to no-MDT, MDT patients were younger with earlier stages and received more surgery. One year after diagnosis, survival was 78.7% (90% in MDT vs. 62% in no-MDT); stratifying by stage, in the MDT group there was no survival advantage for stage I (97.2% vs. 89.9%) and II (96.8% vs. 89.4%), but an advantage was observed for stage III (86.4% vs. 56.9%) and stage IV (63.7% vs. 27.4%). Similar values were observed at 3 years where a marked advantage was observed for stages III (69.9% vs. 35.1%) and IV (29.2% vs. 5.1%). The univariable analysis confirmed an excess risk in the no-MDT group (HR 2.6; 95% CI 2.0-3.3), also confirmed in the multivariable regression analysis (HR 2.0; 95% CI 1.5-2.5). Despite the increase in the number of MDT patients in 2018 (from 50% to 69%), this does not correspond to an improvement in outcome.

GC-CDSS: Personalized gastric cancer treatment recommendations system based on knowledge graph

BackgroundGastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in the world, posing a serious threat to human health. Currently, gastric cancer treatment strategies emphasize a multidisciplinary team (MDT) consultation approach. However, there are numerous treatment guidelines and insights from clinical trials. The application of AI-based Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) in tumor diagnosis and screening is increasing rapidly. ObjectiveThe purpose of this study is to (1) summarize the treatment decision process for GC according to the treatment guidelines in China, and then create a knowledge graph (KG) for GC, (2) based on aforementioned KG, built a CDSS and conducted an initial feasibility evaluation for the current system. MethodsFirstly, we summarized the decision-making process for treatment of GC. Then, we extracted relevant decision nodes and relationships and utilized Neo4j to create the KG. After obtaining the initial node features for building the graph embedding model, graph embedding algorithm, such as Node2Vec and GraphSAGE, were used to construct the GC-CDSS. At last, a retrospective cohort study was used to compare the consistency between GC-CDSS and MDT in treatment decision making. ResultsIn current study, we introduce a GC-CDSS, which is constructed based on Chinese GC treatment guidelines knowledge graph (KG). In the KG, we define four types of nodes and four types of relationships, and it comprise a total of 207 nodes and 300 relationships. Regarding GC-CDSS, the system is capable of providing dynamic and personalized diagnostic and treatment recommendations based on the patient's condition. Furthermore, a retrospective cohort study is conducted to compare GC-CDSS recommendations with those of the MDT group, the overall consistency rate of treatment recommendations between the auxiliary decision system and MDT team is 92.96%. ConclusionsWe construct a GC treatment support system, GC-CDSS, based on KG. The GC-CDSS may help oncologists make treatment decisions more efficient and promote standardization in primary healthcare settings.

Optimizing Outcomes through a Multidisciplinary Team Approach in Endometrial Cancer.

This study aimed to assess the impact of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach on outcomes with endometrial cancer (EC) patients, utilizing 2013-2020 data from the Reggio Emilia Cancer Registry. Recurrence rate, treatments, and outcome indicators were compared between the MDT (319 cases) and non-MDT (324 cases) groups. Among 643 cases, 52.4% were over 65 years old, 98% had microscopic confirmation, and 73% were in stage I. Surgery was performed in 89%, with 41% receiving adjuvant therapies. Recurrence rates (10%) were similar between the two groups, but MDT patients who were older and predominantly in stage I exhibited 79% recurrence within one year (21% in the non-MDT group). Disease-free survival (DFS) showed no significant difference [HR 1.1; 95% CI 0.7-1.6], while differences in overall survival (OS) were notable [HR 1.5; 95% CI 1.0-2.4]. The 5-year OS rates were 87% and 79% in the MDT and non-MDT groups. Comparing the 2013-2015 to 2016-2020 study periods, a shift towards caring for older women, more advanced-stage patients, and those residing outside the metropolitan area, along with a greater number of relapsed cases (from 16% to 76%), were accounted for. These findings underscore the impact of an MDT on EC outcomes, highlighting the evolving patient demographics over time.

Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders - The Impact of the Creation of a Multidisciplinary Team on Maternal Outcomes in Portugal.

To describe a cohort of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) cases from a tertiary care institution and compare the maternal outcomes before and after the creation of a multidisciplinary team (MDT). Retrospective study using hospital databases. Identification of PAS cases with pathological confirmation between 2010 and 2021. Division in two groups: standard care (SC) group - 2010-2014; and MDT group - 2015-2021. Descriptive analysis of their characteristics and maternal outcomes. During the study period, there were 53 cases of PAS (24 - SC group; 29 - MDT group). Standard care group: 1 placenta increta and 3 percreta; 12.5% (3/24) had antenatal suspicion; 4 cases had a peripartum hysterectomy - one planned due to antenatal suspicion of PAS; 3 due to postpartum hemorrhage. Mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 2,469 mL; transfusion of packed red blood cells (PRBC) in 25% (6/24) - median 7.5 units. Multidisciplinary team group: 4 cases of placenta increta and 3 percreta. The rate of antenatal suspicion was 24.1% (7/29); 9 hysterectomies were performed, 7 planned due to antenatal suspicion of PAS, 1 after intrapartum diagnosis of PAS and 1 after uterine rupture following a second trimester termination of pregnancy. The mean EBL was 1,250 mL, with transfusion of PRBC in 37.9% (11/29) - median 2 units. After the creation of the MDT, there was a reduction in the mean EBL and in the median number of PRBC units transfused, despite the higher number of invasive PAS disorders.

Impact of multidisciplinary team on the pattern of care for brain metastasis from breast cancer.

The aim of this study was to explore how a multidisciplinary team (MDT) affects patterns of local or systematic treatment. We retrospectively reviewed the data of consecutive patients in the breast cancer with brain metastases (BCBM) database at our institution from January 2011 to April 2021. The patients were divided into an MDT group and a non-MDT group. A total of 208 patients were analyzed, including 104 each in the MDT and non-MDT groups. After MDT, 56 patients (53.8%) were found to have intracranial "diagnosis upgrade". In the matched population, patients in the MDT group recorded a higher proportion of meningeal metastases (14.4% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.02), symptomatic tumor progression (11.5% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.04), and an increased number of occurrences of brain metastases (BM) progression (p < 0.05). Attending MDT was an independent factor associated with ≥2 courses of intracranial radiotherapy (RT) [odds ratio (OR) 5.4, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.7-10.9, p < 0.001], novel RT technique use (7.0, 95% CI 3.5-14.0, p < 0.001), and prospective clinical research (OR 5.7, 95% CI 2.4-13.4, p < 0.001). Patients with complex conditions are often referred for MDT discussions. An MDT may improve the qualities of intracranial RT and systemic therapy, resulting in benefits of overall survival for BC patients after BM. This encourages the idea that treatment recommendations for patients with BMBC should be discussed within an MDT.

Using a multistep approach with multidisciplinary team to increase the diagnosis rate of Lynch syndrome-associated colorectal cancer after universal screening: a single-center study in Japan

Backgrounds: This study aimed to evaluate the changes in the rates of genetic counseling and genetic testing as well as the diagnosis rate of Lynch syndrome (LS)-associated colorectal cancer before and after multistep approach with multidisciplinary team in Japanese.MethodsIn September 2016, we started universal screening for LS by mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry and prospectively collected the records. Following patient interviews, we started multistep approach with multidisciplinary team (MA) in January 2020. MA consists of six surgeons, one genetic counselor, one medical geneticist, and six pathologists. MA is set up to compensate for patients’ lack of knowledge about genetic diseases and make case selection for elderly colorectal cancer patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR). MA is designed as a system that could be performed by a small number of medical genetic specialists. A total of 522 patients were included during the study duration, 323 and 199 patients in the pre-MA (P-MA) and MA groups, respectively.ResultsThe frequency of dMMR in all patients was 10.0%. The patient interview results indicated a significant lack of patient education regarding genetic diseases. The rates of genetic counseling and genetic testing was significantly higher in MA group than in P-MA group (genetic counseling: MA 34.6% vs. P-MA 7.7%, p = 0.04; genetic testing: MA 30.8% vs. P-MA 3.8%, p = 0.02). Moreover, the diagnosis rate of LS-associated colorectal cancer was significantly higher in MA group (2.5%) than in P-MA group (0.3%) (P = 0.03). In addition, MA could be performed without problems despite the small number of medical and human genetics specialists.ConclusionsMA has achieved appropriate pickup of suspected hereditary colorectal cancer patients and complemented the lack of knowledge about genetic diseases. The introduction of MA increased LS-associated colorectal cancer after universal screening. MA is an appropriate LS screening protocol for Japanese patients who lag behind in medical and human genetics education.

DS15 Metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: how best to develop a skin cancer service for future populations

Abstract The incidence of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is increasing in the White population. Despite a favourable prognosis in the majority, it remains a cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in immunosuppressed and elderly individuals. Large cSCCs can be challenging for surgical clearance, recurrence and metastatic disease, despite guidelines for the management and staging of cSCC. We sought to identify high-risk features of those who develop metastatic disease. Our centre typically manages 300 cSCCs annually, but only cSCCs discussed at our two multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings (head and neck and skin cancer) at our level 4 hospital over a 3-year period (2019–2021) were included in a retrospective observational study. A total of 124 patients with high-risk cSCC (due to patient or tumour factors) were included. Male sex predominated. Sixteen cases had metastatic disease. Median age at diagnosis was 80 years in the total MDT group and 86.5 years in the metastasis group. Of 16 patients with metastases, eight had complete primary excisions. Five cases had incomplete primary excision (peripheral or deep margins involved), and three cases had a narrow margin of &amp;lt; 1 mm. Primary tumour size was similar in both the MDT and metastasis groups (median size 17 vs. 20 mm). Head and neck sites predominated in both (88%). In the metastatic group, one had chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, but no other patients with immunosuppression were identified, and the majority (81%) suffered with multimorbidity (≥ 2 chronic illnesses). Nine patients with metastatic cSCC received radiotherapy, two systemic chemotherapies, five neck dissections and one immunotherapy. Most patients presenting with metastatic cSCC at our centre were &amp;gt; 85 years old, a group sometimes known as ‘the oldest old’, and many had multimorbidity. This, coupled with tumour location, poses challenges for healthcare professionals in managing the initial cSCC aggressively and implementing a reasonable follow-up and surveillance schedule. In comparing both groups, advanced age was the predominant difference, with twice as many aged &amp;gt; 85 years in the metastasis group vs. the MDT group. Immunosenescence is a process of immune dysfunction that occurs with age and includes remodelling of lymphoid organs, leading to changes in the immune function of the elderly and relates to the development of malignant tumours. It is estimated that 5 million people in the UK will be in this age group by 2050 (www.ageuk.org.uk/globalassets/age-uk/documents/reports-and-publications/reports-and-briefings/health–wellbeing/rb_feb13_understanding_the_oldest_old_improving_later_life.pdf). There is a need to continue to consider this dynamic group (those aged &amp;gt; 85 years) and those with multimorbidity when strategies for the projected management of cSCC are being considered.

Reducing complications of femoral neck fracture management: a retrospective study on the application of multidisciplinary team

BackgroundFemoral neck fractures are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality for older adults. Multi-system medical diseases and complications can lead to long-term care needs, functional decline and death, so patients sustaining hip fractures usually have comorbid conditions that may benefit from application of multidisciplinary team(MDT).MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study that incorporates medical record review with an outcomes management database. 199 patients were included who had surgery for a new unilateral femoral neck fracture from January 2018 to December 2021 (96 patients in usual care (UC) model and 103 patients in MDT model. High-energy, pathological, old and periprosthetic femoral neck fracture were excluded. Age, gender, comorbidity status, time to surgery, and postoperative complication, length of stay, in-hospital mortality, 30-day readmission rate, 90-day mortality data were collected and analyzed.ResultsPreoperative general data of sex, age, community dwelling and charlson comorbidity score of MDT group (n = 103) have no statistically significant difference with that of usual care (UC) group. Patients treated in the MDT model had significantly shorter times to surgery (38.5 vs. 73.4 h;P = 0.028) and lower lengths of stay (11.5 vs. 15.2 days;P = 0.031). There were no significant differences between two models in In-hospital mortality (1.0% vs. 2.1%; P = 0.273), 30-day readmission rate (7.8% vs. 11.5%; P = 0.352) and 90-day mortality (2.9% vs. 3.1%; P = 0.782). The MDT model had fewer complications overall (16.5% vs. 31.3%; P = 0.039), with significantly lower risks of delirium, postoperative infection, bleeding, cardiac complication, hypoxia, and thromboembolism.ConclusionApplication of MDT can provide standardized protocols and a total quality management approach, leading to fewer complications for elderly patients with femoral neck fracture.Trial registrationNo.

Improving Outcomes in the Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: The Role of the Multidisciplinary Team Discussion Intervention.

There is disagreement over the prognostic value of multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). This study examined how an MDT affected patients with advanced GISTs in terms of their overall survival (OS) and whether it may enhance their performance status (PS). A retrospective data analysis was conducted on patients with advanced GISTs between 2000 and 2022. Depending on whether they had received the MDT discussion intervention, the patients were split into two groups. The OS between the two groups was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to analyze the prognostic variables for advanced GIST. Fisher's test was used to investigate the relationship between an MDT and PS. There were 122 patients with an MDT and 117 patients without an MDT in this study. In comparison to the non-MDT group, the MDT group showed a higher survival rate (5-year OS, 42.62% vs. 28.21%, p < 0.05). MDT was an independent prognostic factor for OS in univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses (p < 0.05). Fisher's test revealed that there were variations in PS between the two groups (p < 0.05). The effectiveness of an MDT in the treatment of advanced GIST was examined for the first time in this study. MDT discussion intervention is an effective measure for improving the outcomes of patients with advanced GISTs.

Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) Discussion Improves Overall Survival Outcomes for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients.

Multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion is a widely used model to manage patients diagnosed with cancer. However, there has been no direct evidence to prove its effect on the prognosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients, so this study explored the impact of MDT discussion on mRCC patient survival. The clinical data of 269 mRCC patients were retrospectively collected from 2012 to 2021. The cases were grouped into the MDT and non-MDT groups, then subgroup analysis was performed according to different histology types, as well as exploring the role of MDT in patients who have undergone multiple-line therapy. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were set as the study endpoint. Approximately half (48.0%, 129/269) of the patients were in the MDT group, with univariable survival analyses showing these patients had remarkably longer median OS (MDT group: 73.7 months; non-MDT group: 33.2 months, hazard ratio (HR): 0.423 (0.288, 0.622), p<0.001) and longer median PFS (MDT group: 16.9 months, non-MDT group: 12.7 months, HR: 0.722 (0.542, 0.962), p=0.026). Furthermore, MDT management resulted in longer survival for both ccRCC and non-ccRCC subgroups. Patients in the MDT group were more likely to receive multi-line therapy (MDT group: 79/129, 61.2% vs non-MDT group: 56/140, 40.0%, p<0.001), and within this patient group, MDT management still resulted in longer OS (MDT group: 94.0 months; non-MDT group: 43.5 months, p=0.009). MDT is associated with prolonged overall survival in mRCC independent of histology, ensuring that patients receive better management and precise treatment.

Impact of a Multidisciplinary Approach on Cardiometabolic Risk Reduction in a Multiracial Cohort of Adults: A 1-Year Pilot Study.

Evidence examining specific effects of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) on cardiometabolic risk factors (CMRFs) among multi-ethnic patients in real-world clinical settings is lacking. This one-year retrospective chart review (2018) analyzed 598 adults (African American 59%, Hispanic 35%, and Caucasian 6%) with mean age of 43.8 ± 14.0 years. Qualifying patients with primary inclusion criteria of having body mass indices and blood pressure (BP) measurements in the first and last quarter of the study period were treated under an MDT protocol and compared to those qualifying for MDT but treated solely by a primary care provider (PCP). MDT included endocrinologist-directed visits, lifestyle counseling, and shared medical appointments. MDT patients experienced a greater reduction (β; 95% CI) in weight (−4.29 kg; −7.62, −0.97), BMI (−1.43 kg/m2; −2.68, −0.18), systolic BP (−2.18 mmHg; −4.09, −0.26), and diastolic BP (−1.97 mmHg; −3.34, −0.60). Additionally, MDT patients had 77%, 83%, and 59% higher odds of reducing ≥5% of initial weight, 1 BMI point, and ≥2 mmHg DBP, respectively. Improvements in hemoglobin A1C measurements were observed in the MDT group (insufficient data to compare with the PCP group). Compared to PCP only, MDT co-management improves CMRF related to adiposity and hypertension in a multiethnic adult cohort in real-world clinical settings. Patient access to best practices in cardiometabolic care is a priority, including the incorporation of culturally adapted evidence-based recommendations translated within a multi-disciplinary infrastructure, where competing co-morbidities are better managed, and associated research and education programs can promote operational sustainability.

Favorable Impact of a Multidisciplinary Team Approach on Heart Transplantation Outcomes in a Mid-Volume Center.

Although a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach is recommended for advanced heart failure and heart transplantation (HTx), no studies have investigated the impact of the team approach on post-HTx survival. Thus, we implemented an MDT approach in our HTx program in 2014, with the active involvement of critical care and extracorporeal life support (ECLS) teams and the use of a real-time online information sharing system. We hypothesized that this MDT approach would result in improved survival of patients who had undergone HTx. We enrolled 250 adult patients who underwent HTx between December 2003 and June 2018. They were divided into non-MDT (n = 120; before 2014) and MDT (n = 130; since 2014) groups. The primary outcome was overall mortality. In terms of donor age, diabetes, dialysis, ECLS, and waiting time, the MDT group had more high-risk patients. The MDT approach was found to be an independent predictor of overall survival using a variety of multivariable analytic methods, including inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis. An HF team, a critical care team, and an ECLS team collaboration may improve survival following HTx. To improve the efficiency of the MDT approach, we recommend using a real-time online information sharing system.

The Efficacy of Multidisciplinary Team Co-Management Program for Elderly Patients With Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Retrospective Study.

BackgroundIntertrochanteric fractures increased quickly in past decades owing to the increasing number of aging population. Recently, geriatric co-management was rapidly emerging as a favored clinical care model for older patients with hip fractures. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) co-management program in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures.MethodsIn this retrospective study, patients were divided into MDT group and traditional orthopedic care (TOC) group according to the healthcare model applied. 249 patients were included in the TOC group from January 2014 to December 2016 and 241 patients were included in the MDT group from January 2017 to December 2019. Baseline data, peri-operative data, and postoperative complications were collected and analyzed using SPSS 21.0.ResultsNo significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of patient baseline characteristics. Patients in the MDT group had significantly lower time from admission to surgery and length-of-stay (LOS) compared with those in the TOC group. Furthermore, the proportion of patients receiving surgery within 24 h (61.4 vs. 34.9%, p < 0.001) and 48 h (80.9 vs. 63.5%, p < 0.001) after admission to the ward was significantly higher in the MDT group compared with those in the TOC group. In addition, patients in the MDT group had significantly lower proportion of postoperative complications (25.3 vs. 44.2%, p < 0.001), deep vein thrombosis (7.9 vs. 12.9%, p = 0.049), pneumonia (3.8 vs. 8.0%, p = 0.045) and delirium (4.1 vs. 9.2%, p = 0.025) compared with those in the TOC group. However, no significant changes were found for in-hospital and 30-day mortality.ConclusionThe MDT co-management could significantly shorten the time from admission to surgery, LOS, and reduce the postoperative complications for elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures. Further research was needed to evaluate the impact of this model on patient health outcomes.

The influence of multidisciplinary team clinic on the prognosis of patients with chronic kidney disease.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) seriously affects the quality of life and survival time of patients, and even affects social and national economic development. In China, how to effectively control the disease process of CKD outpatients has not been determined. A retrospective analysis was made to 100 patients with CKD. Fifty patients treated with traditional clinical treatment were in the control group, and the other fifty patients treated with multidisciplinary team (MDT) clinical treatment were in the MDT group. The prognosis of the two groups after treatment was compared, including glomerular filtration rate (GFR), number of renal replacement treatments, and mortality, to evaluate the actual effect of MDT clinic. CKD patients in the MDT group received the MDT clinic for 24 months. There was no significant difference between GFR and serum creatinine level before treatment, and the quality of life was significantly higher than before. In the control group, the GFR declined more dramatically, the serum creatinine level was higher, and the quality of life was lower than before (P < 0.05). The frequency of renal replacement therapy and mortality in the MDT group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). MDT clinic can effectively improve the prognosis of patients with CKD, delay kidney disease progression, and reduce mortality.

The effects of a multi-disciplinary team on sleep quality assessment in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease patients with sleep disorders.

Sleep disturbances are a severe problem among patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). By evaluating sleep quality in mild-to-moderate AD patients, this study aimed to assess the effects of multi-disciplinary team (MDT) in reducing the incidence of adverse reactions of AD patients. The reduction in the incidence of adverse reactions to predict multi-disciplinary team (MDT) treatment effects. This study included 60 mild-to-moderate AD patients with sleep problems when hospitalized in Huzhou Third Municipal Hospital. The patients were randomly distributed into two groups, routine and MDT treatments. The cognitive functions, sleep conditions, and psycho-behavioral symptoms were compared between both the groups. Cognitive function declined significantly between pretherapy and follow-up in the routine treatment group (MMSE: t = -7.961, P < 0.001; MoCA: t = -4.672, P < 0.001). There was a significant decline in drowsiness in the MDT group compared to that in the routine treatment group (χ2 = 4.320, P = 0.038). Sleep quality improved significantly during the follow-up in the MDT treatment group (t = 6.098, P < 0.001). The results of the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) and Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) among family caregivers (FCGs) demonstrated that MDT treatment could alleviate caregivers' depression (t = -2.867, P = 0.042), and routine treatment can worsen their anxiety (t = 3.258, P = 0.003). The MDT treatment method as an effective and meaningful therapy can help mitigate the suffering of patients with AD and FCGs.

Improving outcomes in acute and chronic periprosthetic hip and knee joint infection with a multidisciplinary approach.

AimsPeriprosthetic hip and knee infection remains one of the most severe complications following arthroplasty, with an incidence between 0.5% to 1%. This study compares the outcomes of revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following hip and knee arthroplasty prior to and after implementation of a specialist PJI multidisciplinary team (MDT).MethodsData was retrospectively analyzed from a single centre. In all, 29 consecutive joints prior to the implementation of an infection MDT in November 2016 were compared with 29 consecutive joints subsequent to the MDT conception. All individuals who underwent a debridement antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) procedure, a one-stage revision, or a two-stage revision for an acute or chronic PJI in this time period were included. The definition of successfully treated PJI was based on the Delphi international multidisciplinary consensus.ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences in patient demographics or comorbidities between the groups. There was also no significant difference in length of overall hospital stay (p = 0.530). The time taken for formal microbiology advice was significantly shorter in the post MDT group (p = 0.0001). There was a significant difference in failure rates between the two groups (p = 0.001), with 12 individuals (41.38%) pre-MDT requiring further revision surgery compared with one individual (6.67%) post-MDT inception.ConclusionOur standardized multidisciplinary approach for periprosthetic knee and hip joint infection shows a significant reduction in failure rates following revision surgery. Following implementation of our MDT, our success rate in treating PJI is 96.55%, higher than what current literature suggests. We advocate the role of a specialist infection MDT in the management of patients with a PJI to allow an individualized patient-centred approach and care plan, thereby reducing postoperative complications and failure rates.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(7):509–514.

Value of multidisciplinary team (MDT) in minimally invasive treatment of complex intrahepatic bile duct stones.

This study aimed to investigate the value of multidisciplinary team (MDT) management in minimally invasive treatment of complex intrahepatic bile duct stones (IHDs) by laparoscopy, choledochoscopy and percutaneous choledochoscopy. The characteristics, perioperative index, complication rate and minimally invasive rate of patients in MDT group (n = 75) and non-MDT group (n = 70) were compared. The members of MDT include doctors in ultrasound, imaging, hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery, anaesthesia and intensive care medicine. The results showed that minimally invasive surgery reduced the incidence of postoperative residual stones, OR (95% CI) = 0.365 (0.141-0.940) (p = 0.037). MDT reduced the operation time, OR (95% CI) = 0.406 (0.207-0.796) (p = 0.009). Minimally invasive surgery significantly reduced intraoperative bleeding, OR (95% CI) = 0.267 (0.133-0.534) (p < 0.001). Minimally invasive surgery also reduced hospitalization time, OR (95% CI) = 0.295 (0.142-0.611) (p = 0.001). The stone clearance rates of MDT group and non-MDT group were 81.33% and 81.43% respectively. In the MDT group, the operative time was less than that in the non-MDT group (p = 0.010); the intraoperative bleeding volume was significantly less than that in the non-MDT group (p < 0.001); the hospitalization time was less than that in the non-MDT group (p = 0.001). Minimally invasive operation rate:48 cases (64.00%) in MDT group were significantly higher than 17 cases (24.29%) in non-MDT group (p < 0.001). In conclusion, minimally invasive procedures can be selected more through MDT. MDT can shorten the operation time, and minimally invasive surgery can reduce the incidence of residual stones, reduce intraoperative bleeding, and may shorten hospital stay. Therefore, MDT management model can provide personalized and minimally invasive surgical protocol for patients with complex IHD, which has high application value.

Dynamic multidisciplinary team discussions can improve the prognosis of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients.

BackgroundMultidisciplinary team (MDT) management is a popular treatment paradigm in managing cancer patients, which provides fully‐discussed, interdisciplinary treatment recommendations for patients. However, there has been a lack of data on its actual impact on the overall survival (OS) of metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. mCRPC is the end stage of prostate cancer, facing a treatment dilemma of overwhelming options; therefore, we hypothesize dynamic MDT discussions can be helpful in comprehensively managing these patients.MethodsWe retrospectively collected 422 mCRPC patients' clinical information from 2013 to 2020 from our institute. Patients can voluntarily choose whether to enroll in the dynamic MDT group, which includes discussions at CRPC diagnosis and subsequent disease progression. All patients were followed up regularly, and OS from CRPC diagnosis to death was set as the endpoint of this study.ResultsParticipating in MDT discussions is a favorable independent indicator of longer overall survival (median OS: MDT (+): 39.7 months; MDT (−): 27.0 months, hazard ratio: 0.549, p = .001). Moreover, this survival benefit of MDT remained in subgroups with first‐line therapy [median OS: MDT (+): not reached; MDT (−): 27.0 months, p = .001) and with multi‐line therapy until the end of follow‐up (median OS: MDT (+): 36.7 months; MDT (−): 25.6 months, p = .044).ConclusionTherefore, regular MDT discussions are valuable in the management of mCRPC patients. Clinicians are encouraged to tailor MDT discussions dynamically to provide mCRPC patients with a better and more individualized treatment plan and more prolonged survival.Take‐home messages ●The MDT model is defined as dynamic MDT discussions at the time of mCRPC diagnosis and each time they progressed later on throughout the disease management.●Prostate cancer MDT usually includes specialists in urologic oncology, pathology, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, ultrasound, imaging and nuclear medicine.●MDT model can benefit mCRPC patients in terms of overall survival.

Multidisciplinary team consultation for resectable Gastric Cancer: A propensity score matching analysis.

Purpose: Previous studies proposed that the multidisciplinary team (MDT) consultation could improve tumor staging accuracy and outcomes of patients with gastric malignancy. However, evidence-based reports remain limited. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of MDT for tumor staging accuracy and outcomes of patients with resectable gastric cancer, and to explore the potential factors affecting its effectiveness.Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 719 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy in our hospital. After propensity score matching, 378 patients were selected, including 189 in the non-MDT group and 189 in the MDT group. Data regarding baseline characteristics, staging, treatments, and survival were analyzed.Results: The data showed that the staging accuracy in the MDT group and non-MDT group was comparable (53% vs 61% for T stage, 46.1% vs 35.3% for N stage, and 78.3% vs 78.7% for M stage). The MDT group had a higher proportion of preoperative chemotherapy (39.2% vs 28%, p=0.03) and laparoscopic surgery (82.5% vs 72%, p=0.02) than the non-MDT group. However, the achievement of R0 resection was similar in the two groups (93.7% vs 88.9%, p=0.73). There was no significant difference in the 1-year and 3-year overall survival rates between the two groups. Moreover, we observed poor patient compliance when the MDT recommended further examinations, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy before surgical interventions.Conclusion: MDT consultation has limited effects on improving the staging accuracy and treatment outcomes including survival of patients with resectable gastric cancer. Poor patient compliance may be a factor affecting the effectiveness of MDT consultation.

Lung cancer recurrence and mortality outcomes over a 10-year period using a multidisciplinary team approach

BackgroundLongitudinal data are limited regarding the impact of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach on patient outcomes among those diagnosed with lung cancer. The purpose of this study is to 1) compare 1- and 3-year recurrence and mortality rates among patients receiving a MDT vs. standard model of care; and 2) assess trends in these proportions over a 10-year period. MethodsThis investigation included 2044 lung cancer cases reported to the Stony Brook Cancer Registry between 2006 and 2015. Patients were stratified into 2 groups, those participating in Stony Brook’s Lung Cancer Evaluation Center’s (LCEC) MDT Program (n = 1179) and those receiving a standard model of care (n = 865). 1- and 3-year stage-stratified recurrence and mortality rates are reported. Logistic regression analyses are performed and linear by linear associations are used to assess trends over time. ResultsA higher proportion of patients in the MDT program (LCEC) remained disease-free at 1-year compared those receiving standard care (80.0 % vs 62.3 %, p < 0.01). There were no significant changes in mortality over the 10-year observation period in either group, however the rates were significantly lower among LCEC vs non-LCEC cases after adjusting for possible confounders (OR = 0.68 (0.51,0.90) at 1-year; OR = 0.50 (0.36, 0.70) at 3-years). Recurrence was also lower at 3-years in the MDT group (OR = 0.51 (0.32, 0.79)). ConclusionsThis study suggests that a comprehensive MDT program for lung cancer yields improved patient outcomes compared to the standard model of care and this approach may help to decrease rates of disease recurrence and mortality.