Multidisciplinary Medication Review Research Articles

Reduction in the numbers of drugs administered to elderly in-patients with polypharmacy by a multidisciplinary review of medication using electronic medical records.

Polypharmacy is a major problem for elderly patients in developed countries. We investigated whether a multidisciplinary medication review using electronic medical records could reduce the number of drugs administered to elderly patients receiving polypharmacy. The present study included 432 elderly patients (188 women, 244 men; 267 patients aged 65-74 years and 165 patients aged ≥75 years) who were admitted to and discharged from the Department of Neurology and Geriatrics, Gifu University Hospital, between 2004 and 2011; those who died at the hospital were excluded. The names, categories, and numbers of orally administered drugs at admission and discharge were examined retrospectively using electronic medical records. The histories of continuous oral immunotherapy use at the hospital, falls during the 2 years before hospital admission and the presence of fall risk factors were also evaluated. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. On average 1.14 ± 3.07 fewer types of drugs were given to patients at discharge than at admission in patients receiving polypharmacy (P < 0.001). However, the number of drugs given to patients undergoing continuous oral immunotherapy increased by 1.67 ± 3.47 (P < 0.001). The number of drugs was reduced in 33.1% of fallers, and 36.3% of non-fallers. In both fallers and non-fallers, there was a reduction in drug categories associated with falls. Multidisciplinary medication review using electronic medical records could significantly reduce the numbers of drugs taken by elderly inpatients receiving polypharmacy, including drugs associated with falls, in both fallers and non-fallers Geriatr Gerontol Int 2017; 17: 653-658.

Medication review using a Systematic Tool to Reduce Inappropriate Prescribing (STRIP) in adults with an intellectual disability: A pilot study

A Systematic Tool to Reduce Inappropriate Prescribing (STRIP), which includes the Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment (START) and the Screening Tool of Older Peoples’ Prescriptions (STOPP), has recently been developed in the Netherlands for older patients with polypharmacy in the general population. Active involvement of the patient is part of this systematic multidisciplinary medication review. Although annual review of pharmacotherapy is recommended for people with an intellectual disability (ID), a specific tool for this population is not yet available. Besides, active involvement can be compromised by ID. Therefore, the objective of this observational pilot study was to evaluate the process of medication review using STRIP in adults with an ID living in a centralized or dependent setting and the identification of drug-related problems using this tool. The study was performed in three residential care organizations for ID. In each organization nine clients with polypharmacy were selected by an investigator (a physician in training to become a specialized physician for individuals with an ID) for a review using STRIP. Clients as well as their legal representatives (usually a family member) and professional caregivers were invited to participate. Reviews were performed by an investigator together with a pharmacist. First, to evaluate the process time-investments of the investigator and the pharmacist were described. Besides, the proportion of reviews in which a client and/or his legal representative participated was calculated as well as the proportion of professional caregivers that participated. Second, to evaluate the identification of drug-related problems using STRIP, the proportion of clients with at least one drug-related problem was calculated. Mean time investment was 130minutes for the investigator and 90minutes for the pharmacist. The client and/or a legal representatives were present during 25 of 27 reviews (93%). All 27 professional caregivers (100%) were involved. For every client included at least one drug-related problem was identified. In total 127 drug-related problems were detected, mainly potentially inappropriate or unnecessary drugs. After six months, 15.7% of the interventions were actually implemented.Medication review using STRIP seems feasible in adults with an ID and identifies drug-related problems. However, in this pilot study the implementation rate of suggested interventions was low. To improve the implementation rate, the treating physician should be involved in the review process. Besides, specific adaptations to STRIP to address drug-related problems specific for this population are required.

Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary home-based medication review program in reducing healthcare utilization among older adult Singaporeans.

The study aimed to: (i) evaluate the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary home-based medication review (HBMR) program in reducing hospital admissions and emergency department (ED) visits, cost of hospital admissions and length of stay (LOS); and (ii) determine the prevalence of drug-related problems (DRP) in elderly Singaporeans. A retrospective observational study was carried out at an academic medical center in Singapore. Patients referred between 1 March 2011 and 31 December 2012 were included. Frequency of hospital admissions and ED visits, cost of hospital admissions, and LOS 6 months before and after HBMR, number of DRP, their categories, and their outcomes (i.e. resolved/ unresolved) were recorded. The analysis included 107 patients with a mean (SD) age of 75.6 years (7.6 years). HBMR resulted in a 41% reduction in risk for hospital admissions (Incidence rate ratio 0.59, 95% CI 0.47-0.73, P < 0.001). The same magnitude of reduction was observed for ED visits. The mean (SD) cost of hospital admissions reduced from $16 957.77 ($16 118.35) before HBMR to $7488.76 ($12 773.40) after (P < 0.001). Among 62 patients with hospital admissions before and after HBMR, the mean (SD) LOS decreased from 26.5 days (22.4 days) to 17.6 days (17.8 days; P = 0.010). The team identified 525 DRP from 1353 medications reviewed. Of these, 34 (6.7%) and 174 (34.1%) were resolved with and without physician involvement, respectively. The most common DRP identified were failure to receive drug (n = 163, 31.0%) and untreated indication (n = 140, 26.7%). The multidisciplinary HBMR program was associated with reduced ED visits, hospital admissions, LOS and costs in older adult Singaporeans with multiple DRP. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2017; 17: 302-307.

Decreasing the load? Is a Multidisciplinary Multistep Medication Review in older people an effective intervention to reduce a patient's Drug Burden Index? Protocol of a randomised controlled trial

IntroductionOlder people often use medications with anticholinergic or sedative side effects which increase the risk of falling and worsen cognitive impairment. The Drug Burden Index (DBI) is a measure of...

PIH8 - Effects of A Multidisciplinary Home-Based Medication Review Program On Hospital Admissions In Older Adult Singaporeans

PIH8 - Effects of A Multidisciplinary Home-Based Medication Review Program On Hospital Admissions In Older Adult Singaporeans

Evaluation of a Multidisciplinary Home-Based Medication Review Program for Elderly Singaporeans

Evaluation of a Multidisciplinary Home-Based Medication Review Program for Elderly Singaporeans

Discontinuing Inappropriate Medication in Nursing Home Residents (DIM-NHR Study): protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial

IntroductionNursing home residents often have a high number of comorbidities resulting in polypharmacy. Inappropriate prescribing is therefore likely to occur, which in turn is expected to worsen cognitive impairment, to...

Improving psychotropic drug prescription in nursing home patients with dementia: design of a cluster randomized controlled trial.

BackgroundNeuropsychiatric symptoms are highly prevalent in nursing home patients with dementia. Despite modest effectiveness and considerable side effects, psychotropic drugs are frequently prescribed for these neuropsychiatric symptoms. This raises questions whether psychotropic drugs are appropriately prescribed. The aim of the PROPER (PRescription Optimization of Psychotropic drugs in Elderly nuRsing home patients with dementia) II study is to investigate the efficacy of an intervention for improving the appropriateness of psychotropic drug prescription in nursing home patients with dementia.Methods/designThe PROPER II study is a multi-center cluster randomized controlled, pragmatic trial using parallel groups. It has a duration of eighteen months and four six-monthly assessments. Six nursing homes will participate in the intervention and six will continue care as usual. The nursing homes will be located throughout the Netherlands, each participating with two dementia special care units with an average of fifteen patients per unit, resulting in 360 patients. The intervention consists of a structured and repeated multidisciplinary medication review supported by education and continuous evaluation. It is conducted by pharmacists, physicians, and nurses and consists of three components: 1) preparation and education, 2) conduct, and 3) evaluation/guidance. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with appropriate psychotropic drug use. Secondary outcomes are the overall frequency of psychotropic drug use, neuropsychiatric symptoms, quality of life, activities of daily living, psychotropic drug side effects and adverse events (including cognition, comorbidity, and mortality). Besides, a process analysis on the intervention will be carried out.DiscussionThis study is expected to improve the appropriateness of psychotropic drug prescription for neuropsychiatric symptoms in nursing home patients with dementia by introducing a structured and repeated multidisciplinary medication review supported by education and continuous evaluation.Trial registrationNetherlands Trial Registry (NTR): NTR3569.

Persistent elevation of peripheral blood myeloid cell counts associated with omalizumab therapy

A case of persistent hematologic abnormalities in a patient receiving long-term omalizumab therapy for severe asthma is reported. During the course of her treatment at an asthma clinic, a 24-year-old woman was noted to have increased white blood cell counts, with elevated myeloid cell counts; the blood abnormalities were first documented more than 12 months previously. The woman had been taking omalizumab for more than 2 years and was also receiving immune globulin therapy for common variable immunodeficiency. Based on the results of bone marrow aspiration and biopsy, she was diagnosed as having mild neutrophilia, possibly related to past corticosteroid therapy, but there was no evidence of a malignancy, a hemophagocytic syndrome, or an infectious, myeloproliferative, or lymphoproliferative process. Pursuant to a multidisciplinary medication review, the use of omalizumab was identified as a potential factor in the myeloid cell elevations and discontinued. About 1 month after omalizumab therapy was halted, the patient's myeloid cell counts normalized. The temporal association of omalizumab use and blood abnormalities in this case, coupled with the lack of data on the drug's long-term hematologic effects, suggests a need for cautious use and close monitoring of omalizumab therapy, particularly in younger patients. A patient with asthma and common variable immunodeficiency developed an elevation of peripheral blood myeloid cells that was first noticed 29 months after the initiation of monthly omalizumab injections. Omalizumab was discontinued, and the abnormality persisted for 1 month after the last dose. The patient's blood count results remained within normal limits 3 months after the last dose.

Multidisciplinary medication review: evaluation of a pharmaceutical care model for nursing homes

The objective of this study was to assess implementation of a pharmaceutical care model for the multidisciplinary care of elderly patients in nursing homes. Prospective study, medication review, from January 2007 to December 2009 in ten nursing homes affiliated to the Pharmacie interjurassienne (PIJ), Switzerland. Medication use data were collected and reviewed by a pharmacist, focusing on drug indication, dosing, side effects, renal/hepatic elimination and interactions. Drug-related problems (DRPs) were discussed face-to-face with the responsible physician and a nurse. The pharmaceutical care issues were formulated and medication interventions proposed during this meeting. DRPs and interventions were documented using the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe scheme version 5.00 (PCNE V5.00). The economic impact of the service was estimated through a retrospective evaluation of annual drug costs. A satisfaction evaluation was conducted among practitioners and nurses. DRPs, interventions, treatment changes implemented. Drug therapy of 329 patients was reviewed. The number of medicines per patient ranged from 2 to 27 (mean 12.8). A total of 1,225 DRPs were detected and discussed with the physician and the nurse. Medication review led to 343 medical evaluations secondary to drug-drug interactions and 803 treatment adaptations: 373 drugs were stopped, 197 dosages changed, 95 instructions for use amended, 86 drug choices were altered, 35 drug formulations changed and 17 new drugs started. According to the Anatomical Classification System, the main classes involved in interventions were related to Alimentary tract and metabolism (n = 285), Nervous system (n = 189) and Cardiovascular system (n = 115). Since the outset of the PIJ, the annual drug costs decreased in nursing homes with medication review including a pharmacist, whereas it was stable in the other nursing homes. The satisfaction evaluation showed a very positive appreciation by practitioners and nurses. The study showed an efficient pharmaceutical care model, well accepted by physicians and nurses. It also indicated that for elderly patients, continuous drug review contributed to improved drug therapy, reduced unnecessary polypharmacy and reduced pharmaceutical costs.