BackgroundThe mission of our “Centre de référence des troubles du spectre autistique” is to evaluate children and adolescents for whom there is a suspicion of autistic spectrum disorder through a multidisciplinary diagnostic assessment. We encounter cases of patients presenting both Asperger syndrome and High Intellectual Potential. Those patients are frequently older than the norm. The objectives of our study are to understand the reasons leading to a late diagnosis for these patients and to question the value of giving such a diagnosis to children aged from eight to 18 years old. MethodsWe carried out a retrospective study based on the analysis of clinical files from patients presenting both AS and HIP, aged between eight and 18 years old. These patients were all previously seen in our center for a multidisciplinary diagnostic assessment. We analyzed several items from their clinical reports, such as the moment of and the motivation for the assessment; the person(s) asking for the assessment; the possible previous diagnosis; the evident and subtle characteristics of Asperger syndrome present in the speech, neuropsychological, and psychological (ADOS and projective tests) evaluations; psychomotricity; IQ score; the patients’ integration into their peer groups; and the possible associated psychiatric issues. ResultsWe examined the files of 17 subjects presenting both Asperger syndrome and High Intellectual Potential profiles, aged between eight and 18 years old. The results show that autistic traits are more easily observed during the ADOS test and the informal assessments rather than during the other standardized analysis. We also noticed the importance of the clinical intuition and experience of the examiner. DiscussionWe propose to extend the notion of “camouflage” strategies, previously used to describe women with Asperger syndrome, to children and adolescents presenting both an Asperger syndrome and a High Intellectual Potential profile. Their particularly high IQ could allow these patients to compensate for or to hide some of their impairments. ConclusionThe results seem to confirm our hypothesis, which is that thanks to their high intellectual functioning, patients presenting both AS and HIP profiles manage to compensate for or to camouflage some of their difficulties related to social adaptation and communication. Therefore, their impairment appears more subtle, leading to a late diagnosis. The quality of these camouflage strategies could depend on a high IQ score. For the future, it would be interesting to compare these results to a population of patients with AS and a normal IQ, in order to more clearly perceive the impact of IQ on camouflage strategies.
Read full abstract