Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile Research Articles

La dyspnée de l’asthmatique : approche diagnostique

Dyspnoea is a cardinal symptom of asthma and an essential part of assessing control of the disease. Its intensity is variable for the same level of bronchial obstruction, which suggests the involvement of other mechanisms. Therefore, it is extremely important to characterize and measure dyspnoea in asthmatic patients because its profile can be quantitatively and qualitatively modified by disease control, comorbidities and anxiety. Hence the value of using additional tools to ACT and ACQ because the latter do not characterize nor measure specifically dyspnoea in asthma. Different tools can be used in this regard, at rest as the subjective assessment of dyspnoea by scales such as the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC), the New York Heart Association (NYHA) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) or more recently using the Dyspnea-12and the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP) questionnaire, which assesses the sensory and affective dimensions of dyspnoea; and during exercise testing such as the "modified" Borg scale, graduated from 0to 10, or the VAS. Among the factors contributing to dyspnoea in asthmatic patients, probably bronchial obstruction, increased airway resistance and dynamic hyperinflation play an important role. Despite this, the asthmatic patient's description of dyspnoea may be masked by hyperventilation syndrome or other comorbidities that can easily be detected and treated through educational programs and targeted therapies.

The multidimensional nature of dyspnoea in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients with chronic respiratory failure: Air hunger, anxiety and fear.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disorder leading to chronic respiratory failure. Few studies have investigated ALS-related dyspnoea, and none have characterised the emotional distress it inflicts. We hypothesised that ALS-related dyspnoea has a strong affective component that relates to quality of life. This prospective, observational study was conducted in 41 ALS patients >18 with chronic respiratory failure and an indication for noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Dyspnoea was assessed using the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP) at baseline and 1 month after NIV initiation. Correlations between scores evaluating the sensory and affective dimensions of dyspnoea and other patient-reported outcomes and pulmonary function tests were analysed. Dyspnoea was described as intense (median [IQR] score on a 0-10 scale: 6.5 [4.0-7.5]). The sensory dimension of dyspnoea was polymorphic, but «air hunger» was the most common (48.8%) and the most intense (6 [4-8]) sensory descriptor. In the affective domain, most patients rated «anxious» (85.4%) and «afraid» (60.9%) above 0. The MDP affective dimension correlated significantly with other patient-reported outcomes, with the strongest correlation being between MDP «anxious» and the anxiety component of the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (Pearson's R = 0.70). One month after initiation of NIV, dyspnoea during unassisted breathing was described in virtually the same terms, particularly the affective dimension. ALS-related dyspnoea is intense and fear-provoking, persists during unassisted breathing between NIV sessions, and significantly impacts health-related quality of life. This study highlights the need for increased awareness of and research into ALS-related dyspnoea.

Effects of inspiratory muscle training on dyspnoea in severe COPD patients during pulmonary rehabilitation: controlled randomised trial.

The benefit of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) combined with a pulmonary rehabilitation programme (PRP) is uncertain. We aimed to demonstrate that, in severe and very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, IMT performed during a PRP is associated with an improvement of dyspnoea.In a single-blind randomised controlled trial, 150 severe or very severe COPD patients were allocated to follow PRP+IMT versus PRP alone. The evaluations were performed at inclusion and after 4 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in dyspnoea using the Multidimensional Dyspnoea Profile questionnaire at the end of a 6-min walk test (6MWT) at 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes were changes in dyspnoea using the Borg (end of the 6MWT) and modified Medical Research Council scales and in functional parameters (maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax), inspiratory capacity, 6MWT and quality of life). All analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis.Dyspnoea decreased significantly in both groups; however, the improvement of dyspnoea was not statistically different between the two groups. We only found a statistically significant greater increase of PImax after IMT+PRP than after PRP alone.In this trial including severe or very severe COPD patients, we did not find a significant benefit of IMT during PRP+IMT as compared to PRP alone on dyspnoea, despite a significantly higher improvement of PImax in the IMT group.

Real-life assessment of the multidimensional nature of dyspnoea in COPD outpatients.

Dyspnoea is a prominent symptom of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Recent multidimensional dyspnoea questionnaires like the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP) individualise the sensory and affective dimensions of dyspnoea. We tested the MDP in COPD outpatients based on the hypothesis that the importance of the affective dimension of dyspnoea would vary according to clinical characteristics.A multicentre, prospective, observational, real-life study was conducted in 276 patients. MDP data were compared across various categories of patients (modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnoea score, COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) airflow obstruction categories, GOLD "ABCD" categories, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)). Univariate and multivariate regressions were conducted to explore factors influencing the affective dimension of dyspnoea. Cluster analysis was conducted to create homogeneous patient profiles.The MDP identified a more marked affective dimension of dyspnoea with more severe mMRC, CAT, 12-item Short-Form Health Survey mental component, airflow obstruction and HADS. Multivariate analysis identified airflow obstruction, depressive symptoms and physical activity as determinants of the affective dimension of dyspnoea. Patients clustered into an "elderly, ex-smoker, severe disease, no rehabilitation" group exhibited the most marked affective dimension of dyspnoea.An affective/emotional dimension of dyspnoea can be identified in routine clinical practice. It can contribute to the phenotypic description of patients. Studies are needed to determine whether targeted therapeutic interventions can be designed and whether they are useful.

Swedish translation and linguistic validation of the multidimensional dyspnoea profile

BackgroundDyspnoea, the feeling of breathing discomfort, consists of multiple dimensions that can vary in intensity, including the level of unpleasantness, qualities or descriptors of the sensation, emotional responses, and impact on function. No validated instrument for multidimensional measurement of dyspnoea is available in Swedish. The Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP) was recently developed to measure the unpleasantness, sensory qualities, and emotional responses of dyspnoea across diseases and settings. We aimed to take forward a Swedish version of the MDP.MethodsTranslation and linguistic validation of the MDP was conducted in collaboration with a specialised company in the field (Mapi, Lyon, France). The structured process involved forward and backward translations by two independent certified translators, input from an in-country linguistic consultant, the developers, and three respiratory physicians. Understandability and acceptability were evaluated through in-depth interviews with five patients with dyspnoea in accordance with international guidelines.Results and ConclusionA Swedish version of the MDP was obtained and linguistically validated. The MDP includes 11 rated items: the immediate unpleasantness of the sensation, the presence and intensity of five sensory qualities, and the intensity of five emotional responses to dyspnoea. The time period of measurement is specified by the user. The MDP is copyrighted by the developers but can be used free of charge in the context of non-funded academic research.ConclusionThe MDP is the first instrument for measuring multiple dimensions of dyspnoea available in Swedish and should be validated across diseases and settings. Multidimensional measurement is essential for improved assessment and management of dyspnoea in research and clinical care.

Free-living physical activity characteristics, activity-related air trapping and breathlessness, and utilization of transtheoretical constructs in COPD: A pilot study

ObjectiveMany patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) experience air trapping at rest and during exercise. This study examined the relationship between air trapping and air hunger breathlessness during acute physical activity (PA) engagement. In addition, we examined free-living movement patterns of COPD patients, as well as their utilization of psycho-behavioral factors known to influence PA behavior. MethodsTen current or former smokers with COPD (M age=70years) participated. Baseline pulmonary function measurements were gathered and participants completed a graded exercise test (2, 2.5, and 3mph; 5min each). At each stage, air hunger breathlessness was rated using the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP). Inspiratory capacity (IC) measurements were also collected to monitor air trapping. Data regarding PA and sedentary behavior was measured over 7days using accelerometry. ResultsThe results (mean [SD]) showed air trapping during exercise. IC levels across baseline and the 3 stages, respectively, were 1.66 (.62) L, 1.33 (.52) L, 1.35 (.58) L, and 1.28 (.57) L. A significant difference occurred between baseline and stage 1 (p=.01). Coincident low-to-moderate air-hunger breathlessness was observed across baseline and the 3 stages (Likert scale 0–10): 0.44 (1.01), 1.44 (2.12), 2.33 (2.59), and 2.67 (2.64). Participants utilized few PA-related psycho-behavioral strategies and spent the majority (67.4%) of their waking hours in sedentary behavior, while only engaging 5min a day of moderate intensity PA and 0min at vigorous-intensity PA. ConclusionsThese COPD patients were intolerant to low levels of exercise intensity, resulting in little PA engagement, and also utilized few PA-related psycho-behavioral strategies.

Inspiratory muscle training during pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomized trial.

Although recommended by international guidelines, the benefit of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) in addition to rehabilitation remains uncertain. The objective was to demonstrate the effectiveness of IMT on dyspnea using Borg scale and multidimensional dyspnea profile questionnaire at the end of a 6-minute walk test (6MWT) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with preserved average maximum inspiratory pressure (PImax) of 85 cm H2O (95% of predicted (pred.) value) and admitted for a rehabilitation program in a dedicated center. In a randomized trial, comparing IMT versus no IMT in 32 COPD patients without inspiratory muscle weakness (PImax >60 cm H2O) who were admitted for pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for 3 weeks, we evaluated the effect of IMT on dyspnea, using both Borg scale and multidimensional dyspnea profile (MDP) at the end of the 6MWT, and on functional parameters included inspiratory muscle function (PImax) and 6MWT. All testings were performed at the start and the end of PR. In unadjusted analysis, IMT was not found to be associated with an improvement of either dyspnea or PImax. After adjustment on confounders (initial Borg score) and variables of interaction (forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)), we found a trend toward an improvement of "dyspnea sensory intensity", items from MDP and a significant improvement on the variation in the 2 items of MDP ("tight or constricted" and "breathing a lot"). In the subgroup of patients with FEV1 < 50% pred., 5 items of MDP were significantly improved, whereas no benefit was observed in patients with FEV1 > 50% pred. IMT did not significantly improve dyspnea or functional parameter in COPD patients with PImax > 60 cm H2O. However, in the subgroup of patients with FEV1 < 50% pred., MDP was significantly improved.

Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile: an instrument for clinical and laboratory research.

There is growing awareness that dyspnoea, like pain, is a multidimensional experience, but measurement instruments have not kept pace. The Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP) assesses overall breathing discomfort, sensory qualities, and emotional responses in laboratory and clinical settings. Here we provide the MDP, review published evidence regarding its measurement properties and discuss its use and interpretation. The MDP assesses dyspnoea during a specific time or a particular activity (focus period) and is designed to examine individual items that are theoretically aligned with separate mechanisms. In contrast, other multidimensional dyspnoea scales assess recalled recent dyspnoea over a period of days using aggregate scores.Previous psychophysical and psychometric studies using the MDP show that: 1) subjects exposed to different laboratory stimuli could discriminate between air hunger and work/effort sensation, and found air hunger more unpleasant; 2) the MDP immediate unpleasantness scale (A1) was convergent with common dyspnoea scales; 3) in emergency department patients, two domains were distinguished (immediate perception, emotional response); 4) test–retest reliability over hours was high; 5) the instrument responded to opioid treatment of experimental dyspnoea and to clinical improvement; 6) convergent validity with common instruments was good; and 7) items responded differently from one another as predicted for multiple dimensions.

Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile: an instrument for clinical and laboratory research

Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile: an instrument for clinical and laboratory research

Dyspnea affective response: comparing COPD patients with healthy volunteers and laboratory model with activities of daily living.

BackgroundLaboratory-induced dyspnea (breathing discomfort) in healthy subjects is widely used to study perceptual mechanisms, yet the relationship between laboratory-induced dyspnea in healthy volunteers and spontaneous dyspnea in patients with chronic lung disease is not well established. We compared affective responses to dyspnea 1) in COPD patients vs. healthy volunteers (HV) undergoing the same laboratory stimulus; 2) in COPD during laboratory dyspnea vs. during activities of daily living (ADL).MethodsWe induced moderate and high dyspnea levels in 13 COPD patients and 12 HV by increasing end-tidal CO2 (PETCO2) during restricted ventilation, evoking air hunger. We used the multidimensional dyspnea profile (MDP) to measure intensity of sensory qualities (e.g., air hunger (AH) and work/effort (W/E)) as well as immediate discomfort (A1) and secondary emotions (A2). Ten of the COPD subjects also completed the MDP outside the laboratory following dyspnea evoked by ADL.ResultsCOPD patients and HV reported similar levels of immediate discomfort relative to sensory intensity. COPD patients and HV reported anxiety and frustration during laboratory-induced dyspnea; variation among individuals far outweighed the small differences between subject groups. COPD patients reported similar intensities of sensory qualities, discomfort, and emotions during ADL vs. during moderate laboratory dyspnea. Patients with COPD described limiting ADL to avoid greater dyspnea.ConclusionsIn this pilot study, we found no evidence that a history of COPD alters the affective response to laboratory-induced dyspnea, and no difference in affective response between dyspnea evoked by this laboratory model and dyspnea evoked by ADL.

Reliability and Validity of the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile

Most measures of dyspnea assess a single aspect (intensity or distress) of the symptom. We developed the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP) to measure qualities and intensities of the sensory dimension and components of the affective dimension. The MDP is not indexed to a particular activity and can be applied at rest, during exertion, or during clinical care. We report on the development and testing of the MDP in patients with a variety of acute and chronic cardiopulmonary conditions. One hundred fifty-one adults admitted to the ED with breathing symptoms completed the MDP three times in the ED, twice at least 1 h apart (T1, T2), and near discharge from the ED (T3). Measures were repeated in 68 patients twice in a follow-up session 4 to 6 weeks later (T4-T5). The ED sample was 56% men with a mean age of 53 ± 15 years; the follow-up sample was similar. Factor analysis resulted in a two-factor solution with a total explained variance of 63%, 74%, and 72% at T1, T2, and T3, respectively. One domain related to primary sensory qualities and immediate unpleasantness, and the second encompassed emotional response. For the two domains, Cronbach α ranged from 0.82 to 0.95, and the intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.91 to 0.98. Repeated-measures analysis was significant for change (T1, T3, T4), showing responsiveness to change in MDP domains with treatment (F([2,66]) = 19.67, P > .001). These analyses support the reliability, validity, and responsiveness to clinical change of the MDP with two domains in an acute care and follow-up setting.

Test–retest reliability of multidimensional dyspnea profile recall ratings in the emergency department: a prospective, longitudinal study

BackgroundDyspnea is among the most common reasons for emergency department (ED) visits by patients with cardiopulmonary disease who are commonly asked to recall the symptoms that prompted them to come to the ED. The reliability of recalled dyspnea has not been systematically investigated in ED patients.MethodsPatients with chronic or acute cardiopulmonary conditions who came to the ED with dyspnea (N = 154) completed the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP) several times during the visit and in a follow-up visit 4 to 6 weeks later (n = 68). The MDP has 12 items with numerical ratings of intensity, unpleasantness, sensory qualities, and emotions associated with how breathing felt when participants decided to come to the ED (recall MDP) or at the time of administration (“now” MDP). The recall MDP was administered twice in the ED and once during the follow-up visit. Principal components analysis (PCA) with varimax rotation was used to assess domain structure of the recall MDP. Internal consistency reliability was assessed with Cronbach’s alpha. Test–retest reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for absolute agreement for individual items and domains.ResultsPCA of the recall MDP was consistent with two domains (Immediate Perception, 7 items, Cronbach’s alpha = .89 to .94; Emotional Response, 5 items; Cronbach’s alpha = .81 to .85). Test–retest ICCs for the recall MDP during the ED visit ranged from .70 to .87 for individual items and were .93 and .94 for the Immediate Perception and Emotional Response domains. ICCs were much lower for the interval between the ED visit and follow-up, both for individual items (.28 to .66) and for the Immediate Perception and Emotional Response domains (.72 and .78, respectively).ConclusionsDuring an ED visit, recall MDP ratings of dyspnea at the time participants decided to seek care in the ED are reliable and sufficiently stable, both for individual items and the two domains, that a time lag between arrival and questionnaire administration does not critically affect recall of perceptual and emotional characteristics immediately prior to the visit. However, test–retest reliability of recall over a 4- to 6-week interval is poor for individual items and significantly attenuated for the two domains.

Reliability and Validity of the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile

Reliability and Validity of the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile

Insuffisance respiratoire chronique et myotonie de Steinert: Chronic respiratory failure and Steinert's myotonia

In myotonic mystrophy type 1 (DM1), combining respiratory symptom screening and respiratory function testing, is crucial to identify the appropriate time for ventilatory support initiation. Dyspnea has been little investigated in DM1. To provide a multidimensional description of dyspnea, questionnaires assessing dyspnea were administered to 34 consecutive adult patients with DM1 (median (25th-75th centile) age of 36 (28–49), Vital Capacity (VC) of 74 (64–87)% of predicted value). Dyspnea scores were low whatever the questionnaire used: Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile score of 2(0–4.7)/50 for dyspnea sensory descriptor and of 0 (0–4.7)/60 for the emotional descriptor, Visual Analogue Scale score of 0 (0–0)/10 in sitting and supine position and Borg score after six-minute walk test (6MWT) of 2.2 (1.8–4.2)/10. Eleven patients (32%) reported disabling dyspnea in daily living (modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) score ≥ 2). In comparison with patients with mMRC score < 2, patients with mMRC score ≥ 2 had a more severe motor handicap (Muscular Impairment Rating score of 4.0 (4.0–4.0) vs 3.0 (2.0–3.5), p<0.01), a lower 6MWT distance (373 (260–424) vs 436 (346–499)m, p = 0.03) and a lower VC (64 (48–74)% vs 75 (69–89)%, p = 0.02). These data suggest that the mMRC scale might be an easy-to-use and useful tool to assess dyspnea in daily living in DM1 patients. However, the interest of integrating the mMRC dyspnea scale in clinical practice to guide therapeutic management of DM1 patients remains to be assessed in further studies.

The Affective Dimension of Laboratory Dyspnea

It is hypothesized that the affective dimension of dyspnea (unpleasantness, emotional response) is not strictly dependent on the intensity of dyspnea. We tested the hypothesis that the ratio of immediate unpleasantness (A(1)) to sensory intensity (SI) varies depending on the type of dyspnea. Twelve healthy subjects experienced three stimuli: stimulus 1: maximal eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea against inspiratory resistance, requiring 15 times the work of resting breathing; stimulus 2: Pet(CO(2)) 6.1 mm Hg above resting with ventilation restricted to less than spontaneous breathing; stimulus 3: Pet(CO(2)) 7.7 mm Hg above resting with ventilation further restricted. After each trial, subjects rated SI, A(1), and qualities of dyspnea on the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP), a comprehensive instrument tested here for the first time. Stimulus 1 was always limited by subjects failing to meet a higher ventilation target; none signaled severe discomfort. This evoked work and effort sensations, with relatively low unpleasantness (mean A(1)/SI = 0.64). Stimulus 2, titrated to produce dyspnea ratings similar to those subjects gave during stimulus 1, evoked air hunger and produced significantly greater unpleasantness (mean A(1)/SI = 0.95). Stimulus 3, increased until air hunger was intolerable, evoked the highest intensity and unpleasantness ratings and high unpleasantness ratio (mean A(1)/SI = 1.09). When asked which they would prefer to repeat, all subjects chose stimulus 1. (1) Maximal respiratory work is less unpleasant than moderately intense air hunger in this brief test; (2) unpleasantness of dyspnea can vary independently from perceived intensity, consistent with the prevailing model of pain; (3) separate dimensions of dyspnea can be measured with the MDP.