Abstract Introduction ESC guidelines recognise the under use of disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments. These include CAMPHOR, PAH-SYMPACT, Emphasis-10 and Living with Pulmonary Hypertension (LPH). Patients highly value HRQoL as a treatment outcome in PAH. This is the first meta-analysis to evaluate HRQoL instruments and outcomes in RCTs in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Purpose To evaluate which PAH-RCT interventions improve HRQoL outcomes and compare the suitability of HRQoL instruments used. Method We searched MEDLINE (Jan 1970 to Dec 2023) and Cochrane Library from Jan 1990 to Dec 2023 (EMBASE, CT.gov, ICTRP, CINAHL) for RCTs in PAH. Abstracts and unpublished studies were excluded and PRISMA reporting structure followed. Trials meeting final selection criteria included HRQoL instruments sufficiently powered to detect a minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Effective sample sizes were calculated in GPower3.1 from a two independent means model for 80% power, 5% significance, one-tailed test. Meta-analysis was performed in SPSSv28.1. Full search criteria are registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024484021). Results After removal of duplicates, 896 records were screened, 43 studies included a HRQoL endpoint. 8 studies were included in the meta-analysis after exclusion for insufficient data (n=10) or power (n=25). 3 of these did not meet the MCID (>33m) for six-minute walk distance (6MWD) and evaluated separately to discriminate accuracy of HRQoL instrument. Instruments available for comparison were Short Form-36(SF-36), EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L) and Living with Pulmonary Hypertension (LPH). Studies not reaching MCID for 6MWD also showed no change in HRQoL (figure 1). Ambrisentan and exercise training demonstrate a significant improvement (p<0.05) in SF-36 physical(P) component (figure 2). This component was anchored to determine 6MWD MCID; other HRQoL values responded variably. Utility weighting to account for geographical variation was not reported with EQ-5D-5L and SF-36 in multicentre studies however AIR 2002 (Iloprost) was significant for both EQ-5D-5L instruments. The total component score of the disease-specific LPH was more sensitive to functional improvements and overall change in HRQoL compared to EQ-5D-5L (p<0.05). Conclusion Fewer than 10% of all RCTs in PAH have adequately considered a HRQoL outcome measure. 8 RCTs were powered to assess HRQoL. Iloprost, ambrisentan, riociguat and exercise training interventions demonstrate significant improvement in HRQoL. LPH was the only PAH-instrument powered to detect change. LPH was more sensitive to HRQoL than generic instruments and is multidimensional. Geographical indexing should be considered for generic instruments such as EQ-5D-5L and SF-36 in multicentre trials. As a highly valued outcome for patients, future studies should prioritise HRQoL as an endpoint.Figure 1Figure 2
Read full abstract