Multitargeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Research Articles

Effective low-dose Anlotinib induces long-term tumor vascular normalization and improves anti-PD-1 therapy.

Anlotinib is a new multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor for tumor angiogenesis, and its monotherapy exhibits a decent clinical efficacy. However, the process of combining Anlotinib and immune checkpoint therapy to achieve optimal antitumor effects while limiting side effects remains unclear. In this study, we found that effective low-dose Anlotinib was sufficient to inhibit tumor growth while reducing side effects compared with high doses. Effective low-dose Anlotinib treatments induced durable tumor vascular normalization and improved anti-PD-1 therapy in both short- and long-term treatment regimens. Mechanistically, the combination therapy increased the proportions of intratumoral CD4+ T, CD8+ T, and NK cells. Anlotinib-associated antitumor effects were independent of interferon γ; however, the combination therapy required CD8+ T cells to suppress tumor growth. Together, these results suggest that the combination of effective low-dose Anlotinib and PD-1 blockade induces durable antitumor effects with fewer side effects. Our findings indicate that antiangiogenic treatments combined with immune checkpoint therapy at an effective low-dose, rather than a tolerable high dose, would be more efficacious and safer.

Anti-PD-1 antibodies plus lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on lenvatinib: a retrospective cohort study of real-world patients.

BackgroundLenvatinib, a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has proven efficacy as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there is no standard effective second-line treatment option following progression on lenvatinib therapy. Because of the comprehensive coverage of therapeutic targets of lenvatinib, the remission rate of other TKI treatments in HCC patients resistant to lenvatinib is quite low.MethodsIn this study, the effectiveness and safety of anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) antibodies plus lenvatinib were assessed in 46 patients between April 2018 and April 2020 at the Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, by retrospectively reviewing their clinical data. Patients with unresectable HCC who progressed on lenvatinib were given standard doses of lenvatinib and anti-PD-1 antibodies. They were followed-up every 6–8 weeks with medical imaging and laboratory tests and treatment-related adverse reactions were investigated.ResultsThe objective response and the disease control rates were 23.9% (11/46) and 71.7% (33/46), respectively by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1 (RECIST). After a median follow-up period of 15.6 [interquartile range (IQR), 11.2–22.0] months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.1–11.8] and 14.5 months (95% CI: 6.8–22.3), respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events were anorexia (43.5%), hypothyroidism (43.5%), hypertension (36.9%), fatigue (34.8%), and diarrhea (26.1%). Grade 3/4 events occurred in 16 patients (34.8%). Emotional functioning and overall quality of life were improved significantly following the initiation of anti-PD-1 antibodies plus lenvatinib therapy (fatigue, 4.9±7.5 vs. 11.1±12.7, P=0.03; diarrhea, 12.3±20.9 vs. 18.5±16.8, P=0.01; pain, 5.5±10.3 vs. 11.1±13.9, P=0.01).ConclusionsThe combination of anti-PD-1 antibodies and lenvatinib may benefit patients with unresectable HCC who progressed on lenvatinib. This study provides a real-world data and treatment choice for patients progressed with lenvatinib.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with carboplatin and pemetrexed as first-line induction therapy followed by anlotinib plus pemetrexed as maintenance therapy in EGFR/ALK wild-type advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in China: a multicenter, single-arm trial.

BackgroundThe efficacy and safety of chemotherapy strategies combining the multi-target receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor in patients with advanced EGFR/ALK wild-type non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (nsq-NSCLC) are undetermined. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with carboplatin/pemetrexed-based chemotherapy followed by maintenance therapy (anlotinib plus pemetrexed) in advanced EGFR/ALK wild-type nsq-NSCLC.MethodsEligible patients with wild-type EGFR/ALK advanced nsq-NSCLC who received first-line therapy in Henan Province from March 2019 to February 2021 were recruited. All patients were treated with anlotinib in combination with carboplatin/pemetrexed-based chemotherapy, followed by maintenance therapy (anlotinib plus pemetrexed). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs). Response and AEs were assessed based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (1.1) and National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.4.0.3, respectively. The follow-up interval for survival was 6 weeks and the safety follow-up was performed until the end of treatment. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate the median PFS and OS.ResultsThirty-eight participants with median age of 62 (range, 33–75) years were evaluated. Five participants were still on maintenance therapy until the end of the study. The majority were non-smokers (68.4%). The median follow-up was 13.6 (range, 12.3–14.9) months. The median PFS (mPFS) was 10.5 (95% CI: 4.1, 17.0) months, and the median OS was 23.4 [95% CI: not evaluable (NE), NE] months. The DCR and ORR were 94.7% and 60.5%, respectively. Grade 3 and above treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) happened to 12 participants. The most common TRAEs were hypertension (23.7%), neutropenia (19.4%), and bone marrow toxicity (10.5%). Seven patients discontinued treatment, including two patients during induction and five patients during maintenance treatment. No grade 5 TRAE was reported. In the non-smoker participants, the mPFS was 14.5 (95% CI: 4.0–25.0) months.ConclusionsAnlotinib in combination with carboplatin/pemetrexed-based chemotherapy followed by anlotinib plus pemetrexed as maintenance therapy might be an effective choice in treating patients with wild-type EGFR/ALK advanced nsq-NSCLC.

Anlotinib plus chemoradiotherapy in the treatment for FIGO stage IB3 and IIB-IVA cervical cancer: A prospective single-arm, single-center, exploratory phase II trial (299)

<b>Objectives:</b> Cervical carcinoma is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death among women worldwide. Previous randomized clinical trials showed a 30% to 50% decrease in risk of death in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) with the addition of concurrent platinum-based chemoradiotherapy when compared with radiotherapy alone. Mechanisms to account for improved efficacy are thought to include direct cytotoxicity, radiosensitization of tumor cells, and control of subclinical metastases. Anlotinib is an oral multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that strongly inhibits VEGFR, PDGFR, FGFR, and c-kit. Anlotinib synergizes with radiation and cisplatin, as shown in preclinical and clinical studies. This phase II study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding anlotinib to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in FIGO stage IB3 and IIB-IVA cervical cancer. <b>Methods:</b> Inclusion criteria include treatment-naive histologically confirmed FIGO stage IB3 to IVA cervical cancer with at least one measurable lesion and ECOG performance score 0-2 within the age range of 18 to 75 years. Abundant organ functions are required, with no contraindication to anlotinib or chemoradiation present. Patients will be treated with oral anlotinib (12 mg qd, d1-14; 21 days per cycle; total 3 cycles) and X-ray external-beam radiotherapy (total 45Gy-50Gy in 25-28 fraction), followed by brachytherapy (6Gy/5 fractions or 7Gy/4 fractions) with concurrent cisplatin (40 mg/m2 weekly for 5-6 weeks). The primary endpoint is the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at three years. The secondary endpoints include overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and quality of Life (QOL). Safety will be evaluated in all patients who receive study drugs according to the treatment received (safety population) by recording clinical adverse events (AEs) using National Cancer Institute Common. The sample size calculation of 47 patients provides 80% power to detect a difference in survival at the two-sided 5% significance level using the log-rank test; considering a 10% reduction, a total of 53 samples are required. This study is currently open, and 23 patients have been enrolled. The estimated primary completion date is December 1, 2024, and the estimated study completion date is October 31, 2025.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib in metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma: a retrospective study.

BackgroundMetastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a malignant tumor lacking effective therapies. We evaluated a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor anlotinib in patients with metastatic ACC.MethodsFrom September 2018 to October 2020, nineteen patients with histologically confirmed metastatic ACC of any primary site were treated with anlotinib 12 mg orally per day at the two-week on/one-week off schedule at a single institution. Disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded.ResultsThe DCR of anlotinib in metastatic ACC was 63.2% (12/19), including 1 partial response and 11 stable disease. After a median follow-up of 11.0 months, median PFS was 10.1 (95% CI: 6.8–14.8) months. Median OS was not reached. The most common AEs included hypertension (n=6, 32%), oral pain (n=6, 32%), hypothyroidism (n=6, 32%), hand-foot skin syndrome (n=5, 26%), proteinuria (n=5, 26%), fatigue (n=4, 21%), and anorexia (n=4, 21%). Grade 3 AEs occurred in two cases (oral pain and hand-foot skin syndrome) and could be managed.ConclusionsAnlotinib demonstrated antitumor activity and manageable toxicity in metastatic ACC patients. Thus, metastatic ACC patients could benefit from anlotinib as a palliative targeting therapy.

The Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Real-World Study.

PurposeAnlotinib, an antiangiogenic multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has shown favorable anticancer efficacy and acceptable safety in treating extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) in some clinical studies. This research aimed to explore the real-world efficacy and safety of anlotinib in ES-SCLC.MethodsPathologically confirmed ES-SCLC patients receiving anlotinib were enrolled for this retrospective study. The primary endpoint of this study was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse reactions.ResultsIn total, 202 patients were included in this study. The median PFS of all patients was 4.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.9–5.7], and the median OS was 7.6 months (95% CI 6.5–8.7). Respectively, the overall ORR and DCR were 30.2% and 87.1%. The univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) ≤1, plus chemotherapy or immunotherapy, plus radiotherapy, and post-medication hypertension might have longer PFS and OS. The PFS and OS were significantly prolonged in combination group than that in monotherapy group [PFS 6.0 vs 3.6 months, hazards ratio (HR)=0.49, 95% CI 0.34–0.70, P < 0.001; OS 9.2 vs 4.8 months, HR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.32–0.72, P < 0.001]. The main treatment-related adverse reactions were generally tolerated. The incidence of adverse reactions in combination group was higher than that in monotherapy group (75.0% vs 52.6%, P = 0.001). The most common adverse reaction was hypertension, followed by hand-foot syndrome and fatigue, regardless of monotherapy or combination group.ConclusionAnlotinib is effective and well tolerated in patients with ES-SCLC in the real-world. The clinical efficacy of anlotinib combined with chemotherapy or immunotherapy is better than that of monotherapy. Further investigations are needed for prospective studies with larger sample size.

Multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor nanoparticle delivery systems for cancer therapy.

Multi-target Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (MTKIs) have drawn substantial attention in tumor therapy. MTKIs could inhibit tumor cell proliferation and induce apoptosis by blocking the activity of tyrosine kinase. However, the toxicity and drug resistance of MTKIs severely restrict their further clinical application. The nano pharmaceutical technology based on MTKIs has attracted ever-increasing attention in recent years. Researchers deliver MTKIs through various types of nanocarriers to overcome drug resistance and improve considerably therapeutic efficiency. This review intends to summarize comprehensive applications of MTKIs nanoparticles in malignant tumor treatment. Firstly, the mechanism and toxicity were introduced. Secondly, various nanocarriers for MTKIs delivery were outlined. Thirdly, the combination treatment schemes and drug resistance reversal strategies were emphasized to improve the outcomes of cancer therapy. Finally, conclusions and perspectives were summarized to guide future research.

Epidermal growth factor receptor activation confers resistance to lenvatinib in thyroid cancer cells.

Thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine malignancy. A multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, lenvatinib, has been used for the treatment of advanced thyroid cancer. To elucidate the mechanism of resistance to lenvatinib in thyroid cancer cells, we established lenvatinib‐resistant sublines and analyzed the molecular mechanisms of resistance. Two thyroid cancer cell lines (TPC‐1 and FRO) were used, and resistant sublines for lenvatinib (TPC‐1/LR, FRO/LR) were established. In TPC‐1/LR, the phosphorylation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), extracellular signal‐regulated kinase (ERK), and Akt was enhanced whereas in FRO/LR, the phosphorylation of EGFR and downstream signal transduction molecules was not enhanced. The addition of epidermal growth factor decreased sensitivity to lenvatinib in TPC‐1 and FRO. The combination of EGFR inhibitors lapatinib and lenvatinib significantly inhibited the growth of TPC‐1/LR in both in vitro and mouse xenograft models. Short‐term exposure to lenvatinib enhanced the phosphorylation of EGFR in six thyroid cancer cell lines regardless of their histological origin or driver gene mutations; however, phosphorylation of ERK was enhanced in all cells except TPC‐1. A synergistic growth‐inhibitory effect was observed in three thyroid cancer cell lines, including intrinsically lenvatinib‐resistant cells. The results indicate that signal transduction via the EGFR pathway may be involved in the development of lenvatinib resistance in thyroid cancer cells. The inhibition of the EGFR pathway simultaneously by an EGFR inhibitor may have therapeutic potential for overcoming lenvatinib resistance in thyroid cancer.

Inhibition of HSP 90 is associated with potent anti-tumor activity in Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma

BackgroundThere is no universally accepted treatment for patients with advanced papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC). The presence of activating mutations in MET, as well as gain of chromosome 7, where the MET gene is located, are the most common genetic alterations associated with PRCC, leading to the clinical evaluation of MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in this cancer. However, TKIs targeting MET selectively, as well as multitargeted TKIs with activity against MET demonstrate modest efficacy in PRCC and primary and secondary treatment failure is common; other approaches are urgently needed to improve outcomes in these patients.MethodsHigh throughput screening with small molecule libraries identified HSP90 inhibitors as agents of interest based on antitumor activity against patient derived PRCC cell lines. We investigated the activity of the orally available HSP90 inhibitor, SNX2112 in vitro, using 2D/3D PRCC cell culture models and in vivo, in mice tumor xenograft models. The molecular pathways mediating antitumor activity of SNX2112 were assessed by Western blot analysis, Flow cytometry, RNA-seq analysis, Real Time qPCR and imaging approaches.ResultsSNX2112 significantly inhibited cellular proliferation, induced G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in PRCC lines overexpressing MET. In contrast to TKIs targeting MET, SNX2112 inhibited both MET and known downstream mediators of MET activity (AKT, pAKT1/2 and pERK1/2) in PRCC cell lines. RNAi silencing of AKT1/2 or ERK1/2 expression significantly inhibited growth in PRCC cells. Furthermore, SNX2112 inhibited a unique set of E2F and MYC targets and G2M-associated genes. Interestingly, interrogation of the TCGA papillary RCC cohort revealed that these genes were overexpressed in PRCC and portend a poor prognosis. Finally, SNX-2112 demonstrated strong antitumor activity in vivo and prolonged survival of mice bearing human PRCC xenograft.ConclusionsThese results demonstrate that HSP90 inhibition is associated with potent activity in PRCC, and implicate the PI3K/AKT and MEK/ERK1/2 pathways as important mediators of tumorigenesis. These data also provide the impetus for further clinical evaluation of HSP90, AKT, MEK or E2F pathway inhibitors in PRCC.Graphical

Genetic Polymorphisms in CYP2C19 Cause Changes in Plasma Levels and Adverse Reactions to Anlotinib in Chinese Patients With Lung Cancer.

Background: Anlotinib is a small molecular multi-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Growing evidence indicates that treatment efficacy, and toxicity varies considerably between individuals. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between cytochrome P450 (CYP450) gene polymorphisms, drug concentrations, and their adverse reactions in anlotinib-treated patients with lung cancer. Methods: We enrolled 139 patients with lung cancer, treated with anlotinib. Twenty loci in the following five genes of the CYP450 family were genotyped: CYP450 family 3 subfamily A member 5 (CYP3A5), 3 subfamily A member 4 (CYP3A4), 2 subfamily C member 9 (CYP2C9), 2 subfamily C member 19 (CYP2C19), and 1 subfamily A member 2 (CYP1A2). Data on adverse reactions were collected from patients, and plasma anlotinib concentrations were measured. Results: There were significant variances in plasma trough concentration (3.95–52.88 ng/ml) and peak plasma concentration (11.53–42.8 ng/ml) following administration of 8 mg anlotinib. Additionally, there were significant differences in the plasma trough concentration (5.65–81.89 ng/ml) and peak plasma concentration (18.01–107.18 ng/ml) following administration of 12 mg anlotinib. Furthermore, for CYP2C19-rs3814637, the peak plasma concentrations of mutant allele T carriers (TT+CT) were significantly higher than those of wildtypes (CC). For CYP2C19-rs11568732, the peak plasma concentrations of the mutant allele G carriers (GT+GG) were significantly higher than those of the wild-type (TT). More importantly, the incidence rates of hypertension and hemoptysis (peripheral lung cancer) with TT+CT in rs3814637 and GT+GG in rs11568732 were significantly higher than those with CC and TT. Conclusions: The plasma trough and peak concentrations varied significantly for both 8 and 12 mg of anlotinib. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in CYP2C19 are significantly associated with hypertension, hemoptysis, and anlotinib peak concentrations. Polymorphisms in CYP450 may explain inter-individual differences in anlotinib-related adverse reactions.

Abstract 403: Analysis of RET solvent front mutations shows an effect on protein activity in tumor cells

Abstract The rearranged during transfection (RET) gene encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase that is involved in the activation of several signal transduction pathways. Various RET fusions and point mutations were shown to play a role as oncogene drivers in different cancers. In 2020, two selective RET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), pralsetinib and selpercatinib, were approved by the FDA for treatment of RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer, RET-mutant medullary thyroid cancer and RET fusion-positive thyroid cancer. These drugs demonstrate a significant advance in efficacy and safety over previous, multi-targeted TKIs for the treatment of RET-positive patients. However, development of acquired resistance to these agents has been observed through the appearance of on-target secondary solvent front mutations in the RET G810 residue. Moreover, 5 different types of amino acid changes - G810A/C/R/S/V have been identified in this position, of which G810C, G810R and G810S are better characterized but their effect on protein activity is lacking. We used a high-throughput functional assay, in which the mutated protein is expressed together with a fluorescently labeled reporter in a cell-based assay. Using this system, we systematically assessed the activity of different combinations of RET fusions or oncogenic point mutations with one of three different common solvent front mutations and compared them to the activity of the individual mutations. Our results show that when a solvent front mutation is expressed on a RET oncogenic point mutation background, the solvent front mutation consistently decreases the oncogenic protein activity. This is supported by our observation that the individual solvent front mutations expressed on a RET WT background show an activity that is lower than that of the RET WT protein. On a RET fusion background the effect of solvent front mutations is more variable, with some RET fusion-solvent front mutation combinations showing a decreased activity and some not affecting the activity of the fusion protein. Across all mutations and fusions tested, the G810R and G810C mutations had a larger effect on RET activity than that of the G810S mutation. We also compared the effect of drug treatment (pralsetinib and selpercatinib) on RET oncogenic activity in the presence of the different solvent front mutations and observed that on all mutational backgrounds tested, the solvent front mutations have an effect on the response dynamics to the drug, and that the extent of the effect depends on the type of solvent front mutation, with G810R and G810C decreasing sensitivity to drug treatment to a larger extent compared to G810S. Together, our findings provide a better understanding of the differential effects of solvent front mutations on RET activity under different oncogenic contexts. Citation Format: Shay Rotkopf, DIkla Haham, Lea Birnbaum, Zohar Barbash, Gabi Tarcic. Analysis of RET solvent front mutations shows an effect on protein activity in tumor cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 403.

Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of a series of novel pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin/pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-4-amine derivatives as FGFRs-dominant multi-target receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is the second most lethal cancer across the world. With the progress in therapeutic approaches, the 5-year survival rate of early gastric cancer can reach > 95%. However, the prognosis and survival time of advanced gastric cancer is still somber. Therefore, more effective targeted therapies for gastric cancer treatment are urgently needed. FGFR, VEGFR and other receptor tyrosine kinases have recently been suggested as potential targets for gastric cancer treatment. We herein report the discovery of pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin/pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-4-amine derivatives as a new class of FGFRs-dominant multi-target receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. SAR assessment identified the most active compounds 8f and 8k, which showed excellent inhibitory activity against a variety of receptor tyrosine kinases. Moreover, 8f and 8k displayed excellent potency in the SNU-16 gastric cancer cell line. Furthermore, 8f and 8k could inhibit FGFR1 phosphorylation and downstream signaling pathways as well as induce cell apoptosis. In vivo, 8f and 8k suppress tumor growth in the SNU-16 xenograft model without inducing obvious toxicity. These findings raise the possibility that compounds 8f and 8k might serve as potential agents for the treatment of gastric cancer.

Sunitinib-Induced Elevation of Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV)-Exploring Its Possible Clinical Relevance in Cancer Patients.

Sunitinib is a broad-spectrum multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor mainly used as second-line therapy for non-resectable gastrointestinal stromal or first-line treatment option of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), and as an “off-label” option in pediatric oncology. It has been previously reported that sunitinib elevates the mean corpuscular volume of erythrocytes (MCV) in treated subjects. The aim of this study was to assess time-dependent changes of this effect and evaluate its possible clinical relevance. In this study, 179 adult and 21 pediatric patients with solid tumors treated with sunitinib were retrospectively analyzed. The laboratory and treatment-related data were collected for each treatment period. The regression model with a broken-line relationship was used to fit time dependence of the MCV. In the adult group, the MCV was increasing during the first 21.6 weeks (median) of treatment in a median level of 99.8 fL, where it stabilized. MCV increase was faster in the patients who suffered from treatment-related adverse events (21.3 vs. 24.6 weeks, p = 0.010). In the pediatric cohort, the MCV dynamics were similar to adults. In conclusion, MCV changes during sunitinib treatment in pediatric and adult patients may be of clinical utility in monitoring sunitinib treatment course.

A phase II study of anlotinib combined with temozolomide in the treatment of patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

e14021 Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly vascularized tumor and there are few treatment options after disease recurrence. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of anlotinib, a multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, combined with temozolomide in the treatment of these patients. Methods: This is an open-label, single-arm, phase II trial (ChiCTR2000028957). Patients with histologically confirmed GBM with definite progression after surgery followed by radiotherapy and temozolomide chemotherapy were eligible for inclusion. Additional inclusion criteria were 1) 18-70 years old, 2) KPS≥60, 3) disease progression on MRI as defined by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria at least 12 weeks (wks) after completion of radiotherapy，4) antiangiogenic therapy naïve. All patients received temozolomide (150-200mg/m2, orally, QD, d1-5/4wks) and anlotinib (10mg, orally, QD, d1-14/3wks) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR, defined as partial and complete responses according to RANO criteria). Safety assessment was done in patients who received at least one dose of study agent. Results: Twenty-one patients (9 males and 12 females) were enrolled between May 2020 and July 2021, and the median age is 55 (range 27-68) years old. Molecular pathological types included MGMT promoter methylated (n = 5), IDH mutation (n = 5), 1p/19q codeletion (n = 8), and TERT promoter mutation (n = 12). Analyses included data collected through December 15, 2021. Tumor response occurred in 17 patients, of which 9 patients had a complete response, and ORR was 81.0% (17/21). There were also 3 patients achieved stable disease and the disease control rate was 95.2% (20/21). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.2 months [95%CI 3.90-22.52], and the PFS at 6 months was 60.0%. The incidence of adverse events of grade 3 was 28.6%, with a higher incidence of elevated AST (25.0%) and ALT (20.0%), hypertension (16.7%), leukopenia (15.4%). No grade 4 or treatment related death occurred in this study through the follow-up. Overall, toxicities are mild and manageable. Conclusions: Anlotinib combined with temozolomide is efficacious and well-tolerated in recurrent GBM patients. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2000028957.

In vitro and in vivo investigations of anlotinib in bladder cancer treatment.

e16505 Background: Bladder cancer is one of the most common malignancy in urinary system. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) is the most common alteration gene in bladder cancer, occurring in approximately 70% of non-metastatic bladder cancer and 20% of metastatic bladder cancer. Anlotinib is a potent oral, multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor with a favorable safety which mainly targets vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), FGFR, platelet-derived growth factor receptors, and c-kit. This study aims to investigate the role of anlotinib in bladder cancer compared with FGFR3 inhibitor erdafitinib i n vitro and in vivo. Methods: MTT, colony formation, and Transwell assays were performed on bladder cancer cells (SW780 and UMUC14) to confirm the effects of anlotinib and erdafitinib on proliferation, migration and invasion. Apoptotic effect was evaluated by Annexin V/propidium iodide double staining, and the levels of the protein and mRNA were examined by RNA-seq, Western blotting and RT-qPCR. Finally, mice with palpable xenografts were treated either with anlotinib and erdafitinib for 8 days before they were sacrificed for measuring the sizes and weights of the tumors. Results: To assess the roles of anlotinib in bladder cancer, we treated SW780 cell line which had FGFR3-BALAP2L1 fusion mutation and UMUC-14 cell line which had a FGFR3 (MuS247C) mutation with DMSO, anlotinib and erdafitinib. As seen in MTT, colony formation and Transwell assays, anlotinib repressed cell proliferation, migration and invasion as erdafitinib. Compared with vehicle, Anlotinib promoted cell apoptosis of bladder cancer cells. To further explore the mechanism, anlotinib and erdafitinib suppressed p-Erk1/2 and p-AKT, while only anlotinib inhibited the expression of VEGF-a. Compared with erdafitinib, the inhibitory ability of anlotinib was weaker than that of erdafitinib in cell line with FGFR3 (MuS247C) mutation, on the contrary, it was much stronger in cell line with FGFR3-BALAP2L1 fusion mutation. In addition, the in vivo data from xenagrafts also supported that anlotinib could significantly repress tumor growth with FGFR3 fusion mutation, and the efficacy was better than erdafitinib. Conclusions: Anlotinib could repress the proliferation, migration and invasion of bladder cancer cells by inhibiting the phosphorylation of Erk1/2 and AKT, and the suppression VEGF-a expression, whose effects was better than erdafitinib in bladder cancer with FGFR3 fusion mutation. Therefore, anlotinib might be a potential novel targeted agent to treat the bladder cancer patients with FGFR3 fusion mutations, and clinical trials are needed for further investigation.

Anlotinib plus tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment in triple-negative breast cancer: A prospective, single-arm, open-label phase II study.

TPS618 Background: Neoadjuvant anti-PD-(L)1 therapy confers an improvement in pathological complete response (pCR) rate in unselected triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Combination of antiangiogenic agent plus immune checkpoint inhibitor and chemotherapy therapy for advanced TNBC is reported as a promising anti-tumor strategy presented in the FUTURE-C-PLUS study. Tislelizumab is a humanized immunoglobulin G4 anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody engineered to minimize binding to FcγR on macrophages. Anlotinib is a novel multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor that effectively inhibit VEGFR, FGFR, c-KIT, c-MET and RET. Previous studies have proven the efficacy of both anlotinib monotherapy and combination with immune checkpoint inhibitor in advanced breast cancer. This phase II study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment in TNBC. Methods: This is a prospective, single-arm, open-label, phase II trial. Eligible patients (pts) were women, aged 18-75 years, ECOG status 0-1, previously untreated invasive TNBC with histologically confirmed (cT1N1-2M0 or cT2-4N0-2M0). 32 pts will be enrolled and received 5 cycles of anlotinib (8 mg qd, d1-14; 21 days per cycle) with 6 cycles of tislelizumab (200 mg, once every 3 weeks) plus nab-paclitaxel (260 mg/m2, once every 3 weeks) and anthracycline (epirubicin 75 mg/m2 or doxorubicin 60 mg/m2), followed by surgery. The primary endpoint is pathological complete response rate (pCR, ypT0/Tis ypN0) and the secondary endpoints include invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. A sample size of 32 patients was estimated to provide a 80% power to detect a difference of 25% in pCR at a significance level of α = 0.05. The study was initiated in August 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT04914390.

Anlotinib plus radiotherapy-temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: A prospective, multicenter phase II study.

e14020 Background: Concurrent radiotherapy and temozolomide (TMZ) followed by adjuvant TMZ (STUPP regimen) is the standard therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma after resection, however, the progression-free survival (PFS) was only about 7 months (m) and the overall survival (OS) was less than 17m. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of adding anlotinib, a multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, to the STUPP regimen for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Methods: This was a prospective, sing-arm, multicenter, phase II study (NCT04119674). Eligible patients (pts) were diagnosed with newly diagnosed GBM and had undergone surgery within 6 weeks before enrollment. Previous exposure to other therapies was not permitted. Other key inclusion criteria included 18 to 75 years old, Karnofsky performance status ≥ 60 %, had at least one measurable lesion according to RANO criteria, and adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal functions. All pts received radiotherapy (54̃60 Gy administered as 1.8-2.0 Gy fractions, 5 days per week) for 6 weeks, with concurrent oral TMZ (75 mg/m2 QD) and anlotinib (8 mg QD, d1̃d14 per 3 weeks). After a 28-day treatment break, adjuvant therapy was started with six cycles of TMZ (150–200mg/m2, d1–5/4wks) and eight cycles of anlotinib (10 mg QD, d1–14/3wks) ，and followed by anlotinib monotherapy until disease progression or intolerable toxicities. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The adverse events (AEs) were recorded according to CTCAE 5.0. Results: From January 2019 to February 2021, 33 pts (17 males and 16 females) were enrolled from 7 hospitals in China. The median age was 52 (range: 32, 69). At the data cutoff date on January 25th, 2022, all pts had completed the concurrent treatment and 30 pts (90.0%) completed the 6 cycles of adjuvant treatment. The median treatment duration of anlotinib was 16 cycles. At the data cutoff date, 21 patients experienced disease progression and 17 pts were dead. The median PFS was 10.9m (95% CI, 6.6-15.2) and the median OS reached 18.7m (95% CI, 15.0-22.4). The PFS at 1 year was 45.5% and OS at 1 year was 72.7%. No grade 3 or worse AEs were observed during the concurrent phase and anlotinb maintenance phase. Three pts (9.1%) had grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia and 1 pts (3.0%) had grade 3 vomiting during the course of adjuvant therapy. Conclusions: This is the first study to explore the feasibility of adding anlotinib to the standard treatment for newly diagnosed GBM. The efficacy was impressive in that the median OS had exceeded 18m and the safety profile was favorable. The positive-controlled study was ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04119674.

A cohort study of the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus anlotinib versus immune checkpoint inhibitors alone as the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the real world.

BackgroundAnlotinib is a new multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and has been shown to have antitumor effects and synergistic antitumor effects with immunotherapy only in animal studies and in the 2nd-line treatment in small clinical trials. A real-world study with large sample to compare the efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with ICIs alone in the multiline treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was urgently needed.MethodsThe data of 535 advanced NSCLC patients were collected from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021. The patients were divided into 2 groups: (I) ICI monotherapy (230 patients); (II) ICI + anlotinib (305 patients). After propensity-score matching (PSM) to reduce the effects of biases and confounding variables, the progression-free survival time (PFS), occurrence of adverse events, disease control rate (DCR), and objective response rate (ORR) of the 2 groups were compared. The effects of clinical factors, including age, gender, gene mutations, tumor proportion score, metastases, and combined radiotherapy, were also analyzed.ResultsAfter PSM, the baseline clinical characteristics were well balanced and the 2 group had a good comparability. Patients in the ICI + anlotinib group had significantly longer median PFS in both the 2nd-line treatment (7.73 vs. 4.70 months; P=0.003) and 3rd-line treatment (5.90 vs. 3.37 months; P=0.020), but the difference lacked statistical significance in the 1st-line treatment (8.40 vs. 5.20 months; P=0.229). The overall median PFS of patients in the ICI + anlotinib group was also much longer than that of patients in the ICI monotherapy group (6.37 vs. 3.90 months; P<0.001). The ICI + anlotinib group also tended to have a higher DCR, a higher ORR, and a higher probability of severe adverse drug reactions during the treatment than the ICI monotherapy group, but the differences were not statistically significant. Combining ICI + anlotinib could improve the outcomes of patients with bone metastasis.ConclusionsAnlotinib + ICI therapy could have greater efficacy in the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients than ICI monotherapy. The probability of adverse events might increase in the combined treatment, but could be controlled.

ALTER-UC-001: Phase II trial of anlotinib plus everolimus as first-line treatment for advanced non–clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

TPS4598 Background: For patients (pts) with recurrent or stage IV non-clear cell renal cancer (nccRCC), the medical treatment guidelines recommend the first choice to participate in clinical trials, or use TKI drugs such as sunitinib, and mTOR inhibitors such as everolimus. Anlotinib is a novel multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). It’s antitumor targets include vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) and c-kit. This a single-center, single-arm, phase II trial which will evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of anlotinib hydrochloride plus everolimus as first-line therapy in pts with nccRCC (NCT05124431). Methods: Key inclusion criteria are: age ≥18 years; histologically confirmed advanced nccRCC, advanced disease is defined as TNM stage IV, not available for surgery, locally recurrent or metastatic renal cell carcinoma; no prior systemic drug therapy for advanced disease; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1. Approximately 30 pts will be assigned to receive anlotinib hydrochloride: 12 mg every 21 days (14 days on treatment from Day 1-14, 7 days off treatment from Day 15-21) by oral, and everolimus 5mg qd, continued for up to 1 year (∼17 cycles ) or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Radiographic imaging will be performed every 6 weeks. Secondary endpoints included overall disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS), and over survival (OS). Adverse events will be monitored throughout the study and graded according to CTCAE V5.0. Recruitment have begun in Jan. 2022. Research Sponsor: Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd. Clinical trial information: NCT05124431.

Phase 2 study of anlotinib combined with taxanes and lobaplatin in the neoadjuvant treatment of triple-negative breast cancer: Efficacy, safety and biomarker analysis.

e12605 Background: Pathological complete response (pCR) is associated with improved prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Anlotinib, a novel multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor that effectively inhibits VEGFR, FGFR, c-KIT, c-MET, and RET, monotherapy has been proven effective in HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer, but its efficacy in early-stage TNBC is unknown. This phase 2 study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding anlotinib to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients (pts) with primary TNBC. Methods: Pts with clinical stage II/III TNBC were to be treated with 5 cycles of anlotinib (12mg, d1-14, q3w) plus 6 cycles of taxanes (docetaxel 75 mg/m2 or nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m2, d1, q3w) and lobaplatin (30 mg/m2, d1, q3w), followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was the total pCR (tpCR; ypT0/is ypN0). A Simon’s two-stage optimum design was used, and ＞5 of 11 pts were required to achieve tpCR in the first stage, with a pre-specified tpCR rate of 54.5% before proceeding to the second stage. A total of 31 participants was required for the study. Results: Six out of 11 pts achieved tpCR in the first stage, reaching the threshold for the second stage. From Jan 2021 to Jan 2022, a total of 22 pts were enrolled and 12 received surgery after the completion of neoadjuvant therapy, but a total of 2 pts withdrew from the study due to the COVID-19 pandemic or serious adverse events. Of the 22 eligible pts, the median age was 49 years (range, 29-64), 64% were postmenopausal, and 73% were nodal involved. At the time of surgery, 58.3% (7/12) achieved tpCR. Of the 9 pts with the node-positive disease at diagnosis, 88.9% (8/9) became ypN0. The results of FUSCC TNBC classification (IHC-based) revealed the tpCR rates were 57.1% (4/7), 100% (3/3), and 0% (0/2) for BLIS subtype, IM subtype and LAR/unknown subtypes, respectively. Biomarker analysis showed the tpCR rates were 100% (3/3) and 100% (4/4) in patients with gBRCA1 mutation and MYC amplification, respectively. The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were leucopenia (6/22, 27%), neutropenia (6/22, 27%), anemia (5/22, 23%), decreased appetite (5/22, 23%), hypertension (2/22, 9%), ALT increased (1/22, 5%) and oral mucositis (1/22, 5%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. The trial is ongoing. Conclusions: The addition of anlotinib to neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed manageable toxicity and promising antitumor activity for patients with early-stage TNBC. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2100043027.