Multisession Stereotactic Radiosurgery Research Articles

Neurocognitive Functions after Stereotactic Radiosurgery - An Analysis with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)

Background: Throughout the past decade, the research on neuro-oncology has increased awareness regarding the significance of cognitive functions as an outcome in different treatment modalities for patients with a primary brain tumor but only limited studies have explored the subject of the likelihood of cognitive dysfunction in patients undergoing stereotactic radiosurgery/stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS/SRT). This, modern radiation delivery technique allows high-dose delivery to the target and minimum dose to the brain/critical organs resulting in better tumor control and perhaps an improvement in Neurocognitive functions (NCF). Objectives: To explore the effect of stereotactic radiosurgery/stereotactic radiotherapy on neurocognitive functions (NCF) in various brain tumors. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at Neurospinal and Cancer Care Institute (NCCI), Karachi. A total of 100 patients who had undergone multisession stereotactic radiosurgery /stereotactic radiotherapy were selected after taking their written informed consent by employing a convenient sampling technique. The type of tumor was classified and identified on a radiological and histological basis. Neurocognitive function evaluation was carried out through Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score questionnaire provided to patients at baseline (pre-radiosurgery SRS/SRT), and 6 months after treatment (post-radiosurgery SRS/SRT). Results: The mean age of patients was 37.38±15.03 years and the majority (49%) belonged to the 27-44 years age group. The majority of them were males whereas the most common pathology found was glioma (31%). Moreover, both overall and in patients having prior surgery, the comparison of different MMSE score levels showed that there was a significant increase in patients with normal score levels and a significant decrease in patients with mild and moderate score levels after treatment (P=0.006 and P=0.046 respectively) at post-treatment time. Conclusion: Stereotactic radiosurgery results in the improvement of neurocognitive functions. Previously known radiation-related impairment of NCF should be re-explored in light of modern radiosurgery/radiotherapy techniques with larger studies.

Single session versus multisession stereotactic radiosurgery for the management of intracranial meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To compare the efficacy, outcomes, and complications of single session (SS-SRS) and multisession (MS-SRS) stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of intracranial meningiomas. Relevant articles were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane. A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment protocols and outcomes were conducted. After the selection process, 20 articles describing 1483 cases were included. A total of 1303 patients who underwent SS-SRS and 180 patients who underwent MS-SRS for the management of their intracranial meningioma were reported in the included studies. SS-SRS and MS-SRS had comparable one-year (SS-SRS: 98% vs. MS-SRS: 100%, p > 0.99) and five-year (SS-SRS: 94% vs. MS-SRS: 93%, p = 0.71) tumor control rates. The groups also had comparable tumor volume reduction/tumor regression rates (SS-SRS: 44% vs. MS-SRS: 25%, p = 0.25), tumor volume stability rates (SS-SRS: 51% vs. MS-SRS: 75%, p = 0.12), and tumor progression rates (SS-SRS: 4% vs. MS-SRS: 4%, p = 0.89). SS-SRS and MS-SRS yielded similar complication rates (10.4% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.68) and comparable functional improvement rates (MS-SRS: 44% vs. SS-SRS: 36%, p = 0.57). However,MS-SRS was used for significantly larger tumor volumes (MS-SRS: 23.8 cm3 vs. SS-SRS: 6.1 cm3, p = 0.02). SS-SRS and MS-SRS resulted in comparable tumor control, tumor volumetric change, and functional outcomes despite significant biases in selecting patients for SS- or MS-SRS.

The Role of Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Management of Foramen Magnum Meningiomas—A Multicenter Analysis and Review of the Literature

Simple SummaryMeningiomas represent the most common central nervous system (CNS) tumor. Despite their often benign nature, a tumor location in direct proximity to vital brain structures may lead to significant morbidity. This is the case for foramen magnum meningiomas (FMMs) as they grow at the skull base, next to the brain stem and foramen magnum. Surgical resection represents the mainstay of FMM treatments. In patients unsuitable for surgery, with tumor recurrences or tumor remnants after surgery, non-invasive treatment modalities may play a crucial role in patient management. Reports and studies on stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the treatment of FMMs are scarce. This multicenter analysis reported the outcome data of 62 patients with FMMs. SRS achieved a high local tumor control and demonstrated a favorable safety profile. These results are in agreement with previous findings. SRS should be considered for selected FMM patients.Background: Foramen magnum meningiomas (FMMs) represent a considerable neurosurgical challenge given their location and potential morbidity. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an established non-invasive treatment modality for various benign and malignant brain tumors. However, reports on single-session or multisession SRS for the management and treatment of FMMs are exceedingly rare. We report the largest FMM SRS series to date and describe our multicenter treatment experience utilizing robotic radiosurgery. Methods: Patients who underwent SRS between 2005 and 2020 as a treatment for a FMM at six different centers were eligible for analysis. Results: Sixty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. The median follow-up was 28.9 months. The median prescription dose and isodose line were 14 Gy and 70%, respectively. Single-session SRS accounted for 81% of treatments. The remaining patients received three to five fractions, with doses ranging from 19.5 to 25 Gy. Ten (16%) patients were treated for a tumor recurrence after surgery, and thirteen (21%) underwent adjuvant treatment. The remaining 39 FMMs (63%) received SRS as their primary treatment. For patients with an upfront surgical resection, histopathological examination revealed 22 World Health Organization grade I tumors and one grade II FMM. The median tumor volume was 2.6 cubic centimeters. No local failures were observed throughout the available follow-up, including patients with a follow-up ≥ five years (16 patients), leading to an overall local control of 100%. Tumor volume significantly decreased after treatment, with a median volume reduction of 21% at the last available follow-up (p < 0.01). The one-, three-, and five-year progression-free survival were 100%, 96.6%, and 93.0%, respectively. Most patients showed stable (47%) or improved (21%) neurological deficits at the last follow-up. No high-grade adverse events were observed. Conclusions: SRS is an effective and safe treatment modality for FMMs. Despite the paucity of available data and previous reports, SRS should be considered for selected patients, especially those with subtotal tumor resections, recurrences, and patients not suitable for surgery.

Orbital tumors

Orbit can be home for a spectrum of tumors with almost every orbital structure having the potential to harbor a neoplastic process. Surgical exposure and resection of orbital tumors can often be tricky due to the intricate anatomy of the region, with an additional complexity caused by a tumor related distortion. The clinical presentation depends on the primary structure involved and the location of the tumor within the orbit, and so does the scheme of management. Modern diagnostic imaging modalities offer a crucial pre-operative understanding of the precise location of the tumor within the orbit; it also helps in defining the nature of the tumor. Both these aspects are required for planning the appropriate surgical approach. Often, orbital tumors extend beyond the confines of the orbit requiring the tailoring of the surgical procedure, which may necessitate the involvement of a multidisciplinary team. The contemporary neurosurgical practice is also witnessing a progressive inclination towards minimally invasive endoscopic approaches, which have shown equally good if not better results in properly selected cases. Furthermore, early promising results with attempts at performing multisession stereotactic radiosurgery on orbital tumors has rekindled interest in this modality, in line with the management of intra-cranial tumors having a similar pathology. This article aims to recapitulate relevant surgical anatomy and to elucidate the current practice in the management of common orbital tumors encountered by neurosurgeons.

Long-term outcomes of 170 brain arteriovenous malformations treated by frameless image-guided robotic stereotactic radiosurgery: Ramathibodi hospital experience.

This study was conducted to report long-term outcomes of the frameless robotic stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain arteriovenous malformation (AVM) at Ramathibodi Hospital.Retrospective data of patients with brain AVM (bAVM), who underwent CyberKnife SRS (CKSRS) at Ramathibodi Hospital from 2009 to 2014, were examined. Exclusion criteria were insufficient follow-up time (<36 months) or incomplete information. Patients’ demographics, clinical presentation, treatment parameters, and results were analyzed. Excellent outcome was defined as AVM obliteration without a new neurological deficit. Risk factors for achieving excellent outcome were assessed.From a total of 277 CKSRS treatments for bAVM during the 6 years, 170 AVMs in 166 patients met the inclusion criteria. One hundred and thirty-nine cases (81.76%) presented with hemorrhages from ruptured bAVMs. Almost two-thirds underwent embolization before radiosurgery. With the median AVM volume of 4.17 mL, three-quarters of the cohort had single-fraction CKSRS, utilizing the median prescribed dose of 15 Gray (Gy). In the multisession group (25.29%), the median prescribed dose and the AVM volume were 27.5 Gy and 22.3 mL, respectively. An overall excellent outcome, at a median follow-up period of 72.45 months, was observed in 99 cases (58.24%). Seven AVMs (4.12%) ruptured after CKSRS but 1 patient suffered a new neurological deficit. Two patients (1.18%) were classified into the poor outcome category but there were no deaths. Negative factors for excellent outcome, by multivariate regression analysis, were the male sex and multisession SRS delivery, but not age, history of AVM rupture, previous embolization, or AVM volume.Despite relatively larger bAVM and utilizing a lower prescribed radiation dose, the excellent outcome was within the reported range from previous literature. This study offers one of the longest follow-ups and the largest cohorts from the frameless image-guided robotic SRS community.

Subtotal Resection Followed by Adjuvant Radiosurgery for Large Vestibular Schwannomas: Outcomes with Regard to the Timing and Regimen of Irradiation.

To evaluate the results of combined management of large vestibular schwannomas (VS) with initial subtotal resection (STR) followed by adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), with a particular emphasis on the timing and regimen of irradiation. Seventeen patients underwent STR of a VS followed by SRS, whereas five others were observed after STR. Early SRS (<6months after surgery) and late SRS (>6months after surgery) were done in 8 and 9 patients, respectively. Single- and multisession SRS treatments were administered in 10 and 7 patients, respectively. The mean follow-up durations after surgery and SRS were 40 and 28months, respectively. The rates of radiological and oncological tumor control after SRS were 82% and 100%, respectively. The tumor volume at the last follow-up and its relative changes after SRS did not differ significantly on the basis of the irradiation timing (early versus late) or on the basis of the irradiation regimen (single-session versus multisession). In no patient who was observed after STR of a VS was tumor regrowth noted during a mean follow-up period of 49months. At 12months after surgery, motor function of the ipsilateral facial nerve corresponded to House-Brackmann grades I, II, III, and IV in 16patients (73%), 3patients (14%), 1patient (5%), and 2patients (9%), respectively. Facial nerve function at the last follow-up did not differ significantly on the basis of the irradiation timing (early versus late) or on the basis of the irradiation regimen (single-session versus multisession). The combination of initial STR followed by adjuvant SRS is an effective treatment strategy for patients with a large VS. Although the optimal timing and regimen of postoperative irradiation of the residual lesion should be defined further, our preliminary data suggest that either early or late SRS after surgery may provide good tumor control and optimal functional results.

Image-Guided Multisession Radiosurgery of Skull Base Meningiomas.

Simple SummaryStereotactic radiosurgery has changed the landscape of treatment for skull base meningiomas. Lesions encasing or compressing radiosensitive structures are considered not suitable for single session stereotactic radiosurgery because of the high risk of side effects. Multisession stereotactic radiosurgery can reduce these risks, allowing for normal tissue repair between fractions, while delivering a high dose per fraction. The aim of this study is to validate the role of multi-session stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of skull base meningiomas, through a retrospective analysis of 156 patients affected by skull base meningioma, treated at the University of Messina between 2008 and 2018. Our study suggests that multisession stereotactic radiosurgery represents a safe and effective profile in the treatment of skull base meningioma, providing a satisfactory local control and a low toxicity rate, together with patient comfort from a frameless procedure.Background: The efficacy of single-session stereotactic radiosurgery (sSRS) for the treatment of intracranial meningioma is widely recognized. However, sSRS is not always feasible in cases of large tumors and those lying close to critically radiation-sensitive structures. When surgery is not recommended, multi-session stereotactic radiosurgery (mSRS) can be applied. Even so, the efficacy and best treatment schedule of mSRS are not yet established. The aim of this study is to validate the role of mSRS in the treatment of skull base meningiomas. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with skull base meningiomas treated with mSRS (two to five fractions) at the University of Messina, Italy, from 2008 to 2018, was conducted. Results: 156 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median follow-up period was 36.2 ± 29.3 months. Progression-free survival at 2-, 5-, and 10- years was 95%, 90%, and 80.8%, respectively. There were no new visual or motor deficits, nor cranial nerves impairments, excluding trigeminal neuralgia, which was reported by 5.7% of patients. One patient reported carotid occlusion and one developed brain edema. Conclusion: Multisession radiosurgery is an effective approach for skull base meningiomas. The long-term control is comparable to that obtained with conventionally-fractionated radiotherapy, while the toxicity rate is very limited.

Image-Guided Robotic Radiosurgery for Treatment of Recurrent Grade II and III Meningiomas. A Single-Center Study

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been increasingly applied for malignant meningiomas as an alternative to conventionally fractioned radiation therapy. We performed a retrospective analysis of an institutional patient cohort with malignant meningiomas treated by image-guided SRS. All patients with atypical or anaplastic meningiomas who were treated by SRS using CyberKnife (CK) were identified. Local failure and regional and/or distant recurrences were evaluated together with toxicity and overall survival. We identified 127 treated lesions (105 atypical and 22 anaplastic) in 35 patients. The mean time interval between the last surgery and subsequent CK-SRS was 30.8 ± 24.5 months. Most lesions (83.5%) were treated using single-fraction CK-SRS. The median planning target volume of all 127 lesions was 1.71 cm3 (range, 0.06-22.5 cm3). The median follow-up period was 23 months (range, 2.1-60.3 months). The estimated local control rates were 97%, 77%, and 67% at 12, 36, and 60 months, respectively, in atypical meningiomas and 66% each at 12 and 24 months in anaplastic meningiomas. The regional progression-free survival was 93%, 73%, and 59% at 12, 36, and 60 months, respectively, in atypical lesions and 93% and 46% at 12 and 24 months in anaplastic lesions. The estimated distant tumor progression-free interval in atypical lesions was 80%, 44%, and 44% at 12, 36, and 60 months, respectively, and 49% and 24% at 12 and 24 months, respectively, in anaplastic lesions. Age was identified as a risk factor for local failure. Although the real boundaries of efficacy of SRS have to be further evaluated in a prospective trial, it seems that aggressive treatment by high-dose single or multisession SRS of recurring malignant meningiomas provides satisfactory local control rates.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for non-vestibular cranial nerve schwanommas.

Non-vestibular cranial nerve schwannomas (NVCNS) are rare lesions, representing <10 % of cranial nerve schwannomas. The optimal treatment for NVCNS is often derived from vestibular schwannomas experience. Surgical resection has been referred to as the first line treatment for those benign tumors, but significant complication rates are reported. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has arisen as a mainstay of treatment for many benign tumors, including schwanommas. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of NVCNS treated by SRS to characterize tumor control, symptom relief, toxicity, and the role of hypo-fractionation of SRS dose. Eighty-eight (88) patients, with ninety-five (95) NVCNS were treated with either single or multi-session SRS from 2001 to 2014. Local control was achieved in 94 % of patients treated (median follow-up of 33 months, range 1-155). Complications were seen in 7.4 % of cases treated with SRS. At 1-year, 57 % of patients had improvement or resolution of their symptoms, while 35 % were stable and 8 % had worsening or increased symptoms. While 42 % received only one session, results on local control were similar for one or multiple sessions (p = 0.424). SRS for NVCNS is a treatment modality that provides excellent local control with minimal complication risk compared to traditional neurosurgical techniques. Tumor control obtained with a multi-session treatment was not significantly different from single session treatment. Safety profile was also comparable for uni or multi-session treatments. We concluded that, as seen in VS treated with CK SRS, radiosurgery treatment can be safely delivered in cases of NVCNS.

Preliminary experience of fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery with extend system of Gamma Knife

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to present multisession stereotactic radiosurgery with initial experience using custom made extend system (ES) of Gamma Knife. Methods: The ES is comprised of a carbon fiber frame also called extend frame, vacuum head rest cushion, patient surveillance unit and a configurable front piece with dental impression tray. The extend frame is a rigid connection between patient's head and patient positioning system (PPS) of Gamma Knife. A dental impression of patient was created and attached to the frontal piece of extend system. The treatment setup involves positioning the patient within the extend frame using patient specific headrest cushion and front piece. The reference patient’s head position was recorded through measurements of repositioning check tool (RCT) apertures using a high precision digital probe before computed tomography (CT) scan. The RCT measurements taken before treatment were compared with recorded reference position to ensure appropriate patient treatment position. Volumetric magnetic resonance (MR) scan was co-registered with stereotactic CT scan on Leksell Gamma plan. Fused MR to CT images on Gamma Plan was utilized to delineate regions of interest and prepare a precise treatment plan. The presented study includes positional reproducibility check and dosimetric evaluation of ten patients treated with ES. Results: Forty-three fractions on ten patients with prescribed treatment format were delivered successfully. An average tumor volume of 11.26 cm 3 (range, 340 mm 3 to 59.12 cm 3 ) was treated with ES. The mean tumor coverage of 91.91% (range, 90% to 95%) was able to achieve at 50% prescription isodose without compromising adjacent normal structure radiation dose tolerances. The mean inter-fraction positional variation of 0.69 mm influences an inherent strength of immobilization technique. Follow-up of seven patients at a median interval of 16 months (range, 9 months to 26 months) showed evidence of 100% radiographic control with improved clinical results. Conclusion: Conjugative clinical outcome shows the efficacy of fractionation in various clinical indications.

CyberKnife multisession stereotactic radiosurgery and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for perioptic meningiomas: intermediate-term results and radiobiological considerations.

Single fraction radiosurgery is conventionally precluded for lesions lying <2-3 mm of the anterior visual pathway because of the radiosensitivity of the optic nerve. We analyzed a series of 64 patients with “perioptic” meningiomas treated by CyberKnife multisession radiosurgery and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (hSRT). Between July 2007-May 2010, patients were treated using conventional multisession Cyberknife schemes (2–5 fractions) and results were retrospectively analyzed. A radiobiological model was then developed to estimate the best tumor control probability (TCP)/ normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for these lesions. Resulting dose/fraction schemes were applied to patients treated between May 2010 and July 2014. Data were prospectively collectedTwenty-five patients were included in the retrospective part of the study. Median tumor volume was 4.95 cc; median dose was 23.0 Gy and median number of fraction was 5 (range 2–5). No patient had visual deterioration at mean follow-up of 60 ± 12 months. Tumor control was achieved in all cases. Thirty-nine patients were treated according the radiobiology model and results prospectively analyzed. Median tumor volume was 7.5 cc, median dose 25.0 Gy and mean number of fraction 5 (range 3–15). No patient had visual deterioration or tumor progression at mean follow-up of 17 ± 10 months.Conventional multisession CyberKnife treatments (2–5 fractions) provided satisfactory results. Nonetheless, our estimation of TCP suggests the use of higher doses to grant long-term disease control. To achieve higher equivalent doses without significantly increasing the NTCP, we suggest the use of a greater number of fractions, moving to hSRT, in tumors in which the encasement of optic nerves is presumed.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40064-015-0804-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Multisession stereotactic radiosurgery for large vestibular schwannomas

Microsurgery is not the only option for larger vestibular schwannomas (VSs); recent reviews have confirmed the feasibility and efficacy of radiosurgery for larger VSs. This study illustrates the outcomes of a series of large VSs after multisession stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). A series of 33 VSs larger than 8 cm(3) (range 8-24 cm(3), mean 11 cm(3), median 9.4 cm(3)) were treated using the CyberKnife from 2003 to 2011 with the multisession SRS technique in 2-5 fractions (14-19.5 Gy). Five patients had undergone surgical removal and 5 had ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Nine patients were eligible for but refused surgery. Twelve patients were older than 70 years and 5 were younger than 40 years. Two female patients had neurofibromatosis. The follow-up period ranged from 12 to 111 months (median 48 months); radiological growth control was achieved in 94% of cases: 19 tumors (58%) displayed no size variation or reduction in tumor diameter; 12 (36%), after a transient enlargement, presented with arrested growth or shrinkage. Seven patients had a volume reduction of more than 50%. Two patients (6%) needed debulking and 2 were treated with ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Actuarial progressionfree survival rates at 1 year and 5 years were 97% and 83%, respectively. Hearing was retained in 7 of the 8 patients with serviceable baseline hearing. Adverse events were limited to 1 case each of vertigo, tongue paresthesia, and trigeminal neuralgia. The good control rate obtained with multisession SRS deepens the controversy of the radiobiology of VSs and may extend the indication of radiation therapy (fractionated or SRS) for large VSs to include patients without symptoms of mass effect. The limited number of cases and short follow-up period do not provide sufficient support for widespread application of multisession SRS in young patients. Further studies with multisession SRS are warranted.

Multisession Gamma Knife Radiosurgery: A Preliminary Experience with a Noninvasive, Relocatable Frame

To evaluate preliminary outcomes for a cohort of patients who were treated with multisession Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) using the new noninvasive vacuum-assisted immobilization system. A retrospective review was performed of 15 consecutive cases treated with multisession GKRS. Radiosurgical targets included 12 meningiomas, 1 nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma, 1 growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma, and 1 pilocytic astrocytoma. GKRS was delivered in 3-5 sessions to a mean tumor volume of 8.55 mL (median, 7.3 mL; range, 1.24-22.7 mL) with a mean margin dose of 19.7 Gy (median, 20 Gy; range, 15-25 Gy). The optic nerves, chiasm, and tracts received mean doses of 3.5 Gy (range, 0.7-5.7 Gy), 3.1 Gy (range, 1-4.4 Gy), and 2.6 Gy (range, 0.83-5.45 Gy) per session. Mean biologic equivalent dose (α/β = 2.5) was 60.9 Gy (median, 60 Gy; range, 45-79.8 Gy). Follow-up examinations were performed at 3- to 6-month intervals. Mean follow-up was 17.7 months (median, 13.8 months; range, 4-44.3 months), and tumor control was noted in all patients, with regression in 5 patients and stability in 10 patients. New neurologic deficits developed in 3 patients after treatment, but none of these deficits were permanent. Resection was performed in 1 patient with expressive aphasia with worsening of peritumoral T2 signal but a stable tumor on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging. The other 2 patients were managed conservatively for minor complications (ptosis, taste dysfunction), and their symptoms resolved. No patients developed deterioration in vision during the follow-up period. Preliminary experience with multisession GKRS appears promising, with reasonable tumor control and complication rates. Multisession stereotactic radiosurgery may expand the treatment envelope for intracranial pathologies, including targets with larger volumes and locations in close proximity to radiosensitive structures.

Single-session and multisession CyberKnife radiosurgery for spine metastases—University of Pittsburgh and Georgetown University experience

The authors compared the effectiveness of single-session (SS) and multisession (MS) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the treatment of spinal metastases. The authors conducted a retrospective review of the clinical outcomes of 348 lesions in 228 patients treated with the CyberKnife radiosurgery at the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and Georgetown University Medical Center. One hundred ninety-five lesions were treated using an SS treatment regimen (mean 16.3 Gy), whereas 153 lesions were treated using an MS approach (mean 20.6 Gy in 3 fractions, 23.8 Gy in 4 fractions, and 24.5 Gy in 5 fractions). The primary end point was pain control. Secondary end points included neurological deficit improvement, toxicity, local tumor control, need for retreatment, and overall survival. Pain control was significantly improved in the SS group (SSG) for all measured time points up to 1 year posttreatment (100% vs 88%, p = 0.003). Rates of toxicity and neurological deficit improvement were not statistically different. Local tumor control was significantly better in the MS group (MSG) up to 2 years posttreatment (96% vs 70%, p = 0.001). Similarly, the need for retreatment was significantly lower in the MSG (1% vs 13%, p < 0.001). One-year overall survival was significantly greater in the MSG than the SSG (63% vs 46%, p = 0.002). Single-session and MS SRS regimens are both effective in the treatment of spinal metastases. While an SS approach provides greater early pain control and equivalent toxicity, an MS approach achieves greater tumor control and less need for retreatment in long-term survivors.

Multisession Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas

Single-session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment of vestibular schwannomas results in excellent tumor control. It is not known whether functional outcomes can be improved by fractionating the treatment over multiple sessions. To examine tumor control and complication rates after multisession SRS. Three hundred eighty-three patients treated with SRS from 1999 to 2007 at Stanford University Medical Center were retrospectively reviewed. Ninety percent were treated with 18 Gy in 3 sessions, targeting a median tumor volume of 1.1 cm3 (range, 0.02-19.8 cm3). During a median follow-up duration of 3.6 years (range, 1-10 years), 10 tumors required additional treatment, resulting in 3- and 5-year Kaplan-Meier tumor control rates of 99% and 96%, respectively. Five-year tumor control rate was 98% for tumors < 3.4 cm3. Neurofibromatosis type 2-associated tumors were associated with worse tumor control (P = .02). Of the 200 evaluable patients with pre-SRS serviceable hearing (Gardner-Robertson grade 1 and 2), the crude rate of serviceable hearing preservation was 76%. Smaller tumor volume was associated with hearing preservation (P = .001). There was no case of post-SRS facial weakness. Eight patients (2%) developed trigeminal dysfunction, half of which was transient. Multisession SRS treatment of vestibular schwannomas results in an excellent rate of tumor control. The hearing, trigeminal nerve, and facial nerve function preservation rates reported here are promising.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Cranial Nonvestibular Schwannomas: Results of Single- and Multisession Radiosurgery

Surgical resection of nonvestibular cranial schwannomas carries a considerable risk of postoperative complications. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) offers a non-invasive treatment alternative. The efficacy and safety of multi-session SRS of nonvestibular cranial schwannomas has not been well studied. To analyze the results of single- and multi-session SRS of nonvestibular cranial schwannomas. From 2001 to 2007, 42 lesions in 40 patients were treated with SRS at Stanford University Medical Center, targeting schwannomas of cranial nerves IV (n = 1), V (n = 18), VII (n = 6), X (n = 5), XII (n = 2), jugular foramen (n = 8), and cavernous sinus (n = 2). SRS was delivered to a median marginal dose of 18 Gy (range, 15-33 Gy) in 1 to 3 sessions, targeting a median tumor volume of 3.2 cm (range, 0.1-23.7 cm). The median doses for treatments in 1 (n = 18), 2 (n = 9), and 3 (n = 15) sessions were 17.5, 20, and 18 Gy, respectively. With a median follow-up of 29 months (range, 6-84 months), tumor control was achieved in 41 of the 42 lesions. Eighteen of 42 lesions (43%) decreased in size; 23 tumors (55%) remained stable. There were 2 cases of new or worsening cranial nerve deficits in patients treated in single session; no patient treated with multi-session SRS experienced any cranial nerve toxicity (P = 0.18). SRS of nonvestibular cranial schwannomas provides excellent tumor control with minimal risk of complications. There was a trend towards decreased complications with multi-session SRS.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for WHO grade I meningiomas

Meningiomas represent a common intracranial tumor in the adult population. Although extirpation to achieve a gross total resection or at least decrease mass effect has been the mainstay of treatment, stereotactic radiosurgery has come to play an increasingly important role in the management of patients with meningiomas. Radiosurgery utilizes highly focused, beams of ionizing radiation to inactivate tumor cells. Image guidance and a steep dose fall off are critical features of this approach. The radiobiology of radiosurgery differs in certain advantageous ways from conventional radiotherapy. Radiosurgery initially was utilized to treat recurrent or residual skull base meningiomas. As success was observed in this setting, radiosurgery has gradually expanded its role so as to treat convexity meningiomas; it is also used as an upfront treatment for patients for whom clinical and neuro-imaging findings are consistent with a meningioma. Most large series demonstrate tumor control rates for patients with grade I meningiomas in excess of 85%. Neurological function is generally preserved or improved for patients with meningiomas. However, complications can occur. Longitudinal follow-up including neurologic and radiologic assessment is required. Single and multisession stereotactic radiosurgery will likely play an expanded role in the treatment of patients with meningiomas.

MULTISESSION CYBERKNIFE STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY OF LARGE, BENIGN CRANIAL BASE TUMORS

Although radiosurgery plays an important role in managing benign cranial base lesions, the potential for increased toxicity with single-session treatment of large tumors is a concern. In this retrospective study, we report the intermediate-term rate of local control, morbidity, and clinical outcomes of patients with large cranial base tumors treated with multisession stereotactic radiosurgery with the CyberKnife (Accuray, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA). Between 1999 and 2008, 34 consecutive patients with large (>15 cm), benign cranial base tumors (21 meningiomas, 9 schwannomas, 4 glomus jugulare tumors) underwent primary or postoperative radiosurgical treatment using a multisession approach at Stanford University and were considered in this retrospective study. Forty-four percent of these patients had undergone previous subtotal surgical resection or radiotherapy. CyberKnife radiosurgery was delivered in 2 to 5 sessions (median, 3 sessions) to a median tumor volume of 19.3 cm (range, 15.8-69.3 cm). The median marginal dose was 24 Gy (range, 18-25 Gy) prescribed to a median 78% isodose line. After a median clinical follow-up of 31 months (range, 12-77 months), 21% of patients experienced clinical improvement of neurological symptoms, whereas neurological status remained unchanged among the rest. Four patients experienced prolonged use of glucocorticoids owing to transient neurological worsening and radiographic signs of radiation injury. No permanent neurotoxicity was seen. To date, all tumors remain locally controlled. Over our modest length of follow-up, multisession radiosurgery appears to be a safe and effective option for selected large, benign brain and cranial base lesions.

Multisession Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Meningioma Results in Low Rates of Post-treatment Edema

Multisession Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Meningioma Results in Low Rates of Post-treatment Edema

TREATMENT OF SPINAL TUMORS USING CYBERKNIFE FRACTIONATED STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY

Benign and malignant tumors of the spine significantly impair the function and quality of life of many patients. Standard treatment options, including conventional radiotherapy and surgery, are often limited by anatomic constraints and previous treatment. Image-guided stereotactic radiosurgery using the CyberKnife system (Accuray, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) is a novel approach in the multidisciplinary management of spinal tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery on pain and quality-of-life outcomes of patients with spinal tumors. We conducted a prospective study of 200 patients with benign or malignant spinal tumors treated at Georgetown University Hospital between March 2002 and September 2006. Patients were treated by means of multisession stereotactic radiosurgery using the CyberKnife as initial treatment, postoperative treatment, or retreatment. Pain scores were assessed by the Visual Analog Scale, quality of life was assessed by the SF-12 survey, and neurological examinations were conducted after treatment. Mean pain scores decreased significantly from 40.1 to 28.6 after treatment (P < 0.001) and continued to decrease over the entire 4-year follow-up period (P < 0.05). SF-12 Physical Component scores demonstrated no significant change throughout the follow-up period. Mental Component scores were significantly higher after treatment (P < 0.01), representing a quality-of-life improvement. Early side effects of radiosurgery were mild and self-limited, and no late radiation toxicity was observed. CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery is a safe and effective modality in the treatment of patients with spinal tumors. CyberKnife offers durable pain relief and maintenance of quality of life with a very favorable side effect profile.