(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)1. Introduction.In this paper is addressed the public transport planning problem. This is a process which is usually divided into four phases: network design, timetabling construction, vehicle scheduling, and crew scheduling. Usually, these phases are executed sequentially. Here in the paper, we are tackling the bus timetable construction problem of an urban bus transport network. This is usually accomplished in three steps: first for each scenario (covering a concrete planning period) bus frequencies are calculated for each route in the network, then bus departures are settled for each route in the network based on previously calculated frequencies. This is then adjusted for getting acceptable timetables for planners.The main scientific contribution of this work is the development of an integrated multi-objective mixed integer lineal mathematical model to construct multi-period urban bus timetables, which also allows smooth transitions between adjacent planning periods with different demand.Recently Ibarra-Rojas & Rios-Solis (2012) have shown formally that the timetabling problem is NP-Hard, so we implemented two multi-objective metaheuristics to explore the effectiveness of the proposed model. We designed an experiment for testing the heuristics with generated random instances.The timetabling problem has been tackled in the literature from different approaches. Ceder (2007) proposes an exact methods for creating a timetable with maximal synchronization. Also, Eranki (2004), proposes a model to create timetables with maximal synchronization using time windows. She used a heuristic method to solve the problem, but she did not consider multiple criteria. Also, other authors consider maximization of synchronization as a key objective in urban transport planning. Among them, Paunovic (2013) showed a positive correlation between children blood pressure and road traffic noise, transit density and public transport. Burke (2011) also advocates the importance of taking into consideration passenger transfer as a measure of quality for an urban transport system, which indirectly calls for synchronization maximization. Another important measure of quality for urban transport planning is quality of service from the users' perspective (see Ibeas & Cecin, 2011). Ibeas & Cecin, (2011) concluded that the most important variables when defining quality of public transport from the users' perspective are waiting time, journey time and above all, level of occupancy. Recently, this claim has been a subject of research studies by some researchers. For example, Barra et al (2007) presented a model considering different characteristics of the transport system (passenger requirements, budget constraints, level of service). There are other research works on timetabling problem in which the authors use metaheuristics like GRASP. Among these is Mauttone & Urquhart (2009) who developed a metaheuristic based on GRASP for optimizing simultaneously different objectives for passengers and schedulers.In literature, there are approaches such as Szeto & Wu (2011) that combine two phases of the urban transport process. Szeto & Wu (2011) propose a simultaneously integrated solution for the bus network design and frequency setting problems using a genetic algorithm (GA) that tackles the route network design problem. GA is hybridized with a neighborhood search heuristic which tackles the frequency setting problem. Also in Cipriani et al. (2012), network design and frequency calculation are integrated for optimizing passenger transfer, among other impact measures. There are also approaches for solving two phases sequentially. A good example is Chakroborty (2003) who combines the transit routing and scheduling phases using a genetic algorithm. In his approach, he tries to minimize the transfer time and the waiting time. Another research that combines several phases is the one proposed by Zhao & Zeng (2008). …