Multimodal Analgesia Research Articles

Local Infiltration Analgesia Is Superior to Regional Nerve Blocks for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Less Falls, Better Mobility, and Same-Day Discharge.

Background: Multimodal analgesia in total hip arthroplasty (THA) provides better pain control, mobility, and reduced side effects compared to monotherapies. Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) and regional nerve blocks (RNBs) are commonly used throughout these protocols. This study aimed to compare these procedures as part of a multimodal analgesia protocol for patients undergoing THA. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of 1100 consecutive elective primary THAs was performed in 996 patients between June 2018 and December 2021. The RNB consisted of a preoperative continuous femoral nerve catheter and single-shot obturator nerve block, and LIA consisted of the intraoperative infiltration of weight-based bupivacaine. Results: A total of 579 (52.6%) patients received RNB, and 521 (47.4%) received LIA. Mean oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) during the first four hours postoperatively were significantly lower for LIA group (p < 0.001). However, the numeric pain rating scale in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) was similar between groups. Patients with LIA had significantly greater first ambulation distance in the PACU (p < 0.001), higher successful same-day discharge rate (p = 0.029), fewer falls (p = 0.041), and less refill OMEs post-discharge (p < 0.001) than RNB. Conclusions: In the setting of similar pain management between groups and better functional outcomes for LIA, the use of minimally invasive procedures like LIA for pain control following THA is favorable.

Opioid alternatives in spine surgeries.

The escalating opioid crisis has intensified the need to explore alternative pain management strategies for patients undergoing spine surgery. This review is timely and relevant as it synthesizes recent research on opioid alternatives for perioperative management, assessing their efficacy, side effects, and postoperative outcomes. A systematic search was conducted to capture articles from the past 18 months that examined opioid-sparing strategies. Findings indicate that multimodal analgesia, incorporating nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, lidocaine, gabapentinoids, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists, dexmedetomidine, and emerging regional block techniques like the erector spinae block and TLIF (thoraco lumbar interfascial block), can significantly reduce opioid consumption without compromising pain relief. Additionally, these approaches reduce opioid-related side effects such as postoperative nausea, vomiting, and prolonged hospital stays. The use of multimodal analgesia aligns with current pain management guidelines and addresses public health concerns related to opioid misuse. While effective, these alternatives are not without side effects, and the ultimate outcome depends on balancing benefits and risks. Future research should focus on the long-term outcomes of opioid alternatives, their effectiveness across diverse populations, and further validation and optimization of these strategies.

Effect of pericapsular nerve group block on perioperative analgesia characteristics for hip fracture operations

Aims: Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a new regional analgesia technique that has recently been used for perioperative analgesia for hip fracture operations. The purpose of this research was to examine the perioperative analgesic characteristics of PENG block in patients who were going to undergo spinal anesthesia for a hip fracture procedure. Methods: The study was conducted as a prospective randomized controlled study between February 2021 and May 2021 after ethics committee approval. Patients with consent were included in the study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups (Group-I and Group-II). Patients in Group I underwent a PENG block with a 0.25% concentration of 20 cc bupivacaine in the preoperative waiting room 30 minutes before the operation. Afterward, spinal anesthesia was applied in the operating room. The patients in Group II received only spinal anesthesia. Preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded for both groups in the preoperative period. ECG, arterial blood pressure, pulse, and oxygen saturation measurements were performed in all patients preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively. Pulse, arterial blood pressure, oxygen saturation measurements, and VAS scores were recorded in the lateral decubitus position before and at the 5th minute after spinal anesthesia. In addition, the comfort of the anesthetist who will administer the spinal anesthesia during the application was questioned (0: poor, 1: moderate, 2: good, 3: very good). All patients 5 min after spinal anesthesia It remained in the lateral position for the duration. VAS scores were recorded during the postoperative phase at the 0th, 2nd, 8th, 16th, and 24th hours, along with the time of the first analgesic administration. The total amount of tramadol and paracetamol taken during the first 24 hours following surgery was noted. Results: Patients; gender, age, body weight, height, BMI, and ASA values were statistically similar (p &gt; 0.05). In comparisons between the groups; During position, postoperative 2nd, 8th, 16th, 24th hours, and their sum, VAS values were found to be statistically lower in Group-I (p &lt; 0.05). While it was found that the first analgesic administration time was statistically longer in Group-I patients (p &lt; 0.001), the amounts of paracetamol and tramadol consumed in the first 24 hours were found to be statistically lower (p &lt; 0.001). In addition, the comfort of the anesthetist during spinal anesthesia was found to be better in Group-I (p: 0.014). Conclusion: PENG block can be used effectively as a part of perioperative multimodal analgesia in hip fracture surgery. PENG can reduce the pain levels of patients with hip fractures as well as reduce the need for additional analgesia. It also increases the comfort of the anesthetist who will administer regional anesthesia.

A comparative study of adductor canal block with infiltration of the interspace between popliteal artery and the capsule of posterior knee or with periarticular infiltration after total knee arthroplasty

Background &amp; objective: Appropriate perioperative pain management, with multimodal analgesia regimens combining regional anesthesia and systemic analgesics, is crucial for optimum results in individuals undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We evaluated the efficacy of combined Adductor Canal Block (ACB) and infiltration in the interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) supplementing against ACB and Periarticular Infiltration (PAI) on postoperative pain scores, use of opioids, and early physical therapy in patients subjected to TKA under spinal anesthesia (SA). Methodology: In the current prospective, randomized, comparative clinical trial, 40 individuals undergoing TKA were arbitrarily distributed in two groups. Group A comprised of patients undergoing ultrasound-guided ACB plus IPACK block; Group B comprised of patients undergoing ACB plus PAI block at the beginning of the surgical procedure. Results: The ACB + IPACK group exhibited notably lower VAS scores (P &lt; 0.05) compared to the ACB plus PAI group. Group A consumed 67.5 ± 21.6 mg of pethidine over the first 48 h, while Group B consumed 87.5 ± 33.9 mg of pethidine. The range of movement of the knee and walking distance also revealed that the values were considerably higher in Group A compared to Group B. Conclusion: The utilization of both adductor canal block and the interspace between the popliteal artery and the knee capsule provides improved analgesia than adductor canal block and periarticular injection, while preserving the knee joint motor power in the postoperative period. Keywords: Adductor canal block; IPACK; Local anesthetic; Multimodal analgesia; Pain, Postoperative; Arthroplasty Citation: Hassan HA, Elzahaby HM, Elagamy AE, Rashed MM, Hussein MM. A comparative study of adductor canal block with infiltration of the interspace between popliteal artery and the capsule of posterior knee or with periarticular infiltration after total knee arthroplasty. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2024;28(4):620−625; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v28i4.2503 Received: February 10, 2024; Reviewed: March 13, 2024; Accepted: March 18, 2024

Comparison of postoperative analgesia effects between subcostal anterior quadratus lumborum block and transversus abdominis plane block in bariatric surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study

BackgroundCurrently, the prevalence of obesity is on the rise annually. Bariatric surgery stands out as the most efficacious approach for addressing obesity. Obese patients are more prone to experience moderate to severe pain after surgery due to lower pain thresholds. Regional block, as an important component of multimodal analgesia in bariatric surgery, is crucial in reducing opioid consumption and alleviating postoperative pain in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) has gained widespread utilization in bariatric surgery; however, its limitation of inadequate reduction of visceral pain in obese patients remains a significant concern. Therefore, it is imperative to explore new and more efficient strategies for analgesia. Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) has emerged as a popular nerve block in recent years, frequently utilized in conjunction with general anesthesia for abdominal surgery. In the cadaver study of QLB, it was confirmed that the dye level could reach up to T6 when using the subcostal anterior quadratus lumborum muscle approach, which could effectively reduce the incision pain and visceral pain of bariatric surgery patients during the perioperative period.However, there is currently a lack of research on the use of subcostal anterior QLB in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Our study aims to investigate whether subcostal anterior QLB can provide superior perioperative analgesic efficacy for bariatric surgery under general anesthesia compared to TAPB, leading to reduced postoperative opioid consumption and a lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).Methods and designThis study is a prospective, randomized controlled trial aiming to recruit 66 patients undergoing bariatric surgery. The participants will be randomly allocated into two groups in a 1:1 ratio: subcostal anterior QLB group (n = 33) and TAPB group (n = 33). The study aims to investigate the efficacy of subcostal anterior QLB and TAPB in obese patients who are scheduled to undergo bariatric surgery. Our primary outcome is to observe the amount of opioids used in the two groups 24 h after operation. The secondary outcomes included VAS of pain during rest/activity after operation, the type and dose of additional analgesics, the occurrence and severity of PONV, the type and dose of additional antiemetic drugs, postoperative anesthesia care unit (PACU) time, time of first postoperative exhaust, time to first out of bed activity, time to first liquid diet and postoperative admission days.DiscussionOpioid analgesics are prone to causing adverse reactions such as nausea, vomiting, and respiratory depression, especially in obese patients. Multimodal analgesia, including nerve block, can effectively reduce the dose of opioids and alleviate their adverse effects. Currently, TAPB is the most prevalent nerve block analgesia method for abdominal surgery. Recent studies have indicated that subcostal anterior QLB offers advantages over TAPB, including a wider block plane, faster onset, and longer maintenance time. It is not clear which of the two nerve block analgesia techniques is better for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Our objective in this investigation is to elucidate the superior method between TAPB and subcostal anterior QLB for postoperative pain management in bariatric surgery.Trial registrationChiCTR ChiCTR2300070556. Registered on 17 April 2023.

Development of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program in Ventral Hernia.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs have spread after initial success in colorectal surgery decreasing length of stay (LOS) and decreasing opioid consumption. Adoption of ERAS specifically for ventral hernia patients remains in evolution. This study presents the development and implementation of an ERAS pathway for ventral hernia. A multidisciplinary team met weekly over 6 months to develop an ERAS pathway specific to ventral hernia patients. 75 process components and outcome measures were included, spanning multiple phases of care: Preoperative-Clinic, Preoperative Day of Surgery (DOS), Intraoperative, and Postoperative. Preoperative components included education and physiologic optimization. Pain control across phases of care focuses on nonopioid, multimodal analgesia. Postoperatively, the pathway emphasizes early diet advancement, early mobilization, and minimization of IV fluids. We compared compliance and outcome measures between a Pre Go-Live (PGL) period (9/1/2020-8/30/2021) and After Go-live (AGL) period (5/12/2022-5/19/2023). There were 125 patients in the PGL group and 169 patients in the AGL group. Overall, ERAS compliance increased from 73.9% to 82.9% after implementation. Length of stay decreased from an average of 2.27days PGL to 1.92days AGL. Finally, the average daily postoperative opioid usage decreased from 25.4 to 13.5 MME after the implementation. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery can be successfully applied to the care of hernia patients with improvements in LOS and decreased opioid consumption. Institutional support and multidisciplinary cooperation were key for the development of such a program.

Anterior quadratus lumborum block for analgesia after living-donor renal transplantation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial

IntroductionLimited non-opioid analgesic options are available for managing postoperative pain after renal transplantation. We aimed to investigate whether the unilateral anterior quadratus lumborum (QL) block would reduce postoperative opioid consumption...

PEACE-HYPNO – Management of procedural pain by multimodal sedation analgesia combining hypnosis in children with congenital heart disease: A randomized trial of non-inferiority

PEACE-HYPNO – Management of procedural pain by multimodal sedation analgesia combining hypnosis in children with congenital heart disease: A randomized trial of non-inferiority

Outcomes after hip fracture surgery in patients receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs alone, acetaminophen alone, or both.

The use of multimodal non-opioid analgesia in hip fractures, specifically acetaminophen combined with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), has been increasing. However, the effectiveness and safety of this approach remain unclear. This study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes among patients with hip fractures who preoperatively received either acetaminophen combined with NSAIDs, NSAIDs alone, or acetaminophen alone. This nationwide retrospective cohort study used data from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. We included patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent surgery for hip fractures and received acetaminophen combined with NSAIDs (combination group), NSAIDs alone (NSAIDs group), or acetaminophen alone (acetaminophen group) preoperatively, between April 2010 and March 2022. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and complications. Secondary outcomes were opioid use postoperatively; readmission within 90 days, one year, and two years; and total hospitalization costs. We used propensity score overlap weighting models, with the acetaminophen group as the reference group. We identified 93,018 eligible patients, including 13,068 in the combination group, 29,203 in the NSAIDs group, and 50,474 in the acetaminophen group. Propensity score overlap weighting successfully balanced patient characteristics among the three groups, with no significant difference in in-hospital mortality rates observed among the groups (combination group risk difference 0.0% (95% CI -0.5 to 0.4%); NSAIDs group risk difference -0.2% (95% CI -0.5 to 0.2%)). However, the combination group exhibited a significantly lower risk of in-hospital complications than the acetaminophen group (risk difference -1.9% (95% CI -3.2 to -0.6%)) as well as a significantly lower risk of deep vein thrombosis (risk difference -1.4% (95% CI -2.2 to -0.7%)). Furthermore, total hospitalization costs were higher in the NSAIDs group than in the acetaminophen group (difference USD $438 (95% CI 249 to 630); p < 0.001). No significant differences in other secondary outcomes were observed among the three groups. The combination of acetaminophen with NSAIDs appears to be safe and advantageous in terms of reducing in-hospital complications.

Retrospective review of surgeon administered transversus abdominis plane blocks at emergency caesarean.

Effective analgesics with minimal side effects are imperative for patient and neonate wellbeing postpartum. Post-caesarean section ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks have proven safety and efficacy. Surgical TAP blocks appear effective and require little time and equipment. No previous examination of surgical TAP blocks in patients having undergone emergency caesarean section has been undertaken. To investigate surgical TAP block and multimodal analgesic use during emergency caesarean section, the effect on surgical time, post-operative analgesia use, and admission length. We performed a retrospective review of 250 patients who underwent emergency caesarean in 2022. Surgical TAP blocks were performed with 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine either side. Primary outcomes included surgical time, length of admission, time to first request of rescue opiate, opiate use in first post-operative 24 h, total dose used during admission, and opiates prescribed on discharge. Ninety-six patients received surgical TAP blocks, and 154 did not. There were no statistically significant differences in the primary outcomes. Subgroup analyses were performed in patients who did not receive intrathecal morphine, body mass index over 30 kg/m2, for patients whom this was their first caesarean, and for TAP blocks versus local infiltration to the wound. There were no significant differences in the primary outcomes in these subgroups. Surgical TAP blocks did not prolong surgical time or decrease post-operative analgesia use or admission length in patients having undergone emergency caesarean. Patient-tailored multimodal analgesia is encouraged, although more research is needed.

Opioid-free general anesthesia: considerations, techniques, and limitations.

To discuss the role of opioids during general anesthesia and examine their advantages and risks in the context of clinical practice. We define opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) as the absolute avoidance of intraoperative opioids. In most minimally invasive and short-duration procedures, nonopioid analgesics, analgesic adjuvants, and local/regional analgesia can significantly spare the amount of intraoperative opioid needed. OFA should be considered in the context of tailoring to a specific patient and procedure, not as a universal approach. Strategies considered for OFA involve several adjuncts with low therapeutic range, requiring continuous infusions and resources, with potential for delayed recovery or other side effects, including increased short-term and long-term pain. No evidence indicates that OFA leads to decreased long-term opioid-related harms. Complete avoidance of intraoperative opioids remains questionable, as it does not necessarily ensure avoidance of postoperative opioids. Multimodal analgesia including local/regional anesthesia may allow OFA for selected, minimally invasive surgeries, but further research is necessary in surgeries with high postoperative opioid requirements. Until there is definitive evidence regarding procedure and patient-specific combinations as well as the dose and duration of administration of adjunct agents, it is imperative to practice opioid-sparing approach in the intraoperative period.

Multimodal analgesic strategies in polytraumatized patients.

In recent years, the resuscitation of trauma patients has improved; however, pain related to trauma remains associated with systemic complications. In trauma patients, pain should be considered a vital sign, and its control is crucial for reducing complications, improving patient satisfaction, and enhancing the quality of life. The multimodal analgesia approach is the mainstay in pain control, and growing evidence in the literature supports a greater role of regional anesthesia in the management of trauma casualties. In this review, we offer the reader an updated general framework of the various approaches available for pain treatment in polytraumatized patients, with a focus on the opportunities presented by regional anesthesia. We will examine different types of locoregional anesthesia blocks and describe ultrasonographic execution techniques.

Comparative Bioavailability of a Novel Fixed-dose Combination Etoricoxib and Tramadol.

Multimodal analgesia is defined as using several drugs or techniques simultaneously to target different pain pathways or receptors to avoid pain propagation. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic profile and comparative bioavailability of etoricoxib 90mg and tramadol 50mg dosing alone (reference drugs) or in a novel fixed-dose combination (test drug) under fasting conditions in Mexican healthy volunteers. This was a randomized, open-label, 3-way, crossover, single-dose, prospective, and longitudinal study with a 14-day washout period. Eligible subjects were healthy Mexican adult volunteers. The drugs were dosing orally, according to the randomization sequence, after 10hours of fasting and 4hours before breakfast with 250mL of water at room temperature. Serial blood samples were collected before and after dosing, both drugs were quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. Forty-two subjects were enrolled and 38 completed the study (28 men and 14 women, mean age 25.2years, mean weight 66.6kg). Test products were considered to have comparative bioavailability if confidence intervals of natural log-transformed for (maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax), (area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve form 0 up to last sampling time (AUC0-t), and (area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve from 0 up to infinity (AUC0-∞) data were within the range of 80%-125%. Non-serious adverse events were observed. The results demonstrate that the pharmacokinetic profile and bioavailability of the etoricoxib/tramadol fixed-dose combination are comparable to those of the reference products.

Optimizing patient-controlled analgesia: a narrative review based on a single center audit process.

Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is valuable for delivering opioids in a flexible and timely manner. Although it is designed to offer personalized analgesia driven by the patients themselves, users often report insufficient pain relief, which can be addressed by optimizing its settings and multimodal analgesia. We adopted a systematic approach to modify PCA protocols by utilizing a serial audit process based on institutional PCA data. This review retrospectively examined the process, encompassing data from 13,230 patients who had used PCA devices. The two modifications to the fentanyl-based PCA protocols resulted in three distinct phases. In the first phase, high opioid consumption and unintended PCA withdrawal were the common issues. These were addressed in the second phase by omitting the routine use of basal infusion. However, this led to increased delivery-to-demand ratios, mitigated in the third phase by increasing the bolus dose from 15 μg to 20 μg. These serial protocol changes have produced varied outcomes across different surgical departments, underscoring the need for careful and gradual adjustments and thorough impact assessments. Drawing insights from this audit process, we incorporated findings from the literature on PCA settings and multimodal analgesic approaches. This review underscores the significance of iterative feedback and refinement of analgesic protocols to achieve optimal postoperative pain management. Additionally, it discusses critical considerations regarding the postoperative audit processes.

Effects of Local Wound Infiltration Post-Mastectomy Using Bupivacaine Alone, Bupivacaine With Ketamine, and Bupivacaine With Dexmedetomidine: A Randomized Double-Blind Study.

Background and aim While the infiltration of surgical incisions with local anesthetics is not a new practice, it remains a crucial component of contemporary multimodal analgesia protocols. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using adjuvants in combination with local anesthetic wound infiltration for pain management in patients undergoing mastectomy surgery. Methods Eighty-one patients aged 18-60 years, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I or II, were scheduled for unilateral mastectomy and randomly assigned to three groups of 27 each. The groups were designated as Group C (bupivacaine alone), Group D (bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine), and Group K (bupivacaine with ketamine). Group C received 0.25% bupivacaine alone, Group D received 0.25% bupivacaine with 1 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine, and Group K received 0.25% bupivacaine with 1 mg/kg ketamine. The time to achieve a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of 3 following local wound infiltration was recorded for each group. Additionally, total postoperative fentanyl intake during the first 24 hours, as measured by the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump, was compared among the groups. Sedation levels were assessed using the Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS). Data were analyzed using the Chi-Square test and one-way ANOVA in IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 28.0 (Released 2021; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results Demographic factors were similar across the three groups. Analysis of the VAS scores revealed that the ketamine group provided better postoperative pain control than the dexmedetomidine group (p < 0.001). Groups D (71.72 ± 71.73) and K (3.53 ± 13.42) had significantly lower 24-hour fentanyl intake (in mcg) compared to Group C (the control group), as measured by PCA. Additionally, Group C had a significantly lower RSS at the sixth hour (p = 0.003) compared to both Groups D and K. Conclusion Ketamine, when used as an adjuvant to bupivacaine for local infiltration, enhances the effectiveness and prolongs postoperative analgesia more effectively than dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing mastectomy.

Short-Term Celecoxib Promotes Bone Formation without Compromising Cefazolin Efficacy in an Early Orthopaedic Device-Related Infection: Evidence from a Rat Model.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are crucial components of multimodal analgesia for musculoskeletal injuries, targeting cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes (COX-1 and/or COX-2 isoenzymes). Concerns exist regarding their potential interference with bone healing and orthopaedic device-related infections (ODRI), where data are limited. This study aimed to investigate whether the COX-selectivity of NSAIDs interfered with antibiotic efficacy and bone changes in the setting of an ODRI. In vitro testing demonstrated that combining celecoxib (a COX-2 inhibitor) with cefazolin significantly enhanced antibacterial efficacy compared to cefazolin alone (p < 0.0001). In vivo experiments were performed using Staphylococcus epidermidis in the rat proximal tibia of an ODRI model. Long and short durations of celecoxib treatment in combination with antibiotics were compared to a control group receiving an antibiotic only. The long celecoxib treatment group showed impaired infection clearance, while the short celecoxib treatment showed increased bone formation (day 6, p < 0.0001), lower bone resorption (day 6, p < 0.0001), and lower osteolysis (day 6, BV/TV: p < 0.0001; BIC: p = 0.0005) compared to the control group, without impairing antibiotic efficacy (p > 0.9999). Given the use of NSAIDs as part of multimodal analgesia, and considering these findings, short-term use of COX-2 selective NSAIDs like celecoxib not only aids pain management but also promotes favorable bone changes during ODRI.

Preoperative Bilateral External Oblique Intercostal Plus Rectus Sheath Block for Postoperative Pain Management Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Noninferior Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial.

The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has proven efficacy and is an important component of multimodal analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The external oblique intercostal (EOI) block can provide a dermatomal sensory blockade of T6 to T10 using an anterior axillary line injection. The bilateral rectus sheath (RS) block can significantly reduce early postoperative pain caused by umbilical or periumbilical incisions. The current study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacies of ultrasound-guided subcostal TAP (UG-TAP) combined with the RS block and ultrasound-guided EOI (UG-EOI) combined with the RS block for LC. Patients were randomly assigned to TAP or EOI group. Patients in TAP group received UG-TAP combined with an RS block. Patients in EOI group received UG-EOI combined with an RS block. The primary outcome was postoperative 24-hour sufentanil consumption. A total of 49 patients were included in the final analysis. The postoperative 24-hour sufentanil consumption in the EOI group was significantly lower than that in the TAP group (9.79±10.22 vs. 18.67±12.58µg; P [noninferiority] <0.01; noninferiority confirmed). Fewer patients in the EOI versus TAP group had a numerical rating score of >3 during motion. Furthermore, the mean postoperative 48-hour sufentanil consumption was lower in the EOI versus TAP group (11.54±11.70 vs. 23.04±17.10µg; P =0.01). The mean postoperative 24-hour Quality of Recovery-15 score was higher in the EOI versus TAP group (135.21±4.40 vs. 131.91±5.11; P =0.02). These findings suggest that UG-EOI combined with an RS block was superior to UG-TAP combined with an RS block for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing LC.

Efficacy and Safety of Extended-Release Dinalbuphine Sebacate for Postoperative Analgesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract Background Multimodal analgesia, which combines multiple medications with different analgesic mechanisms, is recommended for optimizing postoperative pain control and minimizing opioid-related side effects. Dinalbuphine sebacate (DNS), a prodrug of nalbuphine, has a 7-day long-acting analgesic effect on moderate to severe postoperative pain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze the efficacy and safety of dinalbuphine sebacate for postoperative pain management. Materials and Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of DNS for postoperative analgesia. We assessed the quality of all included studies using the risk-of-bias tool. The primary outcome was postoperative pain score, and the secondary outcomes included analgesic consumption, need for rescue analgesics, adverse events, and length of hospital stay. A meta-analysis was performed for the pooled data, and the level of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Results We included five RCTs with 497 patients who underwent surgery. Compared with the control group, DNS significantly reduced the visual analog scale (VAS) through postoperative 48 hours {mean difference (MD) -37.54 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -70.47, -4.62)} to 7 days [MD -165.99 (95% CI: -231.44)], and decreased the requirement for rescue analgesics [RR 0.89 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.97)]. No significant difference was noted in VAS scores within postoperative 24 hours [MD -10.13 (95% CI: -30.11, 9.85)] or in total analgesic consumption. Patients receiving DNS had a higher risk of dizziness and injection site reactions, without an increased occurrence of other adverse events. Conclusions With a low-to-moderate level of evidence, intramuscular DNS provides long-lasting analgesia from postoperative 48 hours to 7 days and may reduce the requirement for postoperative rescue analgesics. However, DNS does not offer additional pain relief within the first 24 hours postoperatively. Further high-quality studies are warranted. International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registry: identifier: CRD42023494130

Comparison of opioid-free and opioid-inclusive propofol anaesthesia for thyroid and parathyroid surgery: arandomised controlled trial.

Postoperative nausea and vomiting occur frequently following thyroid and parathyroid surgery and are associated with worse patient outcomes. We hypothesised that opioid-free propofol anaesthesia would reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting compared with opioid-inclusive propofol anaesthesia in patients undergoing these procedures. We conducted a randomised, double-blinded controlled trial in adult patients scheduled to undergo thyroid and parathyroid surgery at two medical centres in mainland China. Patients were allocated randomly (1:1, stratified by sex and trial site) to an opioid-free anaesthesia group (esketamine, lidocaine, dexmedetomidine and propofol) or an opioid-inclusive group (sufentanil and propofol). Propofol infusions were titrated to bispectral index 45-55. Patients received prophylaxis for nausea and vomiting using dexamethasone and ondansetron and multimodal analgesia with paracetamol and flurbiprofen axetil. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the first 48 h after surgery. We assessed 557 patients for eligibility and 394 completed this trial. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the first postoperative 48 h was lower in the opioid-free anaesthesia group (10/197, 5%) compared with opioid-inclusive group (47/197, 24%) (OR (95%CI) 0.17 (0.08-0.35), p < 0.001), yielding a number needed to treat of 5.3. Additionally, opioid-free propofol anaesthesia was associated with a reduced need for rescue anti-emetics, lower rates of hypotension and desaturation after tracheal extubation, and higher patient satisfaction. Time to tracheal extubation was prolonged slightly in the opioid-free group. The two groups had similar postoperative pain scores and 30-day outcomes. Opioid-free propofol anaesthesia reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing thyroid and parathyroid surgery. An opioid-free anaesthetic regimen can optimise anaesthetic care during thyroid and parathyroid surgery.

The effect of bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block on postoperative pain control in idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spine fusion surgery: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundPosterior spinal fusion (PSF) for the correction of idiopathic scoliosis is associated with severe postoperative pain. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been proposed to provide analgesia and reduce opioid consumption. We aimed to investigate the effect of bilateral ultrasound-guided single-shot ESPB on postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing PSF.MethodsThis double-blinded, randomized controlled trial will enroll 74 AIS patients undergoing elective PSF. Participants will be assigned to the ESPB group or control group at a 1:1 ratio. Patients in the ESPB group will receive ultrasound-guided bilateral ESPB preoperatively, and patients in the control group received sham ESPB using normal saline. The primary joint endpoints are the area under the curve (AUC) of numerical rating scale (NRS) score and opioid consumption in postoperative 24 h. The secondary endpoints are numerical rating scale (NRS) score and opioid consumption at postoperative 0.5, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h, rescue analgesia, recovery outcomes, and adverse events.DiscussionAt present, studies investigating the effect of ESPB on pediatric patients are still needed. This study focuses on the effect of ESPB on pediatric patients undergoing PSF on postoperative pain control and intends to provide a new strategy of multimodal analgesia management for major spine surgery.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300074505. Registered on August 8, 2023.