Multimodal Analgesia Research Articles

OGC SO08 - Optimising Analgesia in Sub-total Oesophagectomy: A Dose of Success

Abstract Background Sub-total oesophagectomy (STO) is a complex and major surgery with significant associated burdens for our patients. Our centre in North-East England completes 70-80 STOs annually. In the peri-operative period, good analgesia management and delivery is key. Analgesia strategy has evolved across the UK over the past decade, influenced by multi-modal analgesia, progressing surgical approaches towards minimally invasive operations alongside the ongoing drive for enhanced recovery programmes endorsing early mobilisation. Surgical approach in our patient cohort now comprises a combination of Open-Open, combined Open-Minimally invasive and entirely minimally invasive techniques. Our analgesia strategy combines single shot intrathecal diamorphine and regional anaesthesia. Method We engaged our multi-professional (Acute Pain Specialist Nurses, Anaesthesia Consultants and Surgical Consultants) team in a PDSA cycle. A guidance analgesia package was agreed after review of retrospective cases. This package was delivered to our baseline group of 10 patients. We used subjective patient reported abdominal and thorax pain scores on a 0-10 scale, recorded by our pain team each day for post-operative days 1-5. Following analysis, we implemented a single change to Intrathecal diamorphine dosing - changing from uniform delivery of 1000micrograms intrathecal diamorphine to a dose calculated on Ideal Body Weight of 15-20micrograms/kg up to 1500micrograms maximum dose Results Our baseline group of 10 patients all received 1000micrograms of intrathecal diamorphine - mean dose 15.9mcg/kg. Our intervention group of 12 patients received doses based upon their ideal body weight - mean dose 18.9mcg/kg. Overall, there was a trend of reduced pain scores following our intervention. Thoracic reported overall pain scores were significantly lower (p=0.04) following the intervention. No significant difference was demonstrated specifically in the first 24 or 48hours in overall, abdominal or thoracic pain scores. Importantly, there were no reported adverse events related to our higher dosing regime and no recorded side effects such as pruritis or nausea. Conclusion There is little evidence with regards the use of higher dose intrathecal diamorphine in the literature. The sample sizes in our groups are small but overall reduction in patient reported pain scores appear to be associated with use of the higher dose of intrathecal diamorphine, based upon ideal body weight and importantly without any adverse effect. Continued evolution of our analgesia strategies is essential alongside that of surgical techniques. The next iterations of our guidance and PDSA cycle will consider our regional techniques to identify if further advances can be made.

Complication Rates After Ultrasonography-Guided Nerve Blocks Performed in the Emergency Department

ImportanceUltrasonography-guided nerve blocks (UGNBs) have become a core component of multimodal analgesia for acute pain management in the emergency department (ED). Despite their growing use, national adoption of UGNBs has been slow due to a lack of procedural safety in the ED.ObjectiveTo assess the complication rates and patient pain scores of UGNBs performed in the ED.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study included data from the National Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Block Registry, a retrospective multicenter observational registry encompassing procedures performed in 11 EDs in the US from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023, of adult patients who underwent a UGNB.ExposureUGNB encounters.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome of this study was complication rates associated with ED-performed UGNBs recorded in the National Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Block Registry from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023. The secondary outcome was patient pain scores of ED-based UGNBs. Data for all adult patients who underwent an ED-based UGNB at each site were recorded. The volume of UGNB at each site, as well as procedural outcomes (including complications), were recorded. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics of all variables.ResultsIn total, 2735 UGNB encounters among adult patients (median age, 62 years [IQR, 41-77 years]; 51.6% male) across 11 EDs nationwide were analyzed. Fascia iliaca blocks were the most commonly performed UGNBs (975 of 2742 blocks [35.6%]). Complications occurred at a rate of 0.4% (10 of 2735 blocks). One episode of local anesthetic systemic toxicity requiring an intralipid was reported. Overall, 1320 of 1864 patients (70.8%) experienced 51% to 100% pain relief following UGNBs. Operator training level varied, although 1953 of 2733 procedures (71.5%) were performed by resident physicians.Conclusions and RelevanceThe findings of this cohort study of 2735 UGNB encounters support the safety of UGNBs in ED settings and suggest an association with improvement in patient pain scores. Broader implementation of UGNBs in ED settings may have important implications as key elements of multimodal analgesia strategies to reduce opioid use and improve patient care.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols: Advancements and Implementation Challenges

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are a set of evidence-based guidelines designed to improve surgical outcomes by optimizing perioperative care. This approach integrates multidisciplinary strategies to reduce postoperative complications, shorten hospital stays, and enhance overall patient recovery. This article provides a comprehensive review of the advancements in ERAS protocols, including multimodal analgesia, optimized fluid management, early mobilization, and postoperative care. It also addresses the implementation challenges faced by healthcare systems, such as variability in adherence, resource constraints, and the need for interdisciplinary collaboration. By examining current evidence and real-world applications, this article highlights the potential benefits and obstacles of ERAS protocols, offering insights for future improvements and wider adoption.

Perioperative Management of Opioid-Tolerant Patients: A Comprehensive Guide

The perioperative management of opioid-tolerant patients presents significant challenges, necessitating a tailored approach to pain management and the prevention of opioid-related complications. This review discusses the essential aspects of preoperative assessment, intraoperative strategies, and postoperative care for opioid-tolerant patients. Emphasis is placed on the continuation of baseline opioid therapy, the use of multimodal analgesia, and the importance of individualized opioid dosing to achieve effective pain control while minimizing the risk of withdrawal, respiratory depression, and opioid-induced hyperalgesia. The role of a multidisciplinary team in optimizing patient outcomes and the necessity of thorough discharge planning and follow-up are also highlighted. By addressing these critical factors, healthcare providers can ensure safe and effective perioperative care for opioid-tolerant patients.

Comparative Efficacy of Postoperative Pain Management Techniques Following Costal Cartilage Harvest: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Abstract Background Efficient pain control is essential in reconstructive surgeries, particularly in procedures involving the harvest of costal cartilage. This study examines and compares different pain relief treatments using a network meta-analysis (NMA) to determine the most effective techniques for managing pain. Methods We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) by scanning several databases such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and Weipu till March 18, 2024. The review analyzed randomized controlled trials and observational studies that evaluated the effectiveness of local anesthetics and multimodal analgesia techniques in treating postoperative pain following costal cartilage harvest. Primary outcomes were pain scores at 6-, 12-, 24-, and 48-h post-surgery, while secondary outcomes included the need for rescue analgesia and opioid-related adverse effects. Results Fourteen studies involving 935 participants were included. The analysis revealed that multimodal strategies, particularly ‘Methylene Blue and Ropivacaine Intercostal Nerve Block (MB & Ropivacaine ICNB) combined with Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA),’ were the most effective techniques to reduce pain scores across 6, 24, and 48-h time points. “Pre-operation SAPB & PSB + PCA” was most effective in reducing pain score at 12h and significantly decreased the need for rescue analgesia and opioid-related adverse effects. In contrast, traditional ICNB with single drug consistently showed the least efficacy. Conclusion The results of our study strongly support the use of multimodal analgesic techniques instead of typical single medication ICNB for managing postoperative pain after costal cartilage harvest. These strategies not only provide superior pain control but also contribute to reducing the dependency on opioids, aligning with current clinical priorities to enhance recovery and minimize opioid-related risks. No Level Assigned This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

The effects of multimodal versus opioid-only analgesia on pain control and opioid exposure for inpatient acute pancreatitis: A retrospective cohort study

Abstract Disclaimer In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. Purpose Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common gastrointestinal condition that carries a significant financial and physical burden for patients due to the painful presentation and frequent need for hospitalization. Treatment varies in the type and route of analgesic used. Unmanaged pain can lead to worsening health outcomes and prolonged admissions. Further research is needed to understand current practices for managing AP. Methods This study was a retrospective, exploratory, single-center cohort study. Patients admitted to an internal medicine unit with AP from September 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021, were included. Our primary outcome was the change in pain scores during the first 24-hours after administration of the first pain-relieving medication. Secondary outcomes included change in pain scores within the first 12-hours, time to oral tolerance, characterization of analgesic orders, comparison of median pain scores by home analgesic usage, and specific inpatient opioid use. Results One hundred sixty-nine patients were screened, and 94 were included in the study. Forty-four patients were assigned to the multimodal cohort and 50 patients to the opioid-only cohort. Changes in pain scores per unit of time, assessed by a mixed-effects model, within the first 24 hours were –0.080 (SE, 0.018) in the multimodal cohort and –0.090 (SE, 0.014) in the opioid-only cohort (P = 0.780). Morphine milligram equivalents (MME) administered in the multimodal and opioid-only cohorts were 24.50 (interquartile range [IQR], 51.75) and 52.5 (IQR, 68.5) (P = 0.001), respectively. Conclusion There was no significant difference in the change in pain scores between patients receiving multimodal therapy and those receiving opioids only. Significantly fewer MME were administered in the multimodal group, suggesting that multimodal therapy can be opioid-sparing in AP.

Pericapsular nerve group block reduces opioid use and pain after hip surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

While the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block has become increasingly popular for managing pain after hip surgery, its efficacy remains controversial. We systematically searched Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials to assess current evidence about the efficacy of the PENG block. Patients who received PENG block were compared to those who received sham/no block in terms of opioid consumption and pain within 24h after surgery, time to first opioid requirement, functional recovery, risk of nausea and vomiting, and patient dissatisfaction. The quality of evidence was assessed using the "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation" (GRADE) system. We meta-analyzed six trials involving 416 patients who received preoperative PENG block and 415 who received sham/no block. Patients did not receive any other type of multimodal analgesia. Within 24 h after hip surgery, PENG block significantly reduced postoperative opioid consumption (MD = -12.03, 95% CI: -21.47 to -2.59, P < 0.01, I2 = 97%), particularly in subpopulations undergoing hip replacement, hip fracture, or who had spinal anesthesia, and it significantly decreased dynamic pain scores, but not static scores, without increasing risk of nausea or vomiting or patient dissatisfaction. Individual studies suggested that the PENG block can prolong the time to the first opioid requirement and can improve functional recovery. Most meta-analyses provided evidence of moderate quality according to the GRADE system. The available evidence indicates that preoperative PENG block can significantly decrease opioid consumption and pain early after hip surgery, and it may also promote early functional rehabilitation. However, the limited number of included studies and sample size make it difficult to draw firm conclusions. The decision on whether to apply the PENG block should take into account the patient's age and the type of surgery and anesthesia.

Metamizole (dipyrone) for multimodal analgesia in postoperative pain in adults

Metamizole (dipyrone) for multimodal analgesia in postoperative pain in adults

The efficacy and safety of ketorolac for postoperative pain management in lumbar spine surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Ketorolac is widely utilized for postoperative pain management, including back pain after lumbar spinal surgery. Several trials have assessed the efficacy of Ketorolac alone and in combination with other analgesics such as bupivacaine, morphine, epinephrine, paracetamol, and pregabalin. However, the effects and safety profile of ketorolac in these contexts remain controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ketorolac administration, both as a monotherapy and in combination with other analgesics, for managing postoperative pain in adults undergoing lumbar spinal surgery. We searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, EBSCO, CNKI, WanFang, VIP, and Cochrane library databases through July 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the analgesic efficacy of Ketorolac administration for postoperative pain of lumbar surgery. The meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statements. Data were extracted and analyzed using open-source meta-analysis software OpenMeta-Analyst, focusing on outcomes such as VAS pain scores, postoperative morphine requirements (PMR), length of hospital stay (LOS), and adverse effects, such as nausea, vomiting, pruritus, and constipation. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Jada scale. Thirteen RCTs comprising a total of 938 patients were included. The methodological quality of the studies was high, with three studies scoring 5, six studies scoring 4, and four studies scoring 3 on the Jadad scale. Ketorolac significantly reduced pain compared to controls at 0-6h, with a mean difference (MD) of - 1.42 (95% CI: - 2.03 to - 0.80; P < 0.0001), exceeding the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of 1.2 to 2.0 points on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), indicating clinically meaningful pain relief. During the 6-12-h period, the pain reduction was significant (MD = - 0.58; 95% CI: - 0.80 to - 0.35; P < 0.0001), though below the MCID threshold. In the 12-24-h period, Ketorolac continued to show significant pain reduction (MD = - 0.48; 95% CI: - 0.68 to - 0.28; P < 0.0001), but this reduction was also below the MCID. Heterogeneity was low in the 12-24-h period (I2 = 13%), indicating consistent results across studies. There was a significant reduction in PMR (SMD = - 1.83; 95% CI = - 3.42 to - 0.23; P < 0.0001), although with considerable heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 93%, heterogeneity P < 0.01). Ketorolac administration also significantly reduced the LOS compared to controls (MD = - 0.45days; 95% CI = - 0.74 to - 0.16; P = 0.0001), though this reduction, which is less than a full day (0.45days), may have limited clinical significance. The findings suggest that Ketorolac effectively reduces pain and opioid use postoperatively, supporting its role in multimodal analgesia for lumbar spinal surgery. The significant reduction in PMR indicates a beneficial opioid-sparing effect, crucial in the context of reducing opioid-related complications. The observed reduction in LOS, while statistically significant, may not translate into substantial clinical benefit due to its limited magnitude. No significant increase in common adverse effects was noted, indicating Ketorolac's safety profile. Ketorolac administration, either alone or in combination with other analgesics, effectively reduces postoperative pain and opioid consumption in adults following lumbar spinal surgery. And Ketorolac did not significantly increase the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting relative to other analgesics or placebos. While it also decreases LOS, the clinical relevance of this reduction is modest. However, the variability in study designs, dosages, and combination therapies contribute to significant heterogeneity in outcomes. Future research should focus on standardizing protocols and exploring optimal dosing strategies. Additionally, long-term safety and effectiveness studies are needed to better understand Ketorolac's role in postoperative pain management.

Comparative study between effect of preoperative multimodal analgesia and pregabalin as unimodal analgesia in reduction of postoperative opioids consumption and postoperative pain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BackgroundLaparoscopic cholecystectomy is a popular abdominal surgery and the most common problem for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the postoperative pain, and associated side effects due to opioids use for pain management and multimodal analgesia is suggested to reduce postoperative pain and need for postoperative opioids. This controlled clinical trial compares the effects of multimodal analgesia and pregabalin as unimodal analgesia on postoperative pain management, postoperative opioids consumption, and reduction of opioids accompanied adverse effects in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy where large multicenter studies evaluating specific analgesic combinations are lacking.MethodThis comparison randomized controlled trial between multimodal analgesia approach and pregabalin as unimodal analgesia included 95 laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients that were randomly allocated to three groups using a simple randomization method where multimodal and pregabalin groups included 30 patients in each and the drugs was administered orally one hour before the incision and control group included 35 patients that did not receive any preoperative analgesia. Multimodal analgesic therapy included acetaminophen 1 g, pregabalin 150 mg and celecoxib 400 mg while pregabalin group received pregabalin 150 mg only.ResultsMultimodal group showed a significantly lower need for total opioid analgesics mean ± SD (1.33 ± 1.918) as compared to the control group mean ± SD (3.31 ± 2.784) with p-value 0.014. Pregabalin and multimodal groups showed significantly lower postoperative visual analogue scale used for pain assessment mean ± SD (3.50 ± 2.543) and mean ± SD (3.70 ± 2.231), respectively, compared to the control group mean ± SD (5.89 ± 2.857) with p-value 0.001.ConclusionMultimodal analgesia reduced postoperative opioids consumption more than pregabalin alone when used preoperatively in laparoscopic cholecystectomy and consequently reduced opioids associated adverse effects, but they have the same efficacy in reducing postoperative pain, so pregabalin can be used alone preoperatively in patients with contraindications for using some analgesics included in multimodal analgesia protocol. The study was registered retrospectively in clinical trials; Trial registration ID: NCT05547659.

Effect of perioperative single dose intravenous vitamin C on pain after total hip arthroplasty

IntroductionVitamin c can relieve the pain after other diseases, but there are no studies on whether vitamin C can relieve the pain after hip replacement. The purpose of this paper is to study whether vitamin C can relieve the pain after total hip replacement.PurposeIn this prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial, 100 patients receiving THA at our hospital were randomly assigned to vitamin c or control groups. During the operation, the vitamin C group will receive intravenous injection of 3 g vitamin C, and the control group will receive 3 g placebo. If the patient has postoperative pain, 10 ml subcutaneous injection of morphine will be required as a rescue analgesic. The primary outcome was the amount of postoperative injection of morphine as a rescue analgesic and expression of inflammatory factors, and the secondary outcome was postoperative pain and hip recovery as assessed by visual analog scale (VAS).ResultsThe dosage of subcutaneous injection of morphine was significantly reduced in vitamin C group. VAS pain scores at rest and exercise were lower in the vitamin C group 24 h after surgery, and hip motion was better 24 h after surgery, but there was no significant difference between the two groups 24 h after surgery.Nonetheless, the overall changes in morphine usage and VAS scores did not surpass the established minimal clinically important differences (10 mg for morphine consumption; 1.5 at rest and 1.8 during movement for VAS scores).ConclusionAdding intravenous vitamin c to multimodal analgesia significantly improved morphine consumption, VAS pain score, and functional recovery. However, it is recommended that single intravenous administration of vitamin C during the perioperative period may achieve better pain relief for patients after THA.

The effect of sacral erector spinae plane block on the quality of recovery after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study.

Total hip arthroplasty, commonly performed to alleviate hip pain and enhance functionality in elderly patients, requires effective postoperative pain management to reduce opioid consumption and its associated side effects. A novel regional anaesthesia technique, the sacral erector spinae plane block, has the potential to enhance the quality of postoperative recovery significantly. This prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter study investigated the effects of the sacral erector spinae plane block on recovery quality in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. The study comprised 50 patients, divided into Group S (patients receiving patients receiving sacral erector spinae plane block [S-ESPB]) and Group C (patients getting just multimodal analgesia). The primary outcome measured was the Quality of Recovery-15 score 24 hours post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative numerical rating scale scores (A score of 0 indicates no pain, while 10 indicates the most severe pain), total consumption of rescue analgesics, time to first rescue analgesic administration, patient satisfaction, time to first ambulation, the occurrence of complications, and the need for antiemetics. Group S had markedly higher quality of recovery-15 scores compared to Group C (Group S: median 117 percentiles [97-121]; Group C: median 89 percentiles [75-96]; P<0.001). Group S scored higher in postoperative pain, physical comfort, support, emotional state, and general quality of recovery-15 (P<0.001). Nevertheless, the physical independence category ratings were comparable across both groups (P=0.286). Sacral erector spinae plane block is a promising analgesic technique that enhances postoperative recovery and patient comfort in total hip arthroplasty.

Effect of individualized anesthesia and analgesia on postoperative pain in patients stratified for pain sensitivity: A study protocol for the PeriOPerative individualization trial randomized controlled trial.

Despite advancements in surgical and anesthesia techniques, acute and persistent postoperative pain are still a common challenge. Postoperative pain has direct effects on individual patient care and outcome, as well as putting strain on limited health care resources. Several prediction methods for postoperative pain have been described. One such method is the assessment of pain during peripheral venous cannulation (VCP). It is not known if different approaches to anesthesia and analgesia, depending on the evaluation of risk for postoperative pain, can improve outcome. The aim of this study is to evaluate if individualized anesthesia and analgesia can affect postoperative pain and recovery after surgery, in patients stratified by VCP. Adult patients scheduled for laparoscopic surgery undergo pain-sensitivity stratification using VCP on the day of surgery. Patients scoring VCP ≥2.0 on the visual analogue scale (pain-sensitive) are randomized to multimodal anaesthesia and analgesia with opioids or standard of care. Patients scoring VCP ≤1.9 (pain-tolerant) are randomized to opioid-free anaesthesia or standard of care. The primary outcome is acute postoperative pain measured with numeric rating scale in the postoperative care unit. Secondary outcomes include analysis of pain after 24 h, persistent postoperative pain and quality of recovery. Individualized perioperative pain management has the potential to improve patient care. This study will examine the impact of different anesthesia and analgesia regimes, in patients with differing pain sensitivity, on postoperative pain. Prospectively posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04751812.

Intraoperative Methadone in Spine Surgery ERAS Protocols: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Systematic review. To systematically review the use of intraoperative methadone in spine surgery and examine its effects on postoperative opioid use, pain, length of stay, and operative time. Spine surgery patients commonly have a history of chronic pain and opioid use, and as a result, they are at an increased risk of severe postoperative pain. While pure mu opioids remain the standard for acute surgical pain management, they are associated with significant short-term and long-term adverse events. Methadone presents an alternative to pure mu opioids which may improve postoperative management of pain following intraoperative use. A systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases was conducted to review existing literature detailing operating time, postoperative pain, opioid usage, and hospital length of stay (LOS) following intraoperative methadone administration in spine surgery. Following screening of 994 articles and application of inclusion criteria, 8 articles were included, 4 of which were retrospective. Conventional spine surgery intraoperative analgesic strategies used as comparators for intraoperative methadone included hydromorphone, ketamine, and sufentanil. Considering patient outcomes, included studies observed that patients treated with intraoperative methadone had statistically similar or significantly reduced pain scores, opioid usage, and LOS compared with comparator analgesics. However, one study observed that intraoperative methadone used in a multimodal analgesia regimen strategy with ketamine resulted in a shortened LOS compared with the use of intraoperative methadone alone. Differences in operating time between cases that used intraoperative methadone and cases that used comparator analgesics were not statistically significant among included studies. Methadone may present an alternative option for both intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in spine surgery recovery protocols and may reduce postoperative pain, opioid use, and LOS while maintaining consistent operating time and reduced side effects of pure mu opioids. Level II.

No benefit from the addition of low-dose ketamine infusion to standard evidence-based care of patients with multiple rib fractures.

Multiple rib fractures from blunt thoracic trauma cause significant morbidity. Optimal current management includes multimodal analgesia, pulmonary hygiene, and early mobilization. Low-dose ketamine infusion (LDKI) has been proposed as an adjunctive analgesic in this setting. A prior study reported decreased pain scores with LDKI in patients with multiple rib fractures. We hypothesized that LDKI would decrease morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) in patients with multiple rib fractures. A prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial was performed in adult (18 years or older) patients with three or more rib fractures. A prestudy power analysis calculated an 80% chance of identifying a 15% decrease in MMEs with 50 subjects. The study was approved by the institutional review board and informed consent obtained in all subjects. Demographic (age, sex) and injury specific information (Injury Severity Score, number of rib fractures) were obtained. Subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive continuous LDKI (0.1 mg/kg/h) or placebo infusion (0.9% NaCl) for ≤48 hours. All patients received a standard evidence-based multidisciplinary protocol for rib fractures management. Primary outcome measure was MME use or pulmonary complications. Statistical comparison of LDKI versus placebo was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. All 50 enrolled subjects (placebo, 25; LDKI, 25) received study drug infusion. The two groups were well matched for age, Injury Severity Score, and number of rib fractures. We observed no differences in the Day 1 (p = 0.961), Day 2 (p = 0.373), or total MMEs (p = 0.946) between groups. Similar total MME use was observed when subjects who received ≥40 hours of study drug and were compared (p = 0.924). Use of LDKI did not alter subsequent need for opiate analgesics postinfusion, hospital length of stay, pulmonary complications, or need for readmission. The addition of LDKI to an established multimodal, evidence-based protocol for management of multiple rib fractures did not decrease opiate usage or impact pulmonary complications. Therapeutic/Care Managaement; Level I.

Evaluation of postoperative pain on Transversus Abdominis Plane block and Erector Spinae Plane block in patients undergoing gynecological surgery: a prospective, comparative study

INTRODUCTION: Moderate to severe pain after gynecological surgery has an impact on postoperative recovery and mobilization. Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block and Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block have been used as multimodal analgesia for abdominal surgery. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare postoperative pain in patients undergoing either ESP blocks or TAP blocks, and the need for postoperative morphine in patients undergoing gynecological surgery.MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective, double-arm, comparative study. Forty subjects were enrolled in this study, and classified into two groups. One group of 20 subjects underwent ESP block, and the remaining 20 subjects underwent TAP block following a gynecologic surgical procedure. Patients were then assessed using with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score which will be observed at intervals of 0–1 hour, 1–6 hours, 6–12 hours, and 12–24 hours. Numerical data analysis was done using an unpaired T-test on normally distributed data and the Mann-Whitney test on non-normally distributed data. Categorical data analysis was done using Fisher's Exact Test. RESULTS: NRS score at rest was higher in the TAP block group at 1–6 hours and 6–12 hours (pain scale 3) than in the ESP block group (pain scale 1). Movement-evoked pain NRS score was higher in the TAP block groups significantly. CONCLUSION: ESP block results in a lower postoperative pain score NRS value and reduces the need for morphine in post-gynecological surgery patients with a median incision compared to the TAP block.

Perioperative pain management for cardiac surgery

Purpose of review Acute postsurgical pain after cardiac surgery is challenging to treat. Adverse effects related to the high dose opioids which have traditionally been used perioperatively in cardiac surgery have led to the adoption of alternative analgesic strategies. This review aims to highlight current evidence-based approaches to managing pain after cardiac surgery Recent findings Current evidence and international guidelines support the use of multimodal analgesics for managing perioperative pain after cardiac surgery. Regional anaesthesia in the form of fascial plane blocks, such as the erector spinae plane and parasternal intercostal plane blocks, are effective and safe techniques for anticoagulated cardiac surgery patients. Transitional pain services are multidisciplinary programmes that bridge the gap between inpatient and outpatient care for these patients. Summary This paper reviews advancements in perioperative pain management for cardiac surgery patients, emphasising the shift from high-dose opioids to multimodal analgesia and regional anaesthetic techniques, and highlighting the role of multidisciplinary transitional pain services.

Multimodal analgesics after adult cardiac surgery; a systematic review

Abstract Background Moderate to severe pain is frequently reported during the acute recovery phase following adult cardiac surgery. Multimodal analgesics are recommended for adult patients post cardiac surgery, but the optimal combination of multimodal analgesics is unknown. Purpose To synthesise the best available evidence about the effectiveness of multimodal analgesics on pain after adult cardiac surgery. Methods A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA-P statement and the published review protocol. Inclusion criteria were full-text papers or abstracts with adequate reporting, in any language, of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery that investigated the effect of multimodal postoperative analgesic regimens, compared to a control group. The highest mean level of patient self-reported pain intensity at rest, captured using a validated pain assessment tool, was the primary outcome measure. Results Of 3754 citations identified in the initial search to the 12th of December 2022, there were 1605 duplicates leaving 2149 citations for title and abstract screening, of which 2027 were irrelevant. There were 122 full-text papers assessed and 29 included in the review. Data were independently extracted by 2 reviewers in Covidence®. Participants (N = 2360), aged 59.5 + 8.2 years, were primarily male (N = 1561, 66.1%), weighing 78.1 +9.2 kilograms. Risk of bias was high and reporting quality was poor. Pain at rest reported in 18 (62%) studies was 3.5 (SD 1.2) in the control and 2.7 (SD 0.9) in the intervention groups respectively. Nurse-led versus patient-controlled analgesic administration was tested in 14 (48.3%) trials. All trials tested different analgesic combinations, none of which compared a combination of non-opioids, opioid agonist-antagonist agents, or full opioid agonists. Conclusions Poorly managed pain is associated with postoperative complications, unplanned readmissions, and the development of chronic pain. Robust RCTs are urgently needed to inform optimal combinations of multimodal analgesics to optimise patient recovery after adult cardiac surgery.Risk of Bias

The efficacy of preemptive multimodal analgesia in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of preemptive multimodal analgesiain elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Methods A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 2022 to December 2022. A total of 133 patients were included according to the criteria and randomly divided into preemptive analgesia (PRA) group (test group, 67patients) and postoperative analgesia (POA) group (control group, 66patients). Results The Visual Analog Scale (VAS)scores of PRA group 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h after operation were lower than those of POA group, and the difference was statistically significant, P < 0.001.The incidences of postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (POGD) and postoperative delirium (POD)in PRA group were 13.43% and 8.98%, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in POA group (31.82% and 24.24%), P < 0.05. The levels of IL-6 and IL-10 in PRA group after the operation were 17.54 ± 2.13 ng/L and 15.57 ± 1.71 ng/L respectively, which were lower than those in POA group (25.45 ± 2.95 ng/L and 23.45 ± 1.88 ng/L), P < 0.05. The level of acetylcholinesterase(AchE) was 56.34 ± 5.62 nmol/L in the POA group, which was significantly higher than that in the POA group (49.59 ± 5.52 nmol/L), P < 0.001. Conclusion Preemptive multimodal analgesia can reduce the incidence of POGD and POD in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrocolic surgery, improve the recovery process of postoperative gastrointestinal function, increase the concentrations of propionic acid and butyric acid in short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and the number of beneficial intestinal bacteria.

A randomised comparison of transverse abdominal plane block versus thoracic epidural analgesia on postoperative opioid consumption for colorectal enhanced recovery after surgery programme (OPIATE study).

The transverse abdominis plane block is increasingly being used as a less-invasive alternative to thoracic epidural analgesia for effective pain management. This study aimed to compare transverse abdominis plane block with opioid-based thoracic epidural analgesia in terms of postoperative opioid consumption. Patients in the thoracic epidural analgesia group received a continuous infusion of 0.1% levobupivacaine with 2mcg/ml of fentanyl, while those in the transverse abdominis plane group received 6-hourly boluses of 0.4ml/kg of 0.25% levobupivacaine. The primary objective was to compare the average fentanyl consumption, measured as intravenous fentanyl equivalents, over 72 hours. Data of 35 patients were analysed. Fentanyl consumption at the end of 72 hours was significantly lower in the transverse abdominis plane group (median [interquartile range] 495 mcg (255, 750), and mean (95% confidence interval) 717.35mcg (403.54-1031.16)) compared to the thoracic epidural analgesia group (median [interquartile range] 760mcg (750, 760), and mean (95% confidence interval) 787mcg (746.81-827.19)) with a p value of 0.010. Pain scores at rest and during movement were comparable between the groups (p > 0.05). However, the median pain scores during movement were significantly lower in the thoracic epidural analgesia group at 60 and 72 hours (p ⩽ 0.05). Multimodal analgesia with transverse abdominis plane resulted in lower opioid consumption over 72 hours compared to thoracic epidural analgesia.