Introduction Quantitative analysis and automated seizure detection is able to increase efficiency of EEG review. However, acceptance of software assisted review is often low because results are inaccurate in real world patient cohorts and the reason for false detections cannot be deduced. The graphical software tool encevis visualizes detections of fast rhythmic activity and patterns defined by the ACNS critical care EEG terminology. Based on these detections as well as quantitative information of EEG, ECG, and EMG a multimodal seizure detection algorithm was developed. Simple rule based classification is utilized that facilitates easy interpretability. Aim of this work was to assess detection performance of different modalities and patient groups. Methods Our computer algorithm automatically detects seizures including rhythmic EEG patterns that show an increased amplitude compared to baseline. EMG signal is extracted by bandpass filtering EEG (30–60 Hz) to measure line length (LL) for detection of sustained and excessive ictal EMG activity of generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS). High absolute values of LL and an increase of 500% to baseline trigger detections. Heart rate is calculated from ECG signals to detect ictal tachycardia (ITC) with more than 100 beats per minute and an increase of over 30% compared to baseline. To assess sensitivity and false detection rate a retrospective study was conducted including EEG/ECG recordings of 92 patients from two epilepsy monitoring units. Inclusion criteria were an age above 18 and at least one recorded epileptic seizure. EEGs were used without modification or manual editing of any kind. Automatic seizure detection was calculated for all 11,978 h of EEG (min = 23 h, max = 547 h). In total 410 manual seizure annotations were compared to automatic detections to define sensitivity (SE) and false detection in 24 h (FD/24 h). Results Combination of all three seizure detection methods (EMG + ECG + EEG) resulted in SE = 88% with 10.5 FD/24 h on average. By using only EMG based detections 100% of GTCS (n = 49) were found with an average false detection rate of 3.39 FD/24 h. Seizure detection solely based on ECG yielded SE = 31% with 1.35 FD/24 h. Analysis of the temporal lobe epilepsy patients showed SE = 93.3% and 6.75 FD/24 h, the extra temporal lobe patient group resulted in SE = 80% at 15.3 FD/24 h. Conclusion We showed that automatic seizure detection based on multimodal signal quantification can reach high sensitivity. The low false detection rate results in an average of 20 false detections per week than can be validated quickly by using EEG and time synchronized quantitative screens in parallel. By visualizing quantitative information that is the source of automatic seizure detection the interpretability of results is improved. Our proposed approach to automatic EEG analysis will raise efficiency of post hoc analysis compared to the current state of the art.