Multigene Testing Research Articles

Prevalence of pathogenic variants in non-BRCA genes and their impact on clinical practice in Argentina.

e22534 Background: The use of NGS has made it easier and more cost-effective to analyze genes associated with hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes. Germline alterations in breast cancer (BC) have an estimated prevalence of 10.7% of Pathogenic Variant or Likely Pathogenic (P/LP), with up to 8.0% in BRCA1/2 and 2.7% in CHEK2, ATM and PALB2 genes; they increase the risk of cancer 2 to 5 times. To date, two studies of P/LP in genes non-BRCA1/2 have been conducted in Argentina with frequencies of 4.5 and 4.7% in patients with personal and/or family history of BC. Methods: We report the frequency of P/LP in non-BRCA1/2 genes in patients with hereditary cancer criteria referred to the Oncogenetics Program at Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba between 01/2016 and 12/2022. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with BC, ovarian cancer (OC), pancreatic cancer (PaC), or prostate cancer (PC) who had clinical criteria for hereditary cancer. NGS and/or Sanger methods were used to sequence the samples, and the frequency of P/LP, novel P, and their association with other variants were collected and associated with the clinical features of the index case. Results: Of 283 cases studied, 85 (30.0%) were P/LP, with 53 (18.7%) detected in BRCA1/2 and 32 (11.3%) in other genes. Among the 32 mutations found in non-BRCA1/2 genes, the frequency of P/LP was 4.59% for PALB2 and 2.47% for CHEK2, 1.06% for TP53, 0.7% for MUTHY and 0.35% each for ATM, BRIP1, FANCC, MLH1, MSH2, FANCM and PTEN. The cases studied correspond to BC (75%), PaC (9.3%) and asymptomatic patients (15.7%), two of which belonged to families with an identified mutation in PALB2, other two in CHEK2, and one with no available index case with a mutation in ATM. The age at diagnosis in the cases with personal history was 44.5 years (20-66) with a very early age in the cases with TP53 mutations and two cases with PALB2 variants. Of the total mutations in non-BRCA1/2 genes, two were found to be associated with other pathogenic mutations and 12 were associated with VUS. Within our study, four remarkable findings were identified in PALB2 gene: 1) five unrelated families share the pathogenic c.1653T > A; 2) two unrelated families share the pathogenic c.1959T > A; 3) the novel c.2872_2875del LP variant was detected and 4) the frequency of the variant c.1653T > A suggests the possibility of a founder effect. Our study shows a higher frequency of P/LP in non-BRCA genes than those reported in Argentina and Latin America, which may be due to the selection of a population with family and/or personal history of cancer. Conclusions: It is important to perform multi-gene testing including moderate-penetrance genes to determine the hereditary susceptibility to cancer in our population and to identify vulnerable groups that require more specialized surveillance than the general population. This will help individuals with a higher risk of developing cancer to take effective preventive actions.

Systemic Therapy of Premenopausal Patients with Early Stage Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer - Controversies and Standards in Healthcare.

In patients with existing ovarian function, there are some special aspects to adjuvant endocrine therapy in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR pos./HER2 neg.) breast cancer. Treatment options include tamoxifen with or without a GnRH analog, and aromatase inhibitors with a GnRH analog. Furthermore, ovarian function is affected by previous chemotherapy. Both aromatase inhibitors (+GnRH analogs) and GnRH analogs in combination with tamoxifen are supposed to be indicated for patients at increased risk of recurrence. However, national and international guidelines and therapy recommendations do not provide a clear definition of intermediate or high risk; as a result, therapy decisions are often made for each patient on an individual basis. This is also reflected in the considerable variability at national and international levels, e.g., with regard to the use of aromatase inhibitors + GnRH analogs. This review summarizes the data on completed studies (e.g., SOFT, TEXT, EBCTCG meta-analyses) and the current multigene testing studies (TailorX, RxPonder, ADAPT), discusses the rationale for current studies (e.g., CLEAR-B), and looks ahead to future questions.

Multigene germline testing usefulness instead of BRCA1/2 single screening in triple negative breast cancer cases

Triple negative breast cancer is considered as the worst aggressive subtype with poor prognosis. Recent studies suggest a hereditary component is involved in TNBC development, especially in young patients. However, genetic spectrum remains unclear. Our purpose was to evaluate the usefulness of multigene panel testing in triple negative patients compared to overall breast cancer cases as well as contributing to elucidate which genes are most implicated in triple negative subtype development. Two breast cancer cohorts, comprising 100 triple negative breast cancer patients and 100 patients with other breast cancer subtypes, were analyzed by Next-Generation Sequencing using an On-Demand panel which included 35 predisposition cancer genes associated with inherited cancer susceptibility. The percentage of germline pathogenic variant carriers was higher in the triple negative cohort. ATM, PALB2, BRIP1 and TP53 were the most non-BRCA mutated genes. Moreover, triple negative breast cancer patients without family history related who were identified as carriers were diagnosed at significantly earlier age. As conclusion, our study reinforces the usefulness of multigene panel testing in breast cancer cases but specifically in those with triple negative subtype regardless family history.

Personalizing approaches to the management of metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer: role of advanced imaging, genetics and therapeutics.

To summarize contemporary and emerging strategies for the diagnosis and management of metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), focusing on diagnostic testing and therapeutics. Literature review using PUBMED-Medline databases as well as clinicaltrials.gov to include reported or ongoing clinical trials on treatment for mHSPC. We prioritized the findings from phase III randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and clinical practice guidelines. There have been significant changes to the diagnosis and staging evaluation of mHSPC with the integration of increasingly accurate positron emission tomography (PET) imaging tracers that exceed the performance of conventional computerized tomography (CT) and bone scan. Germline multigene testing is recommended for the evaluation of patients newly diagnosed with mHSPC given the prevalence of actionable alterations that may create candidacy for specific therapies. Although androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains the backbone of treatment for mHSPC, approaches to first-line treatment include the integration of multiple agents including androgen receptor synthesis inhibitors (ARSI; abiraterone) Androgen Receptor antagonists (enzalutamide, darolutamide, apalautamide), and docetaxel chemotherapy. The combination of ADT, ARSI, and docetaxel chemotherapy has recently been evaluated in a randomized trial and was associated with significantly improved overall survival including in patients with a high burden of disease. The role of local treatment to the prostate with radiation has been evaluated in randomized trials with additional studies underway evaluating the role of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy. The staging and initial management of patients with mHSPC has undergone significant advances in the last decade with advancements in the diagnosis, treatment and sequencing of therapies.

Detection of multiple druggable mutations of lung cancer from cytology specimens by MINtS: An advanced medicine A trial.

Most multigene mutation tests require tissue specimens. However, cytological specimens are easily obtained in the clinical practice and provide high-quality DNA and RNA. We aimed to establish a test that utilizes cytological specimens and performed a multi-institutional study to investigate the performance of MINtS, a test based on next-generation sequencing. A standard procedure for specimen isolation was defined. The specimens were considered suitable for the test if >100 ng DNA and >50 ng RNA could be extracted from them. In total, 500 specimens from 19 institutions were investigated. MINtS detected druggable mutations in 63% (136 of 222) of adenocarcinomas. Discordant results between MINtS and the companion diagnostics were observed in 14 of 310 specimens for the EGFR gene, and 6 of 339 specimens for the ALK fusion genes. Confirmation by other companion diagnostics for the EGFR mutations or the clinical response to an ALK inhibitor all supported the results obtained by MINtS. MINtS along with the isolation procedure presented in the current study will be a platform to establish multigene mutation tests that utilize cytological specimens. UMIN000040415.

Practice-Level Variation in Molecular Testing and Use of Targeted Therapy for Patients With Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer and Colorectal Cancer

All patients with newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) should receive molecular testing to identify those who can benefit from targeted therapies. However, many patients do not receive recommended testing and targeted therapies. To compare rates of molecular testing and targeted therapy use by practice type and across practices. This cross-sectional study used 100% Medicare fee-for-service data from 2015 through 2019 to identify beneficiaries with new metastatic NSCLC or CRC diagnoses receiving systemic therapy and to assign patients to oncology practices. Hierarchical linear models were used to characterize variation by practice type and across practices. Data analysis was conducted from June 2019 to October 2022. Oncology practice providing care. Primary outcomes were rates of molecular testing and targeted therapy use for patients with NSCLC and CRC. Secondary outcomes were rates of multigene testing for NSCLC and CRC. There were 106 228 Medicare beneficiaries with incident NSCLC (31 521 [29.7%] aged 65-69 years; 50 348 [47.4%] female patients; 2269 [2.1%] Asian, 8282 [7.8%] Black, and 91 215 [85.9%] White patients) and 39 512 beneficiaries with incident CRC (14 045 [35.5%] aged 65-69 years; 17 518 [44.3%] female patients; 896 [2.3%] Asian, 3521 [8.9%] Black, and 32 753 [82.9%] White patients) between 2015 and 2019. Among these beneficiaries, 18 435 (12.9%) were treated at National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated centers, 8187 (5.6%) were treated at other academic centers, and 94 329 (64.7%) were treated at independent oncology practices. Molecular testing rates increased from 74% to 85% for NSCLC and 45% to 65% for CRC. First-line targeted therapy use decreased from 12% to 8% among patients with NSCLC and was constant at 5% for patients with CRC. For NSCLC, molecular testing rates were similar across practice types while rates of multigene panel use (13.2%) and targeted therapy use (16.6%) were highest at NCI-designated cancer centers. For CRC, molecular testing rates were 3.8 (95% CI: 1.2-6.5), 3.3 (95% CI, 0.4-6.1), and 12.2 (95% CI, 9.1-15.3) percentage points lower at hospital-owned practices, large independent practices, and small independent practices, respectively. Rates of targeted therapy use for CRC were similar across practice types. After adjusting for patient characteristics, there was moderate variation in molecular testing and targeted therapy use across oncology practices. In this cross-sectional study of Medicare beneficiaries, molecular testing rates for NSCLC and CRC increased in recent years but remained lower than recommended levels. Rates of targeted therapy use decreased for NSCLC and remained stable for CRC. Variation across practices suggests that where a patient was treated may have affected access to recommended testing and efficacious treatments.

Use of a multi-gene pharmacogenetic panel reduces adverse drug effects

Swen etal.1 examine the utility of multi-gene pharmacogenetic testing in a large multi-national cohort. They show fewer adverse drug reactions among patients receiving testing and prescribing recommendations based on genotype results compared with those receiving usual care.

Quantifying the Value of Multigene Testing in Resected Early Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), each requiring testing for precision biomarkers, have recently been approved in the adjuvant setting. We assessed the potential value of multigene testing in early lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Using a real-world clinicogenomic database linking deidentified electronic health record-derived clinical data to genomic data, we selected patients with LUAD who underwent tissue comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). Using a probabilistic decision tree, we estimated the cost implications of the avoidance of adjuvant ICI in patients with programmed death-ligand 1-positive (PD-L1+) LUAD and an ALK, ROS1 or RET driver. The CGP was performed on a specimen collected before advanced disease in 20% (1320 of 6697) of cases and ordered before advanced diagnosis for 12.6% (847 of 6697) of patients. The prevalence of driver alterations in early and advanced-stage specimens was similar, though KRAS mutations were enriched in early disease and drivers including ALK rearrangements in advanced disease. Patients who had CGP results obtained before versus after recurrence had less time between recurrence and the start of any first-line treatment (median 3.6 versus 6 wk, p < 0.001). Through avoidance of ICI in programmed death-ligand 1-positive early LUAD with an ALK, ROS1 or RET driver, we estimated that the universal CGP could reduce expected costs by $1597.23 per patient relative to EGFR single-gene testing. The CGP can identify driver alterations and accelerate the start of first-line therapy at recurrence. It may also represent a cost-effective approach for avoiding futile adjuvant ICI in patients with drivers that have historically lacked activity with ICI in metastatic disease.

Abstract P6-02-11: Implementation of multigene panel testing in triple-negative breast cancer. The PERSONA-breast trial

Abstract Kahler Ribeiro Fontana S1, Bonetti E2, Bernard L3, Calvello M4, Bonanni B4, Bonizzi G 5, Veronesi P1,6, Mazzarella L 2, Galimberti V1 Introduction Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is frequently associated with germline genetic variants associated with cancer predisposition. Approximately 20% of TNBC carry a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Germline mutations in other genes involved in DNA repair, specifically Homologous Recombination (HRR), including ATM, BARD1, BRIP1, CHEK2, PALB2, RAD50, RAD51C, RAD51D may be associated with TNBC however remain imprecise in several populations as in Italy. In recent years, there has been an increase in multigenic panel testing thanks to better technology and the fact that genetic testing is no longer done just for prevention but they have become relevant in the clinical setting and this is especially true for triple negative disease. At the European Institute of Oncology, we conducted a prospective clinical trial, the PERSONA Breast trial, aimed at providing a more comprehensive picture of the mutational landscape and cancer risk in patients with TNBC by multigene germline genetic testing. Methods PERSONA is a prospective observational trial conducted between June 2018 and January 2022 on 313 patients with a diagnosis of TNBC ≤ 60 years and able to undergo surgery (primary or post-neoadjuvant). Peripheral blood DNA was sequenced with the Illumina TruSight Cancer panel (94 cancer predisposition genes). Genes were classified as germline actionable (n. 15) or non-actionable (n. 79) according to their associated relative risk of cancer. Genetic variants were classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines and the databases of genetic variants (ClinVar, LOVD, BRCA-Exchange,). All enrolled patients were followed up six-monthly for 10 years from informed consent or to death or withdrawal of consent. Results We present preliminary germline results from a 94-gene panel testing performed on a cohort of 313 TNBC patients. The clinical data of these patients was considered for a descriptive analysis of the cohort. Data on outcome such as overall survival and disease-free survival were not yet available. Germline multigene testing detected 62 unique (i.e., n. 49 in actionable, n. 13 in non-actionable genes) pathogenic (C5) and likely pathogenic (C4) variants in 25.2% of TNBC patients (79/313). As expected, 53.2% (42/79) of TNBC patients were carriers of a C5/C4 in BRCA1. C4/C5 were identified also in other actionable genes: 13.9% (11/79) in BRCA2, 8.9% (7/79) in MUTYH, 3.8% (3/79) in PALB2, 2.5% (2/79) in MSH2, 1.3% (1/79) in PMS2, and 1.3% (1/79) in TP53. In addition, 12 TNBC patients had C4/C5 variants in non-actionable genes, and 4 were carriers of both C4/C5 variants in actionable and non-actionable genes. Multigene testing resulted in the identification of 655 (i.e., n.82 in actionable, n. 573 in non-actionable genes) variants of uncertain significance (C3 or VUS) in 89.8% (281/313) of patients. Of the 281 C3 carriers, 60 had other variants (C4 and/or C5), of an uncertain result (in whom C3 was the highest class of variant) only in 70.6% (221/313) of TNBC patients. In 13 patients (13/313; 4.1%) only benign (C1) or likely benign (C2) variants were identified. Regarding family history, 67% of BRCA1 carriers versus 30% of BRCA2 carriers were familial. Conclusion Germline multigene testing in TNBC can identify C4/C5 in actionable genes providing information for a more tailored management of TNBC. Our study showed that the rate of VUS remains high using multigene testing. Of note, VUS were mainly identified in non-actionable genes supporting the rationale of the use in the clinical setting of phenotype-specific multigene panels, including a minor, but more appropriate, number of genes. Citation Format: sabrina K. kahler ribeiro fontana, emanuele bonetti, loris bernard, mariarosaria calvello, Bernardo Bonanni, ppina Bonizzi, Paolo Veronesi, Luca Mazzarella, Viviana Galimberti, claudia sangalli. Implementation of multigene panel testing in triple-negative breast cancer. The PERSONA-breast trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-02-11.

Prevalence and Complications of Aberrant Subclavian Artery in Patients With Heritable and Nonheritable Arteriopathies

BackgroundAn aberrant subclavian artery (ASA) (or lusoria) is the most common congenital anomaly of the aortic arch (0.5%-2.2%; female-to-male ratio 2:1 to 3:1). ASA can become aneurysmal and result in dissection, involving Kommerell’s diverticulum when present and the aorta. Data of its significance in genetic arteriopathies are not available. ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and complications of ASA in gene-positive and -negative nonatherosclerotic arteriopathies. MaterialsThe series includes 1,418 consecutive patients with gene-positive (n = 854) and gene-negative arteriopathies (n = 564) diagnosed as part of institutional work-up for nonatherosclerotic syndromic and nonsyndromic arteriopathies. Comprehensive evaluation includes genetic counseling, next-generation sequencing multigene testing, cardiovascular and multidisciplinary assessment, and whole-body computed tomography angiography. ResultsASA was found in 34 of 1,418 cases (2.4%), with a similar prevalence in gene-positive (n = 21 of 854, 2.5%) and gene-negative (n = 13 of 564, 2.3%) arteriopathies. Of the former 21 patients, 14 had Marfan syndrome, 5 had Loeys-Dietz syndrome, 1 had type-IV Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, and 1 had periventricular heterotopia type 1. ASA did not segregate with genetic defects. Dissection occurred in 5 of 21 patients with genetic arteriopathies (23.8%; 2 Marfan syndrome and 3 Loeys-Dietz syndrome), all with associated Kommerell’s diverticulum. No dissections occurred in gene-negative patients. At baseline, none of the 5 patients with ASA dissection fulfilled criteria for elective repair according to guidelines. ConclusionsThe risk of complications of ASA is higher in patients with genetic arteriopathies and is difficult to predict. In these diseases, imaging of the supra-aortic trunks should enter baseline investigations. Determination of precise indications for repair can prevent unexpected acute events such as those described.

A global analysis of the value of precision medicine in oncology - The case of non-small cell lung cancer.

Biomarker testing is indispensable for the implementation of precision medicine (PM) in oncology. The aim of this study was to assess the value of biomarker testing from a holistic perspective based on the example of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). A partitioned survival model was populated with data from pivotal clinical trials of first-line treatments in aNSCLC. Three testing scenarios were considered; "no biomarker testing" encompassing chemotherapy treatment, "sequential testing" for EGFR and ALK encompassing treatment with targeted- or chemotherapy, and "multigene testing" covering EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, NTRK, MET, RET and encompassing treatment with targeted- or immuno(chemo)therapy. Analyses of health outcomes and costs were run for nine countries (Australia, Brazil, China, Germany, Japan, Poland, South Africa, Turkey, United States). A 1-year and 5-year time horizon was applied. Information on test accuracy was combined with country-specific information on epidemiology and unit costs. Compared to the no-testing scenario, survival improved and treatment-related adverse events decreased with increased testing. Five-year survival increased from 2% to 5-7% and to 13-19% with sequential testing and multigene testing, respectively. The highest survival gains were observed in East Asia due to a higher local prevalence of targetable mutations. Overall costs increased with increased testing in all countries. Although costs for testing and medicines increased, costs for treatment of adverse events and end-of-life care decreased throughout all years. Non-health care costs (sick leave and disability pension payments) decreased during the first year but increased over a 5-year horizon. The broad use of biomarker testing and PM in aNSCLC leads to more efficient treatment assignment and improves health outcomes for patients globally, in particular prolonged progression-free disease phase and overall survival. These health gains require investment in biomarker testing and medicines. While costs for testing and medicines would initially increase, cost decreases for other medical services and non-health care costs may partly offset the cost increases.

Breast Cancer Screening Should Embrace Precision Medicine: Evidence by Reviewing Economic Evaluations in China.

The cost-effectiveness of conventional population-based breast cancer screening strategies (e.g. mammography) has been found controversial, while evidence shows that genetic testing for early detection of pathogenic variants is cost-effective. We aimed to review the economic evaluations of breast cancer screening in China to provide an information summary for future research on this topic. We searched the literature to identify the economic evaluations that examined breast cancer screening and testing in China, supplemented by hand-searching the reference lists of the included studies. We finally included five studies satisfying our inclusion criteria. Four articles examined mammography while the rest investigated multigene testing. The existing breast cancer screening programmes were found to be cost-effective among urban Chinese women, but one study concluded that they might cause harm to women in rural areas. Contextual factors, such as data absence, urban-rural disparity, willingness-to-pay threshold, and model design, imposed barriers to cost-effectiveness analysis. Multigene testing was found to be cost-effective and has a promising population impact among all women with breast cancer in China. Future research should investigate the cost-effectiveness of screening and identifying breast cancer through precision medicine technologies, including genetic testing, genome sequencing, cascade testing, and the return of secondary findings.

Risks and implications of multiple actionable pathogenic germline variants discovered by panel-based cancer predisposition testing.

792 Background: Multi-gene hereditary cancer panels have revolutionized how patients with germline mutations are identified by testing multiple genes at the same time. Despite the availability of panel testing, many patients with a known familial mutation will only undergo single site genetic testing due to limitations in guideline recommendations and insurance coverage. This approach risks a failure to detect additional pathogenic variants and an inappropriate management of cancer risk. In our clinical experience, a subset of patients pursue multigene testing despite a known familial mutation. Our group has identified patients who carry more than one mutation and mutations that would have been missed if the patients had only undergone single site testing. We investigated the patients and families from our risk assessment clinic with multiple familial mutations and determined how medical management may have been changed due to the presence of multiple mutations in family. Methods: The Fox Chase Cancer Center Risk Assessment Program (RAP) Registry was queried to identify patients who carry more than one mutation. Pedigrees of patients and families identified with multiple germline mutations were reviewed. Screening management guidelines were determined from the most recent NCCN guidelines published at the time the patient tested (Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic and Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal). The RAP Registry is an IRB approved protocol (IRB 09-831). Results: 70 patients were found to carry at least 2 mutations (excluding patients with biallelic MUTYH mutations) since introducing multi-gene panel testing in 2014. The most common second mutation was the I1307K variant in the APC gene at 20% (14/70). We also identified 20 patients who would have received incomplete genetic risk assessment if they only underwent single site testing and screening management changed in 60% (12/20) of these patients. 35% (7/20) of these patients did not meet NCCN criteria for additional germline testing beyond single site testing. Conclusions: Multi-gene hereditary cancer panels identify patients and families with multiple germline mutations. Patients undergoing single site cascade testing are at risk of receiving inaccurate risk assessment based on incomplete ascertainment of germline cancer risks. Detection of additional actionable mutations will frequently lead to changes in medical management.

The Rochester Modified Magee Algorithm (RoMMa): An Outcomes Based Strategy for Clinical Risk-Assessment and Risk-Stratification in ER Positive, HER2 Negative Breast Cancer Patients Being Considered for Oncotype DX® Testing.

Multigene genomic profiling has become the standard of care in the clinical risk-assessment and risk-stratification of ER+, HER2- breast cancer (BC) patients, with Oncotype DX® (ODX) emerging as the genomic profile test with the most support from the international community. The current state of the health care economy demands that cost-efficiency and access to testing must be considered when evaluating the clinical utility of multigene profile tests such as ODX. Several studies have suggested that certain lower risk patients can be identified more cost-efficiently than simply reflexing all ER+, HER2- BC patients to ODX testing. The Magee equationsTM use standard histopathologic data in a set of multivariable models to estimate the ODX recurrence score. Our group published the first outcome data in 2019 on the Magee equationsTM, using a modification of the Magee equationsTM combined with an algorithmic approach-the Rochester Modified Magee algorithm (RoMMa). There has since been limited published outcome data on the Magee equationsTM. We present additional outcome data, with considerations of the TAILORx risk-stratification recommendations. 355 patients with an ODX recurrence score, and at least five years of follow-up or a BC recurrence were included in the study. All patients received either Tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor. None of the patients received adjuvant systemic chemotherapy. There was no significant difference in the risk of recurrence in similar risk categories (very low risk, low risk, and high risk) between the average Modified Magee score and ODX recurrence score with the chi-square test of independence (p > 0.05) or log-rank test (p > 0.05). Using the RoMMa, we estimate that at least 17% of individuals can safely avoid ODX testing. Our study further reinforces that BC patients can be confidently stratified into lower and higher-risk recurrence groups using the Magee equationsTM. The RoMMa can be helpful in the initial clinical risk-assessment and risk-stratification of BC patients, providing increased opportunities for cost savings in the health care system, and for clinical risk-assessment and risk-stratification in less-developed geographies where multigene testing might not be available.

Molekularpathologie in der Gynäkoonkologie – Beschreibung einer Revolution

The diagnostics and treatment of gynecologic malignancies have changed profoundly in recent years due to the achievements of modern molecular pathology. The further development of sequencing techniques and other molecular pathology methods, such as liquid biopsy, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) testing, and multigene testing have led to the identification of numerous prognostic and predictive biomarkers and resistance markers in breast, ovarian, and endometrial cancers. In parallel with the identification of novel oncogenic drivers and therapeutic targets, numerous innovative targeted therapies have been introduced into routine clinical practice. This article highlights the groundbreaking new molecular pathology findings in gynecologic oncology in the temporal context of the past 20 years and describes a revolution that has occurred in modern precision targeted oncology.

Single Versus Multigene Testing for Hereditary Hearing Loss: Use and Costs in a Commercially Insured Cohort.

The objectives of this study were to describe trends in single-gene GJB2/6 (connexin 26/30) and multigene hearing loss panel (HLP) testing for hereditary hearing loss using real-world evidence. Retrospective study using insurance claims data. Optum Data Mart database from 2015 to 2020. Rates of overall and hearing-specific genetic testing and costs to insurers and patients were reported. Linear regression models were used to assess the proportion of single-gene GJB2/6 testing over time. Additional linear regression models were used to assess changes in costs over time. From 2015 to 2020, 91,986 children received genetic testing for any indication, of which 601 (0.65%) received hearing-specific tests. The proportion of single-gene GJB2/6 testing remained similar over time (mean difference [MD]: -1.3% per year; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -4.3%, 1.7%), while multigene HLP use increased over time (MD:4.0% per year; 95% CI: 0.4%, 7.5%). The median charge for single-gene GJB2/6 testing remained constant during the study period (MD: -$34; 95% CI: -$86, $18), while the median charge for multigene HLP decreased during the study period (MD: -$145 per year; 95% CI: -$278, -$12). Compared to molecular testing for GJB2/6, HLPs are becoming more common for hereditary hearing loss. The comprehensiveness of HLP and decreasing costs provide justification for its more widespread adoption moving forward.

Guideline-Based, Multi-Gene Panel Germline Genetic Testing for at-Risk Patients with Breast Cancer.

Genetic testing for at-risk patients with breast cancer should be routinely offered. Knowledge generated may influence both treatment decisions and cancer prevention strategies among the patients themselves and their relatives. In this study, we report on the prevalence and patterns of germline mutations, using commercially available next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based multi-gene panels (MGP). Consecutive at-risk breast cancer patients, as determined by international guidelines, were offered germline genetic testing using a 20-gene NGS-based panel at a reference lab. Samples of peripheral blood were obtained for DNA extraction and genetic variants were classified as benign/likely benign (negative), pathogenic/likely pathogenic (positive) or variants of uncertain significance (VUS). A total of 1310 patients, median age (range) 43 (19-82) years, were enrolled. Age ≤45 years (n = 800, 61.1%) was the most common indication for testing. Positive family history of breast, ovarian, pancreatic or prostate cancers, and triple-negative disease were among the common indications. Among the whole group, 184 (14.0%) patients had pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants; only 90 (48.9%) were in BRCA1 or BRCA2, while 94 (51.9%) others had pathogenic variants in other genes; mostly in APC, TP53, CHEK2 and PALB2. Mutation rates were significantly higher among patients with positive family history (p = 0.009); especially if they were 50 years or younger at the time of breast cancer diagnosis (p < 0.001). Patients with triple-negative disease had relatively higher rate (17.5%), and mostly in BRCA1/2 genes (71.4%). Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were reported in 559 (42.7%) patients; majority (90.7%) were in genes other than BRCA1 or BRCA2. Pathogenic mutations in genes other than BRCA1/2 are relatively common and could have been missed if genetic testing was restricted to BRCA1/2. The significantly high rate of VUS associated with multi-gene panel testing can be disturbing.

CRAC (Clinical Relevance of Alterations in Cancer): a Knowledge Base for the Selection of Molecularly Matched Therapy for Solid Tumors.

Multigene testing using NGS (next-generation sequencing) provides a large amount of information and can detect multiple molecular alterations. Subsequent clinical interpretation is a time-consuming process necessary to select a treatment strategy. Existing databases often contain inconsistent information and are not regularly updated. The use of ESCAT levels of evidence requires a deep understanding of the nature of alterations and does not answer the question of which therapy option to select when multiple biomarkers with the same level of evidence are detected. To address these issues, we created the Clinical Relevance of Alterations in Cancer (CRAC) database on the relevance of detected alterations in specific genes, which are often analyzed as part of NGS panels. The team of oncologists and biologists assigned a CRAC score from 1 to 10 to each biomarker (a type of genomic alteration characteristic of specific genes) for 15 malignancies; an average score was entered into the database. CRAC scores are a numerical reflection of the following factors: therapy availability and the prospects of drug treatment with experimental drugs for patients with a particular type of tumor. A total of 134 genes and 15 of the most common tumor types have been selected for CRAC. The biomarker-nosology associations with CRAC scores in the range of 1-3 are the most frequent (n=2719 out of 3495; 77.8%), the least frequent ones (n=52 out of 3495; 1.5%) are with the highest CRAC scores 9 and 10. To estimate the practical effectiveness of the CRAC database, 208 reports on comprehensive molecular profiling were retrospectively analyzed; the applicability of CRAC was compared with the ESCAT level of evidence system. The highest CRAC scores corresponded to the ESCAT maximum levels of evidence: the range of scores 8-10 corresponded to evidence levels I and II. No biomarker within the same level of evidence was represented by the same CRAC score; the largest range of CRAC scores was observed for biomarkers of levels evidence IIIA and IV - from 2 to 10 and from 1 to 9, respectively. The use of CRAC scores allowed to identify additional 95 alterations with CRAC scores of 1-5 in the studied patients. The developed database is available at: https://crac.oncoatlas.ru/.

RF21 | PSUN07 Germline Genetic Testing in a Cohort of Adults with Adrenocortical Carcinoma : Insights From a Clinical Care Setting

Abstract Context About 5-10% of adrenocortical cancer (ACC) arise in patients with genetic predisposition syndromes, including Li-Fraumeni, Lynch, MEN1, or Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (APC). Recent European (2018) and American guidelines (2020) recommend that all adults with ACC should be offered clinical genetic counseling. There is a paucity of data regarding systematic germline testing in adults with ACC and the extent of the genetic evaluation is unclear. Objective To describe the germline genetic characteristics in a cohort of adult patients with ACC evaluated in a tertiary clinical care center. Methods Data including demographics, personal and family history of neoplasia, pathology reports, clinical features and genetic testing were retrospectively collected from charts of patients treated at Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM). After genetic counseling, genetic testing was proposed to patients with a pathologic diagnosis of ACC. From 2005 to 2015, TP53 gene analysis was performed using direct sequencing and MLPA. Since 2016, multigene testing was performed for a progressively increasing number of oncogenic genes using a custom next-generation panel for germline leucocyte DNA including at least the TP53, MSH2, MSH6, MLH1,PMS2, EPCAM, MEN1, BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes (Invitae, CA). An extended panel, based on past medical and familial history, was performed at the discretion of the geneticist. Patient data was retrospectively investigated. Results We analyzed data from 44 patients with available germline genetic results. Median age of the patients was 46 years (ranging from 22 to 79 years), including 11 males (25.0%) and 33 females (75.0%). Ten patients (22.7%) underwent only TP53 gene analysis and 32 patients (72.7%) were studied using the larger oncogenic genetic panel. Germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were identified in 5 of the 44 patients (11.4%) while genetic variants of unknown significance (VUS) were found in 7 of the 44 patients (15.9%). Among patients with pathogenic variants, one had a family history and known germline mutation in the BRCA2 gene (8765delAG, p.Glu2846GlyfsX23). One patient had a personal and familial medical history suggesting a MEN1 syndrome that was confirmed with the finding of a germline MEN1 mutation (c.1556delC, p.Pro519Leu fs40). Unsuspected germline pathogenic variants were found in three patients: 1) TP53 (c.425delC, p.Pro142fs), 2) MUTYH (c.536A&amp;gt;G, p.Tyr179Cys) and 3) MSH6 (c.3649-3655, p.Arg1217Leu fs9) genes. Variants of unknown significance (VUS) were found in the following genes: POT1, MSH3, PALB2, RAD51d, APC, ATM and BRCA2. Conclusions Germline pathogenic variants were found in 11.4% of our cohort of patients with ACC. VUS were found in 15.9% of patients but their significance remains to be determined. Genetic counseling and germline genetic testing should be offered to all patients with ACC; however the optimal use and extent of oncogenic gene panels need to be better defined. Presentation: Sunday, June 12, 2022 12:30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m., Sunday, June 12, 2022 12:48 p.m. - 12:53 p.m.

263 (PB-087) Poster - Comparison of ER, PR, HER2 and Ki67 expression by MammaTyper® RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry (IHC) on needle core biopsies of breast cancer

Background: Breast cancer molecular subtyping is traditionally defined by the immunohistochemical expression of ER, PR, HER2 and Ki67. There is limited data on the role of multigene tests and their correlation with IHC particularly on conventional core biopsies. MammaTyper® is a quantitative CE marked in vitro diagnostic RT-qPCR test for assessment of mRNA expression of these four biomarkers (ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, MKI67), classifying breast cancer into five subtypes. We evaluated the concordance of MammaTyper® with ER, PR, HER2 and Ki67 by IHC on core needle biopsy samples of breast cancer.