Surveillance schemes for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are widely established at the national and international levels. Due to the simple standardization of the protocol, mainly isolates from bloodstream infections are used. However, the limitations of this simple surveillance system are well described. We conducted a comprehensive analysis of MRSA isolates in a large Slovenian region over 5 years to identify the optimal sample group for assessing the overall MRSA diversity. At the same time, this study provides to date non-available molecular characterization of Slovenian MRSA isolates. A total of 306 MRSA isolates from various sources were sequenced and phenotypically tested for resistance. The isolates exhibited significant molecular diversity, encompassing 30 multi locus sequence type (MLST) sequence types (STs), 39 ST-SCCmec genetic lineages, 49 spa types, and 29 antibiotic resistance profiles. Furthermore, the isolate pool comprised 57 resistance genes, representing 22 resistance mechanisms, and 96 virulence genes. While bloodstream isolates, commonly used in surveillance, provided insights into frequently detected clones, they overlooked majority of clones and important virulence and resistance genes. Blood culture isolates detected 21.3% spa types, 24.1% resistance phenotypes, and 28.2% MLST-SCCmec profiles. In contrast, strains from soft tissues demonstrated superior genomic diversity capture, with 65.3% spa types, 58.6% resistance phenotypes, and 71.8% MLST-SCCmec profiles. These strains also encompassed 100.0% of virulence and 82.5% of resistance genes, making them better candidates for inclusion in surveillance programs. This study highlights the limitations of relying solely on bloodstream isolates in MRSA surveillance and suggests incorporating strains from soft tissues to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of the epidemiology of MRSA.IMPORTANCEIn this study, we investigated the diversity of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), a bacterium that can cause infections that are difficult to treat due to its resistance to antimicrobial agents. Currently, surveillance programs for MRSA mainly rely on isolates from bloodstream infections, employing a standardized protocol. However, this study highlights the limitations of this approach and introduces a more comprehensive method. The main goal was to determine which group of samples is best suited to understand the overall diversity of MRSA and to provide, for the first time, molecular characterization of Slovenian MRSA isolates. Our results suggest that including MRSA strains from soft tissue infections rather than just blood infections provides a more accurate and comprehensive view of bacterial diversity and characteristics. This insight is valuable for improving the effectiveness of surveillance programs and for developing strategies to better manage MRSA infections.