mRCC Patients Research Articles

Prognostic potential of standard laboratory parameters in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer receiving first-line immunotherapy

Through their involvement in cancer metabolism, alanine aminotransferase (ALAT), aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT), γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) reflect the tumor burden and thus could have a prognostic potential for patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI). Therefore, this study investigated the prognostic potential of these parameters in a real-world cohort of patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) under first-line CPI-based therapy. The retrospective study cohort included 82 mRCC patients treated with CPI-based first-line therapy between 2019 and 2023. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and response rates were evaluated according to baseline levels and early dynamic changes of ALAT, ASAT, GGT and LDH. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were generated to identify independent prognosticators for PFS and OS. High baseline levels and non-normalized kinetics of ALAT, ASAT, GGT and LDH were significantly associated with shorter PFS and OS (p < 0.05), which was also reflected by lower response rates. Combining the four parameters at baseline into a 4-Risk-Score resulted in an enhanced prognostic power, as indicated by a higher C-index of 0.693 for OS compared to the individual parameters (≤ 0.663). Patients with all four risk factors present showed the worst PFS and OS. Overall, baseline levels and early kinetics of the four parameters as well as the 4-Risk-Score were identified as independent prognosticators for PFS and OS by multivariate analysis. As standard laboratory parameters, ALAT, ASAT, GGT and LDH are cost-effective and could be easily used either alone or in combination for therapy monitoring of CPI-treated mRCC patients.

Estimated cost of VEGFR TKI associated adverse events in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients

IntroductionThe majority of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients receive one or more VEGFR TKI agents, alone or in combination with an immune-oncology (IO) agent or an mTOR inhibitor. To date, the cost of adverse events (AEs) common to VEGFR TKIs has not been quantified. This study estimated the potential impact of differences in VEGFR TKI AE profiles on treatment cost efficiency in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting.MethodsPatients with documented mRCC who were treated with VEGFR TKI therapies between Jan 2015 and Mar 2021 were identified using EMR. ICD-10 diagnosis codes were used to identify the first occurrence of each class effect AE. Patients were matched to 3rd party insurance claims, and costs associated to TKI AEs within 90 days of index event were captured. Average per patient AE cost data was calculated and applied to published incidence data to estimate regimen-specific AE total cost burden within a hypothetical commercial plan for mRCC patients undergoing treatment in the R/R setting.ResultsThe highest total cost for AE management was attributed to lenvatinib and everolimus use at $13,303, followed closely by sunitinib at $13,092. Tivozanib treatment was associated with the lowest total cost of AE management at $7,523, driven by the relatively lower incidence of certain high-cost AEs.ConclusionsThe estimated costs of managing VEGFR TKI class-effect AEs were lowest with tivozanib, and highest with lenvatinib and everolimus, indicating potentially differential healthcare resource burden by TKI regimen. The use of tivozanib in the 3 L + mRCC setting suggests potential costs offsets when compared to other TKI regimens.

PSMD2 overexpression as a biomarker for resistance and prognosis in renal cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint and tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Integrated immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are now the recommended first-line therapy to manage renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Proteasome 26S subunit non-ATPase 2 (PSMD2) overexpression in tumors has been correlated with tumor progression. Currently, mRCC lacks an established biomarker for the combination of ICI+TKI. This study involved RNA sequencing of RCC patients from two cohorts treated with ICI+TKI (ZS-MRCC and JAVELIN-Renal-101). We utilized immunohistochemistry alongside flow cytometry, aiming at assessing immune cell infiltration and functionality in high-risk localized RCC samples. Response and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated relying upon RECIST criteria. PSMD2 was significantly overexpressed in advanced RCC and among non-responders to ICI+TKI therapy. Overexpressed PSMD2 was correlated with poor PFS in the ZS-MRCC and JAVELIN-101 cohorts. Multivariate Cox analysis validated PSMD2 as an independent PFS predictor. PSMD2 overexpression was related to a reduction in CD8+ T cells, especially GZMB+ CD8+ T cells, besides an increase in PD1+ CD4+ T cells. Additionally, tumors with high PSMD2 levels showed enhanced T cell exhaustion levels and a higher regulatory T cell presence. A Machine Learning (ML) model based on PSMD2 expression and other screened factors was subsequently developed to predict the effectiveness of ICI+TKI. Elevated PSMD2 expression is linked to resistance and decreased PFS in mRCC patients undergoing ICI+TKI therapy. High PSMD2 levels are also associated with impaired function and increased exhaustion of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. An ML model incorporating PSMD2 expression could potentially identify patients who may have a higher likelihood of benefiting from ICI+TKI.

204 (PB192): Spatial Analysis of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in mRCC Patients Treated with Pexa-Vec (Thymidine Kinase-Deactivated Vaccinia Virus plus GM-CSF) and cemiplimab (REGN2810; Anti-PD-1)

204 (PB192): Spatial Analysis of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in mRCC Patients Treated with Pexa-Vec (Thymidine Kinase-Deactivated Vaccinia Virus plus GM-CSF) and cemiplimab (REGN2810; Anti-PD-1)

Clinical Outcomes for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) Patients Ineligible for Front-line Clinical Trials.

Clinical trials for immunotherapy-based regimens in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have extensive inclusion and exclusion criteria. We investigated the clinical outcomes in a real-world cohort of patients who would not have met the criteria for inclusion in front-line mRCC trials. Patients treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab and axitinib/pembrolizumab for front-line mRCC were identified and divided into clinical trial eligible (CTE) and clinical trial ineligible (CTI) cohorts based on key inclusion or exclusion criteria from their respective Phase-3 registration trials. Clinical outcomes were compared in CTE and CTI cohorts. A total of 62 patients treated with axitinib/pembrolizumab and 103 treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab were identified. The International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria were similar across CTE and CTI patients in axitinib/pembrolizumab and ipilimumab/nivolumab cohorts. In the axitinib/pembrolizumab cohort (n = 62), 24 (39%) patients were CTI. The major reasons for the ineligibility were lab abnormalities (n = 11), histology (n = 9), and brain metastases (n = 3). There was no significant difference in response rates (P = 0.08). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was numerically longer in CTE patients (28 vs 12 months; P = 0.09). The overall survival (OS) was higher in the CTE patients (P = 0.02). In the ipilimumab/nivolumab cohort (n = 103), 59 (57%) were CTI. The most common reasons for ineligibility were brain metastases (n = 18), lab abnormalities (n = 16), and histology (n = 16). There was no significant difference in response rates (P = 0.22). However, PFS (P = 0.003) and OS (P < 0.0001) were higher in the CTE patients. In conclusion, many real-world patients are ineligible for RCC clinical trials and had worse outcomes when compared to trial-eligible patients. Additional treatment options are needed for these patients, as well as strategies to include them in prospective trials.

Cabozantinib Plus Nivolumab in Adult Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective, Non-Interventional Study in a Real-World Cohort/GUARDIANS Project.

Combinations of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the standard of care (SOC) for treatment-naive metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. In this multicenter study, we evaluated the RW safety and efficacy of cabozantinib plus nivolumab in mRCC patients. Data were retrospectively collected from twelve cancer centers in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. Patients with advanced or mRCC were eligible. The investigator-based objective response rate (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS) were calculated from the start of the treatment to progression or death. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier (KM) plots were utilized where appropriate. In total, 96 eligible patients (66.6% male) with a median age of 66.0 years were included. The most common histology was clear-cell RCC (ccRCC) in 63.4% (n = 61). A prior nephrectomy was performed in 60.4% (n = 58). ECOG 0-1 was 68.8% (n = 66). A partial response was documented in 43.8% of patients (n = 42), a stable disease in 32.3% (n = 31), and a progressive disease in 8.3% (n = 8) as the best overall response. Response data were not evaluable in 13.5% (n = 13). The median follow-up time was 12.7 months (95% CI, 10.0-15.3). The PFS rate at 6 months was 89.8% in the overall population (86.8% for ccRCC; 90.0% for non-ccRCC). Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 82.3% (n = 79) for all grades and 41.7% (n = 40) for grades 3-5. Elevated liver enzymes (34.4%), diarrhea (31.3%), and hand-foot syndrome (29.2%) were the three most frequent AEs of any grade and causality. In this real-world cohort of mRCC patients, the application of cabozantinib plus nivolumab was shown to be safe and feasible. Our data support the use of cabozantinib plus nivolumab as a first-line standard therapy in mRCC patients. Major limitations were the retrospective data capture and short follow-up time of our study.

Prognostic value of type of prior TKI in pretreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients receiving nivolumab.

Aim: To define the prognostic significance of first-line TKI in mRCC patients receiving nivolumab.Materials and methods: A total of 571mRCC patients who received ≥second line nivolumab were included in this subanalysis. The correlation between prior TKI (sunitinib vs. pazopanib) and overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate, progression-free survival and overall survival were investigated. Additionally, the impact of TKI choice according to the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium prognostic score was examined.Results: There was no significant difference between sunitinib and pazopanib groups in terms of mPFS, mOS, overall response rate and disease control rate. Moreover, no difference between sunitinib and pazopanib was found according to the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium prognostic score.Conclusion: There is no conclusive evidence favoring pazopanib or sunitinib treatment before initiating nivolumab therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients.

A red blood cell-based score in the prognostication of patients with metastatic RCC of the Meet-URO 15 study.

Aims: Anemia, mean corpuscular volume and red cell distribution width may have some effects on survival outcomes of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients and are incorporated in a red blood cell (RBC)-based score. Its validity in prognostication of mRCC patients treated with second-line nivolumab was assessed.Patients and methods: Retrospective analysis using Meet-URO-15 cohort of mRCC patients receiving nivolumab in the second-line setting or beyond. Outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).Results: A total of 390 patients were included. Significant differences in OS and PFS between RBC-based score groups, with group 1 (2 or 3 of the RBC-related prognostic factors) having longer OS (median 29.5months, 95% CI: 23.1-35.9, versus 11.5months, 95% CI: 8.5-22.6; p<0.001) and PFS (7.5months, 95% CI: 5.5-10.2, versus 4.2months, 95% CI: 3.3-5.9; p=0.040) than those in group 0 (0 or 1 RBC-related prognostic factors). Belonging to group 1 independently predicted OS (hazard ratio: 0.65, 95% CI:0.50-0.85; p=0.002) but not PFS (hazard ratio: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.70-1.14, p=0.370) or disease response (OR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.41-1.10; p=0.118) at multivariable analysis.Conclusion: RBC-based group scores independently predicted OS in mRCC patients treated with nivolumab.

36 Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients post immune-oncology (IO) and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) receptor targeted therapies

Abstract Background The metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treatment landscape has rapidly evolved with approval of newer IO agents and VEGF targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes data for mRCC in post IO and TKI setting is limited. The objective of this study is to describe real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of mRCC patients with a prior receipt of IO and TKI therapies in community oncology settings. Methods This retrospective cohort study utilized data from The US Oncology Network (iKnowMed) electronic health record database. The study cohort included adult mRCC patients receiving subsequent line of therapy (LOT; index date) post IO and TKI in combination or sequence between January-18’ and March-23’. All patients were followed from the index date until June-23’ to examine treatment pattern and estimate overall survival (OS), real-world time on treatment (rwToT), and real-world time to next treatment (rwTTNT) by line of therapy (LOT) and individual index regimen (with sample size ≥10). LOT was assigned based on patient’s absolute order of treatment regimen using start and stop dates. OS was defined as the time between Index date and the date of death due to any cause. Descriptive analyses were used to describe patient characteristics and treatment pattern. Time-to-event outcomes (OS, rwToT, and rwTTNT) from index date were summarized using Kaplan-Meier method with a log-rank test by individual regimens. A multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards model was performed to assess the association of index regimens with clinical outcomes after controlling for patient characteristics. Results The study cohort included 820 patients. The median age was 66 (range: 58, 72) years, 72.6% were male and 77.1% were Caucasian. Moreover, 60.0% had an Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1 and 74.5% had intermediate/poor IMDC risk score. Overall, 253 (30.9%) received index treatment in LOT2, 509 (62.1%) in LOT3 and 58 (7.1%) in LOT4+. The most common treatments post IO and TKI settings were cabozantinib (35.6%), everolimus plus lenvatinib (9.5%), ipilimumab plus nivolumab (7.4%), and axitinib (7.2%). The median OS for LOT2, LOT3, and LOT4 was (18.0, 17.8, and 28.6 months, respectively). The median rwTOT for LOT2 was 2.5 months, LOT3 was 3.5 months, and LOT4 was 6.2 months. The median rwTTNT for LOT2, LOT3, and LOT4 was 6.4, 7.7, and 11.5 months, respectively. Statistically significant difference across individual regimens was observed for OS, rwToT, and rwTTNT (Table). Conclusions This study presents one of the most comprehensive analysis of treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among mRCC patients in the post IO and TKI settings. TKI-with or without IO-based treatments were the most preferred treatments and associated with improved survival. Overall, clinical outcomes in the post IO and VEGF/TKI setting are limited, and novel treatments are needed in this patient population.

37 Cost-effectiveness of treatment sequences with front-line nivolumab+ipilimumab therapy vs immuno-oncology+tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies in intermediate/poor-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Abstract Background Immuno-oncology (IO) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combinations have transformed the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the most cost-effective sequencing of these systemic therapies. This study aimed to assess the expected health and economic outcomes of various treatment sequences for newly diagnosed patients with intermediate/poor-risk RCC from a US payer perspective. Methods We developed a model using a continuous time micro-simulation framework. First-line treatment options included: nivolumab+ipilimumab, nivolumab+cabozantinib, pembrolizumab+lenvatinib, and pembrolizumab+axitinib. Second-line treatment options included: cabozantinib and everolimus+lenvatinib. In both lines, the source data for the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) distributions were obtained from the registrational randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of each therapy. The analysis included costs associated with drug acquisition in the US wholesale setting, drug administration and monitoring, management of treatment-related adverse events, disease management, and terminal care. Treatment duration for all first-line IO and TKI therapies was capped at 2 years. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated by multiplying time in each phase of the disease by phase-specific utility values estimated from the CheckMate 214 trial data using US tariffs. The analysis was run 1000 times for cohorts of 100 patients over a 20-year time horizon. All costs and health outcomes were discounted annually at a 3% rate. Results Average per-patient QALYs were estimated for each sequence of interest: nivolumab+ipilimumab followed by cabozantinib (3.59), nivolumab+ipilimumab followed by lenvatinib+everolimus (3.26), pembrolizumab+axitinib followed by cabozantinib (3.14), pembrolizumab+axitinib followed by lenvatinib+everolimus (2.97), pembrolizumab+lenvatinib followed by cabozantinib (3.51), and nivolumab+cabozantinib followed by lenvatinib+everolimus (2.99). Average per-patient costs were estimated for each sequence of interest: nivolumab+ipilimumab followed by cabozantinib ($468,856), nivolumab+ipilimumab followed by lenvatinib+everolimus ($491,259), pembrolizumab+axitinib followed by cabozantinib ($675,714), pembrolizumab+axitinib followed by lenvatinib+everolimus ($700,411), pembrolizumab+lenvatinib followed by cabozantinib ($837,888), nivolumab+cabozantinib followed by lenvatinib+everolimus ($873,377). First-line drug acquisition costs accounted for the majority of costs for all sequences. Conclusions Based upon our model using data from registrational RCTs, first-line nivolumab+ipilimumab followed by cabozantinib represents the dominant treatment strategy for intermediate/poor-risk mRCC patients in the US, offering estimated cost savings of up to 45% when compared to IO+TKI options. Additional studies are needed to elucidate whether these cost savings translate to the real-world setting.

First-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of efficacy and safety

PurposeImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapy is a standard systemic treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Although differential pharmacologic action between ICI+ICI and ICI+tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combinations may affect outcomes, comparative studies using real-world data are few. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the records of 447 mRCC patients treated with 1st-line ICI-based combinations at multiple institutions between January 2018 and August 2023, and selected 320 patients diagnosed with clear cell RCC (ccRCC) for further study. Cohorts were matched using one-to-one propensity scores based on IMDC risk classification. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates (ORRs), and treatment-related adverse events (TrAE) were compared. ResultsThe matching process yielded 228 metastatic ccRCC patients treated with ICI+ICI (n = 114) or ICI+TKI (n = 114). Median OS was 53 months (95%CI: 33–NA) in patients treated with ICI+ICI and was not reached (95%CI: 43–NA) with ICI+TKI (P = 0.24). Median PFS was significantly shorter for ICI+ICI (13 months, 95%CI: 7–25) than for ICI+TKI (25 months, 95%CI: 13–NA) (P = 0.047). There were no differences in second-line PFS for sequential therapy after 1st-line combinations of ICI+ICI or ICI+TKI (6 vs. 8 months, P = 0.6). There were no differences in ORR between the 2 groups (ICI+ICI: 51% vs. ICI+TKI: 55%, P = 0.8); the progressive disease (PD) rate was significantly higher in patients treated with the ICI+ICI combination (24% vs. 11%, P = 0.029). The rate of any grade TrAE was significantly higher in patients treated with ICI+TKI (71% vs. 85%, P = 0.016), but we found no differences in severe TrAE between the 2 groups (39% vs. 36%, P = 0.8). ConclusionsIn a matched cohort of real-world data, we confirmed comparable OS benefits between ICI+ICI and ICI+TKI combinations. However, differential clinical behaviors in terms of PFS, PD rates, and TrAE between ICI-based combinations may enrich clinical decision-making.

Systemic therapies and primary tumour downsizing in renal cell carcinoma: a real-world comparison of anti-angiogenic and immune checkpoint inhibition regimens.

To investigate responses in the primary tumour to different systemic treatment regimens in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). A single-centre retrospective analysis of treatment-naive mRCC patients without prior nephrectomy receiving VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGF only), immune checkpoint inhibitors (IO only), or combinations thereof (IO + VEGF). The primary outcome was the rate of partial response in the primary tumour (primary tumour PR, ≥ 30% diameter reduction). Secondary outcomes were time to best primary tumour diameter change, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Predictors of survival outcomes were explored by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. The rate of primary tumour PR was 14% for VEGF only (4/28 patients), 22% for IO only (5/23) and 50% for IO + VEGF (7/14), with median best primary tumour diameter change of -8.0%, + 5.1%, and -31.1% respectively, and median time to best primary tumour diameter change of 3.2, 3.0 and 6.9months respectively. Median OS was significantly greater with IO + VEGF compared to VEGF only (HR 0.45, p = 0.04) and non-significantly greater compared to IO only (HR 0.46, p = 0.06). In multivariable analysis, primary tumour PR was the only response variable significantly associated with both OS (adjusted HR 0.32, p = 0.01) and PFS (adjusted HR 0.29, p < 0.01). mRCC patients without prior nephrectomy receiving first-line IO + VEGF regimens showed the greatest primary tumour responses, suggesting further prospective evaluation of this combination in the neoadjuvant and deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy settings.

TNFSF9 Is Associated with Favorable Tumor Immune Microenvironment in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma Who Are Treated with the Combination Therapy of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab.

Combination therapy of nivolumab and ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has shown efficacy, but approximately 20% of patients experience disease progression in the early stages of treatment. No useful biomarkers have been reported to date. Therefore, it is desirable to identify biomarkers to predict treatment responses in advance. We examined the tumor microenvironment (TME)-related gene expression in mRCC patients treated with NIVO + IPI, between the response and non-response groups, using tumor tissues, before administering NIVO + IPI. In TME-related genes, TNFSF9 expression was identified as a candidate for the predictive biomarker. Its expression discriminated between the response and non-response groups with 88.89% sensitivity and 87.50% specificity (AUC = 0.9444). We further analyzed the roles of TNFSF9 in TME using bioinformatics from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort. An adaptive immune response was activated in the TNFSF9-high-expression tumors. Indeed, T follicular helper cells, plasma B cells, and tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells were increased in the tumors, which indicates the promotion of humoral immunity due to enhanced T-B interactions. However, as the number of regulatory T cells (Treg) increased in the tumors, the percentage of dysfunctional T cells also increased. This suggests that not only PD-1 but also CTLA-4 inhibition may have suppressed Treg activation and improved the therapeutic effect in the TNFSF9 high-expression tumors. Therefore, TNFSF9 may predict the therapeutic efficacy of NIVO + IPI for mRCC and allow more appropriate patient selection.

The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma in immune-oncology era (SEVURO-CN): study protocol for a multi-center, prospective, randomized trial

BackgroundThe role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remains unclear in the immuno-oncology (IO) era. The results of two randomized trials, CARMENA and SURTIME, questioned the role and timing of CN. However, despite the latest advances in the systemic treatment of mRCC, previous trials have only used targeted therapy, and no studies have fully investigated the role of CN in immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) settings, and there is an urgent need for future studies to better define the role and timing of CN.MethodsThis study is an open-label, multi-center, parallel, prospective, randomized, interventional clinical study to evaluate the efficacy of CN in combination with CPIs in mRCC patients with International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) intermediate- and poor-risk. Synchronous mRCC patients with ≤ 3 IMDC risk features will be randomly allocated to three groups (1, upfront CN; 2, deferred CN; and 3, systemic therapy [ST] only). For ST, the nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination regimen, one of the standard regimens for intermediate- and poor-risk mRCC, is chosen. The primary endpoint is overall survival. The secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, objective response rate, number of participants with treatment-related adverse events, and number of participants with surgical morbidity. We will analyze the genetic mutation profiles of the tumor tissue, circulating tumor DNA, urine tumor DNA, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. The gut and urine microbial communities will be analyzed. The study will begin in 2022 and will enroll 55 patients.DiscussionThis study is one of the few prospective randomized trials to evaluate the benefit of CN in the treatment of synchronous mRCC in the IO era. The SEVURO-CN trial will help identify the role and timing of CN, thereby rediscovering the value of CN.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05753839. Registered on 3 March 2023.

Long-term responders to nivolumab in previously treated advanced renal cell carcinoma: a sub-analysis of meet-URO15 study

BackgroundAlthough nivolumab prolongs overall survival (OS) in pretreated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), underlining clinical and biological features of long-term responses are still to be determined. This study aims to investigate clinical and pathological characteristics of mRCC patients who achieved long-term responses during nivolumab treatment.Materials and methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on mRCC patients receiving nivolumab as second or further therapy line between May 2016 and January 2019 in 34 Italian Oncology Centres. Outcome assessments and logistic regression were performed to evaluate factors influencing long-term responses.ResultsA total of 571 patients with a median age of 61 years (range 17–85) were included in the analysis. With a median follow-up of 22.1 (1.0–89.0) months, 23.1% of patients were 2-year progression-free on treatment with nivolumab, hence they were categorized as long-term responders. Baseline characteristics, including age, gender, and histology, were similar between long- and short-term responders. Karnofsky Performance Status ≥ 80% was significantly associated with long-term response (p = 0.02), while bone metastases (p = 0.03), International mRCC Database Consortium intermediate-poor risk (p < 0.01) and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio ≥ 3.2 (p = 0.02) were associate with short-term responses. Long-term responders exhibited a median progression-free survival of 55.0 months versus 4.0 months of the short-term responders. The median OS was not reached in long-term responders while it was 17.0 months for short*term responders.ConclusionThis retrospective analysis sheds light on factors associated with long-term response to nivolumab in mRCC. Understanding these clinical features will be essential for selecting patients who may mostly benefit from immunotherapy.

Single-Cell Analysis Identifies Distinct Populations of Cytotoxic CD4+ T Cells Linked to the Therapeutic Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

The involvement of cytotoxic CD4+ T cells (CD4+ CTLs) and their potential role in dictating the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remains an unexplored area of research. Utilizing single-cell RNA sequencing, we analyzed the immunophenotype and expression patterns of CD4+ T lymphocyte subtypes in mRCC patients, followed by preliminary validation via multi-immunofluorescent staining. In addition, we obtained a comprehensive immunotherapy dataset encompassing single-cell RNA sequencing datasets and bulk RNA-seq cohorts from the European Genome-Phenome Archive and ArrayExpress database. Utilizing the CIBERSORTx deconvolution algorithms, we derived a signature score for CD4+ CTLs from the bulk-RNA-seq datasets of the CheckMate 009/025 clinical trials. Single-cell analysis of CD4+ T lymphocytes in mRCC reveals several cancer-specific states, including diverse phenotypes of regulatory T cells. Remarkably, we observe that CD4+ CTLs cells constitute a substantial proportion of all CD4+ T lymphocyte sub-clusters in mRCC patients, highlighting their potential significance in the disease. Furthermore, within mRCC patients, we identify two distinct cytotoxic states of CD4+ T cells: CD4+GZMK+ T cells, which exhibit a weaker cytotoxic potential, and CD4+GZMB+ T cells, which demonstrate robust cytotoxic activity. Both regulatory T cells and CD4+ CTLs originate from proliferating CD4+ T cells within mRCC tissues. Intriguingly, our trajectory analysis indicates that the weakly cytotoxic CD4+GZMK+ T cells differentiate from their more cytotoxic CD4+GZMB+ counterparts. In comparing patients with lower CD4+ CTLs levels to those with higher CD4+ CTLs abundance in the CheckMate 009 and 25 immunotherapy cohorts, the latter group exhibited significantly improved OS and PFS probability. Our study underscores the pivotal role that intratumoral CD4+ CTLs may play in bolstering anti-tumor immunity, suggesting their potential as a promising biomarker for predicting response to ICIs in patients with mRCC.

Concomitant Administration of VEGFR Tyrosine Kinase and Proton Pump Inhibitors May Impair Clinical Outcome of Patients With Metastatic Renal Cancer

IntroductionThe administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is a common practice to reduce gastro-esophageal adverse events associated with drug treatments but may impair absorption and exposure to oncology drugs. This study investigated the effect of concomitant administration of PPIs and pazopanib, sunitinib and cabozantinib on survival of patients with metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma (mRCC). Patients and MethodsTotal 451 patients receiving pazopanib, sunitinib and cabozantinib as first line treatment were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were defined as “no concomitant PPIs (PPI−)” if no PPIs were administered during TKIs, and as “concomitant PPIs (PPI+)” if the administration of PPIs was at least 75% of the time during which TKIs were given. ResultsEighty patients administered pazopanib were PPI− and 86 PPI+; no difference in PFS was observed (10.7 vs. 11.9 months, P = .79). If patients were stratified as short (n = 89) and long (n = 77) responders, there was a significant difference in terms of PFS in PPI+ (n = 47) versus PPI− (n = 30) in long responders, being 24.7 versus 38 months (P = .04), respectively. In the sunitinib cohort, no significant difference of PFS in PPI+ (n = 102) versus PPI− (n = 131) was found, being 11.3 versus 18.1 months, respectively (P=0.15). In the cabozantinib cohort, there was a statistically significant difference in PFS of PPI+ versus PPI− (6 months vs. not reached, P = .04). No correlation with adverse events was found. ConclusionsThis study demonstrates an association between PPIs and impaired PFS in mRCC patients given pazopanib and cabozantinib and recommends caution on their concomitant use.

International multicenter real-world REGistry for patients with metastatic renAL cell carcinoma – Meet-URO 33 study (REGAL study)

BackgroundNowadays, different therapeutic options are available for the first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Immuno-combinations are the standard first-line therapy in all mRCC patients regardless of the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk category, even though TKI monotherapy is still a therapeutic option in selected patients. However, comparisons between the different first-line treatment strategies are lacking and few real-world data are available in this setting. For this reason, the regimen choice represents an important issue in clinical practice and the optimal treatment sequence remains unclear.MethodsThe REGAL study is a multicentric prospective observational study enrolling mRCC patients treated with first-line systemic therapy according to clinical practice in a real-world setting. A retrospective cohort of mRCC patients who received first-line systemic therapy from the 1st of January 2021 will also be included. The primary objective is to identify potential prognostic and predictive factors that could help guide the treatment choice; secondary objectives included the assessment of the prognostic performance of the novel prognostic Meet-URO score (IMDC score + neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio + bone metastases) compared with the IMDC score and the comparison between treatment strategies according to response and survival outcomes and toxicity profile.DiscussionConsidering the high number of therapeutic first-line strategies available for mRCC, the identification of clinical prognostic and predictive factors to candidate patients to a preferable systemic therapy is still an unmet clinical need. The Meet-URO 33 study aims to provide a large-scale real-world database on mRCC patients, to identify the clinical predictive and prognostic factors and the different performances between the ICI-based combinations according to response, survival and toxicity.Trial RegistrationCESC IOV 2023-78.

Sex and survival outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma receiving first-line immune-based combinations

BackgroundThere is an ongoing debate as to whether sex could be associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) benefit. Existing literature data reveal contradictory results, and data on first-line immune combinations are lacking.MethodThis was a real-world, multicenter, international, observational study to determine the sex effects on the clinical outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with immuno-oncology combinations as first-line therapy.ResultsA total of 1827 mRCC patients from 71 cancer centers in 21 countries were included. The median OS was 38.7 months (95% CI 32.7–44.2) in the overall study population: 40.0 months (95% CI 32.7–51.6) in males and 38.7 months (95% CI 26.4–41.0) in females (p = 0.202). The median OS was higher in males vs. females in patients aged 18-49y (36.9 months, 95% CI 29.0–51.6, vs. 24.8 months, 95% CI 16.8–40.4, p = 0.426, with + 19% of 2y-OS rate, 72% vs. 53%, p = 0.006), in the clear cell histology subgroup (44.2 months, 95% CI 35.8–55.7, vs. 38.7 months, 95% CI 26.0–41.0, p = 0.047), and in patients with sarcomatoid differentiation (34.4 months, 95% CI 26.4–59.0, vs. 15.3 months, 95% CI 8.9–41.0, p < 0.001). Sex female was an independent negative prognostic factor in the sarcomatoid population (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.15 − 2.57, p = 0.008).ConclusionsAlthough the female’s innate and adaptive immunity has been observed to be more active than the male’s, women in the subgroup of clear cell histology, sarcomatoid differentiation, and those under 50 years of age showed shorter OS than males.

First-Line Treatments and Management of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients: An Italian Interdisciplinary Uro-Oncologic Group Algorithm.

The treatment landscape for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has undergone significant transformations in recent years. The introduction of novel combination therapies involving tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitors has resulted in improved oncological outcomes compared to traditional TKI monotherapy. In this evolving paradigm, the pivotal role of the multidisciplinary tumor board is underscored, particularly in shaping the therapeutic trajectory for patients eligible for locoregional interventions like cytoreductive nephrectomy and metastasectomy. In cases where systemic treatment is deemed appropriate, the absence of direct comparisons among the various combination therapies complicates the selection of a first-line approach. The clinician is faced with the challenge of making decisions based on patient-specific factors such as performance status, risk classification according to the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium, comorbidities, and disease characteristics, including the number and location of metastases and tumor histology. Considering these concerns, we propose, as a member of a Tuscany Interdisciplinary Uro-Oncologic Group, an algorithm to streamline the decision-making process for mRCC patients, offering guidance to clinicians in their day-to-day clinical practice.