Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists Research Articles

Proteomic Correlates and Prognostic Significance of Kidney Injury in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Kidney disease is common in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, the biologic correlates and prognostic significance of kidney injury (KI), in HFpEF, beyond the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), are unclear. Using baseline plasma samples from the TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist) trial, we measured the following KI biomarkers: cystatin-C, fatty acid-binding protein-3, Beta-2 microglobulin, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, and kidney-injury molecule-1. Factor analysis was used to extract the common variability underlying these biomarkers. We assessed the relationship between the KI-factor score and the risk of death or HF-related hospital admission in models adjusted for the Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure risk score and eGFR. We also assessed the relationship between the KI factor score and ~5000 plasma proteins, followed by pathway analysis. We validated our findings among HFpEF participants in the Penn Heart Failure Study. KI was associated with the risk of death or HF-related hospital admission independent of the Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure risk score and eGFR. Both the risk score and eGFR were no longer associated with death or HF-related hospital admission after adjusting for the KI factor score. KI was predominantly associated with proteins and biologic pathways related to complement activation, inflammation, fibrosis, and cholesterol homeostasis. KI was associated with 140 proteins, which reproduced across cohorts. Findings regarding biologic associations and the prognostic significance of KI were also reproduced in the validation cohort. KI is associated with adverse outcomes in HFpEF independent of baseline eGFR. Patients with HFpEF and KI exhibit a plasma proteomic signature indicative of complement activation, inflammation, fibrosis, and impaired cholesterol homeostasis.

Finerenone and left ventricular hypertrophy in chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes.

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease and linked to increased morbidity and mortality. In patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D), hypertension is common, and patients with these co-morbidities additionally have a high prevalence of LVH. This analysis of the prespecified pooled FIDELITY analysis comprising the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD phase III studies aimed to explore the CV and kidney effects of finerenone, a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, in patients with CKD and T2D stratified by a diagnosis of LVH at baseline. A diagnosis of LVH in the FIDELITY patient population was determined at baseline using investigator-reported electrocardiogram (ECG) findings. The two efficacy outcomes, assessed by baseline LVH, were the composite CV outcome of time to CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), and a composite kidney outcome of time to onset of kidney failure, a sustained decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)≥57% from baseline over ≥4weeks, or kidney-related death. Safety outcomes by baseline LVH were reported as treatment-emergent adverse events. At baseline out of 13026 patients in FIDELITY, 96.5% had hypertension and 9.6% had investigator-reported LVH. The relative risk reduction for the composite CV and kidney outcomes with finerenone versus placebo was lower in the LVH subgroup; however, the treatment effect of finerenone was not modified by baseline LVH for either outcome (Pinteraction=0.1075 for composite CV outcome and Pinteraction=0.1782 for composite kidney outcome). Analysis of the composite CV outcome components showed a greater reduction in the risk of HHF versus placebo for patients with baseline LVH compared with those without (Pinteraction=0.0024). Overall safety events were comparable between the LVH subgroups and treatment arms. Treatment-emergent hyperkalaemia was observed more frequently with finerenone versus placebo, but discontinuation rates were low in both treatment arms and between LVH subgroups. In conclusion, the overall CV and kidney benefits of finerenone versus placebo were not modified by the presence of LVH at baseline, with overall safety findings being similar between LVH subgroups. A greater benefit was observed for HHF in patients with versus without LVH, suggesting that LVH may be a predictor of the treatment effect of finerenone on HHF.

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in heart failure: an individual patient level meta-analysis

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) reduce hospitalisations and death in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but the benefit in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is unclear. We evaluated the effect of MRAs in four trials that enrolled patients with heart failure across the range of ejection fraction. This is a prespecified, individual patient level meta-analysis of the RALES (spironolactone) and EMPHASIS-HF (eplerenone) trials, which enrolled patients with HFrEF, and of the TOPCAT (spironolactone) and FINEARTS-HF (finerenone) trials, which enrolled patients with HFmrEF or HFpEF. The primary outcome of this meta-analysis was a composite of time to first hospitalisation for heart failure or cardiovascular death. We also estimated the effect of MRAs on components of this composite, total (first or repeat) heart failure hospitalisations (with and without cardiovascular deaths), and all-cause death. Safety outcomes were also assessed, including serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, serum potassium, and systolic blood pressure. An interaction between trials and treatment was tested to examine the heterogeneity of effect in these populations. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024541487. 13 846 patients were included in the four trials. MRAs reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalisation (hazard ratio 0·77 [95% CI 0·72-0·83]). There was a statistically significant interaction by trials and treatment (p for interaction=0·0012) due to the greater efficacy in HFrEF (0·66 [0·59-0·73]) compared with HFmrEF or HFpEF (0·87 [0·79-0·95]). We observed significant reductions in heart failure hospitalisation in the HFrEF trials (0·63 [0·55-0·72]) and the HFmrEF or HFpEF trials (0·82 [0·74-0·91]). The same pattern was observed for total heart failure hospitalisations with or without cardiovascular death. Cardiovascular death was reduced in the HFrEF trials (0·72 [0·63-0·82]) but not in the HFmrEF or HFpEF trials (0·92 [0·80-1·05]). All-cause death was also reduced in the HFrEF trials (0·73 [0·65-0·83]) but not in the HFmrEF or HFpEF trials (0·94 [0·85-1·03]). With an MRA, the risk of hyperkalaemia was doubled compared with placebo (odds ratio 2·27 [95% CI 2·02-2·56]), but the incidence of serious hyperkalaemia (serum potassium >6·0 mmol/L) was low (2·9% vs 1·4%); the risk of hypokalaemia (potassium <3·5 mmol/L) was halved (0·51 [0·45-0·57]; 7% vs 14%). Steroidal MRAs reduce the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalisation in patients with HFrEF and non-steroidal MRAs reduce this risk in patients with HFmrEF or HFpEF. None.

Fixed-dose Combination of Torsemide and Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists.

The combination of torsemide and spironolactone presents a promising approach to managing conditions such as edema and hypertension. Torsemide, a loop diuretic, enhances diuresis by inhibiting sodium reabsorption in the kidneys, while spironolactone, a potassium-sparing diuretic and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), complements this effect by preventing potassium loss and offering additional cardiovascular benefits. This review examines clinical evidence supporting their combined effectiveness in treating fluid retention and improving outcomes in conditions like heart failure (HF). Given the limited research available, it is essential to carefully evaluate patient-specific factors. However, several side effects necessitate careful patient selection and monitoring. Moreover, optimizing dosing regimens is crucial to ensure the safety and efficacy of torsemide and MRAs in clinical settings.

Finerenone in Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists reduce morbidity and mortality among patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, but their efficacy in those with heart failure and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction has not been established. Data regarding the efficacy and safety of the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction are needed. In this international, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned patients with heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or greater, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive finerenone (at a maximum dose of 20 mg or 40 mg once daily) or matching placebo, in addition to usual therapy. The primary outcome was a composite of total worsening heart failure events (with an event defined as a first or recurrent unplanned hospitalization or urgent visit for heart failure) and death from cardiovascular causes. The components of the primary outcome and safety were also assessed. Over a median follow-up of 32 months, 1083 primary-outcome events occurred in 624 of 3003 patients in the finerenone group, and 1283 primary-outcome events occurred in 719 of 2998 patients in the placebo group (rate ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 0.95; P = 0.007). The total number of worsening heart failure events was 842 in the finerenone group and 1024 in the placebo group (rate ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.94; P = 0.006). The percentage of patients who died from cardiovascular causes was 8.1% and 8.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.11). Finerenone was associated with an increased risk of hyperkalemia and a reduced risk of hypokalemia. In patients with heart failure and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction, finerenone resulted in a significantly lower rate of a composite of total worsening heart failure events and death from cardiovascular causes than placebo. (Funded by Bayer; FINEARTS-HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04435626.).

Cardiovascular and Renal Treatment in Heart Failure Patients With Hyperkalemia or High Risk of Hyperkalemia: Rationale and Design of the CARE-HK in HF Registry

Despite guideline recommendations, many patients with heart failure (HF) do not receive target dosages of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASis) in clinical practice due, in part, to concerns about hyperkalemia (HK). This noninterventional, multinational, multicenter registry (NCT04864795; 111 sites in Europe and the USA) enrolled 2558 eligible adults with chronic HF (mostly with reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF]). Eligibility criteria included use of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin-II receptor blocker/angiotensin-receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, being a candidate for or treatment with a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and increased risk of HK (eg, current serum potassium > 5.0 mmol/L), history of HK in the previous 24 months, or estimated glomerular filtration rate < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2). Information on RAASi and other guideline-recommended therapies was collected retrospectively and prospectively (≥ 6 months). Patients were followed according to local clinical practice, without study-specific visits or interventions. The main objectives were to characterize RAASi treatment patterns compared with guideline recommendations, describe RAASi modifications following episodes of HK, and describe RAASi treatment in patients treated with patiromer. Baseline characteristics for the first 1000 patients are presented. CARE-HK is a multinational prospective HF registry designed to report on the management and outcomes of patients with HF at high risk for HK in routine clinical practice.

Indian Consensus on the Role and Position of Angiotensin Receptor-neprilysin Inhibitors in the Management of Heart Failure.

The incidence of heart failure (HF) in India is estimated to be 0.5-1.7 cases per 1,000 people per year, and approximately 4,92,000-1.8 million new cases are detected every year. Despite the high rate of mortality associated with HF, most patients do not receive maximal guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). Current guidelines advocate early multidrug combination therapy with four classes of drugs, namely, beta-blockers (BBs), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), and sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is), particularly in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). ARNIs reduce cardiac morbidity and mortality in patients with HFrEF. However, recent data indicated that only 4.8% of patients with HFrEF receive ARNI in India. Hence, at a national consensus on HF meeting, cardiology experts from India formulated a national consensus on the use of ARNI in HF based on current evidence and guidelines. The consensus states that ARNI should be used early in HF, particularly in de novo patients with HFrEF, and those with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), irrespective of the presence of low systolic blood pressure (SBP) or diabetes. Moreover, those with HFrEF on renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors should be switched to ARNI to reduce the risk of repeated hospitalization for HF, worsening HF, and cardiac death, and to improve the quality of life (QoL). Starting ARNI during the first hospitalization is preferable, and it is safe and effective across all doses. ARNIs can also be used for secondary benefits in patients with preserved ejection fraction [heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)] and HF with mildly reduced EF [heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF)].

Role of L-type Ca2+-channels in the vasorelaxing response to finerenone in arteries of human visceral adipose tissue.

Inadequate blood supply to the expanding adipose tissue (AT) is involved in the unhealthy AT remodeling and cardiometabolic consequences of obesity. Because of the pathophysiological role of upregulated mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) signaling in the complications of obesity, this study tested the vasoactive properties of finerenone, a nonsteroidal MR antagonist, in arteries of human AT. Arteries isolated from the visceral AT of obese subjects were studied in a wire myograph. Finerenone resulted in a concentration-dependent relaxation of arteries precontracted with either the thromboxane-A2 analog U46619, ET-1, or high-K+ solution; the steroidal MR antagonist potassium canrenoate, by contrast, did not relax arteries contracted with either U46619 or high-K+ solution. Finerenone-induced relaxation after precontraction with U46619 was greater in the arteries of obese versus nonobese subjects. Mechanistically, the vasorelaxing response to finerenone was not influenced by preincubation with the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor L-NAME or by endothelium removal. Interestingly, finerenone, like the dihydropyridine Ca2+-channel blocker nifedipine, relaxed arteries contracted with the L-type Ca2+-channel agonist Bay K8644. In conclusion, finerenone relaxes arteries of human visceral AT, likely through antagonism of L-type Ca2+ channels. This finding identifies a novel mechanism by which finerenone may improve AT perfusion, hence protecting against the cardiometabolic complications of obesity.

Therapeutic Effects of Heart Failure Medical Therapies on Standardized Kidney Outcomes: Comprehensive Individual Participant-Level Analysis of 6 Randomized Clinical Trials.

Background: Kidney outcomes have been variably defined using non-standardized composite endpoints in key heart failure (HF) trials, thus introducing complexity in their interpretation and cross-trial comparability. We examined the effects of steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), the angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on composite kidney endpoints using uniform definitions in 6 contemporary HF trials. Methods: Individual participant-level data from trials of steroidal MRAs (EMPHASIS-HF, TOPCAT Americas), ARNI (PARADIGM-HF, PARAGON-HF), and SGLT2 inhibitors (DAPA-HF, DELIVER) were included. The standardized composite kidney endpoint was defined as a sustained decline (a reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) confirmed by a subsequent measurement at least 30 days later) in eGFR by 40%, 50%, or 57%, end-stage kidney disease, or renal death. eGFR was recalculated in a standardized manner using the 2009 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration creatinine equation. Results: Among 28,690 participants across the 6 trials (median age 69 years [IQR, 62-76]; 9,656 [33.7% ] women), the proportion experiencing the composite kidney endpoint with a more stringent definition of a sustained decline in kidney function (eGFR threshold of 57%) ranged from 0.3% to 3.3%. The proportion of patients experiencing this endpoint with a less stringent definition (eGFR threshold of 40%) ranged from 1.0% and 10.0%. The steroidal MRAs doubled the risk of the composite kidney endpoint when applying the least stringent definition compared with placebo, but these effects were less apparent and no longer significant with application of more stringent definitions. ARNI appeared to consistently reduce the occurrence of the composite kidney endpoints irrespective of specific eGFR threshold applied. The potential benefits of SGLT2-inhibitors on the composite kidney endpoints appeared more apparent when defined by more stringent eGFR thresholds, although none of these effects individually were statistically significant. Conclusions: When applying standardized stringent kidney endpoint definitions, steroidal MRAs, ARNI, and SGLT2-inhibitors have either neutral or beneficial effects on kidney outcomes in HF. Applying less stringent definitions increased event rates but included acute declines in eGFR that might not ultimately reflect long-term effects on kidney disease progression.

Finerenone in Patients With a Recent Worsening Heart Failure Event: The FINEARTS-HF Trial.

Patients with heart failure (HF) and a recent worsening heart failure (WHF) event are known to be at high risk of recurrent hospitalization and death, regardless of ejection fraction. This study examined the efficacy and safety of the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) finerenone in relation to the recency of a WHF event. FINEARTS-HF (FINerenone trial to investigate Efficacy and sAfety superioR to placebo in paTientS with Heart Failure) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of finerenone in patients with HF and left ventricular ejection fraction≥40%. In this prespecified analysis, we assessed the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events and response to finerenone vs placebo in relation to the time from WHF to randomization (during or within 7days, 7days to 3months, >3months, or no prior WHF). The primary outcome was a composite of total (first and recurrent) WHF events and CV death, analyzed using a proportional rates method. Of 6,001 patients validly randomized to finerenone or placebo, 1,219 (20.3%) were enrolled during (749 [12.5%]) or within 7days (470 [7.8%]), 2,028 (33.8%) between 7days and 3months, and 937 (15.6%) >3months from a WHF event; 1,817 (30.3%) had no prior history of WHF. Rates of the primary composite outcome varied inversely with time since WHF, with >2-fold higher risk in those enrolled during or within 7days of WHF compared with those enrolled >3months from WHF or without prior WHF (risk ratio [RR]: 2.13; 95%CI: 1.82-2.55). Compared to placebo, finerenone appeared to lower the risk of the primary composite to a greater extent in those enrolled within 7days of WHF (RR: 0.74; 95%CI: 0.57-0.95) or between 7days and 3months of WHF (RR: 0.79; 95%CI: 0.64-0.97) than in those >3months from WHF or without prior WHF (RR: 0.99; 95%CI: 0.81-1.21); however, no definitive treatment-by-time interaction could be confirmed (P = 0.07). Greater absolute risk reductions with finerenone were accordingly seen in those with recent WHF (Ptrend=0.011). The risk of adverse events including hyperkalemia and worsening renal function among patients assigned to finerenone was not increased in those with recent WHF. Compared with those without recent WHF, patients with HF and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction who have experienced a recent WHF event are at higher risk for recurrent HF events and CV death; a possible signal of enhanced absolute treatment benefit with finerenone in this population requires further confirmation in future studies. (Study to Evaluate the Efficacy [Effect on Disease] and Safety of Finerenone on Morbidity [Events Indicating Disease Worsening] & Mortality [Death Rate] in Participants With HeartFailure and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [Proportion of Blood Expelled Per Heart Stroke] Greater or Equal to 40% [FINEARTS-HF], NCT04435626; A study to gather information on the influence of study drug finerenone on the number of deaths and hospitalizations in participants with heart failure EudraCT 2020-000306-29).

Torsemide in Edema Associated with Hepatic Impairment.

Hepatic edema is caused by decreased hepatic protein synthesis, a consequence of decompensated liver cirrhosis. Fluid accumulation occurs when there is an increase in hydrostatic pressure in the hepatic sinusoids and splanchnic capillaries, as well as low albumin. The first-line treatment for cirrhosis-related ascites is an aldosterone antagonist (spironolactone); however, in severe and recurring ascites, a combination of aldosterone antagonists and loop diuretics (torsemide, furosemide, and bumetanide) is preferable. Torsemide outperformed furosemide in terms of natriuretic and diuretic effects at an equivalent dose. Pharmacological features of torsemide, such as lesser hypokalemia effect, longer duration of action, higher bioavailability, and extended half-life, make it a better alternative than furosemide. In clinical studies, it is considered a safer and more acceptable choice with fewer complications.

Finerenone in heart failure and chronic kidney disease with type 2 diabetes: FINE-HEART pooled analysis of cardiovascular, kidney and mortality outcomes.

Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome is an emerging entity that connects cardiovascular diseases, chronic kidney disease and diabetes. The non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone has been studied in three prospective randomized clinical trials of patients with cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome: FIDELIO-DKD, FIGARO-DKD and FINEARTS-HF. In light of the strong epidemiological overlap and shared mechanistic drivers of clinical outcomes across cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome, we summarize the efficacy and safety of finerenone on cardiovascular, kidney and mortality outcomes in this pre-specified participant-level pooled analysis. The three trials included 18,991 participants (mean age 67 ± 10 years; 35% women). During 2.9 years of median follow-up, the primary outcome of cardiovascular death occurred in 421 (4.4%) participants assigned to finerenone and 471 (5.0%) participants assigned to placebo (hazard ratio (HR): 0.89; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-1.01; P = 0.076). Death from any cause occurred in 1,042 (11.0%) participants in the finerenone arm and in 1,136 (12.0%) participants in the placebo arm (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.84-0.99; P = 0.027). Finerenone further reduced the risk of hospitalization from heart failure (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.75-0.92; P < 0.001) and the composite kidney outcome (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.72-0.90; P < 0.001). While in this pooled analysis the reduction in cardiovascular death was not statistically significant, finerenone reduced the risks for deaths of any cause, cardiovascular events and kidney outcomes. PROSPERO identifier: CRD42024570467 .

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for every patient with heart failure

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for every patient with heart failure

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system: An old tree sprouts new shoots

The intricate physiological and pathological diversity of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS) underpins its role in maintaining bodily equilibrium. This paper delves into the classical axis (Renin-ACE-Ang II-AT1R axis), the protective arm (ACE2-Ang (1–7)-MasR axis), the prorenin-PRR-MAP kinases ERK1/2 axis, and the Ang IV-AT4R-IRAP cascade of RAAS, examining their functions in both physiological and pathological states. The dysregulation or hyperactivation of RAAS is intricately linked to numerous diseases, including cardiovascular disease (CVD), renal damage, metabolic disease, eye disease, Gastrointestinal disease, nervous system and reproductive system diseases. This paper explores the pathological mechanisms of RAAS in detail, highlighting its significant role in disease progression. Currently, in addition to traditional drugs like ACEI, ARB, and MRA, several novel therapeutics have emerged, such as angiotensin receptor-enkephalinase inhibitors, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, aldosterone synthase inhibitors, aminopeptidase A inhibitors, and angiotensinogen inhibitors. These have shown potential efficacy and application prospects in various clinical trials for related diseases. Through an in-depth analysis of RAAS, this paper aims to provide crucial insights into its complex physiological and pathological mechanisms and offer valuable guidance for developing new therapeutic approaches. This comprehensive discussion is expected to advance the RAAS research field and provide innovative ideas and directions for future clinical treatment strategies.

The mineralocorticoid system, cardiometabolic health and its interplay with adipose tissue.

The mineralocorticoid system, comprising the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and associated receptors, is traditionally viewed as a regulator of sodium and fluid balance and blood pressure (BP), with the main mineralocorticoid hormone aldosterone acting via the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) in distal renal tubules. Over the past few decades, there has been a wider understanding of the role of the mineralocorticoid system in regulating both classical BP-dependent and non-BP-dependent systemic effects. Mounting evidence indicates the novel role of the mineralocorticoid system in cardiometabolic health with excess mineralocorticoid system activity being associated with adiposity, diabetes, insulin resistance and cardiovascular diseases independent of its effect on BP, and RAAS blockade and MR antagonists offering protection against cardiometabolic dysfunction. The metabolic manifestations of mineralocorticoid system overactivation are mainly mediated by their interactions with adipose tissue which orchestrates energy, lipids and glucose homeostasis via effects on the functions of brown and white adipocytes and immune cells. Adipose tissue can in turn influence mineralocorticoid system activity by harbouring its own RAAS system and by releasing mineralocorticoid-secretory factors/adipokines, with resultant further progression of cardiometabolic dysfunction. This article discusses the interplay between the mineralocorticoid system and adipose tissue in the pathophysiology of cardiometabolic diseases.

Multivariate approaches for assessing dissolution behaviour of spironolactone. Dissolution-driven determination of polymorphic purity limits

Spironolactone (SPN) is an aldosterone antagonist effective for preventing and controlling cardiovascular diseases. Form I and Form II exhibit different behaviour in their dissolution properties, which can compromise the quality of the pharmaceutical formulation. Hence, in the present work, we propose the combination of two multivariate approaches to estimate the polymorphic purity of SPN in commercial tablets and predict the dissolution behaviour of these formulations considering their polymorphic composition. Multiple linear regression (MLR) approach was applied to model the dissolution behaviour of formulations depending on their polymorphic composition, showing excellent agreement among actual vs. predicted dissolution curves. This model was applied to establish a design space were the risks of dissolution failure due to the polymorphic purity was avoided. Next, to evaluate the purity of Form II of SPN in formulated products, two quantitative partial least squares (PLS) models were developed based on near (NIR) and mid (MIR) infrared spectroscopies. Training (n=14) and validation (n=8) sets were prepared by mixing both polymorphs and the excipient matrix to simulate commercial tablets. Methodologies showed recoveries non-statistical different from 100%, but MIR-PLS model showed a higher dispersion (100.1 ± 1.82% and 99.5 ± 6.94% for NIR and MIR, respectively). Similar values of Form II content (1.02 ± 0.01 w/w with NIR and 1.03 ± 0.03 w/w with MIR) were obtained during the analysis of commercial and spiked SPN tablets. Finally, NIR-PLS was coupled to MLR model for the prediction of dissolution in entire tablets based on polymorphic composition to act as Quality by Design (QbD) tool. The full coincidence among actual and NIR-MLR predicted curves validated the final purpose of this approach.

In-hospital initiation of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition in acute heart failure: the PREMIER trial.

The efficacy and safety of early sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) initiation after acute heart failure (AHF) has not been demonstrated outside North America. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of in-hospital Sac/Val therapy initiation after an AHF episode on N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level in Japanese patients. This was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint pragmatic trial. After haemodynamic stabilization within 7 days after hospitalization, eligible inpatients were allocated to switch from angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker to Sac/Val (Sac/Val group) or to continue angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (control group). The primary efficacy endpoint was the 8-week proportional change in geometric means of NT-proBNP levels. A total of 400 patients were equally randomized, and 376 (median age 75 years, 31.9% women, de novo heart failure rate 55.6%, and median left ventricular ejection fraction 37%) were analysed. The per cent changes in NT-proBNP level geometric means at Weeks 4/8 were -35%/-45% (Sac/Val group) and -18%/-32% (control group), and their group ratio (Sac/Val vs. control) was 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.68-0.94; P = .008) at Week 4 and 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.68-0.95; P = .012) at Week 8, respectively. In the pre-specified subgroup analyses, the effects of Sac/Val were confined to patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% and were more evident in those in sinus rhythm and taking mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. No adverse safety signal was evident. In-hospital Sac/Val therapy initiation in addition to contemporary recommended therapy triggered a greater NT-proBNP level reduction in Japanese patients hospitalized for AHF. These findings may expand the evidence on Sac/Val therapy in this clinical situation outside North America. ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT05164653) and Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs021210046).

Finerenone's Impact on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) impacts about 10% of adults globally and substantially elevates the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), such as heart attacks, strokes, cardiovascular-related deaths, and hospital admissions due to heart failure. The interplay between CKD and cardiovascular disease (CVD) leads to poor health outcomes. Nevertheless, there is a scarcity of systematic reviews focusing on the effectiveness of finerenone, a new non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), in lowering these risks. In this systematic review, we aim to evaluate the impact of finerenone on reducing MACEin individuals with CKDand type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). CKD pathophysiology involves hyperglycemia, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, leading to glomerular hyperfiltration, inflammation, and fibrosis. Traditional treatments, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), often fall short in preventing cardiovascular events. Steroidal MRAs like spironolactone and eplerenone, while effective in reducing proteinuria, are limited by hyperkalemia risks. Finerenone offers a more selective mechanism, reducing sodium retention, inflammation, and fibrosis, with a lower risk of hyperkalemia. We searched five electronic databases comprehensively, identifying studies consistently demonstrating that finerenone significantly reduces MACE and improves renal outcomes by reducing albuminuria and slowing the fall in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). However, limitations include study heterogeneity, short follow-up periods, and potential publication bias. In conclusion, finerenone shows promise as a therapeutic option for CKD and T2DM, reducing MACE and improving renal outcomes. Further research is needed to understand its long-term benefits and safety across diverse populations.

Medicines for reduced ejection fraction heart failure in Central region of Portugal’s primary care: a 2022 observational study

Objective: To evaluate the accordance of prognostic medicines prescription (PMP), for persons with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (P-CHFrEF), attended in primary health care units in Central Portugal, with the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2021 August, guidelines. To know about mean age, median time since the diagnosis and last echocardiogram performance in P-CHFrEF. Methods: Observational, cross-sectional study of a random size representative sample, 95% confidence interval, and 8% error margin of the P-CHFrEF of a population on 31st December 2021. Age, gender, year of International Classification for Primary Care-2 (ICPC-2, K-77) problem classification input data, years since the last echocardiogram, ongoing PMP and the use of other chronic heart failure (CHF) drugs were gathered. Data were obtained from 11 Portugal Primary Health Care Units, invited by convenience, after an Ethics Committee approval. Results: From a universe of n=2,381 persons with CHF, n=453 (19.0%) P-CHFrEF was found. A size representative sample of P-CHFrEF of n=133 (5.6%), n=95 males (71.4%) was studied. Prescription of a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RAAS-I) was ongoing in 91.0%, beta-blocker (BB) in 75.2%, mineralocorticoid antagonists (MRA) in 40.6%, inhibitors of the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2i) in 44.4%, neprilisine inhibitors 38.3% and loop diuretics in 72.2%. The optimized medical quadruple therapy was established in 28 patients (21.1%) and the triple one in 38 (28.6 %). Mean age was of 74.3±11.6 years, males 73.4±11.0 and females 76.6±12.9, p=0.088. The median time since the diagnosis was 6.0 for men and 4.0 for women, p=0.031. The median time since the last echocardiogram was 3.0, p=0.750 between genders. Conclusion: According to the 2021 ESC guidelines, prognostic modifying medicines were underused for 50.4% of P-CHFrEF. Even with these results, a reflection must be made, on the barriers physicians encounter, to comply with the ESC guidelines in such patients.

Inpatient Use of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy During HeartFailure Hospitalizations Among Community-Based Health Systems.

Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains underused. Acute heart failure (HF) hospitalization represents a critical opportunity for rapid initiation of evidence-based medications. However, data on GDMT use at discharge are mostly derived from national quality improvement registries. This study aimed to describe contemporary GDMT use patterns across HF hospitalizations at community-based health systems. The authors identified HF hospitalizations from 2016 to 2022 in a U.S. database aggregating deidentified electronic health record data from more than 30 health systems. In-hospital and discharge rates of GDMT use were reported for eligible HFrEF patients. Factors associated with inpatient GDMT use and predischarge discontinuation were evaluated with the use of multivariable models. A total of 20,387 HF hospitalizations among 13,729 HFrEF patients were identified. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists were administered during 70%, 86%, and 37% of eligible hospitalizations, respectively. Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors were used in 17% and 8% of eligible hospitalizations, respectively. Discharge GDMT rates were low. Triple/quadruple therapy was administered in 26% of hospitalizations, falling to 14% on discharge. Predischarge GDMT discontinuations were associated with inpatient hypotension, hyperkalemia, and worsening renal function, but 43%-57% had no medical contraindications. In adjusted analyses, use of 3 or more GDMT classes was associated with fewer 90-day all-cause deaths and HF readmissions compared with less comprehensive GDMT. Inpatient GDMT use in a national analysis of HF hospitalizations was lower than reported in quality improvement registries. High discontinuation rates emphasize an unmet need for inpatient and postdischarge strategies to optimize GDMT use.