Reviewed by: Beyond 1776: Globalizing the Cultures of the American Revolution ed. by Maria O'Malley and Denys Van Renen Anna Vincenzi Maria O'Malley and Denys Van Renen, eds., Beyond 1776: Globalizing the Cultures of the American Revolution (Charlottesville, VA: The Univ. of Virginia Press, 2018). Pp. 272. $45.00 cloth. The "beyond" in this book title has at least three different meanings. The first is geographical. The world of 1776 was one of global interdependencies and cosmopolitanism. As the editors observe, American independence depended on the behavior of other global actors—sometimes very far away actors such as Russia or the Ottoman empire (4). Thus, following in the footsteps of scholars such as Eliga Gould, Claudio Saunt, and Kathleen DuVal, this volume sets out to revisit the foundation of the United States from a global perspective. It carries the reader "beyond" the American Revolution as a "national moment," but also "beyond" the boundaries of the Atlantic and of the British empire, to include, for example, continental Europe (Germany and the Low Countries), the Dutch West Indian colony of St. Eustatius, and China. By doing so, the volume offers a valuable contribution to the mission of achieving a "vaster" perspective on Early America and the Revolution. The volume also aims to go "beyond" traditional methodologies, moving away from canonical sources, actors, and research approaches to the Revolution and its impact abroad. The authors suggest that German-language literature circulating in the early republic or the relatively obscure Mennonite preacher Herman Husband (1724–1795) can reveal nuances of the Revolution that focusing exclusively on Common Sense and the Founding Fathers does not. When the Founders do appear in the volume—as Benjamin Franklin in Maria O'Malley's essay—it as canny, sneaky, and unglorified. Or, to give another example, Carine Louinissi's essay investigates a classic topic, the American Revolution's influence on pre-Revolutionary France, but does so through the eyes of non-canonical interpreters: instead of the usual Brissot, Condorcet, and Raynal, she chooses to focus on lesser-known French intellectuals. "Beyond" is also a value judgment. The essays in many ways relativize the importance of 1776. For starters, there is almost no 1776 in the book. Most essays deal with sources from the 1790s or the nineteenth century. Several essays witness to the impact that foreign events—the French Revolution above all—had on foreign and domestic interpretations of the American Revolution. Leonard von Morzé, for example, examines two 1800 and 1815 pamphlets by the German immigrant Jacob Hütter (1771–1849), showing how his changing perceptions of the French Revolution also prompted his reading of the American Revolution to evolve. Similarly, Miranda Green-Barteet's study of Sarah Pogson's play The Female Enthusiast (1807) documents how the French Revolution shaped Pogson's reflections on the relationship between nationhood and motherhood in the early republic. But other contributions show that elsewhere the American Revolution went unnoticed for much longer. In China, the American Revolution only became a topic of discussion at the turn of the twentieth century. A drastic radicalization of Chinese politics—with the emergence of an anti-Manchurian independence movement in Taiwan and of revolutionary republican societies in mainland China—prompted Chinese people to look back to the American example. Overall, then, what this volume suggests is that 1776 needed other, foreign, events to become 1776, to take up the value of historical milestone that the public [End Page 141] attributes to it today. At the time, instead, peoples around the globe did not attribute to the Revolution universal significance or univocal meaning. The transnational impact of the American Revolution was contingent and diverse, depending on the particular interests of each local community. Paying attention to these local variations and contingent contexts proves fruitful in another way. It discloses a variety of paths-not-taken, missed opportunities, and perspectives on the Age of Revolutions that traditional narratives and Whiggish teleology tend to obscure. For example, Louinissi's essay accounts for the fact that some French intellectuals did not transform their support for the American Revolution into appeals for revolution, remaining moderate reformists or royalists until the beginning of the French Revolution, and sometimes...