Movement Propensity Research Articles

Development of head movement propensity in 4–15 year old children in response to visual step stimuli

Head movement frequency of children in response to horizontal step stimulus is investigated. The aim is to determine if there is a correlation between the age of the child and the frequency of head movements made to visual step stimuli presented at a fixed distance. Also of importance is whether there is a period of rapid change in the frequency of head movements, and if so, what factors could be influencing this change. Seventy-three participants, between the ages of 4 and 15 years were requested to "look at a spot of light" in response to step stimuli which varied in size from 5 to 60 degrees. Eye and head movements were recorded with a video based eye tracker (EL-Mar 2020) equipped with a Flock of Birds head tracker. Frequency of head movements was calculated for each participant and averaged across participants for each age group. Average head movement frequency was then plotted as a function of age. The frequency and variability of head movements decreases as a function of age. This decrease is linear between the ages of 4 and 15 years (y = -1.465x + 22.58; R(2) = 0.4378; F = 26.48; P < 0.0001). More head movements are made in response to larger step sizes than to smaller ones for all ages. The gradual decrease in frequency of head movements in response to step stimuli suggests that a specific environmental event, such as reading, is not the cause of the decline. Improved efficiency of eye movements could be due to pre-programmed factors related to neurological development. Alternatively, cognitive factors may be involved. Children may actually learn that utilizing their head for gaze shifts is more energy and time consuming, than merely using the eyes alone.

Coordination of eye and head movements during reading.

There is little information regarding the characteristics of head movements during reading. This study was undertaken to investigate horizontal and vertical head movements during two different reading tasks. Head and eye movements were monitored with an infrared pupil and head tracker in 15 subjects during repeated reading of text from an A4-sized card and a card 90 degrees wide. In addition, head and eye movements were recorded in 45 subjects to compare head movement propensity during an A4 text-reading task and a saccadic task of an equivalent gaze shift. During the A4 standard reading task, horizontal and vertical head movements accounted for 4.7% and 28.7% of the gaze shift, respectively. During the 90 degrees text reading, horizontal head movements accounted for 40.3% of the gaze amplitude, and vertical head movements accounted for 28.4%. Horizontal gaze velocities increased significantly on repeated A4 and 90 degrees text readings, as did horizontal head velocities and amplitudes. Reading head movement propensities were significantly smaller than saccadic head movement propensities (P < 0.001). Head movement strategies are rapidly switched between the A4 and 90 degrees text-reading paradigms. They are minimized during A4 text reading but actively assist the gaze strategy during 90 degrees text reading. Horizontal head movement is reduced during A4 reading compared to the equivalent saccadic task and may be suppressed to improve fixation stability. The results support the view that the head and eye movement system is a highly coupled but extremely flexible system.

Adaptive plasticity of head movement propensity.

Individual humans exhibit differing propensity to move the head in association with saccadic shifts in gaze. We assessed whether this tendency can be modified in normal subjects by either reducing neck mobility with a cervical collar or restricting the field of view using aperture spectacles. We quantified head movement propensity in terms of the range of orbital eccentricity within which the eyes are customarily maintained (customary ocular motor range), and the range of final eye-in-head eccentricity for which a planned saccade is likely to be executed without a concomitant head movement (eye-only range). Three subjects wore rigid collars during waking hours for periods of up to 9 days. We measured customary and eye-only ranges with the collar removed, at various times during the adaptation and recovery periods. Collar adaptation reduced head movement propensity in all three subjects, increasing the average customary ocular range from 27.6 +/- 8.9 degrees (mean +/- SD) to 66.1 +/- 4.5 degrees and the eye-only range from 24.6 +/- 17.0 degrees to 67.6 +/- 7.4 degrees. In two subjects the modifications persisted for weeks following final collar removal. In parallel with the reduction in head movement propensity, all subjects improved in their ability to maintain eccentric gaze, suggesting that neck restriction led to effects at the level of the brainstem. Three subjects were adapted to spectacles, masked to restrict the field of view to approximately 20 degrees. The aperture spectacles were worn for periods of up to 9 days. When tested without the apertures, one subject exhibited a definite increase in head movement propensity; in the other two, the data were equivocal, indicating either a small increase in head movement propensity or no effect. Averaged across subjects, customary ocular motor range decreased from 35.1 +/- 12.8 degrees to 25.4 +/- 13.4 degrees and eye-only range decreased from 35.1 +/- 7.5 degrees to 23.0 +/- 4.0 degrees. The marked difference in the magnitudes of collar- and spectacle-induced changes suggests that the responses to the two restrictive appliances are mediated by different mechanisms. Collar adaptation may involve parametric modulation of circuits mediating reflex recruitment of head movements, while aperture adaptation may primarily reflect substitution of an alternative mode of head control triggered by the presence of the restricted field of view, with only minor parametric modulation of the underlying head recruitment circuit. The enduring effects of restricting neck mobility upon head movement tendencies may relate to the common clinical association between neck injury and persistent dysequilibrium.

Comparison of Horizontal Head Movements Evoked by Auditory and Visual Targets

Head movement propensity-the pattern of head saccades dependent on methods of target presentation-varies among individuals. The present group of 9 young adults was previously ranked in a visual saccadic task according to this propensity. The present report examines how and why this propensity changes if the saccades are made to auditory targets. 1) Spatially identical, interleaved, auditorily and visually elicited horizontal saccadic gaze shifts (jumps) differed in amplitude and in starting and/or ending position. The jumps were executed in two head movement modes: first, the non-aligned mode was a standard reaction-time single gaze step between two points. Second, the head-aligned mode required alignment of the head with the fixation (starting) point; thereafter both modes were identical. All results in the auditory task are expressed relative to the visual results. 2) In the non-aligned mode, head movement amplitudes were increased on average by 15% (for example, an 80 degrees jump elicited a 12 degrees larger head movement), and velocity decreased by 12%, reflecting the increased demands of the auditory task. More importantly, the differences between subjects was narrowed; that is, head movement propensity was homogenized in the auditory task. In the visual task, head-movers willingly move their heads off and across the midline, whereas non-movers are unwilling to leave the midline from eccentric starting points or to eccentric ending points. This is called the midline attraction effect and was previously linked to spatial reference frames. The homogenization in the auditory task was characterized by head-movers increasing, and non-movers decreasing, their midline attraction, suggesting altered spatial reference frames. 3) For heuristic purposes, the ideal head-mover is defined by a gain of 1.0 in the visual task, and by external earth-fixed reference frames. Similarly, the ideal non-mover has a gain of 0.0 and has a bias toward body (or some par of the body)-fixed reference frames. In the auditory task these gains (and reference frames) in head movers and non-movers are homogenized (close to 0.5), either by the participation of the head (movement of the ears in space) in sensory acquisition or by differences in central nervous processing of the two modalities, or both.

Head movement propensity.

In studies of human eye-head coordinated saccadic gaze shifts, different laboratories have found greatly different magnitudes of head movements for a given amplitude of gaze shift (head movement gain). The present study was conducted to examine why, and to quantify volitional head movements. Fixation/target lights were located at 20 degrees and 40 degrees on either side of a central light. There were two tasks or modes. In the non-aligned mode, gaze fixation (first light) was followed by a gaze step to the target (second light) accurately and quickly. In the head-aligned mode, the head was aligned within 3 degrees of the first fixation light (i.e., initial starting position) before the step sequence began. In both non-aligned and head-aligned modes, subject instructions pertaining to the second target light concerned only gaze; there was no requisite head position. The head movement propensity of nine subjects was ranked according to the mean gain (head/target amplitude) of two 40 degree jumps (0-40 degrees and -20 to +20 degrees) in the non-aligned mode. This ranking method clearly identified extreme head-movers and non-movers. The moderate movers were further characterized by three additional criteria, derived by comparing the gains in different jumps, which varied in starting position and amplitude. First, when the two 40 degree jumps were compared, typically the gain of non-movers was less in the symmetric jump (-20 to +20 degrees) with the gain of the head-movers was greater in the symmetric jump. Second, in the head-aligned mode the gain of non-movers progressively increased when the starting position was progressively moved eccentrically, whereas the gain of head-movers increased only slightly, if at all. Third, when the gains of two symmetric (40 degrees and 80 degrees) jumps were compared, the head-movers consistently had opposite trends from non-movers. These three comparative criteria and the initial criterion together define head movement propensity. To explain the above observations, three effects are proposed. First, a "midline-attraction" effect causes resistance to movement away from the midline in non-movers and an increase in movement amplitude if the jump starts eccentrically. Second, a "resetting" effect occurs when the eccentricity of the jump is varied; the stopping position is reset closer to the target. Third, an "awareness/arousal" effect increases the gain in the head-aligned mode due to the intrinsic nature of the alignment procedure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)