Cardiovascular surgeons increasingly resort to catheter-based diagnostic and therapeutic interventions because of their limited invasiveness. Although, these approaches allow treatment of patients considered unfit for conventional open surgery, exposure to radiation and high procedural complexity could lead to complications. These factors motivated the introduction of robotic technology offering more dexterous catheters, enhanced visualization and opening new possibilities in terms of guidance and coordinated control. In addition to improvements of patient outcome, through teleoperated catheter control radiation exposure of surgeons can be reduced. In order to limit surgical workload, intuitive mappings between joystick input and resulting catheter motion are essential. This paper presents and compares two proposed mappings and investigates the benefits of additional visual guidance. The comparison is based on data gathered during an experimental campaign involving 14 novices and three surgeons. The participants were asked to perform an endovascular task in a virtual reality simulator presented in the first part of this paper. Statistical results show significant superiority of one mapping with respect to the other and a significant improvement of performance thanks to additional visual guidance. Future work will focus on translating the results to a physical setup for surgical validation, also the learning effect will be analyzed more in-depth.