Ethnopharmacological relevanceSaposhnikoviae Radix (SR) was initially documented in Shennong Bencao Jing classics for its properties in dispelling wind, dissolving surface, relieving pain, and alleviating spasms. This herb is commonly used in traditional Chinese medicine to address conditions that affect the body's surface, by aiding in the expulsion of pathogens from the surface and alleviating pain associated with the immune response. Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a prevalent allergic skin disorder, and the therapeutic effects of SR in dispelling wind and relieving the body's surface are consistent with the clinical symptoms commonly observed in AD. Aim of the studyThe anti-AD effects of SR were examined under three different growth patterns to identify active pharmacodynamic compounds. The results provide insight into the clinical efficacy of wild and cultivated SR. Materials and methodsThe efficacy of wild, wild-simulated, and cultivated SR was assessed in a mouse model of AD. In addition, the effects of wild and varying doses of cultivated SR were evaluated in mice with short-term AD symptoms. GC-MS and UPLC-MS/MS were used to analyze the chemical components of the three SR treatments and molecular docking was used to identify active components. ResultsA mouse model of AD was used to assess the pharmacodynamic effects of SR prepared by three different cultivation methods. The study found that all three SR preparations improved phenotypic markers and histopathological features in the AD mouse model. The efficacy of wild SR and wild-simulated SR was similar, although there was a significant difference between wild and cultivated SR. Both wild SR and various doses of cultivated SR ameliorated skin injuries and reduced inflammation in serum and skin tissues. Furthermore, skin thickness, inflammatory cells, mast cell infiltration, and IL-33 expression improved following treatment. Notably, wild SR, double-cultivated SR, and triple-cultivated SR demonstrated significant therapeutic effects. An analysis using GC-MS revealed the presence of 55, 52, and 43 volatile oils in the three SR preparations, with more common components observed between wild and wild-simulated SR. Fewer common components were evident between cultivated and wild SR. UPLC-MS/MS analysis identified a total of 37 compounds, with larger relative peak areas observed for the chromogenic ketones. Molecular docking studies revealed that certain compounds, such as n-propyl 9,12-octadecadienoate, (E)-9-octadecenoic acid ethyl ester, and various chromogenic ketones, such as cimifugin, 5-O-methyIvisamminol, hamaudol, 3′-O-acetylhamaudol, 3′-O-angeloyhamandol, adenosine and farnesylaceton, may be the major substances that distinguish the activities of SR with three different growth patterns. ConclusionVariations in the anti-AD efficacy of SR with three growth patterns were identified, and their chemical composition differences were determined. These findings suggest that increasing the dosage of cultivated SR could potentially be a viable clinical alternative for atopic dermatitis treatment.