Most-cited Papers Research Articles

The top 100 most cited papers in the first 100 years of calcium hydroxide as a dental material (1920-2020): a bibliometric analysis

Celebrating the centenary of calcium hydroxide (CH), the aim of this study was to analyze the 100 most-cited papers on this biomaterial. The bibliometric analysis was conducted in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoS-CC) database. Title, authorship information, study design, year, journal, number of citations, CH use, and fields of Dentistry were extracted. The number of citations in the WoS-CC, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases was cross-matched with the Spearman correlation. From the 1,596 papers identified, a list was compiled with the 100 most-cited papers. The number of citations in WoS-CC ranged from 78 to 384 (mean: 131.4). The main CH uses were: intracanal dressing (61%), and pulp protection (29%). The fields of Dentistry with most studies on CH were Endodontics (62%) and Operative Dentistry (30%). The most frequent study design was laboratory studies (44%). Three hundred and thirty-five authors from 29 countries were identified. The United States of America (USA) was the leading country with 23 articles. Dag Ørstavik was the author with the most papers and citations (9 papers; 1,118 citations). Most papers were published between 1991 and 2015 and in the Journal of Endodontics (38%). A very strong positive correlation was observed among the number of citations in the databases. The 100 most-cited papers were published mainly by European journals or from USA, with laboratory and multifaceted interventional designs. The present study celebrated the centenary of CH, highlighting the role and importance of this biomaterial in Dentistry.

Massive covidization of research citations and the citation elite

Massive scientific productivity accompanied the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated the citation impact of COVID-19 publications relative to all scientific work published in 2020 to 2021 and assessed the impact on scientist citation profiles. Using Scopus data until August 1, 2021, COVID-19 items accounted for 4% of papers published, 20% of citations received to papers published in 2020 to 2021, and >30% of citations received in 36 of the 174 disciplines of science (up to 79.3% in general and internal medicine). Across science, 98 of the 100 most-cited papers published in 2020 to 2021 were related to COVID-19; 110 scientists received ≥10,000 citations for COVID-19 work, but none received ≥10,000 citations for non-COVID-19 work published in 2020 to 2021. For many scientists, citations to their COVID-19 work already accounted for more than half of their total career citation count. Overall, these data show a strong covidization of research citations across science, with major impact on shaping the citation elite.

Gender analysis of the top classic papers in otolaryngology head and neck surgery.

The aim of this study was to identify and analyze the gender breakdown of first authorship contributing to the most-cited papers in the field of otolaryngology, with a goal ofidentifying trends in gender representation in publishing. The top 150 most-cited papers were identified using the Science Citation Index of the Institute for Scientific Information. Among the first authors, gender, h-index, percentage of first, last, and corresponding authorship positions, total publications, and citations were analyzed. The majority of papers were in the English language, from the United States, of clinical nature, and on otologic topics. Eighty-one percent of papers (n = 122) had men who were first authors, although there was no difference in h-index score, authorship position, number of publications, citations, and average citations/year between men and women first authors. Upon subgroup analysis by decade (1950s-2010s), there was no difference in the number of articles by women first authors (P = 0.11); however, there was a statistically significant increase in the percentage of women authors (P = 0.001) in papers published later compared to those published earlier. While a promising number of women otolaryngologists are publishing high-powered articles, future initiatives to promote academic inclusivity of women should be considered.

Macro-level literature analysis on pedestrian safety: Bibliometric overview, conceptual frames, and trends

Due to the high volume of documents in the pedestrian safety field, the current study conducts a systematic bibliometric analysis on the researches published before October 3, 2021, based on the science-mapping approach. Science mapping enables us to present a broad picture and comprehensive review of a significant number of documents using co-citation, bibliographic coupling, collaboration, and co-word analysis. To this end, a dataset of 6311 pedestrian safety papers was collected from the Web of Science Core Collection database. First, a descriptive analysis was carried out, covering whole yearly publications, most-cited papers, and most-productive authors, as well as sources, affiliations, and countries. In the next steps, science mapping was implemented to clarify the social, intellectual, and conceptual structures of pedestrian-safety research using the VOSviewer and Bibliometrix R-package tools. Remarkably, based on intellectual structure, pedestrian safety demonstrated an association with seven research areas: “Pedestrian crash frequency models”, “Pedestrian injury severity crash models”, “Traffic engineering measures in pedestrians’ safety”, “Global reports around pedestrian accident epidemiology”, “Effect of age and gender on pedestrians’ behavior”, “Distraction of pedestrians”, and “Pedestrian crowd dynamics and evacuation”. Moreover, according to conceptual structure, five major research fronts were found to be relevant, namely “Collision avoidance and intelligent transportation systems (ITS)”, “Epidemiological studies of pedestrian injury and prevention”, “Pedestrian road crossing and behavioral factors”, “Pedestrian flow simulation”, and “Walkable environment and pedestrian safety”. Finally, “autonomous vehicle”, “pedestrian detection”, and “collision avoidance” themes were identified as having the greatest centrality and development degrees in recent years.

Evolutions in the management of non-small cell lung cancer in the 21st century: A bibliometric analysis from the 100 most impactful articles in the field.

e20562 Background: The study was designed to explore the evolution of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) management in the 21st century. Methods: The top 100 most-cited papers on NSCLC treatment were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database. R and VOSviewer were used to extract bibliographic information, including the year of publication, countries/regions, institutions, authors, journals, keywords, impact factor, and total citations. The topic and type of papers were checked independently by authors. Bibliometric analysis was conducted and visualized with R, CiteSpace, Excel and VOSviewer to identify output dynamics, research forces, topics, hotspots, and frontiers in the field. Results: The average citation of each retrieved top 100 most-cited NSCLC management papers in 21st century was 1,725 (range: 615-7,340). Fifty-seven corresponding authors were from the United States. This country contributed the most papers (n = 76), followed by Germany (n = 34), France (n = 33), and South Korea (n = 32). The top contributors were Paz-Ares L. (n = 12) and Reck M. (n = 12). The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center published the largest number of papers (n = 20). There were two significant citation paths, indicating publications in medicine/medical/clinical journals primarily cited journals in molecular/biology/genetics fields, partly cited health/nursing/medicine fields. Top-cited papers mainly came from the New England Journal of Medicine (n = 33, citations =80427), followed closely by the Journal of Clinical Oncology (n = 28, citations = 32408). “Chemotherapy” (n = 36) was the keyword with the greatest frequency of co-occurrence. “Open-label” was the keyword with the strongest burst strength (= 4.01), followed by “nivolumab” (= 3.85), “blockade” (= 2.86), and “efficacy” (= 2.85). Conclusions: The United States as a nation and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center as an institute contributed the most papers on this topic in 21st century. Individual authors, such as Paz-Ares L. and Reck M., have developed extensive international collaborations. The New England Journal of Medicine is the most eye-catching journal. Molecular, biological, and genetic research plays important role in this field. Hotspots of NSCLC management have almost undergone an evolution from chemotherapy and radiotherapy to targeted therapy to immunotherapy. Immunotherapy and combination therapy are research frontiers. To our knowledge, the study is the first bibliometric assessment on the evolution of NSCLC treatment from the 21st century.

Two decades of the bottom of the pyramid research: identifying the influencers, structure, and the evolution of the concept

This paper reviews the literature on the bottom of the pyramid (BoP) across disciplines using systematic literature review (SLR). It explores the evolution of literature over the last 20 years, beginning with the work of C.K. Prahalad. A systematic search resulted in 665 publications related to BoP in various journals. This paper analyses these BoP publications from the start of the concept until 2018 using bibliographic data and thematic analysis of the entire text of the most influential papers. The analysis involves identifying trends in publications and citations, most-cited journals and papers, most productive and influential authors in the field. The results indicate a surge in BoP research. We also find that the focus of the research has shifted to newer disciplines. A thematic analysis of the top 151 papers in BoP indicates the domain's evolution over the years. Overall, the results suggest a sustained and growing interest in BoP. The findings also indicate a shift in focus and nature of the research over the years.

Top 100 cited articles on Silver diamine fluoride-A bibliometric analysis

BackgroundIdentification of top cited articles aids in providing comprehensive and cumulative standardized quality work to research community. The present bibliometric study was aimed at identifying 100 top cited articles on Silver diamine fluoride, highlighting its landmark publications available in the current literature and aids in providing comprehensive and cumulative standardised quality work to research community. MethodologyFour major databases (Web of science, Pubmed, Scopus and Embase) were searched using search terms like ‘silver fluoride’ OR ‘silver diamine fluoride’ OR ‘silverdiammine fluoride’ OR ‘diamine silver fluoride’ OR ‘diammine silver fluoride’ OR silver ammonia fluoride AND dentistry. Selected publications were studied to tabulate information like journal, authors, year etc and contents of the publications were summarised. Variables such as journal name, first author, journal rank, citation count and average citations per year, authorship patterns, author's country of origin, most productive authors, journals and countries were identified. Additional outcome variables were SDF concentrations used, study designs adopted and SDF use like caries arrest/prevention/anti-hypersensitive agent and as an irrigant. ResultsAmong them maximum articles were clinical trials(n = 24) however systematic(n = 12), literature(n = 14) and narrative reviews(n = 12) had an equal share. The countries with the highest number of most-cited papers were China and USA. The most studied aspect was caries arrest. Journal of Dentistry and Journal of Dental Research had major publications among top cited papers. ConclusionThis particular review will prove to be a great source of information for research community worldwide and will aid in directing them towards relevant articles.

Bibliometric analysis on wellness tourism – citation and co-citation analysis

PurposeTourism on wellness is a rapidly expanding segment of the travel industry; nevertheless, it is still in its infancy, and more study research is needed to develop a scientific foundation for health and wellness tourism. The study uses bibliometric indicators like as citations to determine the field structure on wellness tourism from 1998 to 2021, and the VOSviewer software to map the significant trends in wellness tourism (WT) area, to examine the present situation.Design/methodology/approachTo reach this objective, the theme of “wellness tourism” was searched in the “Scopus” database, and bibliometrics data on the publications were obtained. In total, 414 papers were found during the initial search, which was then narrowed according to the criteria. Using this strategy, the author discovered 386 records, and after removing 4 duplicates and 1 irrelevant document, the refining produced 381 related documents. The most-cited papers, significant authors, co-citation of references, sources and authors were all investigated for the publications related to WT.FindingsAccording to this report, research into wellness tourism has increased in recent years. The authors discovered two papers with over 238 “Scopus” citations and a total of 10 studies with 1414 citations. According to Scopus, the document Napier et al. receives 36.5% of citations each year. There were a total of 804 authors who published about WT between 1998 and 2021, with Smith, M, Voigt, c, and Puczkó, L being the most-cited reference authors in the subject. Han h. has the highest index of 56 of all the authors.Research limitations/implicationsThe “Scopus” database was used for bibliometric analysis, although the VOSviewer was used exclusively. This considered as a first study to utilize a bibliometric method to address this research gap, identifying the tools, journals, and, most crucially, conceptual subdomains like spa, yoga, therapy, spirituality and trekking that will be significant in future research.Originality/valueUsing a bibliometric analytic approach, this article looked at papers on wellness tourism published between 1998 and 2021. Thus, its goal is to learn more about wellness tourism and to enlighten wellness tourism scholars on the field's structure.

A Bibliometric Analysis of Mobile Assisted Second Language Learning

This article reviews mobile assisted second language learning (MASLL) with a bibliometric method. The authors collected data of papers related to MASLL from Web of Science and then analyzed the sources, authors, papers, and conceptual structure. The result suggests that: the effects of technology on learning, vocabulary, personalized learning, learning environment, learner attitudes were popular topics in this field; the attention on themes related to “technology” is fading away and the focus of MASLL research is shifting to themes related to “students”. Most-cited journals, authors, and papers are also presented in this article.

Geology's Most-Cited Papers

<i>Geology</i>'s Most-Cited Papers

Principles for responsible management education - PRME: Collaboration among researchers

This study characterizes as a systematically reviews literature on the Principles for Responsible Management Education (PRME) through bibliometric research. The research maps and analyzes scientific research networks of PRME by identifying the distribution of publications per year, and delineating the most cited documents, along with co-authorship networks, country co-authorship, co-authorship networks among universities, and keyword occurrence across articles. The review examines 135 articles published in 50 journals by 304 authors affiliated with 187 institutions in 35 countries. Results highlight two specific approaches that recur frequently: first entails focusing descriptively on the application of PRME signatory institutions; second comprises the contribution of PRME to supporting signatories’ institutions to adopt an interdisciplinary approach for sustainability and corporate social responsibility (CSR) for responsible management education (RME). Moreover, the most-cited papers consider PRME in terms of dynamics, relation to business schools, and implementation regarding Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In terms of co-authorship networks, 80% of scientific output related to PRME has involved collaboration among researchers at various levels, reaching five continents and the study found fragmented networks with potential to achieve more density with greater partnership. The most-used keywords highlight future directions to raise the sustainability knowledge level, CSR, and SDG implementation to enrich RME.

Scientometric Analysis of the Top 50 Most-Cited Joint Arthroplasty Papers: Traditional vs Altmetric Measures

BackgroundAlternative scientometric measures have introduced a novel view of the scientific literature. This study aimed to identify the top 50 most-cited recent articles in the field of knee and hip arthroplasty, characterize their traditional and alternative scientometric measures, and determine the relationship between traditional and alternative scientometric measures.Material and methodsThe 50 most-cited articles with the term “arthroplasty” in the title that were published between 2015 and 2019 were retrieved from the Scopus database. Alternative scientometric parameters such as Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) from Altmetrics bookmarklet (Altmetrics.com) were retrieved. Scientometric variables such as journal impact factor, first author H-index, and keywords were also extracted.ResultsThe 50 most-cited papers accrued 7955 total citations, with a mean of 159.10 ± 56.4 citations per article. The overall mean AAS across the papers was 63.4 ± 164.8. The mean first author’s H-index was 23.8 ± 18.9. Papers published in 2017 and 2018 had a significantly higher mean AAS than those published in 2015 and 2016 (35.1 vs 22.5, P = .009). Citation count was weakly correlated with the AAS (correlation coefficient = 0.379, P = .009). Also, AAS had significant correlations with the journal’s impact factor (P < .001).ConclusionWe found that the AAS was highest in more recently published papers, while citation count had the opposite trend. The AAS was significantly correlated with the journal’s impact factor and citation count, but the correlation is weak. This suggests that the alternative scientometric measures are complementary to, and not substitutes for, complement traditional measures such as citation count and impact factor.

Evaluating the Evidence: Scientometric Analysis of Highly Cited Neurofibromatosis 1 Publications.

The study of Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) is progressing rapidly. This study aimed to identify historical trends in publications focusing on NF1, to find the top 100 most cited publications on this topic, and to evaluate their level of evidence. This study identifies historical trends in publication regarding NF1 with the aim of providing readers useful information about the areas of research being performed, an educational guide to facilitate novice researchers in conducting effective evidence-based medical research, and unique insight into developments and trends of NF 1 research. This study also evaluates the evidence of highly cited papers on NF1.A search of all databases and journals accessible within Elsevier's Scopus was performed on June 27th, 2020, using combinations of the Boolean queries "Neurofibromatosis 1," "Von Recklinghausen," and "NF1," which yielded 13,599 documents. The top 100 most-cited papers were identified, analyzed, and evaluated for level of evidence. Evidence was assessed using the GRADE guidelines.The top 100 most-cited articles span years 1963-2010 and are published in 50 different journals. The average number of citations per publication was 366.5 (range 189-1527). The most cited article is "Neurofibromatosis: Conference Statement" (Stumpf et al., 1988). In this study, the top 100 most-cited works in NF1 are identified, characterized, and analyzed. This study will serve as a historical point of reference for future research, a jumping point for those unfamiliar with the topic, and an educational foundation for future NF1 specialists and researchers.

A Survey on Machine Reading Comprehension Systems

AbstractMachine Reading Comprehension (MRC) is a challenging task and hot topic in Natural Language Processing. The goal of this field is to develop systems for answering the questions regarding a given context. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey on diverse aspects of MRC systems, including their approaches, structures, input/outputs, and research novelties. We illustrate the recent trends in this field based on a review of 241 papers published during 2016–2020. Our investigation demonstrated that the focus of research has changed in recent years from answer extraction to answer generation, from single- to multi-document reading comprehension, and from learning from scratch to using pre-trained word vectors. Moreover, we discuss the popular datasets and the evaluation metrics in this field. The paper ends with an investigation of the most-cited papers and their contributions.

Bibliometric studies of most-cited medical papers: A bibliometric analysis

Aims: The purpose of this study is the analysis of bibliometric studies of the medical most-cited papers. Materials and Methods: This applied and the scientometric study was conducted using retrospective bibliometric analysis methods. A Scopus search was conducted and 883 articles were retrieved. After reviewing the titles and abstracts, 432 articles related to the purpose of this research were identified. Items such as year, journal, country, and institution were considered. Medical subject heading and NLM were applied for the subject categorization of articles. Given the dynamics of subject areas over time, only the content of 117 articles published in 2020 and 2021 were analyzed. These 117 articles have been reviewed with 11,700 most-cited articles. By reviewing 117 articles, the most productive journal, country, and institute in producing 11,700 articles were identified. Results: The findings have shown a significant number of these publications review 100 most-cited articles in the field of medicine. Articles pertaining to the Nervous System, Musculoskeletal System, Dentistry, Radiology, and Cardiovascular System are the most numerous among the publications. Conclusion: The results of this study allow readers to know the most productive countries, institutions, and journals of various subject areas, as well as the most influential fields and research trends in that subject area. The results of this study also identify subject areas for which the characteristics of their core articles have not yet been explored to plan future research.

Endodontic therapy in primary teeth: a bibliometric analysis of the 100 most-cited papers.

The purpose of this review was to identify and analyze the main characteristics of the 100 most-cited papers in the field of endodontic therapy in primary teeth. A search for the most-cited articles was conducted in the Clarivate Analytics Web of Science 'Core-Collection' (WoS-CC) database up to December 2020. Papers were ranked in descending order, by number of citations, and each paper was matched with the citation count on Scopus and Google Scholar. Two independent reviewers selected the most-cited papers and analyzed it according to the number and density of citations, year and journal of publication, authors, countries and contributing institutions, study design, topic of the paper, and keywords. Spearman's correlation and Poisson regression were used to determine associations between the number of citations and study characteristics. The citation count varied from 15 to 135 (WoS-CC), 8 to 141 (Scopus), and 14 to 317 (Google Scholar). Of the 306 contributing authors, most paper contributions were from Sakai VT, Oliveira TM, and Machado MAAM (5 each). Most of the papers originated from the USA (n=21) and Brazil (n=18). Randomized trials were the most common study design (n=32), and "pulpotomy" was the most frequently used keyword (n=35). Poisson regression showed that the number of citations decreased by 1.5% each year, and increased by 9.7% for each unit of impact factor. This bibliometric analysis highlighted papers, authors, and institutions that have contributed to endodontic therapy in primary teeth. Common terms of interest in this research area was also identified, representing the first bibliometric analysis on this subject.

Application of lasers in dentistry: a bibliometric study of the top 100 most-cited papers.

This bibliometric study analyzed the 100 most-cited papers about the use of lasers and their modalities in dentistry. A search strategy was created using specific keywords related to the topic. A comprehensive search was then conducted in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoS-CC) database up to July 2021. Papers that addressed the application of any type of laser and its modalities in dentistry were included. Each paper was cross-matched with the number of citations on Scopus and Google Scholar. The following data were extracted from papers: title, number of citations, authorship, country, year of publication, journal, study design, subject, laser type, and oral health outcomes. The VOSviewer software was used to generate bibliometric networks. The total number of citations ranged from 120 to 4,124 and 23 papers received more than 200 citations. Papers were published from 1964 to 2015. Most papers were from Europe (42%) and Anglo-Saxon America (27%). The USA was the country with more top 100 papers (25%). Papers were published mainly in Lasers in Surgery and Medicine (15%) and Lasers in Medical Science (7%). VOSviewer maps demonstrated the existence of national and international research collaborations among institutions and authors. Most studies had a laboratory design (57%) and were about restorative dentistry (32%) and periodontics (21%). This bibliometric study of the top 100 most-cited papers on lasers in dentistry allowed a quantitative and qualitative analysis of this very promising research field, revealing a net of collaboration and the importance of this topic in dentistry.

Characteristics and research trends of 50 most-cited hallux rigidus papers

BackgroundThe bibliometric studies in the field of orthopaedics have gained popularity since they can determine the characteristics and research trends of most influential papers in specific subjects. This study aimed to evaluate the 50 most-cited articles related to hallux rigidus, and analyze possible factors associated with increased citation counts. MethodsThe available literature about hallux rigidus on Web of Science database until January 2021 were analyzed and the 50 most-cited articles were determined. The characteristics of the papers were documented and analyzed for any relationship or correlation with total citation or citation per year (citation density) values. ResultsThe average citation number and citation density were 52.8 (range: 26–243) and 3 (range: 0.8–12.8), respectively. The average author number was 3.4, while the average institution number was 1.9. The USA had the highest number of articles with 29. Twenty-six papers were case-series, only 3 studies had level 1 and only 2 had level 2 evidence. The highest number of articles were published in Foot and Ankle International with 22 papers. Forty papers were clinical studies while 10 were reviews. Five studies were multicentric. ConclusionThis study provided the general characteristic and research trends of 50 most influential hallux rigidus papers. The number of institutions and references were positively correlated with citation density, indicating a higher chance of getting cited for papers with collaborations from different institutions and papers using more references from other works. Publication year was also positively correlated with citation density, indicating the better performance of more recent articles. Level of Clinical EvidenceLevel 3

Bibliometric and visualized analysis of the top 100 most-cited articles on anterior cervical surgery.

Anterior cervical surgery (ACS) owes its development to various pioneering individuals whose revolutionary works form key advances and guide current medical decisions. This bibliometric study aimed to identify, analyse and visualize the main features of the most-cited papers in ACS.The citation count for the top 100 most-cited articles ranged from 148 to 1,197, and citations per year ranged from 3.1 to 89.8. The articles were published from 1958 to 2016, with the 2000s being the most active decade. There was an inverse correlation between the average citations per year since publication and article age.The oldest as well as most-cited two articles were both published in 1958 by Smith and Robinson, and Cloward, respectively. In their studies, the authors individually described the technique of anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF).The most popular keywords were: ‘fusion’ (22), ‘spine’ (20), ‘cervical spine’ (16), ‘complications’ (15), ‘arthrodesis’ (13), ‘interbody fusion’ (13), ‘bone morphogenetic protein’ (13), and ‘radiculopathy’ (12).ACDF was the most frequent surgical procedure (80%), while cervical disc arthroplasty is of gradual greater impact.The surgical techniques of ACDF have remained unaltered for over 60 years. More attempts are needed to promote its development. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:1203-1213. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210074

The nature and building blocks of educational technology research

Supporting teaching and learning with different technologies has a long and broad history. The theories of learning have changed in recent decades, and new technologies have been invented that provide possibilities for supporting learning processes based on different learning theories. Recently, this field has been studied using bibliometric methods with large datasets to gain an overview of this research area. This paper continues this approach by targeting and analyzing the most relevant journals in the field, covering 30,632 articles. The aim was to deepen the results gained from previous bibliometric studies by focusing on the journals within the educational technology field, the keywords used, the most-cited papers, and especially by outlining the theoretical backgrounds of the analyzed articles. Results show new journals with increasing numbers of articles published. By analyzing the publications used as the articles' backgrounds, we can identify the large entities within the field. Articles targeted how technology can support learning processes based on different learning theories. Along with building an understanding of technology-related learning processes, the second large area of research targets the integration and factors affecting the use of technology for teaching and learning practices. The third large perspective focuses on learners’ characteristics, especially their learning skills, motivation, and self-efficacy. The results show that new technologies by themselves do not cause fast changes in research goals and topics; rather, significant changes in the research field evolve slowly.