Morphometric Radiography Research Articles

SAT0358 The usefulness of vertebral fracture assessment in detecting prevalent vertebral fracture in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

BackgroundOsteoporosis is recognized as the main extra-articular complication of RA and results in an increased risk of fractures. It is important to detect vertebral fractures because they have been associated...

Radiographic methods for evaluating osteoporotic vertebral fractures

Reproducible methods for the radiological assessment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures, defined based on accurate criteria, are needed in everyday practice and in therapeutic trials and epidemiological studies. Objectives To describe and to evaluate methods for osteoporotic vertebral fracture assessment based on standard radiographs or dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and to determine the role for each method in clinical practice, therapeutic trials, and epidemiological studies. Methods A review written by a rheumatologist based on his clinical experience and on a literature review was submitted to four experts. Studies in English or French published between 1975 and February 2008 were retrieved from Medline using the keywords vertebral fracture, osteoporosis, vertebral deformity, and vertebral fracture assessment. Results One hundred forty-nine articles were selected and read in their full-text version. There was no consensus regarding the definition of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. The following methods were evaluated: visual assessment, Genant's semi-quantitative assessment, Jiang's algorithm-based qualitative method, morphometric radiography, and DXA of the spine. In everyday practice, Genant's semi-quantitative assessment on standard radiographs may provide useful information on the severity and prognosis of osteoporosis. DXA done for bone mineral density measurement may detect vertebral fractures in asymptomatic patients. Assessment of standard radiographs remains the reference standard for diagnosing vertebral fractures in patients with suggestive symptoms (e.g., pain in the thoracic or lumbar spine, height loss, or thoracic kyphosis). For therapeutic trials and epidemiological studies, Genant's semi-quantitative assessment used by a trained and experienced observer is the preferred method, based on its good reproducibility and ability to differentiate fractures from other deformities. However, thousands of radiographs may be needed, making routine interpretation by an expert impractical. A visual semi-quantitative method may be used to separate normal radiographs from radiographs showing possible or obvious fractures, which can then be read by an expert. Alternatively, radiomorphometric indices can be determined on digitized radiographs in combination with a semi-quantitative assessment, with discordant cases being reviewed by an expert. We do not recommend Jiang's method at present, as it is still undergoing validation.

Comment on: Comparing morphometric X-ray absorptiometry and radiography in defining vertebral wedge fractures in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE To compare the level of agreement of quantitative morphometry of the vertebrae on lateral views of the spine using conventional X-ray and using a dual X-ray absorptiometry device (DXA) in determining the degree of wedging of vertebrae in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS Thirty patients with AS underwent DXA to acquire single-energy morphometric X-ray absorptiometry (MXA) scans and conventional lateral radiography (MRX) of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Vertebral anterior and posterior heights were measured and the anterior/posterior (AP)-ratio was calculated. We analysed the level of agreement for vertebral wedging between MRX and MXA on the patient level and on the vertebral level, using average AP-ratios per patient, and per vertebra, as well as dichotomized AP-ratios (above or below cut-off levels that are commonly used to identify fractures). RESULTS Per-patient analysis showed good agreement between both methods in the whole spine [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.64], as well as in the thoracic (ICC = 0.66) and lumbar spine (ICC = 0.62) separately. Analysis on individual vertebrae showed differences in agreement dependent on which part of the spine was measured. The ICC on all vertebrae was 0.71, 0.76 in the lumbar and 0.43 in the thoracic vertebrae. If AP-ratios were translated into fractures (yes vs no) using different cut off levels for a fracture (AP-ratios 0.75, 0.80 or 0.85) between-method agreement became fair to good (kappa 0.26-0.35 in the thoracic and 0.47-0.80 in the lumbar vertebrae). Differences in classifications were in both directions and in all vertebral fractures according to the Genant definition. In this study with a prevalence of 5% of vertebral fractures, the positive predicted value (PPV) was 39% and the negative predicted value (NPV) was 97%. CONCLUSION Although the agreement between MRX and MXA in measuring global vertebral wedging, expressed as (mean) AP-ratio, was good, the reliability of both measures to assess wedging at the vertebral level was highly variable, ranging from fair to very good agreement, dependent on the level. If fracture studies are performed with either of both the methods, the results of wedging at the individual vertebral level cannot be generalized to the other method, except for wedging <0.75 at the lumbar spine. However, as the NPV was high, DXA could be of clinical value to select patients for further evaluation by X-ray to assess vertebral fractures as a sign of bone failure.

Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry in the assessment of vertebral fractures in renal transplant patients

Bone mineral density (BMD) is widely employed to evaluate the risk of fractures, but more than mineral content is bone quality that accounts for bone strength. In fact, occasionally, subjects with normal or only mildly reduced BMD also experience pathologic fractures. In metabolic bone disease, like renal transplantation, the agreement between fractures and BMD is less predictable. We assessed the prevalence of vertebral fractures by means of a new, DEXA-based method (morphometric absorptiometry, MXA) and compared its concordance with the two mostly employed radiological techniques (Visual semi-quantitative, SQ, and morphometric radiography, MRX) in an asymptomatic population of transplanted patients. Moreover, the association of bone fractures with low BMD values was examined. Fifty-three renal transplant patients underwent spinal radiographs and BMD measurements by DEXA. In order to obtain a morphometric assessment, a lateral DEXA scan was performed. Patients with vertebral fracture were 17/53 (32%) with both SQ and MRX, and 12/53 (23%) with MXA (chi(2) = n.s.). A single fracture was detected in 9/53 patients (17%) with SQ and MRX, and in 4/53 (7.5%) with MXA; multiple fractures were 8/53 (15%) with any technique. With SQ as the standard reference, predictive indexes were excellent with MRX (invariably 100%) and quite good with MXA (sensitivity 70.6%; specificity 100%). Of the total of 689 vertebrae, 49 were fractured with SQ, 54 with MRX and 41 with MXA. Mild deformities were present in 21 (SQ), 26 (MRX) and 13 (MXA) vertebral bodies, respectively, while moderate-severe deformities were 28 with any technique. Again, with SQ as standard reference, predictive indexes were good (MRX: sensitivity 100%, specificity 99.2%; MXA: sensitivity 83.7%, specificity 100%). When we classified patients according to BMD T-score values, SQ and MRX recognized fractures in 4/18 normal (22%), 10/22 osteopenic (45%) and 3/13 osteoporotic (23%). With MXA 3/18 (17%) normal, 6/22 (27%) osteopenic and 3/13 (23%) osteoporotic were fractured. The lower performance of MXA was very likely due to the poor quality of images from the upper thoracic spine of obese subjects. Prevalence of vertebral fractures in renal transplant patients is quite high and randomly associated with reduced BMD. A surveillance of the spine by Rx, implemented with vertebral morphometry, is therefore warranted to recognize the disease. (MXA is a reliable alternative technique, especially in more severely affected individuals.) MXA, although less sensitive than the conventional techniques because of possible technical biases, is very specific, and can be proposed for follow-up purposes in this population of patients.

Short-term precision for morphometric X-ray absorptiometry.

Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry (MXA) is a low-radiation technique used for the identification of vertebral deformities. The reliability of MXA measurements is dependent on the precision of the technique, and this is influenced by system error, variability associated with morphometric analysis, and variability within study populations. Short-term precision in vivo affects the identification of prevalent deformities, and may vary according to the age and health status of the study population. The aims of this study were to measure short-term precision in vitro and in vivo for MXA, and to compare intraoperator variability for repeat marking of radiographs in morphometric radiography (MRX) and scan images in MXA. For short-term precision in vitro (based on 30 consecutive MXA phantom scans), the coefficient of variation (CV) was approximately 1%. Intraoperator variability for repeat marking of baseline radiographs and MXA scans (marked without the compare facility) in a population-based group of 32 postmenopausal women, was significantly lower for MRX (CV for vertebral heights = 1.5%) than for MXA (CV = 2.9%). The CV for duplicate same-day MXA scans performed in subjects with osteoporosis (n = 20) was 2.2% for vertebral heights between T8 and L4 using the compare facility, and 4.8% when scans were analyzed without the compare facility. We conclude that short-term precision for MXA is good for vertebrae T8 to L4, but the technique is limited due to poor image resolution in the upper thoracic vertebrae. Intraoperator variability for repeat marking was lower for MRX, but the error associated with marking MXA scans remained below the minimum change required for identification of a vertebral deformity.

Identification of vertebral deformities in men: comparison of morphometric radiography and morphometric X-ray absorptiometry.

Osteoporotic vertebral deformities may be detected by morphometric radiography (MR) using spinal radiographs, and by morphometric X-ray absorptiometry (MXA) using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Reference values for MR may not be appropriate for MXA, and reference values may be affected by gender and age. The aims of this study were to (1) compare mean deformity of vertebral height ratios for MR and MXA in men, (2) compare mean deformity for MXA in men and women, (3) compare mean wedge angle measured by MXA in men and women and (4) assess the effect of aging on MXA values in men. We studied a general practitioner sample of 115 men aged 22-81 years (mean 53 years) and 124 women aged 55-89 years (mean 68 years). Subjects had MXA of T4 to L4 using the Hologic QDR 4500A. Women and men over age 50 years had radiographs of the thoraco-lumbar spine. Scans and radiographs were marked in the same way by one operator and vertebral height ratios and mean deformity were calculated for MR and MXA. The mean wedge angle, &theta;, was calculated for MXA in all subjects. Mean wedge and biconcavity deformity and standard deviation (SD) in men were greater for MXA than for MR. The mean wedge and biconcavity deformity measured by MXA tended to be greater for men than for women. Vertebral deformity in men increased with age, and was associated with degenerative change seen on spinal radiographs. The mean wedge angle was greater for men than for women, and it increased with age in men. We conclude that sex- and age-specific reference ranges should be established separately for MXA.

Measurement of vertebral body heights: ex vivo comparisons between morphometric X-ray absorptiometry, morphometric radiography and direct measurements.

Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry (MXA) offers some potential advantages over spinal radiography for the quantitative evaluation of vertebral fractures in individuals with spinal osteoporosis. This ex vivo study examined the accuracy of MXA and quantitative morphometry (QM) for the evaluation of vertebral height, in relation to direct measurements from cadaveric vertebral columns. Spinal radiographs and MXA scans were obtained from nine cadaveric vertebral columns (mean age at death 64 years). Anterior, middle and posterior vertebral body heights of all segments from T4 to L4 were measured interactively using MXA software and QM (from the spinal radiographs), and compared with direct measurements derived using digital callipers following cadaveric dissection. Coefficients of variation for repeat QM and MXA scan analysis were less than 2%. The QM and MXA measurements were both strongly correlated (r(2) = 0.99) with the direct measurements, with accuracy errors of between 2.6% and 4.3%, and 4.5% and 4.8%, for QM and MXA respectively. At the three measurement sites, analysis of measurement differences showed that QM tended to overestimate the true height and MXA tended towards under-estimation. The mean difference between the direct measurements and QM measurements ranged from 2.7% to 8.7%, and the mean difference between direct and MXA measurements ranged from -2. 9% to 4.1%. There was strong linear association between the MXA and QM measurements (r(2) = 0.99) with mean differences at the three measurement sites ranging from -4.1% to -5.9%. Under the optimal (ex vivo) scanning conditions used in this study, MXA is comparable to spinal radiography for the assessment of vertebral height. Further studies are required to determine the conditions under which satisfactory MXA image resolution and measurement accuracy can be achieved in a clinical population.

Morphometric X-ray Absorptiometry and Morphometric Radiography of the Spine: A Comparison of Analysis Precision in Normal and Osteoporotic Subjects

Morphometric X-ray Absorptiometry and Morphometric Radiography of the Spine: A Comparison of Analysis Precision in Normal and Osteoporotic Subjects

Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry of the spine: Correlation in vivo with morphometric radiography

The diagnosis of vertebral fractures has been based on lateral thoracic and lumbar spine films and entails the determination of crush, endplate and wedge deformities of the vertebral bodies, generally between T4 and L4. Accuracy and precision of X-ray based morphometry are limited by geometric distortion and other technique-related factors. This paper proposes the use of morphometric X-ray absorptiometry (MXA) as a method which overcomes many of the limitations of morphometric radiography. MXA generates paired anteroposterior and lateral images of the spine using a scanning fan beam geometry that significantly reduces distortions inherent in the cone beam geometry used in conventional X-rays. Intra-observer precision of MXA on 41 subjects aged 65 years and older was 1 mm for vertebral height assessments and 4.7% for vertebral wedge parameters. Linear correlation with vertebral heights and wedge parameters on 32 subjects evaluated by both MXA and morphometric radiography demonstrated a root of the mean squared error of 2.1-2.4 mm and 7.0%, respectively. Vertebral deformities could be identified by MXA. The study documents the feasibility of MXA for the assessment of vertebral deformities. However, further investigation is needed to document the ability of MXA to diagnose prevalent and incident fractures.