BackgroundSeveral studies demonstrated the association between tobacco smoking and higher risk and increased progression of multiple sclerosis (MS). Data about the effect of smoking during the recovery from MS attacks is limited. Furthermore, different types of tobacco exposures such as water pipe and passive smoking are not well assessed separately. So this study evaluated the effect of different types of smokes, cigarette and water pipe as well as passive smoking on the function recovery of relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) attacks MethodsThis cohort study evaluated the adult patients with RRMS and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) < 5 in the attack phase. Patients were divided into two groups: smokers and non-smokers. The smokers included those who use cigarette, water pipe as well as passive smokers as subgroups for more analyses later. EDSS was monitored after relapse and two months after relapse. Change of EDSS considered as the criteria for functional recovery. The correlation between the amount of consumption and disability level was assessed among smokers by Pearson’s correlation test. While, the difference of EDSS between smoker and non-smoker were assessed by Independent samples T-test. Results142 patients were evaluated. 79 (55.6%) were smokers (43% male) while 63 (44.4%) were non-smokers (36.5% male). There was a statistically significant difference in change of EDSS between smoker and non-smoker groups, which change of EDSS was higher in non-smoker (−2.62 ± 0.90 non-smoker vs. −1.75 ± 0.76 smoker, P < 0.001). Also, only there was a significantly lesser decline in EDSS after two months in the cigarette smokers in subgroups analyses (P < 0.001). A correlation analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between the number per day of cigarette smoking and EDSS after relapse (r = 0.3, P = 0.03) and a significant positive correlation between minutes per month of smoking of water pipe and EDSS two months after relapse (r = 0.6, P > 0.001). ConclusionTobacco smoking especially cigarette smoking is associated with a negative effect on recovery from the attack in patients with RRMS.
Read full abstract