Documenting Slavery at the Local Level: Montgomery, Alabama; A Case Study Dallas Hanbury (bio) Slavery, a defining characteristic of american history, continues to impact communities across the country and the nation as a whole. From frustration over the role and place of Confederate monuments in public places to the historical under-representation of minorities in cultural institutions, slavery and its continuing effects constitute a phenomenon that is anything but forgotten, including in Alabama. Repositories in Alabama that house local public records, including the Alabama Department of Archives and History (ADAH), county courthouses, probate courts, circuit courts, historical societies, and archives have something to offer to the ongoing, multi-faceted discourse regarding slavery. These repositories hold a wide array of records, some possibly unknown or otherwise underused, that provide insight into how slavery manifested itself in communities across the state.1 These records greatly aid in documenting slavery at the local level and demonstrate how local histories of slavery in Alabama contribute to and fit within much [End Page 223] broader narratives regarding American slavery. A close reading of these records, many of which researchers can find on microfilm at ADAH and in Alabama county seats of government, probate courts, historical societies, and county archives, reveals a great deal of information about how Alabama communities constituted a part of, reacted to, and became shaped by the wider contexts in which American slavery existed, including antebellum finance, law, morality, race relations, territorial expansion, and more. Local government records also document that enslaved and formerly enslaved people constantly worked to carve out a space in which they made their own choices, created their own lives, and claimed and defended their humanity during the oppression of slavery and the turbulent times following emancipation. From running away, marrying during slavery—despite the knowledge that the law did not recognize such unions—negotiating the sale of their labor and their own working conditions post-slavery, to having marriages made during slavery legitimized following emancipation, African Americans in the South, specifically Montgomery County, Alabama, exhibited tremendous agency as they built their own worlds. Although local government records provide a wealth of information about how slavery manifested itself in Alabama communities, and therefore deserve attention, it remains important to consult other bodies of knowledge that help to contextualize the information found in local government records. Publications focused on the history of slavery and Reconstruction in Alabama demonstrate that a pattern exists in terms of what local records, and records of a broader context regarding slavery and its aftermath, researchers will find in Alabama. For example, in Michael W. Fitzgerald’s Reconstruction in Alabama and Anthony Gene Carey’s Sold Down the River, the authors show that a blend of local public records and other primary sources, including court records, census records, newspapers, and letters, provide illuminating insight into the history of slavery in Alabama and Georgia communities. In other words, published works suggest that researchers may find a degree of typicality among sources when researching slavery in Alabama communities. Such similarities constitute [End Page 224] a boon in that they provide researchers with a guide to beginning their inquiries into how slavery and its aftereffects manifested themselves in Alabama communities. However, as most researchers know, while typicality may exist among local records when researching certain topics, scholars should not take it for granted that such uniformities are universal; local public records will yield interesting surprises. This article aims to make interested, though perhaps less-experienced, non-professional historians aware of local government records related to slavery, and to help them understand how those records exist within a broader historical context. Professional historians have long known the value of, and have accordingly used, local government records in their research regarding all manner of subjects, including slavery. However, it remains important to remember that there exists a body of non-professional historians who may not know that local records, like those discussed in this piece, are available to scholars. This article does not provide an exhaustive list of local government records related to slavery; rather, using a selection of local government records from Montgomery County, Alabama, it provides a framework for engaging with and constructing narratives from local government...
Read full abstract