Monofocal Toric Intraocular Lens Research Articles

Rotational stability of monofocal and diffractive multifocal toric intraocular lens with identical design and material: a propensity score based prospective comparative study

PurposeTo compare the rotational stability of a monofocal and a diffractive multifocal toric intraocular lens(IOLs) with identical design and material.MethodsThis prospective study enrolled patients who underwent plate-haptic toric IOL (AT TORBI 709 M and AT LISA 909 M) implantation. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline factors. Follow-up examinations were conducted at 1 h, 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. A linear mixed model of repeated measures was used to investigate the changes in IOL rotation over time. A 2-week timeframe was utilized to assess differences in IOL rotation between the two groups.ResultAfter PSM, a total of 126 eyes were selected from each group for further analysis. Postoperatively, the time course of IOL rotation change in the two groups remained consistent, with the greatest rotation occurring between 1 h and 1 day postoperatively. At the 2-week postoperative mark, the monofocal toric IOL exhibited a higher degree of rotation compared to the multifocal toric IOL (5.40 ± 7.77° vs. 3.53 ± 3.54°, P = 0.015). In lens thickness(LT) ≥ 4.5 mm and white-to-white distance(WTW) ≥ 11.6 mm subgroups, the monofocal toric IOL rotated greater than the multifocal toric IOL (P = 0.026 and P = 0.011, respectively).ConclusionThe diffractive multifocal toric IOL exhibits superior rotational stability compared to the monofocal toric IOL, especially in subgroups LT ≥ 4.5 mm and WTW ≥ 11.6 mm. Moreover, the time course of IOL rotation change is consistent for both, with the maximum rotation occurring between 1 h and 1 day postoperatively.

IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research In Sight) Analysis of the Incidence of Monovision in Cataract Patients with Bilateral Monofocal Intraocular Lens Implantation.

To determine the incidence of pseudophakic monovision among patients bilaterally implanted with monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and to characterize the distribution of myopic offsets achieved. This retrospective database study included data on patients receiving care from ophthalmologists who contributed to the Academy IRIS® (Intelligent Research In Sight) Registry. Anonymized data were collected, including patient age, ethnicity, procedure data (CPT code, date, laterality), and postoperative manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) in both eyes implanted with monofocal or monofocal toric IOLs. No data regarding IOL manufacturer, model, or power were collected. One primary outcome measure was the percentage of patients achieving monovision (defined as emmetropia within ±0.25 diopters [D] in one eye and a myopic offset of ≥0.50 D in the fellow eye) among all patients receiving bilateral monofocal IOLs at the time of cataract surgery between January 1, 2016, and September 1, 2019, with at least 90 days of follow-up. Other primary outcomes included the distribution and frequency of myopic offsets (anisometropia) between eyes. Of the 16,765 people receiving bilateral monofocal IOLs within the study period, 4796 (28.6%) achieved emmetropia in at least one eye, as defined by an MRSE within ± 0.25 D. The incidence of monovision among these patients was 34.2% (1638/4796). One-quarter (24.7%; 405/1638) of patients who achieved monovision had a myopic offset between 0.50 and 0.74 D, with more than one-third (35.2%; 576/1638) falling within 0.75-1.24 D and 18.0% within 1.25-1.74 D. A myopic offset ≥1.75 D was observed in 22.1% (362/1638) of patients who achieved monovision. Pseudophakic monovision for presbyopia correction was achieved in ~34% of patients in the IRIS Registry bilaterally implanted with monofocal IOLs, with myopic offsets typically ranging from 0.5 to 1.24 D.

Rotational Stability of Toric Capsular Bag–Fixated Intraocular Lenses in Duet Procedure for Reversible Trifocality

To evaluate the long-term rotational stability of capsular bag-fixated toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) in polypseudophakic eyes of patients who underwent duet procedure for reversible trifocality. Retrospective interventional case series. We included 34 eyes of 20 patients who underwent duet procedure with implantation of a monofocal toric IOL (RayOne toric, Hoya XY1AT, or a Tecnis ZCT800) into the capsular bag and a trifocal-diffractive Sulcoflex IOL into the ciliary sulcus. All toric IOLs were implanted with image-guided navigation. The manifest refraction and uncorrected and distance corrected visual acuity at far, intermediate, and near distance were measured. The position of the axis of the toric IOL was determined with the Pentacam device (Oculus GmbH) by evaluating retroillumination images. The results were compared with the preoperatively planned axis position. The median follow-up was 27 months. The spherical equivalent of manifest refraction was -0.04 ± 0.34 diopters (D) postoperatively, and the refractive cylinder was -0.14 ± 0.22 D on average. Binocular uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity were 0.05 ± 0.11 logMAR and 0.02 ± 0.09 logMAR, respectively. The mean deviation from the calculated cylinder axis was 3.8° ± 3.5° with a median of 2.8° and a maximum deviation of 15.0°. Ninety-four percent of all eyes showed a deviation of less than 10°. The long-term axial alignment of capsular bag-fixated toric IOLs in polypseudophakic eyes was comparable to the results reported for single implantation of toric IOLs. The polypseudophakic approach did not affect the rotational stability of capsular bag-fixated IOLs.

Reversible Multifocality Achieved Through Polypseudophakia.

Simultaneous implantation of a monofocal or monofocal toric intraocular lens (IOL) into the capsular bag and a multifocal IOL into the ciliary sulcus, referred to as duet procedure, allows us to create multifocality that is more easily reversible than the implantation of a capsular bag-fixated multifocal IOL. The optical quality and results after the duet procedure are equivalent to those of a capsular bag-fixated multifocal IOL. Patients who cannot tolerate the side effects of multifocal optics or who develop an ocular condition leading to loss of function such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD) or glaucoma in the course of their lives may benefit from the reversibility of the procedure.

Rotational stability and clinical outcomes after implantation of a new monofocal toric intraocular lens with double C-loop design

To investigate rotational stability and visual outcomes of patients unilaterally or bilaterally implanted with a new monofocal toric intraocular lens (IOL). Ophthalmology service, clinique Beausoleil, avenue de Lodève, Montpellier. Single-center retrospective study. This study included patients who underwent routine cataract surgery with the PODEYE toric (BVI/PhysIOL SA, Liège, Belgium) IOL using the ZEISS CALLISTO eye®. Biometry and keratometry data, refractive outcomes, rotational stability, and astigmatism correction were recorded. IOL rotation was evaluated using an image analysis technique. Postoperative assessments were performed at 1 week, 1 month, and 4 to 6 months after surgery. Clinical outcomes of 102 patients (136 eyes) were analyzed. Patients had a mean age of 74 years. Of the included eyes, 25% had an axial length greater than 24.5mm. Median postoperative IOL rotation from baseline (surgery) was 2̊. With the exception of one outlier (15̊ rotation), IOL rotation was≤6̊ (1 month) and≤10̊ (4-6 months) in 100% of the eyes. No surgical IOL re-positioning was required. Median postoperative corrected distance visual acuity was -0.08 logMAR, and median postoperative subjective cylinder was between 0.25 and 0.50 D. The PODEYE toric IOL showed high rotational stability, allowing for correction of corneal astigmatism during cataract surgery.

Incidence and Risk Factors of Repositioning Surgery to Correct Misalignment of Toric Intraocular Lenses after Cataract Surgery: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and outcomes of repositioning surgery to correct misalignment of several toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) after cataract surgery. Methods: In this retrospective study, patients who underwent repositioning surgery to correct misalignment of toric IOLs following cataract surgery between January 2019 and December 2021 were enrolled. The medical data on patients’ age, gender, preoperative axial length, corneal astigmatism, the axis of astigmatism, IOL models, IOL axis, uncorrected distance visual acuity, residual refraction, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Results: Among the 1,135 eyes implanted with toric IOLs at Qingdao Eye Hospital, 23 (2.026%, 23/1,135) underwent repositioning surgery. Univariate analysis revealed that the incidence of repositioning surgery was significantly lower with AcrySof (0.636%, 5/786) than with ZEISS (2.959%, 5/169) and TECNIS (7.222%, 13/180) IOL platforms; the incidence of repositioning surgery with monofocal toric IOLs (1.169%, 11/941) was significantly lower than multifocal toric IOLs (6.186%, 12/194) (p < 0.001); additionally, a significant difference in age was also observed (p = 0.002). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the IOL platform (p = 0.004) and younger age (p = 0.006) were independent risk factors for repositioning surgery. Conclusion: The incidence of repositioning surgery of toric IOLs after cataract surgery was 2.026%. It was linked to the IOL platform, multifocal toric IOLs, and younger age.

Efficacy of the Image-Guided Alignment System for a Four-Haptic Hydrophobic Monofocal Toric Intraocular Lens.

To compare the difference in performance between the image-guided alignment system and the manual-marking method in the four-haptic hydrophobic monofocal toric intraocular lens (IOL). Medical records of patients who underwent cataract surgery with a four-haptic hydrophobic monofocal toric IOL implantation between May 2020 and April 2021 and with 3-month visit data available were investigated. Toric IOL misalignment, residual astigmatism, and mean prediction errors between the two groups were compared. This study included 49 eyes of 44 patients (women: 68%; mean age: 67.2±7.0 [range: 47-82] years). Twenty-nine eyes of 26 patients were treated with toric IOL implantation using the image-guided system and 20 eyes of 18 patients were treated using the manual-marking method. No statistical differences were observed regarding the baseline characteristics of the two groups. Three months after the surgery, the misalignment of the toric IOL was significantly lower in the image-guided group (2.18°±0.65°, range: 1.26°-3.95°) than in the manual; marking group (4.72°±0.74°, range: 3.44°-6.21°; P <0.001). In comparison to the manual-marking method, the image-guided system reduced the misalignment of a four-haptic hydrophobic monofocal toric IOL.

Visual and refractive outcomes of monofocal toric intraocular lens implantation in amblyopic eyes.

To evaluate the visual and refractive outcomes of monofocal toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation after cataract surgery in amblyopic eyes. Our center's database was used to identify patients who had undergone bilateral cataract surgery between 2016 and 2020 with the implantation of a toric IOL in their amblyopic eye. Exclusion criteria were the presence of strabismus, ocular pathologies other than cataract or intra-surgical complications. The outcomes analysed were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), subjective refraction and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) one month after surgery. Ninety patients were included, with a mean age of 68.96 ± 7.81years. CDVA was lower for the amblyopic eye, both before and after surgery. There was a mean improvement in CDVA of 0.23 ± 0.21 LogMAR for the dominant eye and of 0.39 ± 0.33 for the amblyopic eye, p < 0.001 in both cases. Postoperative subjective refractive cylinder was higher in the amblyopic eye (-0.24 ± 0.39 D versus -0.10 ± 0.25 D, p < 0.01), as well as mean cylinder prediction error (-0.30 ± 0.47 D versus 0.02 ± 0.42 D, p < 0.01), compared to the dominant eye. There was a statistically significant correlation between preoperative and postoperative CDVA in amblyopic eyes (Spearmańs Rho = 260, p = 0.013). Mean postoperative UCVA was 0.15 ± 0.25 for amblyopic and 0.03 ± 0.12 for dominant eyes. Only one patient required distance spectacle correction due to residual astigmatism. Cataract surgery with toric IOL implantation in amblyopic eyes leads to an improvement in visual acuity and to spectacle independence in almost all cases, even in the presence of a higher cylinder prediction error.

Outcomes of cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens implantation after keratoplasty.

To evaluate the efficacy and predictability of cataract extraction with toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) or mushroom penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Villa Igea Hospital, Forlì, Italy. Prospective case series. Toric IOL implantation was offered to patients with cataract, corneal astigmatism >1.5 diopters (D) and regular central corneal topography after complete suture removal. Phacoemulsification was performed through a 2.4 mm scleral tunnel and an enVista monofocal toric MX60T or Eyecryl monofocal toric IOL was inserted in the capsular bag. Main outcome measures were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction, total prediction error, and IOL misalignment. 37 consecutive patients who had previously undergone either DALK (n = 27, 73%) or 2-piece mushroom PK (n = 10, 27%) were included. All patients completed the 6-month follow-up. The mean toric IOL power was 5.3 ± 1.1 D. Both UDVA and CDVA significantly improved (from 1.02 ± 0.27 to 0.46 ± 0.31 logMAR and from 0.65 ± 0.27 to 0.11 ± 0.12 logMAR, respectively; P < .001). 20 eyes (54%) reached UDVA ≥20/40, whereas 35 eyes (95%) reached a CDVA ≥20/40. Final refractive astigmatism was 0.93 ± 0.87 D, with 35 eyes (95%) within 2 D. Prediction error was ≤1 D in 18 eyes (49%). Absolute IOL misalignment was 3.3 ± 3.5 degrees. Toric IOL implantation in postkeratoplasty eyes allowed reduction of refractive astigmatism to predictably low levels with concomitant improved visual outcomes.

Comparison of Barrett and Emmetropia Verifying Optical Toric Calculators.

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to compare the Barrett (BTC) and Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO) Toric Calculators’ performance with regards to prediction of residual post-operative astigmatism after cataract surgery.MethodsThis was a secondary analysis of de-identified data that was collected as part of a prospective multicenter clinical trial in which 109 eyes from 109 patients were implanted with a monofocal toric intraocular lens (IOL). Post-operative biometry was used to calculate the predicted post-operative residual astigmatism for each eye using the two different calculators. The vector difference between the actual and predicted residual astigmatism was calculated.ResultsThe mean absolute astigmatism prediction errors were 0.59 ± 0.38 D and 0.59 ± 0.36 D for the BTC and EVO calculators, respectively (p = 0.98). The centroid of the prediction errors were 0.18 D @ 89° ± 0.68 D and 0.20 D @ 89° ± 0.66 D, respectively (p = 0.21). The proportion of eyes in which the astigmatism prediction error was ≤0.5 D was 50% for BTC and 46% for EVO (p = 0.28). The proportion of eyes in which the post-operative astigmatism orientation was correctly predicted as being against-the-rule, with-the-rule, or oblique was 81% for BTC and 77% for EVO (p = 0.15).ConclusionThe Barrett and Emmetropia Verifying Optical Toric Calculators had similar performance with regards to their astigmatism prediction accuracy.

Real-world incidence of monofocal toric intraocular lens repositioning: analysis of the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS Registry.

To determine the 12-month incidence of reoperation to realign 2 commercially available types of implanted monofocal toric acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs). American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS (Intelligent Research in Sight) Registry. Registry retrospective study. Eyes that underwent cataract extraction and were implanted with a TECNIS or AcrySof monofocal toric IOL in 2016 and 2017 were identified. The rate of reoperation for IOL realignment (Current Procedural Terminology code 66825) within 365 days of implantation was determined for each IOL group. Risk factors for repositioning were evaluated using logistic regression modeling. A total of 6482 eyes were implanted with a monofocal toric IOL, including 2013 (31.06%) with a TECNIS and 4469 (68.94%) with an AcrySof IOL. During the first postoperative year, 87 (1.3%) eyes underwent surgical IOL repositioning. The incidence of repositioning was significantly higher (P < .0001) for TECNIS-implanted (3.1%, 62/2013) than for AcrySof-implanted (0.6%, 25/4469) eyes (odds ratio [OR] 5.6; 95% CI, 3.5-8.9). Younger age (OR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.67-0.86 per 5-year increase) was associated with a higher risk for IOL repositioning. Real-world analysis of U.S. patients in the IRIS Registry revealed that the rate of surgical IOL repositioning was 5 times higher in eyes implanted with TECNIS than with AcrySof monofocal toric IOLs for astigmatic correction at the time of cataract surgery. These findings should be considered when selecting a toric IOL for correction of astigmatism in cataract patients, particularly in younger patients with a higher risk for misalignment requiring repositioning.

Comparison of rotational stability and repositioning rates of 2 presbyopia-correcting and 2 monofocal toric intraocular lenses.

To compare the rotational stability of 2 commonly used toric presbyopia-correcting (PC) intraocular lenses (IOLs) and their monofocal toric counterparts. Single 2-surgeon private practice. Retrospective study. This study included 2 cohorts: (1) all eyes receiving a toric ReSTOR (n = 61 eyes, 49 patients) or toric Symfony (n = 779 eyes, 520 patients) IOL from September 2016 to January 2019; and (2) all eyes receiving an AcrySof (n = 2 393) or TECNIS (n = 731) monofocal toric IOL (TIOL) from April 2015 to January 2019. Eyes were only excluded if digital marking could not be used. All patients had image-guided digital marking to verify TIOL position at the conclusion of surgery. Postoperative rotation was determined by dilated examination performed later on the day of surgery or the following morning. The toric ReSTOR IOL was more likely to rotate 5 degrees or less than the toric Symfony IOL, 91.8% vs 79.0% (P = .01). This remained true for rotation of 10 degrees or less (100% vs 89.5%, P < 0.003). The mean rotation was 2.3 degrees for toric ReSTOR IOL compared with 4.5 for toric Symfony IOL (P = .01). Statistically significantly more eyes with toric Symfony IOL required a return to the operating room for repositioning (6.9% vs 0%, P < .03). More TECNIS monofocal TIOL eyes required surgical repositioning than AcrySof monofocal TIOL eyes (3.5% vs 1.2%, P < .001). Between these PC-TIOLs, the Symfony IOL was more likely to rotate and to require surgical repositioning than the ReSTOR IOL. The TECNIS TIOL built on the same platform as the Symfony IOL was more likely to require surgical repositioning than that by the AcrySof TIOL. Despite comparable rotational stability between the Symfony and TECNIS monofocal TIOLs, the Symfony was twice as likely to require surgical repositioning.

Evaluation of Astigmatism-Correcting Efficiency and Rotational Stability after Cataract Surgery with a Double-Loop Haptic Toric Intraocular Lens: A 1-Year Follow-Up

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes, predictability of results, efficiency of astigmatism correction, and rotational stability of the Bi-Flex 677TAY (Medicontur Medical Engineering Ltd., Zsámbék, Hungary) monofocal toric intraocular lens (IOL) designed for cataract patients with astigmatism. Methods: The IOLs were implanted either mono- or binocularly, following routine cataract surgery. Visual and refractive outcomes, as well as off-axis rotation were assessed throughout a 1-year follow-up period. All clinical data for this work were collected retrospectively. Vector analysis based on the Alpins method was performed to assess the efficiency of astigmatism correction. Results: No complications or adverse events occurred during surgery or the follow-up period. IOL implantation brought 88% of eyes into the ±0.50 D, and 100% into the ± 1.00 D range compared to the target spherical equivalent refraction, emmetropia. Astigmatism correction brought similar results: 94% of eyes had a residual cylindrical error of not higher than ±0.50 D, and 97% were within ±1.00 D. Vector analysis resulted in a correction index of 0.96 and a difference vector of 0.17. Both refractive and visual outcomes showed long-term stability. During the 12-month follow-up period, no eyes had a rotation of >5°. Absolute rotation after 1 year was 1.42 ± 1.89° (median = 0°), while signed rotation was 1.06 ± 2.12° (median = 0°). Conclusion: The Bi-Flex 677TAY monofocal toric IOL, designed by Medicontur Medical Engineering Ltd., represents an efficient and safe solution for cataract patients with astigmatism. Clinical and refractive outcomes are predictable, and rotational stability ensures long-term visual comfort.

Rotation Characteristics of Three Toric Monofocal Intraocular Lenses.

PurposeTo evaluate the rotational stability of the three monofocal toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) via data from an online toric IOL back-calculator.MethodsA retrospective data review of an online toric IOL back-calculator, which allows users to input preoperative toric planning information, postoperative lens orientation, and subjective refraction. Inputted data were used to determine the optimal orientation of the toric IOL to minimize residual refractive astigmatism. Aggregate data from 3/11/2019 to 3/10/2020 were extracted and validated. Only data with ≥0.5D of residual refractive astigmatism were used in the study. Pre-operative intended IOL orientation and post-operative IOL orientation were used to calculate IOL rotation.ResultsAfter validation, 5397 entries were determined to represent patient eyes, of which 3238 represented the three monofocal IOLs evaluated. The rate of rotation for AcrySof, TECNIS, and enVista Toric IOLs was 72.7%, 83.4%, and 83.0%, respectively, and location only significantly impacted TECNIS IOLs. The magnitude of rotation for rotated IOLs was similar for all models and was significantly more for IOLs initially placed in the oblique axis. All IOL models tended to rotate in a counterclockwise direction (53.2%, 73.0%, 69.7%, respectively; p<0.05), and the tendency was greater for IOLs initially located horizontally.ConclusionThe AcrySof IQ Toric IOL was more rotationally stable than both the TECNIS and enVista Toric IOLs; there was no significant difference in rotational stability of the latter two.

Clinical Results After Precision Pulse Capsulotomy.

PurposeTo compare residual refractive error and complication rates between eyes undergoing a manual capsulotomy and those receiving a precision pulse capsulotomy using an automated device.Patients and MethodsThis study was a non-interventional two-arm retrospective chart review of clinical results after bilateral cataract surgery or refractive lens exchange (RLE) surgery with a monofocal toric intraocular lens (IOL) or a trifocal IOL where a manual capsulorhexis (Manual) or automated precision pulse capsulotomy (PPC) was performed.ResultsExams from 243 eyes (122 PPC, 121 Manual) from 124 patients were reviewed; about 75% of which had a trifocal IOL implanted. There was no statistically significant difference in the MRSE with either IOL type, or overall. The overall percentage of eyes with residual refractive cylinder ≤ 0.50 D was significantly higher in the PPC group (89% vs. 79% in the manual group, p = 0.03), primarily driven by results with the toric IOL. Best corrected distance visual acuity was not statistically significantly different by group. Capsulotomy-related complications were lower in the PPC group relative to the manual group (4.1% vs. 6.6%), but this result was not statistically significant (p = 0.38).ConclusionSignificantly more eyes had refractive cylinder ≤0.50 D in the PPC group. For all other measures, the automated PPC device produced clinical results equivalent to those achieved with a manual capsulorhexis.

Comparison of surgical repositioning rates and outcomes for hydrophilic vs hydrophobic single-piece acrylic toric IOLs.

To evaluate the comparative rotational stability and the repositioning rates and outcomes of a hydrophilic and hydrophobic acrylic monofocal toric intraocular lens (IOLs). Single center, Aravind Eye Hospital in Madurai, India. Retrospective cohort study. All patients had either an Auroflex hydrophilic acrylic toric IOL (n = 4603) or AcrySof hydrophobic acrylic toric IOL (n = 926) implanted between January 2015 and April 2019. Surgical repositioning was offered if the toric IOL was 15 degrees or greater misaligned or there was a 2-line or greater improvement in uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) predicted with repositioning. A total of 5529 single-piece toric IOLs were implanted during the study period. There was no statistically significant difference between the hydrophilic and hydrophobic acrylic toric IOL groups in need for surgical repositioning (2.5% vs 1.9%; P = .34) or actual surgical repositioning rate (1.8% vs 1.5%; P = .59). A higher rate of surgical toric IOL repositioning was associated with younger age (62.7 vs 67.2 years; P < .0001), higher presurgical astigmatism (2.32 vs 1.99 diopters [D]; P < .0001), and with-the-rule astigmatism (4.7% vs 2.1% against-the-rule astigmatism; P = .002). In 95 eyes that underwent toric IOL repositioning, there was significant preoperative to postoperative improvement in UDVA (0.48 vs 0.12 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; P < .001), mean residual cylinder (1.79 vs 0.7 D; P < .001), and mean toric IOL misalignment (49.7 vs 5.4 degrees; P < .001). The repositioning outcomes were statistically similar with both toric IOL models. There were no major complications or recurrent toric IOL rotation after surgical repositioning. The hydrophilic acrylic toric IOL had comparable rates of postoperative misalignment and surgical repositioning with the hydrophobic acrylic toric IOL. Early postoperative surgical repositioning was both safe and effective with both toric IOLs.

Duet procedure to achieve reversible trifocality

Funktionelle Ergebnisse und das Auftreten von Nebenwirkungen (insbesondere photischer Phänomene) können beim Einsatz multifokaler Intraokularlinsen (IOL) schwer vorhergesagt werden. Des Weiteren können Patienten im Laufe des Lebens Erkrankungen entwickeln, bei denen eine multifokale Optik von Nachteil sein kann. In diesen Fällen ist ein Austausch der IOL die einzige Therapieoption. Die Implantation einer monofokalen oder monofokal-torischen IOL in den Kapselsack und einer additiven trifokalen IOL in den Sulcus ciliaris in einer als Duett-Verfahren bezeichneten Operation ermöglicht Trifokalität, die bei Bedarf vergleichsweise einfach wieder rückgängig gemacht werden kann.Video onlineDie Online-Version dieses Beitrags (10.1007/s00347-020-01096-4) enthält ein Video.

Visual outcome and refractive status with monofocal toric intraocular lens implantation to correct astigmatism during cataract surgery.

Purpose:Measurement, calculations, visual assessment, and refractive status after monofocal toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation were the purpose of this study.Methods:This was a hospital-based interventional prospective study, where 40 eyes were included with astigmatism of more than 2D. They underwent biometric assessment using Lenstar. Toric IOL power calculation was done based on Barrett's Toric calculation method. Preoperative axis marking was done using both bubble marker and direct slit beam to avoid cyclotorsion in sleeping position. On table, axis marking was reassessed. Post phacoemulsification, monofocal Supra Phob Toric IOL was rotated till its marking matches corneal axis marking. Postoperative best-corrected visual acuity was measured at 1 and 3 months.Results:Mean of refractive astigmatism reduced from 3.55 ± 0.97 preoperatively to 0.81 ± 0.28 at 1 month and 0.79 ± 0.27 at 3 months postoperatively. In total, 92.5% had residual astigmatism less than 1D at 3 months postoperatively, while 7.5% eyes had residual astigmatism more than 1D. In total, 72.5% patients had IOL rotation of less than or equal to 5°, 20% patients had it between 6° and 10° and 7.5% eyes had more than 10° at day 7 postoperatively, which required IOL repositioning.Conclusion:Accurate measurement of parameters and proper calculation reduce the postoperative residual astigmatism after toric IOL.

Correction of High Corneal Astigmatism during Cataract Surgery

Patients, who need cataract surgical treatment, often fail to achieve a high uncorrected visual acuity after surgery due to the concomitant astigmatism involved. Currently, surgeons are increasingly performing combined surgical interventions, including relaxing limbal keratotomic incisions (manual keratotomy) or femtoarcuatous keratotomy, as well as implanting toric intraocular lenses. In recent years, additional toric intraocular lenses have been available. Purpose: to analyze our own clinical experience of implanting an additional toric intraocular lens to correct corneal astigmatism in three clinical cases. The article presents our clinical experience of successful correction of residual corneal astigmatism after previous cataract phacoemulsification with the implantation of a monofocal toric intraocular lens in three patients patients aged 70, 61 and 54 years. In all cases, an additional toric intraocular lens Add-on Torica-sPB pre-filled in the cartridge with a good refractive effect was implanted. The uncorrected visual acuity was 1.0 in all the investigated cases at the follow-upo period of 6 months after the surgical intervention. Calculation of the toric intraocular lens optical power was performed using an online calculator. A feature of surgical intervention was the repositioning of the additional toric intraocular lens into the ciliary sulcus. Changes in the data of keratotopography before and after surgery were absent. In none of the investigated cases, intra- and postoperative complications and dislocation of the implanted additional toric intraocular lens were determined. Based on these cases, high predictability, efficacy and safety of implantation of an additional toric intraocular lens are shown, in the case of residual middle-grade corneal astigmatism after the initial cataract phacoemulsification with the toric intraocular lens implantation. This approach can be successfully used in patients during one-stage surgical treatment of cataract and associated high-grade corneal astigmatism, expanding existing protocols for the treatment of this group of patients.

Pseudophakic mini-monovision: high patient satisfaction, reduced spectacle dependence, and low cost

BackgroundCataract surgery with pseudophakic mini-monovision has lower out-of-pocket patient expense than premium multifocal intraocular lenses (IOL). The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient-reported satisfaction and spectacle dependence for key activities of daily living after cataract surgery with pseudophakic mini-monovision. The study also examined statistical relationships between patient demographic variables, visual acuity and satisfaction.MethodsProspective cohort study of 56 patients (112 eyes) who underwent bilateral cataract surgery with pseudophakic mini-monovision. Mini-monovision corrects one eye for distance vision and the other eye is focused at near with − 0.75 to − 1.75 D of myopia. All patients with 1 diopter or greater of corneal astigmatism had a monofocal toric IOLs implanted or limbal relaxing incision. The main study outcomes were assessed at the last follow-up appointment and included refraction, visual acuity, patient reported spectacle use, and patient satisfaction. Descriptive statistics, correlation matrixes and Pearson’s chi-square tests were examined.ResultsUncorrected visual acuity was significantly better post-operatively. Most patients reported the surgery met their expectations for decreased dependence on spectacles (93%). Most patients report little or no use of spectacles post-operatively for computer use (93%), distance viewing (93%) and general use throughout the day (87%). A small number of patients report spectacle use for reading (9%) and night driving (18%). There were no relationships detected between demographic variables and visual acuity or patient satisfaction.ConclusionsAging of the population presents one of the biggest challenges in the health sector, which includes a rising number of individuals with chronic vision impairment and increased demand for accessible treatment strategies. Cataract surgery with pseudophakic mini-monovision results in high patient satisfaction and considerable reduction in spectacle dependence. Pseudophakic mini-monovision technique is a low-cost, valuable option for patients who would like to reduce dependence on spectacles post-operatively and should be considered along with premium multifocal IOLs in options available for patients based on their needs, preferences and clinical indicators. Reducing spectacle dependence with the pseudophakic mini-monovision technique could improve the functionality, independence and quality of life for many patients who are unsuitable or are unable to pay additional fees associated with premium multifocal IOLs.