Monofocal Intraocular Lens Research Articles

Refractive Astigmatism Outcomes of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Arcuate Keratotomies Combined with Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery: Two-Year Results

Purpose To evaluate the effectiveness and stability of refractive astigmatism reduction after penetrating femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy performed at the time of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. Methods Non-randomized retrospective data analysis of all patients that underwent femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy over a 4-year period with a non-toric monofocal intraocular lens (2017–2021) at a tertiary care academic center. Postoperative visual acuity, manifest refraction, and predicted residual refractive error were also recorded at 1 month, 3–6 months, 12–18 months, and 2 years postoperatively. Preoperative keratometric astigmatism was compared to postoperative refractive astigmatism using vector calculations and the ASCRS double-angle plot tool. Results This study comprised 266 eyes (179 patients) that met inclusion criteria. The mean preoperative keratometric astigmatism magnitude was 0.99 ± 0.53 D. At 1 month, 3–6 months, 12–18 months, and 2 years postoperatively, the mean refractive cylinder was 0.49 ± 0.45 D, 0.49 ± 0.45 D, 0.55 ± 0.54 D, and 0.52 ± 0.46 D, respectively. Horizontal against-the-rule astigmatism showed a higher tendency toward undercorrection than vertical with-the-rule astigmatism, which had a slightly higher tendency toward overcorrection. With-the-rule astigmatism had smaller difference vectors between target-induced astigmatism and surgically induced astigmatism. Conclusions Femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy performed at the time of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery was an effective option for correcting low-to-moderate corneal astigmatism for up to 2 years.

Comparison of SRK/T with Kane formula for prediction of refractive outcome after phacoemulsification: Insights from a South Asian patient group

BackgroundPhacoemulsification stands as the most commonly conducted ocular procedure. Biometry represents an art with numerous generations of formulas introduced to enhance refractive prediction accuracy. The Sanders Retzlaff Kraff theoretical (SRK/T), a third-generation formula that merges linear regression and a theoretical eye model, and the Kane formula, a fourth-generation formula incorporating theoretical optics, regression, and artificial intelligence, embody our focal points. Our aim is to compare post-operative refractive outcomes utilizing SRK/T and Kane formulae for calculating intraocular lens (IOL) power in senile cataract patients undergoing phacoemulsification featuring a hydrophilic acrylic, monofocal IOL. MethodsThis prospective, interventional institutional study engaged 70 patients, totaling 74 eyes. They were categorized into two groups: Group A employed the SRK/T for IOL power calculation, while Group B used the Kane formula. Quantel Medical® A-scan biometer was employed. A comparison was drawn between both formulae in terms of mean absolute error (MAE) and median absolute error (MedAE), with the utilization of IBM SPSS 20 and a significance level of p < 0.05. ResultsThe MAE for the SRK/T and Kane formulae stood at 0.18 ± 0.82 D and 0.24 ± 0.94 D, respectively, while the MedAE recorded values of 0.16 D and 0.155 D, correspondingly (p < 0.05). ConclusionWithin this South Asian cohort of senile cataract patients, the SRK/T formula demonstrated a marginally improved refractive outcome, evidenced by a reduced mean absolute error.

Retinal Image Quality Through an Operating Microscope With Wavefront Shaping Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens in Model Eye

To compare the quality of images of gratings placed in a model eye viewed through an extended depth of focus (EDoF) intraocular lens (IOL) to that of diffractive bifocal IOL or monofocal IOL. Experimental laboratory investigation. Nondiffractive wavefront shaping EDoF (CNAET0, Alcon Laboratories), echelette-designed EDoF (ZXR00V, Johnson & Johnson Vision), diffractive bifocal IOL with low power addition (SV25T, Alcon Laboratories), or monofocal IOL (CNA0T0, Alcon Laboratories) was placed in a fluid-filled model eye. A United States Air Force Resolution Grating Target was glued to the posterior surface of the model eye and viewed through a flat or a wide-angle contact lens. The contrast of the gratings viewed through the EDoF or multifocal IOLs was compared to that through the monofocal IOL. A wavefront analyzer was used to measure the spherical power of the central 4.5 mm optics of the EDoF, multifocal, and monofocal IOLs. The distribution of the dioptric power and the dioptric power map were compared. The gratings observed through the flat contact lens with CNAET0, ZXR00V, or SV25T were slightly blurred when viewed through the multifocal optics. The blurred area was in the circumferential area of CNAET0, the central area of SV25T, and the peripheral area of ZXR00V. The mean contrast was 0.258 ± 0.020 for CNAET0, 0.227 ± 0.025 for ZXR00V, and 0.221 ± 0.020 for SV25T for the 16.0 cyc/mm grating. The contrast was significantly lower for ZXR00V (P = .004) and SV25T (P = .004) than 0.303 ± 0.015 for CNA0T0 but the differences were not significant for CNAET0. For the wide-angle contact lens, the contrast for CNAET0 was 0.182 ± 0.009, for ZXR00V was 0.162 ± 0.011, and for SV25T was 0.163 ± 0.007 for the 16.0 cyc/mm grating, and none was significantly different from 0.188 ± 0.012 for CNA0T0. The dioptric variations of CNAET0 indicated a ring-shaped area of higher power corresponding to the circumferential blurred zone observed through the flat contact lens. The wavefront shaping and echelette-designed EDoF-IOLs reduce the contrast of the grating more than the monofocal IOL when viewed through the flat contact lens. The degree of reduction depended on the design of the extended-focus optics. The difference was less through the wide-angle contact lens.

Impact of Aspheric Monofocal Intraocular Lens Implantation on Uncorrected Intermediate Visual Acuity: a Combined Analysis.

To evaluate binocular intermediate visual acuity (IVA), depth of focus, and other visual outcomes achieved with a monofocal aspheric intraocular lens (IOL) using pooled data from 2 randomized, double-masked, controlled trials. The studies conducted at 32 sites included patients aged ≥22 years with bilateral cataracts, preoperative corneal astigmatism 1.0 D, and lens power 18.0-25.0 D. Patients received bilateral AcrySof IQ IOLs (SN60WF). Primary endpoint data were collected at month 6. Binocular uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA) at 4 m, binocular uncorrected and corrected IVA (UIVA and DCIVA) at 66 cm, manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), and binocular defocus curve at 4 m were assessed under photopic conditions. Validated questionnaires were used to assess spectacle use and quality of vision. Of 233 patients who received SN60WF, 228 had visual acuity data at 6 months. Under photopic conditions, 51% of the eyes had pupils >4 mm, 40% had pupils 3-4 mm, and 9% had pupils <3 mm. Mean ± SD UDVA and CDVA were -0.019 ± 0.110 and -0.088 ± 0.082 logMAR, respectively. Mean ± SD UIVA and DCIVA were 0.125 ± 0.145 and 0.196 ± 0.139 logMAR, respectively. UIVA and DCIVA of 20/32 or better were achieved by 83% (188/228) and 71% (162/228) of patients, respectively. Mean ± SD MRSE was -0.007 ± 0.404 D for the first eye and 0.036 ± 0.371 for the second eye. The defocus curve demonstrated binocular vision of 0.24 logMAR or better from +1.2 to -1.5 D. Spectacle independence for distance and intermediate vision was reported by 86% and 41% of the patients, respectively. Based on questionnaires, 61%, 79%, and 65% of the patients did not experience starbursts, halos, or glare. A monofocal aspheric IOL (SN60WF) assessed in a large, pooled study provided excellent distance vision and clinically functional intermediate vision.

Comparative Analysis of Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of a New Enhanced Monofocal IOL and a Conventional Monofocal IOL.

To compare the outcomes of the Tecnis Eyhance ICB00 IOL, designed to enhance intermediate vision, to a conventional Tecnis Monofocal ZCB00 IOL. This retrospective analysis compared two cohorts of patients undergoing lens replacement surgery with bilateral implantation of the Tecnis ICB00 or the Tecnis ZCB00 IOL (383 patients in each group). Monocular and binocular uncorrected distance (UDVA), intermediate (UIVA; 66cm), and near (UNVA; 40cm) visual acuities, refractive predictability, and patient-reported outcomes were compared. A sub-analysis of patients with the Eyhance IOL was performed to compare patients who achieved bilateral emmetropia to those with mini-monovision. One-month postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Both groups had comparable UDVA outcomes. On average, both monocular and binocular UIVAs were approximately one Snellen line better in patients implanted with Eyhance IOL (monocular UIVA: ICB00 0.23 ± 0.18 logMAR, ZCB00 0.33 ± 0.19 logMAR; binocular UIVA: ICB00 0.18 ± 0.18 logMAR, ZCB00 0.26 ± 0.20 logMAR, p < 0.01). Likewise, the mean UNVA was also one Snellen line better with the ICB00 model (monocular UNVA: ICB00 0.51 ± 0.20 logMAR, ZCB00 0.61 ± 0.18 logMAR; binocular UNVA: ICB00 0.42 ± 0.19 logMAR, ZCB00 0.51 ± 0.22 logMAR, p < 0.01). There was no difference between the two groups in overall satisfaction or visual phenomena. A subgroup of patients who achieved mini-monovision with Eyhance IOL had, on average, one Snellen line better UIVA and UNVA compared to patients with bilateral emmetropia. Patients receiving the enhanced monofocal IOL had better intermediate and near vision compared to those receiving the conventional monofocal IOL, with similar levels of patient-reported photic phenomena in both groups.

Severely subluxated cataract

A 56-year-old man with a history of myopic LASIK presented with left eye gradual blurring of vision over 3 months. There was no history of trauma. His uncorrected visual acuities were 20/25 in the right eye and 20/400 in the left eye. The right eye was normal except for an early cataract. The left eye had a moderate cataract that was phacodonetic. Vitreous was present in the shallow anterior chamber (AC) (Figure 1 JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202405000-00018/figure1/v/2024-04-22T135154Z/r/image-tiff ). The fundus was normal. The intraocular pressures (IOPs) were 14 mm Hg in the right eye and 20 mm Hg in the left eye. Ultrasound biomicroscopy of the anterior segment in the left eye revealed near total zonular loss with few intact zonular strands at the 6 and 10 o'clock regions (Figure 2 JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202405000-00018/figure2/v/2024-04-22T135154Z/r/image-tiff ). Vitreous was observed in the AC, herniating mostly from the 3 o'clock region. The endothelial cell density and optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the macular and disc in both eyes were normal. Central corneal thickness was 527 µm in the right eye and 520 µm in the left eye. Describe how you would manage this case surgically. Optical biometry had been obtained, and the axial length in both eyes was similar. Discuss how you would select the monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) diopter (D) targeted for −1.50 D if the AC depth in the left eye was 2.48 mm and in the right eye was 3.25 mm.

In vitro optical assessment of three types of non-diffractive extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses

Objective: To evaluate the in vitro optical performance of three types of non-diffractive extended depth-of-focus (EDoF) intraocular lenses (IOLs). Methods: Experimental study. Three Vivity IOLs, three Eyhance IOLs, and three ES60 IOLs were included. The professional optical bench OptiSpheric® IOL PRO 2 and an ISO-2 corneal model were applied. The through-focus modulation transfer function (MTF) and predicted visual acuity (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) of different spatial frequencies and different focuses under apertures of 3.0 mm and 4.5 mm were recorded. The aspheric monofocal (Tecnis ZCB00), diffractive EDoF (Tecnis Symfony), and trifocus (STF1) IOLs, as well as the lowest visual requirement criteria of EDoF IOLs of American Academy of Ophthalmology served as assessment controls. Results: For the 3.0-mm aperture, the peak value of the MTF was highest with ZCB00, followed by Eyhance, ES60, Vivity, Symfony, and STF1. All experimental non-diffractive EDoF IOLs had two MTF peaks, and the distance between both peaks was longest with Vivity (1.76 D), followed by ES60 (1.43 D) and Eyhance (1.36 D). Among the control IOLs, Symfony had two MTF peaks, and the peak MTF of the intermediate focus was highest. STF1 had three MTF peaks, and the peak MTF of the near focus was highest. For the 4.5-mm aperture, the ranking of the MTF peak of the six types of IOLs was the same as that for the 3.0-mm aperture. Vivity had an increased MTF peak of the distance focus, but a decreased intermediate focus MTF peak, while the MTF peaks of the distance, intermediate, and near focuses in the other IOLs decreased, compared to those for the 3.0-mm aperture. The predicted visual acuity of the distance focus of the three types of non-diffractive EDoF IOLs was all better than 0.0. The predicted visual acuity of the intermediate focus of the Vivity IOL and the ES60 IOL was 0.11 and 0.05 better than that of the Eyhance IOL, respectively. Based on the predicted visual acuity of 0.2, Vivity and ES60 had a depth of focus of at least 0.50 D exceeding ZCB00, while Eyhance had a depth of focus of 0.40 D exceeding ZCB00. Conclusion: In the experiments in vitro, the three types of non-diffractive EDoF IOLs exhibited varying degrees of intermediate to near focus optical performance while maintaining distance focus optical performance. The Eyhance IOL showed better distance focus optical performance than ES60 and Vivity IOL. The Vivity IOL and the ES60 IOL showed better depth of focus extensions than the Eyhance IOL and met the lowest visual requirement criteria of EDoF IOLs of American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Comparatively analysing the postoperative optical performance of different intraocular lenses: a prospective observational study

BackgroundPostoperative performance, including best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) and optical metrics (from the OQAS and iTrace devices), was compared among 4 different intraocular lenses (IOLs).MethodsThis prospective observational study included 104 eyes from 104 subjects who underwent cataract surgery combined with implantation of 4 different IOLs: monofocal (Mon) IOLs, segmental refractive (SegRef) IOLs, diffractive (Dif) IOLs and extended depth of focus (EDoF) IOLs. Postoperative BCDVA and optical metrics were collected at the 6th month. The OQAS optical metrics included the objective scattering index (OSI), Strehl ratio (SR), modulation transfer function (MTF) cut-off frequency, and predicted visual acuity (PVA); the iTrace optical metrics included blur/double vision, glare/halo, starburst, mixed focus, night myopia, and night hyperopia.ResultsThere was no significant difference in BCDVA among the 4 groups (P = 0.059; power = 70.3%). Differences were observed in all OQAS optical metrics among the groups (all P < 0.001). Overall, Mon IOLs and EDoF IOLs exhibited better performance than Dif IOLs and SegRef IOLs. Starburst was the only iTrace optical metric that differed among the groups (P < 0.001): SegRef IOLs caused more starbursts than Mon IOLs (P = 0.001), Dif IOLs (P = 0.006) and EDoF IOLs (P < 0.001). Spearman rank correlation analysis was used to determine the relationships among the iTrace optical metrics, OQAS optical metrics and BCDVA: starburst was negatively correlated with BCDVA, PVA at contrasts of 100% and 20%, OSI, and MTF cut-off frequency (all P ≤ 0.001); mixed focus was positively correlated with BCDVA, PVA at contrasts of 100% and 20%, OSI, and MTF cut-off frequency (all P ≤ 0.001).ConclusionsPostoperative BCDVA and optical metrics varied among the different IOLs, which should be taken into account in the selection and management of IOLs for cataract patients.Trial registrationThis study was approved by the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University Ethical Review Board (No. 50 2022).

Effect of decentration and tilt on the in vitro optical quality of monofocal and trifocal intraocular lenses.

To evaluate and compare the effect of decentration and tilt on the optical quality of monofocal and trifocal intraocular lenses (IOL). Optical quality of a monofocal IOL (AcrySof IQ SN60WF; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., USA) and a trifocal IOL (AcrySof IQ PanOptix; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., USA) was assessed using an in vitro optical bench (OptiSpheric IOL R&D; Trioptics GmbH, Germany). At apertures of 3.0mm and 4.5mm, modulation transfer function (MTF) at spatial frequency of 50 lp/mm, MTF curve and the United States Air Force (USAF) resolution test chart of the two IOLs were measured and compared at their focus with different degrees of decentration and tilt. Optical quality at infinity, 60cm and 40cm and the through-focus MTF curves were compared when the two IOLs were centered at apertures of 3.0mm and 4.5mm. Spectral transmittance of the two IOLs was measured by the UV-visible spectrophotometer (UV 3300 PC; MAPADA, China). The SN60WF and the PanOptix filtered blue light from 400 to 500nm. Both IOLs at the far focus and the PanOptix at the intermediate focus showed a decrease in optical quality with increasing decentration and tilt. The PanOptix demonstrated enhanced optical quality compared to the previous gradient at the near focus at a decentration range of 0.3-0.7mm with a 3.0mm aperture, and 0.5mm with a 4.5mm aperture, whereas other conditions exhibited diminished optical quality with increasing decentration and tilt at the focus of both IOLs. When the two IOLs were centered, the SN60WF had better optical quality at infinity, while the PanOptix had better optical quality at 60cm and 40cm defocus. The optical quality of the SN60WF exceeded that of the PanOptix at far focus, with a 3mm aperture decentration up to 0.7mm and a 4.5mm aperture decentration up to 0.3mm; this observation held true for all tilts, irrespective of aperture size. As both decentration and tilt increased, the optical quality of the SN60WF deteriorated more rapidly than that of the PanOptix at the far focal point. The SN60WF showed a decrease in optical quality with increasing decentration and tilt. Optical quality of the PanOptix at the near focus increased in some decentration conditions and decreased in some conditions, while it showed a decrease at the other focuses with increasing decentration. While tilt only had a negative effect on optical quality. When both IOLs were centered, the PanOptix provided a wider range of vision, while the SN60WF provided better far distance vision. At the far focus, the SN60WF has better resistance to tilt than the PanOptix, but the optical quality degrades more quickly when decentered and tilted.

Analysis of intraocular lens decentration and tilt after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery using swept-source anterior optical coherence tomography

ObjectiveTo evaluate and compare the magnitude of intraocular lens (IOL) decentration and tilt following conventional and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) using swept-source anterior optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). MethodsIn this retrospective observational study, we enrolled patients who underwent conventional cataract surgery or FLACS with the implantation of hydrophobic 1-piece monofocal IOL. The magnitude of IOL decentration and tilt were measured using SS-OCT. Visual acuity, intraocular pressure, spherical equivalent, axial length, contrast sensitivity, and satisfaction questionnaire were evaluated before and one-month post-surgery. Additionally, postoperative internal cylinder measurements were obtained using a wavefront aberrometer. Correlation factors between each parameter and IOL decentration or tilt were analyzed. ResultsThis study included 100 eyes from 100 patients. Mean IOL decentration and tilt were 0.21 ± 0.13 mm and 5.01 ± 1.49°, respectively. Conventional cataract surgery (versus FLACS, P = 0.001) and male sex (versus female, P = 0.047) were significantly correlated with higher postoperative decentration. Preoperative lens diameter (P < 0.001), preoperative lens tilt (P = 0.007), and preoperative intraocular pressure (P = 0.027) were correlated with higher postoperative tilt. Fifty eyes that underwent FLACS demonstrated mean postoperative decentration of 0.21 ± 0.13 mm and tilt of 4.64 ± 1.48°. Compared with the conventional surgery group, the FLACS group significantly differed in postoperative decentration (0.30 ± 0.12 mm, P < 0.001) but not in tilt (5.03 ± 1.35°, P = 0.173). Postoperative visual acuity did not significantly differ between the two groups. ConclusionPatients who underwent FLACS demonstrated better IOL decentration and tilt than those who underwent conventional cataract surgery one-month post-surgery. However, differences in IOL decentration and tilt did not affect postoperative visual acuity.

Comparative efficacy and safety of all kinds of intraocular lenses in presbyopia-correcting cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To assess the efficacy and safety of various intraocular lenses (IOLs), including standard monofocal, bifocal, trifocal, extended depth of focus (EDOF), and enhanced monofocal IOLs, post-cataract surgery through a network meta-analysis. A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted to identify relevant studies from the past 5 years. Parameters such as binocular visual acuities, spectacle independence, contrast sensitivity (CS), and optical quality were used to evaluate efficacy and safety. Data from the selected studies were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 17.0 software. Twenty-eight Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comprising 2465 subjects were included. Trifocal IOLs exhibited superior uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) compared to monofocal IOLs (MD: -0.35; 95% CI: -0.48, -0.22). Both trifocal (AcrySof IQ PanOptix IOLs group MD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.21, -0.06) and EDOF IOLs (MD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.17, -0.09) showed better uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) than monofocal IOLs. Trifocal IOLs ranked highest in spectacle independence at various distances (AT LISAtri 839MP group: SUCRA 97.5% for distance, 80.7% for intermediate; AcrySof IQ PanOptix group: SUCRA 83.0% for near). For cataract patients who want to treat presbyopia, trifocal IOLs demonstrated better visual acuity and spectacle independence at near distances. Different types of trifocal IOL characteristics differ. EDOF and enhanced monofocal IOLs have improved visual quality at intermediate distances.Therefore, It is very important to select the appropriate IOLs based on the lens characteristics and patient needs.

Этапное обеспечение высокого профиля безопасности факоэмульсификации у пациента с сочетанной патологией кератоконусом I и IV стадией, набухающей катарактой и косоглазием

Purpose. Provision of preoperative preparation of the patient for the uncomplicated course of phacoemulsification and the postoperative period in a patient with cataracts. Material and methods. The paper presents a clinical case of phacoemulsification of swelling and immature cataracts in a patient N., 59 years old, with a diagnosis of keratoconus IV degree and I degree in the paired eye. In this regard, the patient was recommended to perform phacoemulsification surgery with implantation of intraocular Toric IOL and Tecnis Eyhance IOL on the paired eye to achieve maximum visual acuity in the distance, but maintaining high visual acuity in the eyes with keratoconus stages I and IV. 2 days before surgery, 4x instillations of the NSAID Indocollir (indomethacin) 0.1% (Bausch &amp; Lomb, USA) were prescribed to prevent an inflammatory reaction and maintain mydriasis during surgery. Also, to prevent surgical complications during phacoemulsification of swelling cataracts, instillations of carbonic anhydrase inhibitor (ICA) 2 r/s were prescribed to reduce IOP and reduce the volume of the vitreous body. Results. No complications were detected during the operations, and there was no tendency to myosis. After the operation, the patient was in the clinic for 1 hour. Instillations of Indocollir, antibiotic, corticosteroid and Cornergel (dexpanthenol 5%) are prescribed at night and in the morning. The patient removes the monofocal bandage in the morning and instillates Indocollir, antibiotic, corticosteroids and corneregel (5% dexpanthenol). On the 1st post/op day visual acuity was 0.1 best corrected 0.4. IOP of 18 mm Hg. On the 5th day, the antibiotic was canceled, and the steroid drug was replaced with instillations of the drug fluorometholone for 2 weeks, instillations of Indocollir and corneregel were continued until 4 weeks post/op. After phacoemulsification in the paired eye with implantation of a monofocal IOL Tecnis Eyhance, visual acuity on the 1st day was 0.7 and text No. 5 was read at a distance of 40 cm. In 1 month visual acuity in the distance was 1.0, reading text No. 7 at a distance of 35 cm. According to the OCT of the macular, no clinically significant edema was detected, and no inflammatory reactions were detected in the postoperative period, which indicates the effectiveness of prescribing the NSAID Indocollir 0.1% with rapid withdrawal of antibiotics and corticosteroids, which allowed to minimize the load on the surface of the eye. Conclusion. The preliminary administration of NSAID preparations (indomethacin 0.1%) a day before surgery before ultrasound phacoemulsification allows maintaining the necessary mydriasis for safe operation. Postoperative management of the patient on NSAIDs (indomethacin 0.1%) avoids prolonged instillation of corticosteroids. Implantation of a monofocal IOL with a gradual increase in optical power from the periphery to the center provides patients with keratoconus with high visual acuity in the distance and at an average distance. Key words: cataract surgery, phacoemulsification, combined pathology, keratoconus, NSAID, indomethacin, monofocal IOL

Optical and clinical simulated performance of a new refractive extended depth of focus intraocular lens.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the optical and expected clinical performance of a new refractive Extended Depth of Focus (EDF) intraocular lens (IOL) designed to maintain a monofocal-like dysphotopsia profile. Simulated visual acuity (sVA) with varying defocus was calculated using the area under the Modulation Transfer Function measured in an average eye model and from computer simulations in eye models with corneal higher-order aberrations. Tolerance to defocus was evaluated using computer simulations of the uncorrected distance sVA under defocus. To evaluate the dysphotopsia profile, halo pictures obtained using an IOL-telescope, as well as simulated images in a realistic eye model under defocus were assessed. The results of the refractive EDF were compared to those of a diffractive EDF of the same platform. The refractive EDF IOL provides similar range of vision to the diffractive EDF IOL with the same distance, and similar intermediate and near sVA. The refractive EDF IOL provides the same tolerance to hyperopia as the diffractive EDF but more tolerance to myopia. Halo pictures and simulations showed that the refractive EDF provides comparable dysphotopsia profile to the monofocal IOL and better than the diffractive EDF. The results of this preclinical study in clinically relevant conditions show that the new refractive EDF IOL is expected to provide similar range of vision to the diffractive IOL of the same platform and higher tolerance to refractive errors. The refractive EDF provides a dysphotopsia profile that is better than the diffractive EDF and comparable to that of the monofocal IOL, also in the presence of residual refractive errors.

Tolerance to refractive error with a new extended depth of focus intraocular lens

PurposeTo evaluate the tolerance to refractive errors of a new purely refractive extended depth of focus (EDF) intraocular lens (IOL) using preclinical and clinical metrics.MethodsPreclinical evaluation included computer simulations of visual acuity (sVA) and dysphotopsia profile of different IOL designs (refractive EDF, diffractive EDF, multifocal, standard, and enhanced monofocals) using an appropriate eye model with and without ±0.50 D defocus and/or +0.75 D of astigmatism. Patients bilaterally implanted with a refractive EDF (Model ZEN00V) or an enhanced monofocal (Model ICB00) IOL from a prospective, randomized study were included. At the 6-month postoperative visit, uncorrected and corrected distance vision (UDVA and CDVA), visual symptoms, satisfaction and dependency on glasses were evaluated in a subgroup of patients with absolute residual refractive error of >0.25 D in one or both eyes.ResultsIn the presence of defocus and astigmatism, sVA was comparable for all except the multifocal IOL design. The refractive EDF was more tolerant to myopic outcomes and maintained a monofocal-like dysphotopsia profile with defocus. Binocular logMAR UDVA was −0.03 ± 0.08 for ZEN00V and −0.02 ± 0.11 for ICB00. 100% ZEN00V and 97% ICB00 patients did not need glasses and were satisfied with their distance vision. Monocular CDVA, contrast sensitivity and visual symptoms were also similar between both groups.ConclusionsThe clinical outcomes of the refractive EDF IOL demonstrated high quality distance vision and dysphotopsia comparable to a monofocal IOL, even in the presence of refractive error, thus matching the design expectations of the EDF IOL.

Quality of vision clinical outcomes for a new fully-refractive extended depth of focus Intraocular Lens.

To evaluate the visual performance of a purely refractive extended depth of focus (EDF) intraocular lens (IOL). A prospective, multi-center, randomized, subject/evaluator-masked study. Subjects were bilaterally implanted with the EDF test (Model ZEN00V, N = 60) or an enhanced monofocal control (Model ICB00, N = 57) IOL. Monocular corrected distance (CDVA), intermediate (DCIVA), near acuities (DCNVA) and patient reported visual symptoms were evaluated at the 6-month visit. Monocular mesopic contrast sensitivity (CS) and depth of focus (DOF) testing were assessed at 3 months. CDVA (Mean ± SD) was -0.06 ± 0.08 for test and -0.05 ± 0.08 logMAR for control groups. DCIVA was 0.13 ± 0.08 for test and 0.18 ± 0.14 logMAR for control groups (p = 0.0127). DCNVA was 0.37 ± 0.10 for test and 0.43 ± 0.16 logMAR for control groups (p = 0.0137). Test lens was statistically superior for intermediate and near. Overall, 91.7% (halos), 95.0% (starbursts) and 95.0% (glare) of test lens patients reported that they did not experience, were not bothered, or were slightly bothered by specific visual symptoms, compared to 98.2%, 100% and 96.5% in the control group. The DOF range over which monocular visual acuity was 0.20 logMAR or better was -1.6 D for the test lens. Mesopic CS was comparable between both groups, falling within 0.11 log units for all measured cycles per degree with and without glare. The EDF IOL demonstrated extended range of vision and statistically superior intermediate and near performance compared to the monofocal IOL. Distance visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and dysphotopsia profile were similar to the monofocal IOL.

Characterizing glare effects associated with diffractive optics in presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses.

To objectively quantify glare of intraocular lenses (IOLs) utilizing a diffractive principle to extend visual range. To identify models with increased susceptibility to inducing glare. David J Apple Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany. Laboratory investigation. Glare was assessed by means of straylight parameter with a standard C-Quant (Oculus GmbH) intended for 7°. In addition, two C-Quant modifications were used to test lower angles (i.e., 2.5° and 3.5°). The following IOL models were assessed: PanOptix (Alcon Inc.) and AT Lisa Tri (Zeiss Meditec), Synergy (J&J Vision), and Triumf (BVI Medical), the latter two with chromatic-aberration correction at distance. Straylight from trifocals was compared against a monofocal W-60R lens (Santen). The C-Quant test was performed through the studied IOLs via additional optical components attached to its ocular. Straylight (deg2sr-1) of the control was <1 at all tested angles, with the trifocal models showing comparable straylight at 7°. At 3.5°, Triumf's straylight increased to 15.5 ±0.6, followed by Synergy (6.2 ±1.1), PanOptix (4.1 ±0.3), and AT Lisa Tri (2.0 ±0.8). The chromatic-aberration correcting models demonstrated correspondingly high straylight (Synergy: 18.8 ±1.3; Triumf: 17.3 ±0.5) at 2.5° compared to PanOptix (4.3 ±0.4), AT Lisa Tri (2.1 ±0.1) and monofocal IOLs yielding minimal or no increase. Trifocal IOLs induced increased straylight, but it was limited to lower angles, which may cause difficulties detecting these effects using a standard clinical approach. The latest IOL designs featuring chromatic aberration correction at far-focus appear more susceptible than the established trifocals to inducing glare phenomena.

Astigmatism-induced image degradation in a model eye with a monofocal intraocular lens

Astigmatism-induced image degradation in a model eye with a monofocal intraocular lens

Aspheric hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens outcomes in patients with additional ocular pathology

Objectives: The objective of the study was to examine the real-world visual performance, refractive outcomes, and glistening occurrence of a hydrophobic acrylic aspheric monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) in patients with ocular comorbidities. Materials and Methods: All cases of cataract surgery with the implantation of a hydrophobic acrylic aspheric monofocal IOL in a single centre between September 2020 and March 2022 were reviewed in a retrospective cohort study. Refraction (autorefract), visual acuity, peri- and post-operative complications, and the presence of posterior capsular opacification (PCO) and glistenings were recorded. Due to facility and surgeon preference, this lens was utilised predominantly for younger patients with additional ocular pathology. Results: Data regarding 15 patients (21 eyes) were collected. The mean age was 57.3 years (Range: 37–70). Eleven patients (73%) had ocular pathology in addition to cataracts. One patient was excluded due to a lack of follow-up. Post-operative refraction was available for 13 eyes (61%). The median follow-up time was five months. Corrected distance visual acuity (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) improved from 0.52 ± 0.54 to 0.17 ± 0.21 (mean ± standard deviation; P = 0.01); 95% confidence interval 0.08–0.26). 77% of eyes were within 0.5 D of the refractive target, and 92% were within 0.7 D. Six patients (30%) had documented PCO, with two requiring YAG capsulotomy. No patients had IOL glistenings. Conclusion: The hydrophobic aspheric monofocal IOL performs well for young patients with ocular pathology in addition to cataracts. Further, long-term follow-up will help to support its use for patients who require greater than standard longevity from an IOL.

Effect of Low Myopia on Near and Distance Vision in Astigmatic Pseudophakic Eyes

Purpose: To investigate the effect of the postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) and astigmatism on the uncorrected near/distance visual acuity (UNVA/UDVA) in monofocal intraocular lens (IOL)-implanted pseudophakic eyes.Methods: Of the eyes that underwent successful cataract surgery and monofocal IOL implantation from January 2020 to September 2021 by a single surgeon, eyes with postoperative astigmatism ≤ 1.5 diopters (D) and -0.75 D ≤ SE &lt; +0.25 D were included. Eyes implanted with a toric IOL or with a best corrected visual acuity under 20/25 were excluded. This was a cross-sectional study, and the correlation of SE/astigmatism and UNVA/UDVA at 1 month postoperatively was analyzed retrospectively. The eyes were divided into mini-myopia (-0.75 D ≤ SE &lt; -0.25 D) and emmetropia (-0.25 D ≤ SE &lt; 0.25 D) groups according to the SE.Results: This study included 118 eyes (86 patients). The UNVA was significantly better in the mini-myopia group than in the emmetropia group (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.009), without a significant difference in UDVA (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.412). Dividing the range into 0.5 D units according to the degree of astigmatism, no significant difference was observed in UNVA/UDVA between the mini-myopia and emmetropia groups in eyes with astigmatism ≤ 1.0 D. However, the mini-myopia group had a significantly better UNVA (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.03), without a significant difference in UDVA (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.879) in eyes with astigmatism &gt; 1.0 D or ≤ 1.5 D.Conclusions: In non-toric monofocal IOL-implanted pseudophakic eyes with postoperative residual astigmatism of ≤ 1.5 D, especially in eyes with astigmatism &gt; 1.0 D and ≤ 1.5 D, the mini-myopia group had a significantly better UNVA compared to the emmetropia group, without a significant difference in UDVA.

Migraine is a risk factor for pseudophakic positive dysphotopsia following monofocal lens implantation

ObjectiveTo identify neuroadaptation-related risk factors for persistent positive dysphotopsia (>6 months) following monofocal lens implantation. DesignRetrospective cohort study. ParticipantsPatients of an academic institution and a private practice in Saint Louis, Missouri. Inclusion criteria were adults with cataract extraction between January 2010 and April 2021 with monofocal intraocular lens implantation. Exclusion criteria included dementia, <20/40 acuity, visual pathway damage, visual field loss, and significant pathology causing photopsia. MethodsParticipants were surveyed via telephone. ResultsThere were 385 participants (385 eyes), of whom 66 had persistent dysphotopsia (58 positive), 298 had none, and 21 had nonpersistent dysphotopsia. Among the 58 who had positive persistent dysphotopsia, mean Pseudophakic Dysphotopsia Questionnaire 6 (PDQ-6) score was 14.11 (SD, 8.46). There were no significant differences in sex or race. Migraine prevalence was greater among those with dysphotopsia (21.2%) than among those without (11.4%; p = 0.054). History of migraine was associated with an increase in PDQ-6 score of 2.76 points (p = 0.006). Six people in each group had Visual Aura Rating Scale (VARS) scores greater than zero. Mean VARS score was 0.48 for those with dysphotopsia and 0.14 for those without (p = 0.03). History of migraine or increased VARS score, younger age, and female sex were associated with lower satisfaction. ConclusionHistory of migraine was associated with increased dysphotopsia severity and decreased patient satisfaction. Although further study with a larger sample size is warranted, these preliminary results highlight the potential of simple questions to individualize lens choice, reduce the risk of dysphotopsia, and improve patient satisfaction.