Monoallelic MUTYH Research Articles

Identifying colorectal cancer caused by biallelic MUTYH pathogenic variants using tumor mutational signatures

Carriers of germline biallelic pathogenic variants in the MUTYH gene have a high risk of colorectal cancer. We test 5649 colorectal cancers to evaluate the discriminatory potential of a tumor mutational signature specific to MUTYH for identifying biallelic carriers and classifying variants of uncertain clinical significance (VUS). Using a tumor and matched germline targeted multi-gene panel approach, our classifier identifies all biallelic MUTYH carriers and all known non-carriers in an independent test set of 3019 colorectal cancers (accuracy = 100% (95% confidence interval 99.87–100%)). All monoallelic MUTYH carriers are classified with the non-MUTYH carriers. The classifier provides evidence for a pathogenic classification for two VUS and a benign classification for five VUS. Somatic hotspot mutations KRAS p.G12C and PIK3CA p.Q546K are associated with colorectal cancers from biallelic MUTYH carriers compared with non-carriers (p = 2 × 10−23 and p = 6 × 10−11, respectively). Here, we demonstrate the potential application of mutational signatures to tumor sequencing workflows to improve the identification of biallelic MUTYH carriers.

Germline variants across self-reported racial populations with urothelial carcinoma (UC).

4569 Background: Prior studies of the UC germline landscape centered around White patients with minimal representation of other racial populations. Herein, we examine the frequency of germline pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in 2,582 patients with UC from various racial populations. Methods: 2,582 patients with UC underwent germline testing of 1 to 126 genes using massively parallel sequencing with customized capture bait-sets to analyze exonic regions, flanking intronic regions, and copy number alterations (CNAs). P/LP variants including single nucleotide variants, indels and CNAs were reported. Fisher’s Exact test and multivariable logistic regression were used after accounting for the number of genes tested, age at diagnosis, site of disease (upper versus lower tract), gender, family history of UC, and personal history of any cancer. Results: Among the 2,582 patients with UC, median age at diagnosis was 63 years (range, 4-90) and 1158 (44.8%) were female. There were 58 Asians (2.2%), 110 Blacks (4.3%), and 2,414 Whites (93.5%). Overall, 1,639/2,582 (63.5%) patients had a personal history of another cancer and 284/2,393 (11.9%) had history of UC in a family member. 465 P/LP variants were identified in 18% of patients, among whom 286 (11.1%) harbored ≥1 clinically actionable variants. P/LP in cancer-associated genes were most frequently reported in MSH2 (72/2,512, 2.9%), monoallelic MUTYH (45/2,136, 2.1%), BRCA2 (44/2,299, 1.9%) and MSH6 (47/2,511, 1.9%). Patients with upper tract UC had significantly more P/LP (72/247, 29.1%) compared to lower tract UC (332/2,076, 16%, p= 1.3x10-5). Age at diagnosis, gender, personal history of other primary cancers, or family history of UC were not significantly associated with the prevalence of P/LP variants. There were no significant differences ( p= 0.33) in P/LP variants across Asians (11/58, 19.0%), Blacks (14/110, 12.7%), and Whites (440/2,414, 18.2%) although a trend towards lower P/LP in Blacks is notable. Compared to Whites, Blacks and Asians harbored significantly more variants of unknown significance (VUS, Whites vs Blacks: 241/2414 vs 25/110, p= 0.0015; Whites vs Asians: 241/2414 vs 17/58, p= 4e-7). Asians with UC harbored significantly more P/LP variants in ATM (2/50, 4%) compared to Whites (30/2122, 1.4%, OR = 1.1 [95% CI, 1.0-1.2]) and Asian controls from the gnomAD Database. There were no significant differences across racial populations for other highly altered genes ( BRCA1/2, CHEK2, FH, MSH2/6, MUTYH) or for actionable variants. Conclusions: Germline P/LP variants were identified in 18% of patients with UC and were enriched in upper tract tumors. Although no significant differences in P/LP prevalence were noted among patients of different racial populations, a trend towards lower P/LP in Blacks and a higher rate of VUS in Asians and Blacks suggest that ongoing analysis by genetic ancestry may provide richer admixture data and insights.

MUTYH-associated tumor syndrome: The other face of MAP.

MUTYH gene is involved in the base excision repair (BER) mechanism and its pathogenic alterations are associated with colorectal polyposis and cancer. MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP) is a condition which is inherited in an autosomal recessive manner. MAP patients, beyond colorectal cancer (CRC), may develop other types of tumors, including duodenal, breast, ovarian, pancreatic, bladder and skin cancers. Carriers of biallelic MUTYH likely pathogenic/pathogenic variants exhibit a high lifetime risk of CRC, though cancer risk evidence becomes less clear when monoallelic carriers and extraintestinal tumors are considered. However, several studies recently reported an increased genetic susceptibility to cancer also for carriers of germline monoallelic MUTYH mutations. Moreover, experimental evidence highlighted the MUTYH involvement in many other biological functions. In future, MUTYH mutation carriers might benefit from new target therapies involving the use of PD-1 or KRAS inhibitors. Therefore, "MUTYH-associated tumor syndrome" might be the most appropriate term, due to the multiplicity of tumors observed in MAP patients and different biological contexts in which MUTYH acts as a "playmaker". In this Review, we will investigate the impact of germline mono- and biallelic MUTYH mutations on cancer risk, providing a proposal for clinical surveillance of mutation carriers.

Detection of germline variants in Brazilian breast cancer patients using multigene panel testing

Genetic diversity of germline variants in breast cancer (BC) predisposition genes is unexplored in miscegenated populations, such those living in Latin America. We evaluated 1663 Brazilian BC patients, who underwent hereditary multigene panel testing (20–38 cancer susceptibility genes), to determine the spectrum and prevalence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants and variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Associations between P/LP variants and BC risk were estimated in a case–control analysis of BC patients and 18,919 Brazilian reference controls (RC). In total, 335 (20.1%) participants carried germline P/LP variants: 167 (10.0%) in BRCA1/2, 122 (7.3%) in BC actionable non-BRCA genes and 47 (2.8%) in candidate genes or other cancer predisposition genes. Overall, 354 distinctive P/LP variants were identified in 23 genes. The most commonly mutated genes were: BRCA1 (27.4%), BRCA2 (20.3%), TP53 (10.5%), monoallelic MUTYH (9.9%), ATM (8.8%), CHEK2 (6.2%) and PALB2 (5.1%). The Brazilian variant TP53 R337H (c.1010G>A, p.Arg337His), detected in 1.6% of BC patients and 0.1% of RC, was strongly associated with risk of BC, OR = 17.4 (95% CI: 9.4–32.1; p < 0.0001); monoallelic MUTYH variants c.1187G>A and c.536A>G, detected in 1.2% (0.9% RC) and 0.8% (0.4% RC) of the patients, respectively, were not associated with the odds of BC, the former with OR = 1.4 (95% CI: 0.8–2.4; p = 0.29) and the latter with OR = 1.9 (95% CI: 0.9–3.9; p = 0.09). The overall VUS rate was 46.1% for the entire patient population. Concluding, the use of multigene panel testing almost doubled the identification of germline P/LP variants in clinically actionable predisposition genes in BC patients. In Brazil, special attention should be given to TP53 P/LP variants.

Hereditary cancer risk assessment in the community urology practice setting.

278 Background: Professional guidelines recommend hereditary cancer risk assessment (HCRA) for men with prostate cancer to inform both risk of cancer (primary or subsequent) and treatment decisions. The objectives of the study were to evaluate the feasibility of integrating a HCRA protocol in urology practice for patients with prostate cancer and determine the response of providers and patients to the HCRA protocol. Methods: This prospective study was divided into 4 segments: process integration (4 wks.), practice (4 wks.), post-integration (8 wks.), and follow up (10 wks.). Study site staff were trained to perform HCRA for men with prostate cancer (integration). The sites then incorporated recommendations from the integration process into their normal practice workflow (practice). During the post-integration period, the HCRA process was implemented with eligible patients consented to participate. Eligible patients were ≥18 years old, had a personal history of prostate cancer, and met National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for genetic testing (2.2018). Patients and providers completed surveys regarding testing ≥ 8 weeks of test delivery or 1 week of end of data collection period, respectively (follow up). Results: In the 8 weeks prior to the study, 4.2% of patients completed testing at the study sites. During the study, 8.4% of patients completed testing, about 1/2 of eligible patients screened. Of all patients who completed testing and consented for their results to be summarized (N = 182), 10.4% (N = 19) tested positive for a single pathogenic variant (PV; monoallelic MUTYH N = 4; BRCA2 N = 3; ATM, BRCA1, BRIP1, CHEK2, HOXB13 N = 2 each; RAD51C, RAD51D N = 1 each). Not all men who tested positive or a PV reported a family history of cancer and not all PVs detected were in known prostate cancer risk genes. During follow up, most providers (61.0%) felt HCRA was as important as other assessments regularly performed and 68.3% planned to continue to use the HCRA process. In contrast, only 9.8% of providers did not believe HCRA was as important and 12.2% did not plan to continue to use the process. Of the patients that responded to the survey (N = 166), most had shared (62.0%) or planned to share (25.3%) their results with family members post-testing. Conclusions: Urologists and patients responded favorably to HCRA protocol integration. Based on this study, education around and incorporation of an HCRA process in a community urology practice setting for men with prostate cancer appears effective at increasing appropriate uptake of genetic testing. Clinical trial information: NCT04015102.

Novel Insights From the Germline Landscape of Breast Cancer in Brazil.

IntroductionBreast cancer patients with germline pathogenic variants may benefit from risk-reducing surgeries, intensive screening, and targeted cancer therapies. There is a paucity of data regarding prevalence and distribution of germline pathogenic variants in the Brazilian population. Our primary endpoint was the description of prevalence and distribution of germline pathogenic variants among breast cancer patients who underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel testing. Secondary endpoint was the assessment of predictive factors of a positive test.MethodsWe analyzed NGS results, personal, and family history data from a prospectively collected cohort of breast cancer patients from August 2013 to May 2019. Exact logistic regression was used to perform multivariable analysis.ResultsOf 370 breast cancer patients, we found 59 pathogenic variants in 57 (15%) patients. Pathogenic variants were identified in BRCA1 (24%), ATM (14%), BRCA2 (10%), TP53 (8%), PALB2 (8%), CHEK2 (7%), CDH1 (3%), RAD51C (3%), MITF (2%), PMS2 (2%), RAD51D (2%), and TERT (2%). Monoallelic MUTYH pathogenic variants were found in 15%. After multivariable analysis, age of diagnosis (OR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.81–0.95, for each year increase), triple-negative subtype (OR 17.2, 95% CI: 3.74–114.72), and number of breast cancers in the family (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.57–4.03, for each additional case) were associated with BRCA1 pathogenic variants. In the present study, a quarter of triple-negative breast cancer patients harbored a germline pathogenic variant and two-thirds of those were BRCA1 carriers.ConclusionsPrevalence and distribution of germline pathogenic variants in this Brazilian sample of breast cancer patients are mostly similar to other populations. However, there is a trend to an overrepresentation of TP53 pathogenic variants that merits confirmation in further studies. Early-onset breast cancer patients should be offered genetic counseling, particularly those with triple-negative subtype.

Monoallelic MUTYH pathogenic variants ascertained via multi-gene hereditary cancer panels are not associated with colorectal, endometrial, or breast cancer.

We aimed to determine whether monoallelic MUTYH pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants (PVs) are associated with colorectal, breast, and endometrial cancer. Cases were individuals with colorectal, female breast, or endometrial cancer who reported European ancestry alone and underwent a multi-gene hereditary cancer panel at a large reference laboratory. Controls were individuals of European (non-Finnish) descent from GnomAD with cancer cohorts removed. We performed a Fisher's exact test to generate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Prevalence of single MUTYH PVs in cancer cohorts versus controls, respectively, was: colorectal cancer, 2.1% vs. 1.8% (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.99-1.5, p = 0.064); breast cancer 1.9% vs. 1.7% (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.96-1.3, p = 0.15); and endometrial cancer, 1.7% vs. 1.7% (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.70-1.3, p = 0.94). Using the largest colorectal and endometrial cancer cohorts and one of the largest breast cancer cohorts from a single case-control study, we did not observe a significant difference in the prevalence of monoallelic MUTYH PVs in these cohorts compared to controls. Additionally, frequencies among cancer cohorts were consistent with the published MUTYH carrier frequency of 1-2%. These findings suggest there is no association between colorectal, endometrial, or breast cancer and MUTYH heterozygosity in individuals of European ancestry.

Monoallelic deleterious MUTYH germline variants as a driver for tumorigenesis.

MUTYH encodes a glycosylase involved in the base excision repair of DNA. Biallelic pathogenic germline variants in MUTYH cause an autosomal recessive condition known as MUTYH-associated adenomatous polyposis and consequently increase the risk of colorectal cancer. However, reports of increased cancer risk in individuals carrying only one defective MUTYH allele are controversial and based on studies involving few individuals. Here, we describe a comprehensive investigation of monoallelic pathogenic MUTYH germline variants in 10,389 cancer patients across 33 different tumour types and 117,000 healthy individuals. Our results indicate that monoallelic pathogenic MUTYH germline variants can lead to tumorigenesis through a mechanism of somatic loss of heterozygosity of the functional MUTYH allele in the tumour. We confirmed that the frequency of monoallelic pathogenic MUTYH germline variants is higher in individuals with cancer than in the general population, although this frequency is not homogeneous among tumour types. We also demonstrated that the MUTYH mutational signature is present only in tumours with loss of the functional allele and found that the characteristic MUTYH base substitution (C>A) increases stop-codon generation. We identified key genes that are affected during tumorigenesis. In conclusion, we propose that carriers of the monoallelic pathogenic MUTYH germline variant are at a higher risk of developing tumours, especially those with frequent loss of heterozygosity events, such as adrenal adenocarcinoma, although the overall risk is still low. © 2021 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Filling the gap: A thorough investigation for the genetic diagnosis of unsolved polyposis patients with monoallelic MUTYH pathogenic variants.

Backgrounds MUTYH‐associated polyposis (MAP) is an autosomal recessive disease caused by biallelic pathogenic variants (PV) of the MUTYH gene. The aim of this study was to investigate the genetic causes of unexplained polyposis patients with monoallelic MUTYH PV. The analysis focused on 26 patients with suspected MAP, belonging to 23 families. Ten probands carried also one or more additional MUTYH variants of unknown significance.MethodsBased on variant type and on the collected clinical and molecular data, these variants were reinterpreted by applying the ACMG/AMP rules. Moreover, supplementary analyses were carried out to investigate the presence of other variants and copy number variations in the coding and promoter regions of MUTYH, as well as other polyposis genes (APC, NTHL1, POLE, POLD1, MSH3, RNF43, and MCM9).ResultsWe reclassified 4 out of 10 MUTYH variants as pathogenic or likely pathogenic, thus supporting the diagnosis of MAP in only four cases. Two other patients belonging to the same family showed a previously undetected deletion of the APC gene promoter. No PVs were found in the other investigated genes. However, 6 out of the 18 remaining families are still interesting MAP candidates, due to the co‐presence of a class 3 MUTYH variant that could be reinterpreted in the next future.ConclusionSeveral efforts are necessary to fully elucidate the genetic etiology of suspected MAP patients, especially those with the most severe polyposis/tumor phenotype. Clinical data, tumor molecular profile, family history, and polyposis inheritance mode may guide variant interpretation and address supplementary studies.

Germline Alterations in Patients With IBD-associated Colorectal Cancer.

Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), are at risk of developing a colorectal cancer (CRC). No information is available on the contribution of patients' genetic background to CRC occurrence. This study investigates germline alterations in patients with IBD-associated CRC. We profiled a panel of 39 genes potentially involved in cancer predisposition and searched for germline variants in IBD patients with CRC or high-grade dysplasia. After clinical exclusion of genetic cancer syndromes, 25 IBD patients (4 CD and 21 UC) with CRC or high-grade dysplasia were studied. After excluding variants with low likelihood of pathogenicity (classes 1 or 2 according the International Agency for Research on Cancer [IARC]), the panel identified pathogenic variants, likely pathogenic, or variants with unknown significance in 18 patients (72%). Six patients (24%) carried pathogenic or likely variants (IARC class 5 or 4). Of the identified variants, 4 encompassed the APC region, 3 the MLH1 gene, and the remaining ones the MSH2, MSH3, monoallelic MUTYH, EPCAM, BRCA1, CHEK2, POLD1, POLE, CDKN2A, and PDGFRA genes. Four patients carried at least 2 variants in different genes. Duration of IBD was significantly shorter in carriers of 4 or 5 IARC variants (7 years; range 0-21; P = .002) and in those with variants with unknown significance (12 years; range 0-22; P = .005) compared with patients without or with only benign variations (23.5 years; range 15-34). In silico analysis and sequence-based testing of germline DNA from IBD patients with CRC or high-grade dysplasia detected 24% of variants positioned in pathogenic classes. In patients with type 3, 4, and 5 variants, the onset of high-grade dysplasia or CRC was significantly earlier than in patients with benign or unidentified variants. The screening for these genes could identify IBD patients requiring a more intensive endoscopic surveillance for earlier detection of dysplastic changes.

P044 - Monoallelic MUTYH mutations and hereditary breast cancer - results of an epidemiologic study in Brazil

P044 - Monoallelic MUTYH mutations and hereditary breast cancer - results of an epidemiologic study in Brazil

Multiple neoplasia in a patient with Gitelman syndrome harboring germline monoallelic MUTYH mutation

Gitelman syndrome is a rare, recessively inherited disease characterized by chronic hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia as a result of defective electrolyte co-transport at the level of the distal convoluted tubule of the kidney. Here, we present the first report of a patient with Gitelman syndrome who developed multiple neoplasia including colorectal polyposis, synchronous colorectal cancers, recurrent breast fibroadenomata and a desmoid tumor. Whole-exome sequencing confirmed germline compound heterozygous mutations of c.179C > T and c.1326C > G in SLC12A3, and in addition, identified a monoallelic germline c.934-2A > G splice site mutation in MUTYH. In vitro, magnesium deficiency potentiated oxidative DNA damage in lymphoblastoid cell lines derived from the same patient. We postulate that monoallelic MUTYH mutations may manifest in the presence of cooperative non-genetic mechanisms, in this case possibly magnesium deficiency from Gitelman syndrome.

Characterizing germline APC and MUTYH variants in Ashkenazi Jews compared to other individuals.

Germline variants in the APC and MUTYH genes contribute to colorectal cancer (CRC) and adenoma risk, though may occur with varying frequencies in individuals of different ancestries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of APC, monoallelic MUTYH and biallelic MUTYH germline variants in Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) and Other Ancestry (OA) individuals with colorectal adenomas. We studied 7225 individuals with colorectal adenomas who had germline APC and MUTYH testing at a commercial laboratory. Cross-sectional medical history data were extracted from provider-completed test requisition forms. We performed bivariate analysis to compare the frequency of APC and MUTYH variants between AJ and OA, and examined APC p.I1307K and monoallelic MUTYH carrier phenotypes using logistic regression. Pathogenic APC variants occurred in 38/285 AJ (13%) and 1342/6940 OA (19%; P = 0.09); biallelic MUTYH variants in 2/285 (1%) AJ and 399/6940 (6%) OA (P < 0.0001); APC p.I1307K in 35/285 (12%) AJ and 29/6940 (1%) OA (P < 0.0001); and monoallelic MUTYH in 2/285 (1%) AJ and 133/6940 (2%) OA (P = 0.06). Monoallelic MUTYH variants were significantly associated with having a personal history of CRC, regardless of ancestry (OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.21-2.49; P < 0.01), but no significant association was found between APC p.I1307K variants and personal history of CRC (OR 1.38; 95% CI 0.79-2.44; P = 0.26). Ashkenazim with colorectal adenomas rarely have monoallelic or biallelic MUTYH variants, suggesting different genetic etiologies for polyposis in AJ compared to OA individuals. AJ ancestry assessment may be important in clinical evaluation for polyposis.

Monoallelic MUTYH carrier status is not associated with increased breast cancer risk in a multigene panel cohort

Whether monoallelic MUTYH mutations increase female breast cancer risk remains controversial. This study aimed to determine if monoallelic MUTYH mutations are associated with increased breast cancer risk in women undergoing multigene panel testing (MGPT). The prevalence of monoallelic MUTYH mutations was compared between Non-Hispanic white female breast cancer cases (n = 30,456) and cancer-free controls (n = 12,289), all of whom underwent MGPT that included MUTYH. We tested breast cancer associations with MUTYH alleles using Fisher's exact test, followed by multivariate logistic regression adjusted for age at testing and MGPT type ordered. Frequencies of the two most common MUTYH founder mutations, p.G396D and p.Y179C, were compared independently between the breast cancer cases and MGPT controls, as well as the healthy UK10K control population (n = 2640). Comparing cases to MGPT controls, no association was observed between female breast cancer and any monoallelic MUTYH carrier status (OR 0.86-1.36, p = 0.21-0.96). Similarly, comparisons to UK10K controls revealed no significant increase in breast cancer risk associated with p.G396D (OR 1.20, p = 0.44) or p.Y179C (OR 1.71, p = 0.24). This study did not find a significant increase in breast cancer risk associated with monoallelic MUTYH mutations.

Contribution of MUTYH Variants to Male Breast Cancer Risk: Results From a Multicenter Study in Italy.

Inherited mutations in BRCA1, and, mainly, BRCA2 genes are associated with increased risk of male breast cancer (MBC). Mutations in PALB2 and CHEK2 genes may also increase MBC risk. Overall, these genes are functionally linked to DNA repair pathways, highlighting the central role of genome maintenance in MBC genetic predisposition. MUTYH is a DNA repair gene whose biallelic germline variants cause MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP) syndrome. Monoallelic MUTYH variants have been reported in families with both colorectal and breast cancer and there is some evidence on increased breast cancer risk in women with monoallelic variants. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether MUTYH germline variants may contribute to MBC susceptibility. To this aim, we screened the entire coding region of MUTYH in 503 BRCA1/2 mutation negative MBC cases by multigene panel analysis. Moreover, we genotyped selected variants, including p.Tyr179Cys, p.Gly396Asp, p.Arg245His, p.Gly264Trpfs*7, and p.Gln338His, in a total of 560 MBC cases and 1,540 male controls. Biallelic MUTYH pathogenic variants (p.Tyr179Cys/p.Arg241Trp) were identified in one MBC patient with phenotypic manifestation of adenomatous polyposis. Monoallelic pathogenic variants were identified in 14 (2.5%) MBC patients, in particular, p.Tyr179Cys was detected in seven cases, p.Gly396Asp in five cases, p.Arg245His and p.Gly264Trpfs*7 in one case each. The majority of MBC cases with MUTYH pathogenic variants had family history of cancer including breast, colorectal, and gastric cancers. In the case-control study, an association between the variant p.Tyr179Cys and increased MBC risk emerged by multivariate analysis [odds ratio (OR) = 4.54; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.17–17.58; p = 0.028]. Overall, our study suggests that MUTYH pathogenic variants may have a role in MBC and, in particular, the p.Tyr179Cys variant may be a low/moderate penetrance risk allele for MBC. Moreover, our results suggest that MBC may be part of the tumor spectrum associated with MAP syndrome, with implication in the clinical management of patients and their relatives. Large-scale collaborative studies are needed to validate these findings.

Increased Yield of Hereditary Cancer Risk Assessment in a GI Office Practice Utilizing NCCN Guidelines and Panel Testing

Introduction: Deleterious mutations associated with an increased risk of cancer are prevalent in the general population and remain undetected in the vast majority of patients until cancer develops. Hereditary cancer assessment is an important part of patient evaluation, especially upon initial presentation to a clinician. Customarily, specialists focus on family history specific to their specialty. Gynecologists and breast surgeons query patients about family history of breast and ovarian cancer (ie HBOC syndrome) while gastroenterologists & colorectal surgeons focus on Lynch syndrome. Recently, we broadened our cancer risk assessment in our GI population by utilizing the more broad NCCN guidelines rather than focusing on GI criteria. Methods: We employed a digital survey on a tablet using NCCN guidelines. The patients were presented with the tablet prior to being seen by the physician. If the survey indicated that the patient was at increased risk for hereditary cancer, further evaluation and possible testing was offered. Results: 2,239 patients were screened: 639 patients (29%) = high risk, 76% met HBOC criteria, 12% met Lynch criteria, and 12% both; 381 interested in genetic evaluation (60%), 374 were tested (98%): 27 were positive for deleterious mutations: 9 APC low penetrance (7 of 9 Ashkenazi Jewish - elevated colon cancer risk), 6 Monoallelic MUTYH, 3 ATM, 2 APC, 2 BRCA1, 2 BRCA2, 1 CHEK2, 1 PMS2, 1 RAD51D. 26/27 mutations (96%) with GI-related cancer risk - 3 single-site testing=24 mutations via panel testing & 23 (95.8%) with GI-related cancer risk. 14/23 (61%) had HBOC-related indications vs. 9 (39%) with Lynch indications. Overall, 18 mutations (67%) are GI-related genes (monoallelic MUTYH, APC low penetrance, APC & PMS2) - 2 were single-site testing, ie 16 mutations were identified by panel testing. 8/16 (50%) = HBOC-related indications & 8 (50%) were Lynch indications Conclusion: In an attempt to identify individuals with an increased risk of hereditary cancer in our practice, we expanded our assessment based on overall risk by utilizing NCCN guidelines rather than focused GI criteria. We detected 27 previously unidentified mutations in our population of 2239 screened patients. Expanding the survey questions to include HBOC risks and using panel testing, resulted in a 2.5 fold increase in the detection of GI related mutations. This experience suggests that hereditary risk assessment should address overall cancer risk and not be limited to focused assessment.

Characteristics of MUTYH variants in Japanese colorectal polyposis patients.

The base excision repair gene MUTYH is the causative gene of colorectal polyposis syndrome, which is an autosomal recessive disorder associated with a high risk of colorectal cancer. Since few studies have investigated the genotype-phenotype association in Japanese patients with MUTYH variants, the aim of this study was to clarify the clinicopathological findings in Japanese patients with MUTYH gene variants who were detected by screening causative genes associated with hereditary colorectal polyposis. After obtaining informed consent, genetic testing was performed using target enrichment sequencing of 26 genes, including MUTYH. Of the 31 Japanese patients with suspected hereditary colorectal polyposis, eight MUTYH variants were detected in five patients. MUTYH hotspot variants known for Caucasians, namely p.G396D and p.Y179D, were not among the detected variants.Of five patients, two with biallelic MUTYH variants were diagnosed with MUTYH-associated polyposis, while two others had monoallelic MUTYH variants. One patient had the p.P18L and p.G25D variants on the same allele; however, supportive data for considering these two variants 'pathogenic' were lacking. Two patients with biallelic MUTYH variants and two others with monoallelic MUTYH variants were identified among Japanese colorectal polyposis patients. Hotspot variants of the MUTYH gene for Caucasians were not hotspots for Japanese patients.

Cancer Susceptibility Gene Mutations in Individuals With Colorectal Cancer.

Purpose Hereditary factors play an important role in colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, yet the prevalence of germline cancer susceptibility gene mutations in patients with CRC unselected for high-risk features (eg, early age at diagnosis, personal/family history of cancer or polyps, tumor microsatellite instability [MSI], mismatch repair [MMR] deficiency) is unknown. Patients and Methods We recruited 1,058 participants who received CRC care in a clinic-based setting without preselection for age at diagnosis, personal/family history, or MSI/MMR results. All participants underwent germline testing for mutations in 25 genes associated with inherited cancer risk. Each gene was categorized as high penetrance or moderate penetrance on the basis of published estimates of the lifetime cancer risks conferred by pathogenic germline mutations in that gene. Results One hundred five (9.9%; 95% CI, 8.2% to 11.9%) of 1,058 participants carried one or more pathogenic mutations, including 33 (3.1%) with Lynch syndrome (LS). Twenty-eight (96.6%) of 29 available LS CRCs demonstrated abnormal MSI/MMR results. Seventy-four (7.0%) of 1,058 participants carried non-LS gene mutations, including 23 (2.2%) with mutations in high-penetrance genes (five APC, three biallelic MUTYH, 11 BRCA1/2, two PALB2, one CDKN2A, and one TP53), 15 of whom lacked clinical histories suggestive of their underlying mutation. Thirty-eight (3.6%) participants had moderate-penetrance CRC risk gene mutations (19 monoallelic MUTYH, 17 APC*I1307K, two CHEK2). Neither proband age at CRC diagnosis, family history of CRC, nor personal history of other cancers significantly predicted the presence of pathogenic mutations in non-LS genes. Conclusion Germline cancer susceptibility gene mutations are carried by 9.9% of patients with CRC. MSI/MMR testing reliably identifies LS probands, although 7.0% of patients with CRC carry non-LS mutations, including 1.0% with BRCA1/2 mutations.

Prevalence and Spectrum of Germline Cancer Susceptibility Gene Mutations Among Patients With Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer

ImportanceHereditary cancer syndromes infer high cancer risks and require intensive cancer surveillance, yet the prevalence and spectrum of these conditions among unselected patients with early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) is largely undetermined.ObjectiveTo determine the frequency and spectrum of cancer susceptibility gene mutations among patients with early-onset CRC.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsOverall, 450 patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer younger than 50 years were prospectively accrued from 51 hospitals into the Ohio Colorectal Cancer Prevention Initiative from January 1, 2013, to June 20, 2016. Mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency was determined by microsatellite instability and/or immunohistochemistry. Germline DNA was tested for mutations in 25 cancer susceptibility genes using next-generation sequencing.Main Outcomes and MeasuresMutation prevalence and spectrum in patients with early-onset CRC was determined. Clinical characteristics were assessed by mutation status.ResultsIn total 450 patients younger than 50 years were included in the study, and 75 gene mutations were found in 72 patients (16%). Forty-eight patients (10.7%) had MMR-deficient tumors, and 40 patients (83.3%) had at least 1 gene mutation: 37 had Lynch syndrome (13, MLH1 [including one with constitutional MLH1 methylation]; 16, MSH2; 1, MSH2/monoallelic MUTYH; 2, MSH6; 5, PMS2); 1 patient had the APC c.3920T>A, p.I1307K mutation and a PMS2 variant; 9 patients (18.8%) had double somatic MMR mutations (including 2 with germline biallelic MUTYH mutations); and 1 patient had somatic MLH1 methylation. Four hundred two patients (89.3%) had MMR-proficient tumors, and 32 patients (8%) had at least 1 gene mutation: 9 had mutations in high-penetrance CRC genes (5, APC; 1, APC/PMS2; 2, biallelic MUTYH; 1, SMAD4); 13 patients had mutations in high- or moderate-penetrance genes not traditionally associated with CRC (3, ATM; 1, ATM/CHEK2; 2, BRCA1; 4, BRCA2; 1, CDKN2A; 2, PALB2); 10 patients had mutations in low-penetrance CRC genes (3, APC c.3920T>A, p.I1307K; 7, monoallelic MUTYH). Importantly, 24 of 72 patients (33.3%) who were mutation positive did not meet established genetic testing criteria for the gene(s) in which they had a mutation.Conclusions and RelevanceOf 450 patients with early-onset CRC, 72 (16%) had gene mutations. Given the high frequency and wide spectrum of mutations, genetic counseling and testing with a multigene panel could be considered for all patients with early-onset CRC.

Association of monoallelic MUTYH mutation among Egyptian patients with colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous triat that involves both environmental and genetic factors. Genetic mutations of MUTYH (p.Y179C and p.G396D) have been reported to be associated with increased risk of CRC among several ethnic populations. The aim of this work is to assess the association of the monoallelic MUTYH mutations (p.Y179C and p.G396D) with increased risk of CRC among Egyptian patients. This study included 120 unrelated CRC Egyptian patients who were compared with 100 healthy controls from the same locality. For all individuals, DNA was genotyped for MUTYH p.Y179C and MUTYH p.G396D mutations using the T-ARMS-PCR technique. The frequencies of monoallelic MUTYH mutations showed a strong association with the increased risk of CRC among Egyptian patients compared with controls (12.5 vs. 4.0%, OR=3.49, 95% CI=1.12-10.90, P=0.03). Moreover, the frequency of MUTYH p.Y179C mutation was noted to be significantly higher among CRC patients compared to controls rather than MUTYH p.G396D mutation. Interestingly, CRC patients with tumors in the right side colon showed an evidence for association with the MUTYH p.Y179C mutation compared with tumors in the left side colon (p=0.01). MUTYH p.Y179C mutation was associated with an increased risk of CRC among Egyptian patients rather than MUTYH p.G396D mutation.