Combined passive [or acoustic emission (AE)] and active ultrasonic stress (US) wave monitoring has been shown to provide a more holistic picture of ongoing fracture processes, damage progression, as well as slowly occurring aging and degradation mechanisms in concrete structures. Traditionally, different data analysis techniques have been used to analyze the data generated from these two monitoring approaches. For AE data analysis, for instance, signal amplitudes, hit rates, source localization, and b-value analysis have been used to detect and locate cracking. On the other hand, amplitude tracking, magnitude squared coherence (MSC), and coda wave interferometry (CWI) are examples that have been employed for US data analysis. In this presentation, we explore these data analysis techniques and show where their respective applications and limitations might be. After providing an overview of the monitoring approach and the different data analysis techniques, results and observations from select laboratory experiments, as well as an in-service structure are discussed. Finally, suggestions for further work are proposed.