Monitored Anesthesia Care Research Articles

Comparison of periprocedural and procedure room times between moderate sedation and monitored anesthesia care in interventional radiology.

In recent years, there has been increased utilization of monitored anesthesia care (MAC) in interventional radiology (IR) departments. The purpose of this study was to compare pre-procedure bed, procedure room, and post-procedure bed times for IR procedures performed with either nurse-administered moderate sedation (MOSED) or MAC. An institutional review board-approved single institution retrospective review of IR procedures between January 2010 and September 2022 was performed. Procedures performed with general anesthesia or local anesthetic only, missing time stamps, or where <50 cases were performed for both MAC and MOSED were excluded from the study. Pre-procedure bed, procedure room, post-procedure bed, and total IR encounter times were compared between MAC and MOSED using the t-test. The effect size was estimated using Cohen's d statistic. 97,480 cases spanning 69 procedure codes were examined. Mean time in pre-procedure bed was 27 min longer for MAC procedures (69 vs. 42 min, P < 0.001, d = 0.95). Mean procedure room time was 11 min shorter for MAC (60 vs. 71 min, P < 0.001, d = 0.48), and mean time in post-procedure bed was 10 min longer for MAC (102 vs. 92 min, P < 0.001, d = 0.22). Total IR encounter times were on average 27 min longer for MAC cases (231 vs. 204 min, P < 0.001, d = 0.41). MAC improves the utilization of IR procedure rooms, but at the cost of increased patient time in the pre- and post-procedure areas.

Natural airway as an alternative to intubation for pediatric endoscopic esophageal foreign body removal: A retrospective cohort study of 326 patients.

Anesthesia is required for endoscopic removal of esophageal foreign bodies (EFBs) in children. Historically, endotracheal intubation has been the de facto gold standard for airway management in these cases. However, as more elective endoscopic procedures are now performed under propofol sedation with natural airway, there has been a move toward using similar Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC) for select patients who require endoscopic removal of an EFB. In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we compared endoscopic EFB removal with either MAC or endotracheal intubation. Descriptive statistics summarized factors stratified by initial choice of airway technique, including intra- and postanesthesia complications and the frequency of mid-procedure conversion to endotracheal intubation in those initially managed with MAC. To demonstrate the magnitude of associations between these factors and the anesthesiologist's choice of airway technique, univariable Firth logistic and quantile regressions were used to estimate odds ratios (95% CI) and beta coefficients (95% CI). From the initial search, 326 patients were identified. Among them, 23% (n = 75) were planned for intubation and 77% (n = 251) were planned for MAC. Three patients (0.9%) who were initially planned for MAC required conversion to endotracheal intubation after induction. Two (0.6%) of these children were admitted to the hospital after the procedure and treated for ongoing airway reactivity. No patient experienced reflux of gastric contents to the mouth or dislodgement of the foreign body to the airway, and no patient required administration of vasoactive medications or cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Patients had higher odds that the anesthesiologist chose to utilize MAC if the foreign body was a coin (OR, 3.3; CI, 1.9-5.7, p < .001) or if their fasting time was >6 h. Median total operating time was 15 min greater in intubated patients (11 vs. 26 min, p < .001). This study demonstrates that MAC may be considered for select pediatric patients undergoing endoscopic removal of EFB, especially those who have ingested coins, who do not have reactive airways, who have fasted for >6 h, and in whom the endoscopic procedure is expected to be short and uncomplicated. Prospective multi-site studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Patient experience with bronchoscopy: topical versus monitored anesthesia

BackgroundThis study aimed to compare patient experiences during bronchoscopy procedures using either topical anesthesia (TA) or monitored anesthesia care (MA). The goal was to identify circumstances where patients could achieve similar levels of tolerance and satisfaction using only TA, especially in resource-limited settings.MethodsThis study included consecutive patients who underwent bronchoscopy with either TA or MA. Data collected included demographics, indications for bronchoscopy, procedure time, and complications during the procedure. A quality assurance survey was administered to assess patient experience and satisfaction with both procedures. A pre-specified subgroup analysis was performed based on procedure invasiveness and time.ResultsThis study enrolled 350 (TA 251; MA 99) patients, with an average age of 65 years. Main indications for bronchoscopy included tumor diagnosis (38%), esophageal cancer staging (18%), and pulmonary infection (17%). The average duration of the procedures was 20 min, with MA being associated with a significantly longer procedure time than TA (31 min vs. 16 min; P < 0.001). The overall satisfaction rating with bronchoscopy was significantly higher in the MA group (visual analogue scale, 8.9 vs. 8.2; P = 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that when less invasive or shorter procedures were performed, TA patients reported tolerance and satisfaction levels comparable to MA patients.ConclusionsBronchoscopy with MA offered patients a better experience and greater satisfaction; however, in settings with limited resources, TA alone may provide similar levels of patient tolerance and satisfaction during less invasive or shorter procedures.

Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Under Lateral Decubitus Position with Local Anesthesia

Endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy is gaining popularity among endoscopic spine surgeons for the treatment of radiculopathy caused by foraminal stenosis. This study describes a technique utilizing lateral decubitus position for an endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy under Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC) and local anesthesia only. 10 patients with contraindications to general anesthesia underwent the procedure, resulting in an improvement in cervical radicular pain with no perioperative complications. The findings suggest that this approach is a viable alternative for high-risk patients for general anesthesia care, expanding the surgical options for the treatment of radiculopathy.

Sedation for Colonoscopy Procedures Using Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol-Fentanyl Infusions: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Different anaesthetists for sedation or monitored anaesthesia care have been used for colonoscopy. The target of this research was the ability to perform colonoscopy under a painless degree of sedation and the prevalence of undesired proceedings. A total of 60 patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group D received dexmedetomidine and Group PF received propofol-fentanyl. Patients in both groups received the same infusion ratio. The minimum infusion amount of dexmetatomidine is (0.1 to 0.4 μg kg-1 h-1) in Group D, whereas fentanyl is administered at a rate of 0.01 to 0.05 μg kg-1 min-1 in the PF group during the approximately 45-min colonoscopy. Group D exhibited significantly lower modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scores at intraoperative time points T1-T12. Group D also exhibited significantly lower visual analog scale scores for pain at intraoperative time points T4 and T7. The mean arterial pressure was significantly lower in Group D at intraoperative times T6-T8 and T11-T12, as well as upon admission to the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) and 30 min after admission to the PACU. The results of the ANOVA tests revealed a significantly lower heart rate in Group D. The respiratory rate exhibited a notable decrease during time intervals T8 and T10 in the PF group. The administration of dexmetatomidine and propofol-fentanyl during colonoscopy was found to be safe. In addition, dexmetatomidine may present significant benefits in this context because of its lower occurrence of adverse respiratory events.

Efficacy and safety during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) under total intravenous anesthesia – propofol alone versus propofol supplemented with dexketa, a comparative study in medical college, Kolkata

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an invasive procedure and, hence, is distressing for awake patients, requiring an adequate level of anesthesia. Recent advancements have encouraged the use of monitored anesthesia care, that allows the patient to tolerate unpleasant experiences during procedures while maintaining cardio-respiratory function. Usually, propofol-based anesthesia is given in ERCP. The main aim of this study is to compare the effect of propofol alone and propofol with ketamine and dexmedetomidine on the hemodynamics during ERCP, recovery profile, and side effects (if any). Aims and Objectives: (1) To compare efficacy in terms of hemodynamic stability and desaturation events. (2) Recovery and quality of recovery. (3) Pain score. (4) Incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting. Materials and Methods: This is a comparative double-blinded study. Adult patients from the age group of 18–70 years belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA-I) and ASA-II who had undergone ERCP under total intravenous anesthesia were taken and randomly assigned to either of the two groups. Both groups received 0.01 mg/kg glycopyrrolate, 0.1 mg/kg ondansetron, 0.05 mg/kg midazolam, 50 mcg fentanyl, and 40 mg hyoscine. Group A patients received 30 mg propofol as a bolus dose and then repeated according to requirements. Group B patients received 0.5 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine as a loading dose and 0.3 mcg/kg/h as a maintenance infusion dose. 30 mg propofol was given before negotiating scope and then 1 mL (1:1) mixture of propofol and ketamine was repeated according to requirements. Total propofol consumption, hemodynamics, quality of recovery, and side effects (if any) were recorded at regular intervals. Results: The study showed significant cases in Group A had episodes of hypotension and apneic events, whereas there were very few hemodynamic instability and almost no apneic events in Group B patients. The requirement of propofol was much higher in Group A patients. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine when used along with propofol and ketamine in ERCP patients reduced the dose requirement of propofol and maintained hemodynamic stability without causing any apneic events.

Intraoperative Corticosteroids and Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has revolutionized the treatment of aortic stenosis. However, conduction disturbances leading to pacemaker implantation remain a common complication, increasing morbidity and mortality in these patients. Hence, measures to lower its incidence should be taken, and corticosteroid therapy could be effective by reducing inflammation caused by direct mechanical trauma to the conduction system. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, analyzing the medical records of patients with native severe aortic stenosis who underwent transfemoral TAVR in 2022. The Chi-square test was used to compare the rate of pacemaker implantation in patients who received corticosteroids with patients who didn't. The statistical significance was considered for a p-value <0.05. A total of 341 patients were included in this study. Monitored anesthesia care was the preferred anesthetic technique (99.1%). Sixty-three point three percent (63.3%) of patients received corticosteroids at the beginning of the procedure. Corticosteroid administration did not significantly affect the incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation (p=0.277), vascular complications on the access site (p=0.765), or in-hospital mortality (p=0.909). Male gender, 1st-degree atrioventricular block, and right branch block were the only identified predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation after transfemoral TAVR (p=0.041 <0.001 and <0.001, respectively). Corticosteroid administration at the beginning of TAVR doesn't seem to influence the incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation, which can suggest that other factors play a more important role in the development of conduction disturbances leading to pacemaker implantation.

Evaluation of Surgical Conditions during Elective Endoscopic Sinus Surgery with Total Intravenous Anesthesia and Monitored Anesthesia Care

Evaluation of Surgical Conditions during Elective Endoscopic Sinus Surgery with Total Intravenous Anesthesia and Monitored Anesthesia Care

Use of a Combination Lavender/Peppermint Aromatherapy Patch During Port Catheter Placement Under Monitored Anesthesia Care Does Not Reduce Time to Discharge Readiness: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Intraoperative anxiety is a common problem when Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC) is used instead of general anesthesia during minor surgical procedures such as port catheter placement. Nonpharmacological anxiolytics such as aromatherapy have been studied for their effects on preoperative anxiety, but no placebo-controlled study of aromatherapy during surgeries under MAC has yet been performed. Methods: After IRB approval, 70 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either a lavender/peppermint aromatherapy patch (Elequil Aromatabs®; Beekley Corporation) or a matching placebo patch. The primary outcome, time to readiness for discharge from postoperative acute care units (PACU; min), was assessed every 15 min until a modified postanesthesia recovery score for ambulatory patients (PARSAP) score of 18 or higher was reached. In the preoperative holding area, the assigned patch/placebo was activated and affixed to a folded towel placed aside the subject's head, contralateral to the side of the planned surgery. The towel and patch/placebo were discarded when the subject left the operating room (OR). Results: No difference was found between the treatment and placebo groups on the primary outcome of time to discharge readiness (mean [standard deviation, SD]: 82 [15] vs. 89 [21] min, respectively, p = 0.131). No difference was found between the treatment and placebo groups on the secondary outcomes of intraoperative midazolam dose, intraoperative opioid dose, intraoperative ondansetron dose, or intraoperative promethazine dose. No difference was found between the treatment and placebo groups in the proportion of subjects requiring rescue postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) medication in the PACU or the proportion of subjects requiring opioids in the PACU. No difference was found between the treatment and placebo groups in pain intensity in PACU, average PONV score in PACU, or patient satisfaction in PACU. PACU patient satisfaction was high for both the patch and placebo groups (35/35 [100%] vs. 32/34 [94%] "very satisfied," p = 0.239). Conclusions: Aromatherapy treatment is not indicated intraoperatively to reduce anxiety or the use of antiemetics in patients requiring Port catheter placement. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT05328973.

Comparative study between Ketamine and Propofol versus Ketamine and Dexmedetomidine for Monitored Anaesthesia Care for Dilatation and Curettage surgeries in Daycare procedures

Introduction. Anaesthesia is frequently administered through Monitored Anaesthesia Care (MAC) utilising various combinations of anaesthetic drugs for moderately painful operations like Dilatation and Curettage (D&amp;C), which is preferably done as a daycare procedure. The hunt for improved drug combinations is always ongoing, and the pharmacological properties of the individual drugs are considered. In this regard, anaesthesiologists all over the world are quite fond of the combination of Ketamine and Propofol, which is also known as Ketofol. Recently, especially in situations involving MRI sedation, the combination of ketamine and dexmedetomidine (Dexket) has gained popularity. This study compares the combinations for MAC during D&amp;C surgeries in a daycare setting. Aim. The primary objective was to estimate the recovery times using either combination. Secondarily, we would also compare the duration of analgesia, the haemodynamics, and the side-effect profiles of the two combinations. Material and Methods. This study enrolled 60 patients posted for elective D&amp;C. According to standard institutional protocols, they were administered Ketofol(KP group) or Dexket(KD group), depending on the anaesthesia provider’s choice. The Ketofol group received Ketamine 1mg/kg and Propofol 1mg/kg with boluses of Ketamine 0.25mg/kg to maintain the depth of anaesthesia using Ramsay sedation score(RSS) &gt;3. KD group received Dexmedetomidine intravenously 1mic/kg over 10 minutes followed by ketamine 1mg/kg boluses of Ketamine 0.25mg/kg to maintain the adequate anaesthetic depth of RSS&gt;3. Results. The Recovery time in post-operative period was significantly prolonged in the KD group (mean 22.77 minutes) compared to the KP group (mean 17.8 minutes). The total duration of analgesia was also longer in the KD group (250 minutes vs 220 minutes in the KP group). It was seen that the hemodynamic variables (HR, SBP, DBP) were consistently higher in the KD group compared to the KP group. There was a significant difference in SBP, DBP, and MAP in the intraoperative period between the KP and KD groups till 4hr in the postoperative period. Conclusions. We conclude that a combination of Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine has longer recovery times and analgesia duration than a combination of Propofol and Ketamine. Side effects like postoperative nausea and vomiting are not significant. However, since the recovery times are comparatively longer in a daycare setting, dexmedetomidine and Ketamine may not be the preferred agents compared to the combination of Ketamine and Propofol in the context of a daycare setting.

Impact of Replacing Fentanyl With Hydromorphone as the First-Line Postoperative Opioid Among Patients Undergoing Outpatient Cancer Surgery

In response to a nationwide fentanyl shortage, our institution assessed whether changing our first-line postoperative intravenous opioid from fentanyl to hydromorphone impacted patient outcomes. The primary research aim was to evaluate the association between first-line opioid and rapidity of recovery. The study team retrospectively obtained data on all consecutive patients extracted from the electronic medical record. The rapidity of recovery was defined as the time from entry into the postanesthesia care unit to the transition to Phase 2 for ambulatory extended recovery patients and as the length of total postanesthesia care unit stay for outpatients. Following intent-to-treat-principles, we tested the association between study period and rapidity of recovery (a priori clinically meaningful difference: 20minutes) using multivariable linear regression, adjusting for anesthesia type (general vs monitored anesthesia care), American Society of Anesthesiologst physical status (ASA) score (1-2 vs 3-4), age, service, robotic procedure, and surgery start time. Ambulatory extended recovery patients treated in the hydromorphone period had, on average, a 0.25minute(95% confidence interval [CI] -6.5, 7.0), nonstatistically significant (P>.9) longer time to transition. For outpatient procedures, those who received hydromorphone had, on average, 8.5-minute longer stays (95% CI 3.7-13, P<.001). Although we saw statistical evidence of an increased risk of resurgery associated with receiving hydromorphone (0.5%; 95% CI -0.1%, 1.0%; P=.039 on univariate analysis), the size of the estimate is clinically and biologically implausible and is most likely a chance finding related either to multiple testing or confounding. The multidisciplinary team concluded that the increase in postoperative length of stay associated with hydromorphone was not clinically significant and the decrease waste of prefilled syringes outweighed the small potential increased risk of resurgery compared to the shorter-acting fentanyl. We will therefore use hydromorphone moving forward.

Emergency Tracheostomy: Complications, Anesthetic Techniques, and Outcomes.

Objectives: Acute upper airway obstruction is a critical medical condition that presents considerable challenges to anesthesiologists. This study aims to provide a formal report on the incidence and outcomes of perioperative complications, as well as the factors that influence unstable intraoperative hemodynamics. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed patients aged 18 years and older who underwent emergency tracheostomy between January 2013 and October 2021. Data on perioperative complications and outcomes within the first 24 hours and 7 days after surgery were subjected to analysis. Descriptive and multivariate analyses were used to examine the results. Results: A total of 253 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 61.5 ± 12.9 years. Malignancy was detected in 78.3% of the patients. General anesthesia was administered to 43.9% of the patients. The incidence of intraoperative complications was 51.8%, with hypotension and hypertension occurring in 30.4% and 22.5% of the cases, respectively. Desaturation and cardiac arrest were observed in 4.7% and 0.8% of the patients, respectively. The mortality rate at 7 days after surgery was 1.6%. Multivariate analysis revealed that monitored anesthesia care [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.80; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08-3.00] and hypertensive patients (adjusted OR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.01-2.86) were associated with unstable intraoperative hemodynamics. Conclusions: Cardiovascular instability represented the majority of the complications observed. Monitoring anesthesia care and hypertension were significant prognostic factors for unstable intraoperative hemodynamics. We recommend extensive communication between ear, nose, and throat surgeons and anesthesiologists to determine the appropriate choice of anesthesia.

Observational Cross-Sectional Study of ETCO2 and Pulse Oximetry for Early Detection of Hypoxia in MAC Patient (Monitored Anaesthesia Care)

Background and Aim: The study aims to identify whether ETCO2 detects early hypoxia compared to monitoring of SpO2, HR and RR (Standard Monitor) in patients undergoing surgical procedure under MAC. Method: Total 336 patients belonging to Age group of 18-60 years, ASA grade 1 and grade 2, procedure lasting for &lt;4hrs, undergoing sedation under MAC for day care surgery. Measurements of Spo2, HR, RR, ETCO2, NIBP done by applying monitors. Nasal cannula also put for supplemental Oxygen. Result: Overall 92 episodes of disordered ventilation were detected out of which 67 were detected by ETCO2 (44- Hypoventilation and 23- Apnoea) and 25 were detected by Pulse Oximetry (4- Hypoventilation and 21- desaturation. Overall a mean delay of 51.04 seconds was seen in detection by Pulse Oximetry. Conclusion: In the study it was concluded that patients under sedation, underwent frequent episodes of disordered ventilation leading to hypoxia. In such scenarios it was seen that ETCO2 monitoring provided a practical advantage of detecting hypoventilation and apnea earlier than Pulse Oximetry showing desaturation. Keywords: Capnography, ETCO2, pulse oximetry.

Accuracy of Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide Measurement During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Under Monitored Anesthesia Care: A Prospective Observational Study.

Background Transcutaneous carbon dioxide tension (PtcCO2) measurement is a promising alternative to arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) measurement. PaCO2 measurement is invasive and intermittent, whereas PtcCO2 measurement is non-invasive and continuous. However, previous studies evaluating PtcCO2measurements did not include patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), who experience anticipated hemodynamic changes, particularly before and after valve placement. Therefore, we investigated whether PtcCO2 measurement could provide an alternative to PaCO2 measurement during transfemoral TAVR under monitored anesthesia care (MAC) with local anesthesia. Methodology We conducted a prospective observational study. We included all consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis who were scheduled to undergo a transfemoral TAVR under MAC at our institution from November 1, 2020, to April 30, 2021. During the procedures, PaCO2 and PtcCO2 were concurrently monitored six times as a reference standard and index test, respectively. PtcCO2 was monitored continuously using a non-invasive earlobe sensor. The agreement between PtcCO2 and PaCO2 measurements was assessed using the Bland-Altman method, and the 95% limits of agreement were calculated. Based on previous studies, we determined that 95% limits of agreement of ±6.0 mmHg would be clinically acceptable to define PtcCO2 as an alternative to PaCO2. Results We obtained 88 measurement pairs from 15 patients. The lower and upper 95% limits of agreement between the PtcCO2 and PaCO2 measurements were -4.22 mmHg and 6.56 mmHg, respectively. Conclusions During TAVR under MAC with local anesthesia, PtcCO2 measurement could not provide a viable alternative to PaCO2 measurement to reduce high PaCO2 events. This study focused on comparing intraoperative periods before and after valve implantation. Therefore, further investigation is warranted to assess the impact of various factors, including the prosthetic valve type and the hemodynamic effects of balloon aortic valvuloplasty, on PtcCO2 measurement in TAVR.

Endovascular aortic arch repair under monitored anaesthesia care: maximizing microinvasiveness.

Patients with aortic arch pathologies after surgery for type-A acute aortic dissection represent a challenging population since open surgery is associated with a non-negligible rate of mortality and complications. Microinvasive endovascular aortic arch repair Arch-Thoracic EndoVascular Aortic Repair (Ar-TEVAR) has shown promising results in high-risk patients. Ar-TEVAR is usually performed under general anaesthesia. We report the case of an 83-year-old man with a history of ascending aorta replacement for type-A acute aortic dissection who was referred for an anastomotic pseudoaneurysm. Ar-TEVAR using an off-the-shelf single-branch aortic arch stent graft was chosen. In order to further minimize procedural invasiveness, monitored anaesthesia care (local anaesthesia with sedation and analgesia) was performed since it provides less stress on the cardiovascular and respiratory systems and overall leads to a faster recovery especially in elderly patients.

Retrospective Analysis of Perioperative Dexmedetomidine Use in Retina Surgeries: Impact on Postanesthesia Care.

Dexmedetomidine (Precedex®) has been linked to depressive hemodynamic effects and increased length of stay in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) when used in ambulatory phacoemulsification procedures. We aimed to determine the prevalence and impact of dexmedetomidine use during ambulatory vitreoretinal procedures. This retrospective cohort study involved 9,666 adult vitrectomies. Cases were divided into groups by anesthesia type: general anesthesia (GA) and monitored anesthesia care (MAC). For each group, various factors were compared between those who did and did not receive dexmedetomidine. Chi-squared and t tests were used for comparisons. Changes in mean arterial pressure in the MAC group were -1.69 ± 0.23 mmHg for no dexmedetomidine patients and -6.31 ± 0.39 mmHg for dexmedetomidine patients (P < 0.01). In the GA group, mean arterial pressure was -6.1 ± 0.35 mmHg for no dexmedetomidine patients and -11.18 ± 0.88 mmHg for dexmedetomidine patients (P < 0.01). PACU Phase II time in the MAC group was 36.93 ± 0.37 minutes and 40.67 ± 0.86 minutes for no dexmedetomidine and dexmedetomidine patients, respectively (P < 0.01). In the GA group, PACU Phase II time was 58.63 ± 0.95 minutes and 65.19 ± 2.38 minutes for no dexmedetomidine and dexmedetomidine patients, respectively (P < 0.01). Dexmedetomidine use in vitrectomies was associated with significant PACU delays. These delays may stem from adverse hemodynamic effects. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:86-91.].

COMPARISON EFECTIVENESS OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE VERSUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE WITH KETAMINE FOR TYMPANOPLASTY SURGERY DONE UNDER MONITOREDANAESTHESIA CARE

Background: Monitored Anaesthesia Care (MAC) has been widely used for patients undergoing middle ear surgeries. The use of dexmedetomidine in middle ear surgeries as a sole anaesthetic agent had many disadvantages owing to its insufficient sedative effect, increased recovery time and haemodynamic instability. Aims and objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine and ketamine combination in comparison with dexmedetomidine alone for tympanoplasty surgery under MAC. Materials and Methods: In this cross sectional observational study, a total of 100 patients were included. Before the surgery, group D received 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine followed by infusion of 0.2μg/kg/h to maintain 2 or 3 of modified observers assessment of analgesia and sedation score. The patients in group DK received 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine followed by infusion of 0.2μg/kg/h plus ketamine 0.5mg/kg 10 minutes before the start of the procedure. Results: In the present study total of 100 patients were included, among which 66.0% were females and 34.0% were males. The mean age of 100 patients was 38.3±11.34 years. There were no differences in baseline measurements of HR, SBP and DBP between the two groups, but Group DK had significant fall in heart rate (5-10%) (P &lt; 0.001). Average patients and surgeons satisfaction with sedation and analgesia was higher in Group DK than Group D (P = 0.001). Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine and ketamine combination provides good haemodynamic stability, higher sedation score with safe and effective method of anaesthesia that provides good MAC for patients undergoing tympanoplasty surgery.

Does choice of anesthesia during stage 1 sacral neuromodulation testing influence outcomes?

Staged sacral neuromodulation (SNM) testing has been shown to have a high rate of progression to permanent implantation for the management of voiding dysfunction. Stage 1 lead placement (SNM-I) can be performed under monitored anesthesia care (MAC) or general anesthesia (GA). MAC allows for interpretation of sensory and motor responses to optimize lead placement while GA only permits for motor assessment. However, patient discomfort and movement can make lead placement challenging during MAC. Herein we evaluate whether the anesthesia type impacts the progression rate to permanent implantation (SNM-II). A retrospective chart review was performed for patients who underwent SNM-I in the operating room for wet overactive bladder between 2005 and 2023. Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of anesthesia used, MAC or GA. Clinical variables and progression to SNM-II were compared between cohorts. Progression to SNM-II was based on ≥50% symptomatic improvement during a 1-2 week trial period following SNM-I. Of 121 patients included in the study, 95 (79%) underwent MAC and 26 (21%) GA for SNM-I. No difference in the progression rate to SNM-II was noted between groups (MAC, 68/95 patients, 72%; GA, 19/26, 73%; p = 0.39). We also found no difference when comparing the GA group to the 26 most recent MAC patients (MAC, 20/26 patients, 77%; GA, 19/26, 73%; p = 0.48). Types of anesthesia for SNM-I did not affect rate of progression to SNM-II. The result lends support to the reliance on motor responses alone for lead placement during SNM-I.

Marijuana and endoscopy: the effects of marijuana on sedation

Background and AimsMarijuana usage has increased significantly as it has become more readily available and legal, either recreationally or medicinally, in many states. It has been postulated that marijuana usage increases the amount of sedation required for procedures. However, there is minimal data defining this relationship. We aim to establish the relationship between marijuana usage and the amount of sedation used during endoscopy. MethodsThis was a single institution prospective study of patients undergoing outpatient endoscopy (both Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC) and moderate sedation) at the Oklahoma City Veterans Affairs Medical Center with a total of 976 patients participating. Marijuana usage was assessed by a voluntary de-identified pre-endoscopy survey. Information regarding sedation used, endoscopy outcomes, demographics, comorbidities, medical history, and medications used were extracted from the medical record. A univariate and stratified analysis of alcohol usage was performed. A P-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results976 patients were analyzed. 21.5% of the patients endorsed marijuana usage (210/976). Marijuana users were found to be younger (p=0.0002), leaner (p<0.0001), and less likely to have diabetes (p=0.002), obstructive sleep apnea (p=0.0002) and hypertension (p=0.04). They were also more likely to smoke (p<0.0001) and vape (p<0.0001). Marijuana usage was associated with a higher requirement of sedation (Fentanyl [p=0.003]; Midazolam [p=0.05]; propofol [p=0.02]) and higher use of adjunct sedation (Diphenhydramine in moderate sedation (p=0.0003)). Further multivariate analyses were performed to control for possible confounders. Marijuana usage was still deemed to be an independent predictor for high propofol use among MAC cases (OR = 1.77, 95% CI [1.00, 3.12]). Likewise, marijuana usage was found to be an independent predictor for high midazolam use (OR = 1.57, 95% CI [1.02, 2.42]) and high fentanyl use (OR = 1.54, 95% CI [0.98, 2.38]) but failed to reach statistical significance in the fentanyl group. ConclusionMarijuana use is associated with a significantly higher amount of sedation along with a significantly higher usage of other adjunct sedatives. A patient’s marijuana history should be considered when determining the methods of sedation to be used for endoscopy.

Comparison of Intracardiac Echocardiography Versus Transesophageal Echocardiography for Guidance During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) for guidance during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is limited. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of ICE versus transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for guiding TAVR. This prospective cohort study included patients who underwent TAVR from August 18, 2015, to June 31, 2021. Eligible patients were stratified by echocardiographic modality (ICE or TEE) and anesthesia mode (monitored anesthesia care [MAC] or general anesthesia [GA]). Primary outcome was the 1-year composite of all-cause mortality, rehospitalization for cardiovascular cause, or stroke, according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 (VARC-3) definition. Propensity score matching was performed, and study outcomes were analyzed for the matched cohorts. Of the 359 eligible patients, 120 patients were matched for the ICE-MAC and TEE-GA groups, respectively. The incidence of primary outcome was similar between matched groups (18.3% vs. 20.0%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-1.68; p=0.843). ICE-MAC and TEE-GA also had similar incidences of moderate-to-severe paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) (4.2% vs. 5.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.23-2.82; p=0.758), new permanent pacemaker implantation, and VARC-3 types 2-4 bleeding. ICE was comparable to TEE for guidance during TAVR for the composite clinical efficacy outcome, with similar incidences of moderate-to-severe PVR, new permanent pacemaker implantation, and major bleeding. These results suggest that ICE could be a safe and effective alternative echocardiographic modality to TEE for guiding TAVR.