Modulation Of Motor Cortical Excitability Research Articles

Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human.

Transcranially applied weak direct currents are capable of modulating motor cortical excitability in the human. Anodal stimulation enhances excitability, cathodal stimulation diminishes it. Cortical excitability changes accompany motor learning. Here we show that weak direct currents are capable of improving implicit motor learning in the human. During performance of a serial reaction time task, the primary motor cortex, premotor, or prefrontal cortices were stimulated contralaterally to the performing hand. Anodal stimulation of the primary motor cortex resulted in increased performance, whereas stimulation of the remaining cortices had no effect. We conclude that the primary motor cortex is involved in the acquisition and early consolidation phase of implicit motor learning.

Modulation of motor cortical excitability by air-puff stimulation applied to finger tips -A lesion study-

Modulation of motor cortical excitability by air-puff stimulation applied to finger tips -A lesion study-

Modulation of motor cortical excitability by electrical stimulation over the cerebellum in man.

1. We have stimulated over the cerebellum of intact human subjects by applying single electrical stimuli through electrodes placed on the back of the head, approximately at the level of the inion. The intensity of stimulation used was below that required to produce direct EMG responses in pre-activated muscles of the hand. 2. In ten subjects the effect of the stimulus over the cerebellum was to reduce the size of the EMG response in first dorsal interosseous muscle evoked by a magnetic stimulus to the cerebral cortex. In all subjects the onset of the period of suppression occurred when the test magnetic cortical shock followed the conditioning cerebellar shock by 5 ms. The duration of the suppression lasted from 3 to 7 ms. 3. The amount of suppression was related to the intensity of stimulation over the cerebellum. At 15% below the threshold for direct motor activation there was no effect; increasing suppression was evident at 10, 5 and 0% below motor threshold. 4. With a conditioning-test interval of 5-6 ms the suppression was the same whether the target muscle was relaxed or active. With longer conditioning-test intervals (12 and 15 ms) the amount of suppression was greater in active than relaxed muscles. 5. The short-latency suppression was greatest when the stimulating anode was ipsilateral to the target muscle and contralateral to the stimulated sensorimotor cortex. The later period of suppression was insensitive to the polarity of stimulation. When the stimulating electrodes were moved 2 cm caudally or cranially the short latency suppression disappeared whereas the longer latency suppression was still observed with the electrodes in the lower position. 6. Different results were obtained when the test EMG response was produced by an electrical (rather than magnetic) stimulus over the sensorimotor cortex. The short latency effect was no longer visible whereas the longer latency effect was the same as when testing with a magnetic cortical stimulus. 7. We suggest that a single electrical stimulus across the base of the skull (particularly with the anode over one cerebellar hemisphere) produces a short latency (5-6 ms) disfacilitation of the contralateral motor cortex through activation of cerebellar structures. A later (12 and 15 ms), less specific suppression which is present when testing in active muscles is thought to be mediated by a different mechanism and probably produces its effect at the level of the spinal cord.

Amplitude asymmetry of hemi-field pattern reversal VEPs

TMS techniques have provided controversial information on motor cortical function in Huntington's disease (HD). We investigated the excitability of motor cortex in patients with HD using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS).Eleven patients with HD, and 11 age-matched healthy subjects participated in the study. The clinical features of patients with HD were evaluated with the United Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS). rTMS was delivered with a Magstim Repetitive Magnetic Stimulator through a figure-of-8 coil placed over the motor area of the first dorsal interosseus (FDI) muscle. Trains of 10 stimuli were delivered at 5 Hz frequency and suprathreshold intensity (120% resting motor threshold) with the subjects at rest and during voluntary contraction of the target muscle.In healthy subjects at rest, rTMS produced motor evoked potentials (MEPs) that increased in amplitude over the course of the trains. Conversely in patients, rTMS left the MEP size almost unchanged. In both groups, during voluntary contraction rTMS increased the silent period (SP) duration.Because rTMS modulates motor cortical excitability by activating cortical excitatory and inhibitory interneurons these findings suggest that in patients with HD the excitability of facilitatory intracortical interneurones is decreased.We suggest that depressed excitability of the motor cortex in patients with HD reflects a disease-related weakening of cortical facilitatory mechanisms.