Endoscopic Modified Lothrop Procedure Research Articles

A Study on the Possibility of Endoscopic Modified Lothrop Procedure Using Imaging Measurements

Background and Objectives Endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure (EMLP) is indicated after the failure of standard endoscopic sinus surgery techniques to alleviate frontal sinus disease. Three parameters, such as nasal beak thickness (NBT), accessible dimension of frontal recess (AD), and distance of frontal sinus (DFS), are important in the preoperative evaluation and selection of patients for EMLP. The purpose of this study is to apply the parameters to determine the feasibility of EMLP for the Korean population.Subjects and Method Sinus CT was performed on a total of 233 people, and a study was conducted using 466 bilateral sides with the following parameters: 1) NBT 2) the distance from the posterior margin of nasal beak to the anterior margin of skull base (DNBSB) 3) the right and left AD and 4) the right and left DFS. If the values of NBT, AD, and DFS of the study group were less than 10 mm, greater than 5 mm and 7 mm, respectively, they were considered candidates for the EMLP.Results DNBSB, NBT, AD, and DFS were 6.97±1.96 mm, 7.01±1.58 mm, 7.16±2.40 mm, and 9.47±2.91 mm, respectively. Parameters except DNBSB showed significant differences in male and female. The feasibility of EMLP was 75.36% for male and 57.89% for female, with 68.24% overall.Conclusion The overall feasibility of EMLP was 68.24% for the study group, where feasibility was lower for female than for male.

Increased nasality of connected speech in patients underwent modified Lothrop procedure for refractory chronic rhinosinusitis: Cross-sectional and prospective study.

The endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure (EMLP) is performed to create a large frontal neostium in patients who had failed previous frontal sinus surgeries. EMLP causes obvious changes in the volume and anatomy of the sinuses, which may cause a more significant change in nasality. This study aimed to evaluate the changes in nasalance in patients who underwent EMLP by comparing their preoperative nasalance to the established normative values and postoperative nasalance. This was a prospective study. Twenty-one patients diagnosed with refractory frontal sinusitis who were indicated to undergo EMLP were enrolled. One hundred one healthy participants were enrolled as norm references. The Nasometer II Model 6400 (KayPENTAX) was used to analyze the nasalance scores. Nasalance scores were tested before surgery and 1 and 3 months after the surgery. The normative references of nasalance were (mean ± SD) 14.6% ± 6.7%, 39.4% ± 8.4%, and 55.8% ± 8.3% for the oral passage, oral-nasal passage, and nasal sentences, respectively. The mean nasalance scores pre-EMLP and 1 and 3 months post-EMLP were 23.2% ± 9.6%, 29.0% ± 9.3%, and 29.9% ± 0.4% for the oral passage; 48.7% ± 10.7%, 54.7% ± 7.7%, and 56.4% ± 7.2% for the oral-nasal passage; and 62.7% ± 10.9%, 69.8% ± 6.7%, and 70.7% ± 6.4% for the nasal sentences, respectively. Compared with the normative references, pre-EMLP nasalance was higher for all the three speech stimuli (t-test, p < 0.05). Post-EMLP nasalance also significantly increased for all the three stimuli at the 1- and 3-month follow-up visits (Paired t-test, p < 0.05). EMLP has a short-term impact on resonance; however, long-term follow-up is required for further study.

Anterior Pedicled Nasal Flap in Frontal Sinus Drill-Out Patients: A Randomised Controlled Pilot Study.

Background: The endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure (EMLP) is a common procedure performed in patients with frontal sinus pathology. While performing this procedure, large segments of bone are exposed, which may lead to the promotion of frontal sinus neo-ostium stenosis. Here we examine the peri-operative differences in time to achieve healing in patients where a mucosal flap is used to cover the exposed bone on one side of the neo-ostium. Design: A randomised pilot study with 12 patients undergoing EMLP surgery participated in this study. Methods: Patients were randomised to undergo a mucosal flap on either the left or right side of the neo-ostium. Prior to surgery, patients completed a SNOT-22 and smell identification test. Patients were reviewed until the neo-ostium had healed on both sides. Once healing had occurred, a post-operative SNOT-22 score and smell identification test were recorded. Results: Average time to healing for the frontal sinus neo-ostium was 4.7 vs. 4.2 (p = 0.3) on the flap vs. non-flap side, respectively. There was an average 24.4 point (range: −75 to +9) decrease in SNOT-22 scores post-surgery. The post-operative USPIT score demonstrated an average increase of 6.6 points (range −13 to +27). Conclusion: We did not detect significant differences in peri-operative time toward healing in neo-ostiums where a single flap is utilised. Further studies are needed to determine whether the usage of a single neo-ostium flap affords any benefit over no flap on either ostium. SNOT-22 and UPSIT scores improved post-surgery.

Improvement of Eosinophilic Rhinosinusitis Headache after Endoscopic Modified Lothrop Procedure: Case Report and Literature Review

The main symptoms of eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis are olfactory disturbances, nasal obstruction and posterior rhinorrhea. chronic rhinosinusitis cases, only few reports have described an association between eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis and headache.

Trans-Nasion-Complex Approach for Endoscopic Modified Lothrop Procedure: Conception, Anatomy, and Technique

BackgroundThe endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure (EMLP) is an important procedure used to address frontal and anterior skull-base lesions. Two techniques were established, namely, the inside-out approach and the outside-in approach. The former technique take the frontal recess and the first olfactory filament (FOF) as key landmarks while the latter use the FOF as posterior boundary. In some cases, however, these two landmarks are not available. Therefore, we supplement the outside-in approach and named it trans-nasion-complex approach (TNCA) for EMLP that can be performed without locating these two landmarks.MethodsTwo dry human skulls were used to observe the bony nasion complex. Then, five colored silicon-injected human head specimens were dissected via TNCA for EMLP. Finally, the outcomes of patients who underwent TNCA were reviewed.ResultsThe nasion complex is an osseous complex that consists of the nasion and its adjacent structures, including the bilateral root of nasal bones, nasal process of frontal bones, anterior portion of the perpendicular plate of the ethmoid bone that connects with the inferior aspect of the nasal bones, and portions of the bilateral frontal process of the maxillary bones. Surgical landmarks for TNCA include the anterior superior portion of the nasal septum, anterior margin and axilla of the middle turbinate, frontal process of the maxilla bone, nasal process of the frontal bone and upper part of the nasal bone. These structures form a “mushroom sign” during cadaveric dissection and surgery. Twenty-one patients underwent TNCA, of whom 9 had tumors and 12 had chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). None of them had major complications.ConclusionTNCA is expected to be a safe, and direct route for EMLP. Adequate understanding of the nasion complex and “mushroom sign” will be helpful to complete TNCA.

Endoscopic modified Lothrop procedureが有効であった外傷性反復性前頭洞炎・外瘻孔例

Endoscopic modified Lothrop procedureが有効であった外傷性反復性前頭洞炎・外瘻孔例

Lynch vs transcaruncular approach: optimizing access to the lateral frontal sinus.

Visualization and instrumentation of the frontal sinus is not always possible with a Draf III or modified endoscopic Lothrop procedure (MELP), and external incisions can help augment exposure. We compare lateral frontal sinus access using only a MELP compared to the adjunctive transcaruncular approach and transcutaneous Lynch incision. Twelve cadaveric heads underwent thin-cut computed tomography scanning. Measurement of the frontal beak, anteroposterior depth of the frontal sinus, and interorbital distance was performed. There were 4 specimens with poorly pneumatized frontal sinuses that were excluded from the study. Eight cadaveric heads (16 sides) were dissected and a MELP with bilateral transcaruncular and Lynch incisions for access to the lateral frontal sinus was performed. Under image guidance, measurements extended from the midline crista galli to the most lateral point of the frontal sinus visualized using a 0-degree endoscope with straight suction and a 30-degree endoscope with curved suction. The proportion of the ipsilateral frontal sinus accessed through the contralateral nare with a 0-degree endoscope and straight suction using a MELP only, a MELP with transcaruncular approach, and a MELP with Lynch incision, respectively, averaged 41.6%, 51.6%, and 58.9% on the right, and 48.9%, 47.1%, and 61.2% on the left. Using a 30-degree endoscope and curved suction the proportion accessed using a MELP only, a MELP with transcaruncular approach, and a MELP with Lynch incision, respectively, increased to 76.1%, 62.6%, and 91.8% on the right, and 83.2%, 62.7%, and 88.7% on the left. Adjunctive external approaches can improve access and instrumentation of the frontal sinus when combined with a MELP.

Surgical treatment of frontal sinus osteoma.

The purpose of this study was to describe our experience in the surgical treatment of frontal sinus osteomas. This study involved 18 patients who underwent surgery for frontal sinus osteoma between January 2016 and December 2019. Demographic characteristics, site and size of osteoma, presenting symptoms, frontal sinus osteoma grading system, presence of frontal sinusitis, surgical methods, treatment outcome, operation time, and complications were reviewed. The endoscopic approach was performed in all patients except one. Among patients who underwent an endoscopic approach, endoscopic sinus surgery was performed in ten patients and endoscopic-modified Lothrop procedure was performed in seven patients. The mean size of the frontal sinus osteoma was 1.5 ± 0.7cm. According to the frontal sinus osteoma grading system, grade III (n = 9, 50.0%) was the most common, followed by grade II (n = 4), grade I (n = 3), and grade IV (n = 2). The size of the osteoma and frontal osteoma grading system exhibited statistical significance with the operation time (p < 0.05). There were no major surgical complications or recurrence. The operation time was prolonged when the frontal sinus osteomas were more than 1.5cm or in grade III and IV frontal osteomas.

Frontal osteoplastic flap without frontal sinus obliteration for orbital roof decompression

ABSTRACT Purpose: We describe a novel surgical approach for bilateral orbital roof decompression using a frontal osteoplastic flap without frontal sinus obliteration. This technique utilizes a combined external and endonasal endoscopic approach for wide exposure to the orbital roof bilaterally. We demonstrate this technique for the resection of a massive frontal fibrous dysplasia lesion in a healthy male with bilateral orbital roof involvement. The endonasal endoscopic portion of the technique includes a Draf III frontal sinusotomy (endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure) which precludes the need for frontal sinus obliteration, restores normal frontal sinus function, and allows for postoperative endoscopic surveillance. Methods: Report of novel surgical technique with video demonstration. Results: This technique for orbital roof decompression allows for removal of a frontal lesion, wide decompression of the bilateral orbital roof, and post-operative endonasal endoscopic surveillance of the cavity. The patient in whom we demonstrate this technique had complete resolution of his orbital symptoms and minimal residual fibrous dysplasia postoperatively. Conclusion: Bilateral orbital roof decompression for frontal lesions can be performed safely and effectively with a frontal osteoplastic flap without frontal sinus obliteration, restoring normal orbital and sinus function.

Expanded transnasal approaches to the skull base in the Middle East: Where do we stand?

ABSTRACTBACKGROUND: Endoscopic transnasal surgery has gained rapid global acceptance over the last two decades. The growing literature and understanding of anterior skull base endoscopic anatomy, in addition to new dedicated endoscopic instruments and tools, have helped to expand the use of the transnasal route in skull base surgery.OBJECTIVE: Report our early experience in expanded endoscopic transnasal surgery (EETS) and approach to skull base neoplasms.DESIGN: Descriptive, retrospective case series.SETTING: Major tertiary care center.PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective case review was conducted at King Saud University Medical City between December 2014 and August 2019. Cases with skull base neoplasms that underwent EETS were included. EETS was defined as endoscopic surgical exposure that extended beyond the sellar margins (prechiasmatic sulcus superiorly, clival recess inferiorly, cavernous carotid lines laterally). Routine transsphenoidal pituitary neoplasms, neoplasms of sinonasal origin and meningoencephaloceles were excluded.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative clinical assessment, imaging results, surgical approach, and hospital course were all retrieved from the patient electronic charts. Clinical follow-up, perioperative complications, and gross residual tumor rates were documented and reviewed.SAMPLE SIZE AND CHARACTERISTICS: 45 cases of EETS, 13 males and 32 females with mean age of 39.0 (17.7) years (range 2–70 years).RESULTS: The series comprised a wide range of pathologies, including giant pituitary adenoma (8 cases), meningioma (23 cases), craniopharyngioma (4 cases), chordoma (4 cases), optic pathway glioma (2 cases), epidermoid neoplasms (2 cases), astrocytoma (1 case), and teratoma (1 case). For the entire series, gross total resection was achieved in 25/45 operations (55.5%). Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak was the most common complication observed in 9 patients (20%) which were all managed endoscopically. Major vascular complications occurred in 2 patients (4.4%) and are described. Other complications are outlined as well. No mortality was observed.CONCLUSIONS: EETS to the skull base can be done with results comparable to traditional approaches. More work is needed to expand our experience, improve outcomes, and educate the public and medical community in our region about the usefulness of this approach.LIMITATIONS: Sample size and study design.CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.

Free mucosal grafts and anterior pedicled flaps to prevent ostium restenosis after endoscopic modified Lothrop (frontal drillout) procedure: a randomized, controlled study.

The endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure (EMLP) is used to manage ongoing refractory frontal sinusitis after failed previous endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), but this approach has a significant restenosis rate. We evaluated the potential benefits of mucosal grafts and pedicled flaps on the opening of the newly formed frontal ostium. Fifty patients with refractory frontal sinusitis or mucoceles after ESS were randomized to undergo EMLP, either with (n = 27) or without (n = 23) mucosal grafts and pedicled flap reconstruction of the neo-ostium. The frontal neo-ostium was measured with Lindholm distending forceps, and anteroposterior (A-P) and lateral dimensions were measured intraoperatively, and then again at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. Olfaction outcomes were assessed using the Taiwan Smell Identification Test (TWSIT) and a smell visual analog scale (VAS) score preoperatively and at 6 months postsurgery. The initial intraoperative mean lateral and A-P dimensions were 23.2 ± 2.7 mm and 14.8 ± 2.3 mm and were significantly decreased at all time-points postoperatively. The mucosal grafts and pedicled flaps had greater lateral and A-P dimensions, and a greater percentage of intraoperative frontal neo-ostium area at all time-points postoperatively (all p < 0.05). At 6 months postoperatively, TWSIT (p = 0.027), but not the smell VAS score (p = 0.063), was significantly improved compared with baseline. TWSIT and smell VAS score changes did not differ between groups (p = 0.92 and p = 0.85, respectively). The use of mucosal grafts and pedicled flaps reduces stenosis of the frontal neo-ostium postsurgery and should be considered after EMLP.

Draf IIB with superior septectomy: finding the "middle ground".

Previous studies have demonstrated a high failure rate of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) with Draf IIa in patients with diffuse polyposis, asthma, and aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease. A high percentage of these patients progress to endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure (EMLP). We describe a modification of the Draf IIb with a superior septectomy (IIb+SS), which may provide similar therapeutic benefit as demonstrated by the distribution of sinus irrigations in the sinus cavity with ESS with IIb+SS vs ESS with EMLP. ESS with IIb+SS was performed on 6 cadaver heads. Fluorescein-dyed irrigations were performed on each head and penetration was recorded using video endoscopy. EMLP was subsequently performed on each head with repeat dye-irrigation and video endoscopy. The videos were reviewed by 4 blinded fellowship-trained rhinologists, and irrigant penetration of the maxillary, ethmoid, frontal, sphenoid sinuses, and olfactory cleft was graded 0 to 3 (3 implying complete staining). The mean scores when comparing IIb+SS to EMLP were as follows: overall 1.99 vs 1.97 (p = 0.816), maxillary sinus 2.67 vs 2.38 (p = 0.128), ethmoid sinus 1.88 vs 1.98 (p = 0.536), sphenoid sinus 2.58 vs 2.50 (p = 0.467), frontal sinus 1.13 vs 1.38 (p = 0.073), and olfactory cleft 1.71 vs 1.63 (p = 0.529). There was no significant difference between subsites. Interrater reliability was good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.781). Performing ESS with IIb+SS provides similar irrigation delivery benefits to ESS with EMLP, without the need for altering natural sinus outflow and creating circumferential scarring. Further studies evaluating its use in patients that are high risk for revision surgery are needed.

Size of septectomy does not affect distribution of nasal irrigation after endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure

The endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure (EMLP) is commonly performed in recalcitrant frontal sinusitis, in part to achieve better penetration of medicated irrigations postoperatively. Although EMLP requires a septectomy for exposure, it is unknown whether septectomy size affects delivery of irrigations. In this study we evaluated the role of septectomy in delivery of irrigations to the EMLP cavity. EMLP was performed on fresh human cadavers with sequentially increasing septectomy (minimal septectomy: drilling across septum to combine frontal sinuses; standard septectomy: 1.5 cm anterior to middle turbinate and inferiorly to the midlevel of the turbinate; large septectomy: extension to nasal floor). Irrigation with fluorescein-labeled water was performed with a 240-mL irrigation bottle in the vertex position and recorded with a 30° endoscope fixed in a 4-mm trephine in the paramedian EMLP cavity. Two blinded reviewers scored irrigation distribution recordings (0 = nasal cavity only; 1 = frontal recess; 2 = medial distribution; 3 = lateral distribution; 4 = entire sinus lavage). Distribution scores were assessed with Wilcoxon rank sum analysis. Six specimens (mean age, 75.2 ± 2.4; 50% female) were assessed. Interobserver scores were highly concordant (Kendall's W = 0.86, p < 0.01), internally validating the experiment. Distribution scores did not vary significantly when comparing minimal septectomy with standard or large septectomy (Z = 0.55, p = 0.58, Z = 0.37, p = 0.71). Increasing septectomy does not improve irrigation delivery in patients undergoing EMLP. These results suggest that a limited septectomy for access to the bilateral frontal sinuses is all that is required for effective drug delivery postoperatively. This strategy may reduce morbidity associated with larger septectomies.

The endoscopic modified lothrop procedure: Review of single institution experience and long-term outcomes.

BackgroundEndoscopic Modified Lothrop Procedure (EMLP) has become a fundamental practice in rhinology. Improvements in symptom burden, ostial patency, morbidity, and costs have surpassed that of an open approach to the frontal sinus. Long‐term efficacy has not been well established.ObjectiveThis study details the long‐term outcomes of EMLP and risk factors for subsequent surgical revision at a single institution.MethodsThis study utilized a retrospective review of patients who underwent EMLP from September 2006 to February 2017 by a single surgeon at an academic tertiary referral center. Patient demographics, indications, symptom burden, and endoscopic assessment of frontal ostium patency were analyzed for their effect on surgical outcome. Risk factors for failures were identified.ResultsSeventy‐six consecutive patients with an average age of 58.1 years met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and underwent EMLP for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS, 59%), neoplasm (26%), and mucoceles (15%). The average number of standard endoscopic sinus surgeries prior to EMLP was 2.9. The mean follow‐up of the cohort was 34.8 months, at the end of which, EMLP was successful in 78% of all patients, requiring no further surgery. Ninety percent of patients reported significant clinical improvement at the most recent follow‐up. Subgroup analysis of CRS patients revealed an equally high success rate but a higher likelihood of ostial closure. Recurrent disease necessitated revision endoscopic surgery in 17 patients, the majority of whom suffered CRS. Only tissue eosinophilia was identified to significantly increase the risk of revision surgery.ConclusionsThe majority of the patients who undergo EMLP achieve sustained patency of the frontal sinus outflow tract and adequate symptom improvement. Prominent tissue eosinophilia identifies patients at risk of requiring additional frontal sinus surgery.Level of Evidence4.

Endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure after failure of primary endoscopic sinus surgery: a meta-analysis.

The endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure (EMLP) has been used as a salvage technique for frontal sinusitis following failed endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). We aim to examine the safety and efficacy of the EMLP following failure of primary ESS. All English-language publications from 2000 to 2016 reporting the use of EMLP after primary ESS were identified using the PubMed database and evaluated per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Random effects summaries of patient demographics, comorbidities, and surgical outcomes were obtained through meta-analysis. Eleven studies constituting 778 patients were included and 86.5% had chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Mean follow-up duration was 28.4 months. The mean number of surgeries prior to EMLP was 3.5. Symptom improvement was reported in 82.3%. Subgroup analysis of 7 studies in which all 357 patients had CRS revealed a mean follow-up of 31.5 months. Symptom improvement occurred in 75.9% of cases and 23.1% experienced polyp recurrence. The cerebrospinal fluid leak rate was 2.5%. Restenosis of the neo-ostium occurred in 17.1% with complete closure occurring in 3.9% of cases. The reoperation rate after EMLP was 9.0%. Aspirin sensitivity was associated with an increased risk of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak (p = 0.0339) and a reduced incidence of neo-ostium closure (p = 0.0001). Aspirin sensitivity and asthma were associated with a reduced incidence of reoperation (p ≤ 0.001) and increased symptom improvement (p < 0.005). Restenosis or closure of the frontal neo-ostium was associated with less symptom improvement (p < 0.04) but not with reoperation. The EMLP is an effective salvage procedure for refractory frontal sinusitis based on data from higher-volume centers.

Evolution of the endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Since first described in the 1990s, the endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure (EMLP) has been the subject of a growing body of literature. We performed a review to compare indications and outcomes of EMLP in an early cohort of publications (1990-2008) versus a contemporary cohort (2009-2016) and compare outcomes associated with follow-up ≥2 years versus <2 years. PubMed, SCOPUS and Cochrane databases. An English-language search of the PubMed and Ovid databases was conducted to identify publications from 1990 to 2016 reporting clinical outcomes of EMLP. Meta-analysis was performed using Statistical Analysis System 9.4. A total of 1,205 patients were abstracted from 29 articles with a mean follow-up of 29.1 ± 10.3 months. The overall rate of significant or complete symptom improvement was 86.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 84.2%-88.7%). The overall patency rate was 90.7% (95% CI: 89.1%-92.3%), with a revision rate of 12.6% (95% CI: 10.6%-14.3%). Compared to the early cohort, patients in the contemporary cohort underwent EMLP more often for tumors (P < .001), had higher rates of complete or significant symptom improvement (90.0% vs. 82.6 %, P < .001); and trended toward greater patency rates (92.1% vs. 88.6%, P = .052). Compared to the short-term follow-up cohort, the long-term cohort showed no differences in symptom improvement or patency, but the revision rate was higher (14.5% vs. 9.2%, P = .016). In the last decade, EMLP has been performed more frequently for tumors. Recent studies have demonstrated improved symptom outcomes and a trend toward improved patency rates. The revision rate increased significantly when follow-up exceeded 2 years. Laryngoscope, 128:317-326, 2018.

Anatomic relationship of the first olfactory neuron and trochlea: cadaveric study with surgical implications.

Iatrogenic injury to the trochlea is a potential complication of the Draf III or endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure; however, the location of the trochlea from within the sinus cavity has yet to be clearly characterized. We performed the first cadaveric study assessing the position of the trochlea in relation to the first olfactory neuron, a commonly identified landmark during the Draf III procedure. Thirteen external dissections of the trochlea were performed on 7 disarticulated cadaveric heads via an extended Lynch type incision. An endoscopic Draf III procedure was then performed on all cadavers. A burr hole was then created at the trochlear fovea. A straight vector between the trochlear attachment and the ipsilateral first olfactory neuron was then created. The vector was then viewed from within the sinuses using a 30-degree endoscope. The endoscope was maneuvered to create an upright midline view centered on the olfactory neurons. An image was subsequently captured and analyzed using ImageJ software to calculate a vector angle. The linear distance between the 2 structures was also recorded. Relative to the first olfactory neuron, the trochlea was found to be 19.52 ± 4.68 mm away and at an angle of 39.42 ± 8.54 degrees in the anterolateral, superior direction along the frontal bone. We report the first anatomical dissection characterizing the position of the trochlea relative to the ipsilateral first olfactory neuron. Intraoperative recognition of this relationship during Draf III procedures can prevent potential injury to the trochlea.

Extended applications of the endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure.

The endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure is mainly used for refractory frontal sinusitis. However, we have used it as an access procedure to facilitate treatment for an extended range of additional frontal sinus pathologies. A retrospective review of patients who underwent the endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure for 'alternative' frontal sinus pathologies was conducted. Patient data were reviewed. The main outcome parameter measured was signs of recurrence. Twelve patients (6 males, 6 females) from a 7-year study period, with a mean age of 45.2 years (range, 16-78 years), were analysed. The surgical indications included frontoethmoidal mucoceles, cerebrospinal fluid leaks within the frontal sinus, cystic fibrosis, frontal sinus osteoma, frontal sinus ossifying fibroma and frontal silent sinus syndrome. The mean follow-up period was 33.3 months. There were no known recurrences. We have used the endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure for a range of frontal sinus pathologies, safely and effectively, with no peri-operative complications.

A Short Term Subjective and Objective Analysis of Modified Endoscopic Lothrop's Procedure and Its Functional Outcome: Our Experience.

To study the short-term functional outcomes of the endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure with well defined subjective and objective criteria. It's a retrospective cohort study with chart review carried out at a tertiary referral center. 31 patients with chronic frontal sinusitis who underwent endoscopic modified Lothrop's procedure with uncinate preservation during the period Jan 2011-2014 were followed up for a period of minimum 6months. Assessment was done post-operatively based on subjective severity score and Kennedy's 5 point endoscopic criteria. Subjective improvement was seen in all symptoms whereas statistically significant improvement was found for the three parameters headache (p<0.025), nose block (p<0.03) and rhinorrhea (p<0.05). Post operative nasal endoscopy revealed crusting and polypoidal mucosa in few patients which were managed conservatively. Asymptomatic narrowing of ostium seen in two patients. No complications were identified. The study illustrates the benefit obtained from endoscopic modified Lothrop's surgery in chronic frontal sinusitis refractory to medical treatment and standard endoscopic sinus surgery.

Outcomes of modified endoscopic Lothrop in aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease with nasal polyposis.

Patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) are often reported to be recalcitrant to standard medical and surgical intervention. Failure rates of standard endoscopic sinus surgery in these patients are reported to be as high as 90%. We review the outcomes for our cohort of AERD patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery and endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure (EMLP). Data was collected prospectively between January 2001 and December 2013. Information including demographics, asthma status, aspirin sensitivity, 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), Lund-Mackay scores, and endoscopic ostium assessment were collected for up to 5 years. Minimum follow-up was 6 months. A total of 31 AERD patients underwent complete sphenoethmoidectomy, maxillary antrostomy and EMLP during the study period with an average follow-up of 36 months. Polyp recurrence was seen in a total of 18 patients (58%). Seven patients required revision EMLP following initial surgery demonstrating a failure rate of 22.5%. AERD patients had a statistically significant increased risk of both nasal polyps recurrence and need for revision surgery. Revision EMLP was needed due to recurrence of nasal polyps in 6 cases and frontal ostium stenosis in a single case. Time to revision EMLP was similar between the groups. Complete sphenoethmoidectomy, maxillary antrostomy, and EMLP is successful in a significant majority of patients with AERD and CRSwNP. It is well tolerated with a low complication rate and facilitates successful ongoing medical management of the condition in patients with AERD.