Abstract Objective Anatomical extension of surgical treatment of thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch is still controversial. The adoption of distal anastomosis in aortic arch zone–2 (Z2–AAR), in order to facilitate bleeding control, has been widely recommended. In such case the revascularization of left subclavian artery (LSA) may add further concerns. Here we report our different strategy of LSA revascularization in 2 different scenario of Z2–AAR Clinical. Cases Case#1 17 yo male patient affected by Loeys–Dietz Syndrome and a previous David procedure at age of 11yo. He presented complaining chest pain and CT scan revealed a dilatation (5,8 cm) of ascending aorta and an intimal flap with preserved previous distal anastomosis. Surgical strategy #1 (Left subclavian artery in situ): Arch replacement (Zone 2 distal anastomosis) with Siena Graft 24mm and modified Elephant Trunk Tecnique (2cm distal endoluminal graft). Innominate artery and left carotid artery reimplantation. Distal Anastomosis Siena 24 (Z2). Case #2 78 yo male with a previous (6 month before) Biological AVR (Trifecta 25) + ascending aorta replacement (Jotec 30). Presented complaining acute chest pain, CT Scan revealed a residual dilatation of distal ascending aorta, dissection/rupture of distal aortic arch at level of a complicated plaque. Surgical strategy #2 (Left subclavian artery reimplanted): Arch replacement (Zone 2 distal anastomosis) with Siena Graft 30mm and Elephant trunk Teccnique (10cm distal endoluminal graft). Closure of the extended ulcera. Total epiaortic vessels de–branching 10 mm Tube on LSA – Distal Anastomosis Siena 30 (Z2). Conclusion Surgical extension of aortic arch replacement is still matter of discussion. Zone–2 approach for aortic arch replacement seems a safe and effective option. In our mind strategy for left subclavian revascularization should be tailored according patient’s anatomy and potential future scenarios.