Abstract

We assess the outcome of emergency total arch replacement with a modified elephant trunk technique for acute type A aortic dissection to clarify whether our aggressive approach is justified in certain patients. Between 2000 and 2006, 54 patients (55.1% of all) underwent emergency total arch replacement for acute type A aortic dissection. The surgery was performed using open distal anastomosis with selective antegrade cerebral perfusion under hypothermia. Total arch replacement with individual arch-vessel reconstruction was applied in the following settings: the intimal tear in the transverse arch or the proximal descending aorta, massive arch dissection, Marfan syndrome, arch aneurysm, and atheromatous arch. At the distal anastomosis, a modified elephant trunk procedure was added for secure anastomosis and early thrombosed closure of the false channel in the descending aorta. Only 2 patients (3.7%) died of low cardiac output, in whom cardiac arrest had developed preoperatively owing to rupture of the arch or to left coronary artery malperfusion. There were 4 late deaths from nonaortic events. On the follow-up computed tomographic scanning, a high incidence of early thrombosed closure of the false channel in the dissected descending aorta was found. Only 2 patients, whose tear had not been resected in the first surgery, required reoperation of the descending aorta. Total arch replacement with an elephant trunk procedure, which permits immediate survival and provides early thrombosed closure of the distal false channel, is justified in certain patients with acute type A dissection.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.