In the year 2000, total knee arthroplasty is an accepted, reliable form of treatment of the end-stage arthritic knee, and there is a wealth of literature available to support its widespread success. For modern implants to be regarded as bona fide improvements over their predecessors, however, long-term prosthesis survival and patient satisfaction must be demonstrated. The ancestor of most contemporary implants was the Total Condylar Knee prosthesis, a posterior cruciate–sacrificing design. From this design, a multitude of different cruciate-substituting and cruciate-retaining designs have evolved, many of which have proven durable, reliable, and successful over the long term. Other, less popular designs have also been used with published long-term success. The concept of bicruciate retention continues to be implemented in an attempt to use minimal constraint and to allow for normal knee kinematics with reduced wear. Although cemented fixation has become the “gold standard,” various cementless implants have emerged in an attempt to improve upon fixation. Mobile-bearing designs have been developed to lower contact stresses and decrease interface stress and component loosening. The younger arthritic patient has traditionally represented a frustrating dilemma for the knee surgeon, but recent literature supports the decision to proceed with arthroplasty when end-stage disease is identified in this population. This article presents a brief overview of the available long-term data for the various designs of total knee arthroplasty applied to a variety of different patient populations. Abbreviations:ACL anterior cruciate ligament, PCL posterior cruciate ligament Tricompartmental arthroplasty has evolved into a predictable and satisfying procedure for providing pain relief for the arthritic knee. A recent meta-analysis that examined patient outcomes following total knee arthroplasty noted almost 90% good or excellent results 4 years after surgery, with a 3.8% revision rate in nearly 10,000 patients from 130 published reports [1]. Over 245,000 total knee replacements are performed in the United States annually [2], and this number is expected to rise as the percentage of Americans over 65 years of age rises in the coming years. Modifications are frequently made to implants with respect to prosthetic design, materials, and fixation technique. Consequently, most clinical studies report only short-or intermediate-term follow-up data. Time and large study populations are necessary to determine whether these modifications truly represent long-term improvements. The purpose of this article is to review the available long-term data for outcomes of modern condylar-type total knee arthroplasties.