Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) following radical prostatectomy, transurethral resection of the prostate, and posterior urethroplasty (PU) continues to be a distressing problem with severe impact on quality of life. Although artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation remains the gold standard for incontinence after prostatectomy, morbidity and complications are considerable. 1 Xu YM Zhang XR Sa YL Chen R Fei XF. Bulbourethral composite suspension for treatment of male-acquired urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2007; 51 (discussion 1715-6): 1709-1714 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (28) Google Scholar The male slings (eg AdVance), on the contrary, seem to be less expensive, and complications and morbidity rates are lower. However, an artificial sling is not ideal for patients with previous radiation therapy and urethral surgery. 2 Sturm RM Guralnick ML Stone AR Bales GT Dangle PP O'Connor RC. Comparison of clinical outcomes between “ideal” and “nonideal” transobturator male sling patients for treatment of postprostatectomy incontinence. Urology. 2014; 83: 1186-1188 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (27) Google Scholar , 3 Cornu JN Sèbe P Ciofu C Peyrat L Cussenot O Haab F. Mid-term evaluation of the transobturator male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence: focus on prognostic factors. BJU Int. 2011; 108: 236-240 Crossref PubMed Scopus (142) Google Scholar The good and sustainable results of patients with mild or moderate incontinence after PU in our study suggest that adynamic graciloplasty might be a reasonable option for particular patients who are not appropriate for AUS and male slings.
Read full abstract