Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Cardiac rehabilitation using Telehealth has increased rapidly over the past two decades and has become the predominant mode of delivery during the Covid 19 pandemic. Numerous systematic reviews have been conducted summarizing the evidence on the advantages and disadvantages of cardiac rehabilitation using Telehealth on various cardiovascular risk factors and health-related behaviours. Purpose To conduct an umbrella review summarizing the evidence from existing systematic reviews of telehealth cardiac rehabilitation on health outcomes of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). Methods An umbrella review of systematic reviews was undertaken in accordance with the PRISMA and JBI guidelines. A systematic search was conducted in Medline, APA PsycInfo, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane database of systematic reviews, JBI evidence synthesis, Epistemonikos, and PROSPERO, searching for systematic reviews published from 1990 to current and was limited to the language source of English and Chinese. Outcomes of interest were modifiable CHD risk factors, psychosocial outcomes, and other secondary outcomes. Study quality was appraised using the JBI checklist for systematic reviews. A narrative analysis was conducted, and meta-analysis results were synthesized. Results From 1,301 identified reviews, 13 systematic reviews (10 meta-analyses) comprised 132 primary studies conducted in 28 countries. All the included reviews have high quality, with scores ranging from 73% to 100%. Findings to the modifiable risk factors remained inconclusive, except solid evidence was found in the significant improvement in physical activity level and behaviours from telehealth interventions, exercise capacity from m-health only and web-based only interventions, and medication adherence from m-health interventions. Conclusion Telehealth cardiac rehabilitation programs, work adjunct or in addition to traditional cardiac rehabilitation and standard care, are effective in improving modifiable CHD risk factors, particularly in physical activity. In addition, it does not increase the incidence in terms of mortality, adverse events, hospital readmission and revascularisation.
Read full abstract