Jason Danely, Aging and Loss: Mourning and Maturity in Contemporary Japan. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2014. 246 pp.In this timely ethnographic contribution, Jason Danely zooms in on what it means to be under condition of Japan's so-called low-fertility, aging society problem (3). Aging and Loss: Mourning and Maturity in Contemporary Japan tells a story of old people, old things, and old places in a brand new light. It is a story of stories as well, orchestrating diverse narratives of aged subjectivity emanating from these people, things, and places. Arguing that the sociopolitical and economic conditions of contemporary urban Japan are producing aged subjectivities suspended between abandonment and hope (133), Danely's powerful storytelling seizes this suspended subjectivity as it haunts ordinary (71). He draws our attention to shades of this death-in-life, which do not exist on margins of Japanese society, but fill up its most intimate of everyday experience (142). Danely tells readers that older Japanese adults with whom he worked say that old people like themselves are more closely associated with rituals of memorialization and mourning than are younger people (and their own past, younger selves). Seeing themselves closely aligned with world of spirits and ancestors, they participate in these rituals of interstitiality, constituting themselves as an interface that mediates past and future, living and dead, seen and unseen. Capturing this interface through concepts such as space-time of waiting (see 195n2 in particular), structured indeterminacy (91), and aesthetic suspension (190), Danely seeks to disclose a new perspective on larger sociopolitical process by attending to interstices of everyday life. is an old-school ethnography, and a fine one at that.Danely's ethnographic interlocutors carry out diverse everyday projects of memory and forgetting in which they generate signs of agency. To better understand these signs, Danely offers concept of creativity of as a crtical corrective to hegemonic model of ageless self (189). Certainly in West, as Danely suggests, this model relies on and reproduces our rather conventional view of loss as lack, a void that needs to be compensated for through creative acts (and becomes a basis of desire as post-Freudian discourses would have it). With concept of creativity of loss, however, Danely pleasantly disturbs such a view. He draws our attention to everyday project of aging in Japan as a question of how loss creates new possibilities of participating in economies of care: how to actively perform...loss (190). This book approaches loss as something that is for older adults, Danely declares (25). Here, we should take meaningful not merely in sense of symbolic or representational, but precisely in sense of performatively creative, consequential, or transformative.In exploring this creativity, Danely uses Obasuteyama-an age-old legend of abandonment and care in Japan-quite effectively as a master narrative for understanding intricacy of aged subjectivities that he has encountered in his fieldwork (for a discussion of legend, see pages 35-38). But here, I would like to point to another set of themes that recur, like leitmotivs, throughout book: ma and en. These are so straight-forwardly everyday concepts that any attempt to overphilosophize them as rooted in some primordialized Japanese culture would look like a textbook orientalist move. While these concepts have been featured in anthropological study of Japan, I believe that Danely's treatment here merits particular attention. There are several ways in which he glosses ma and en (and all are good translations), but descriptions that I believe are most persuasive are yielding and connecting. If ma-an empty space or openness (e. …