ABSTRACT Crop simulation models are useful for determining the effects of different environmental and management factors on crop growth, phenology, and grain yield. In this study, two process-oriented simulation models, CERES-Maize, and WOFOST-Maize, were evaluated for anthesis date, maturity date, biomass yield, grain yield, harvest index, and maximum leaf area index (LAI-max), and their comparative performance was assessed. The field experiments were conducted using a split–split plot design with four sowing dates {25th May (D1), 4th June (D2), 14th June (D3) and 24th June (D4)} in the main plot, two cultivars (PMH1 and PMH2) in the sub plot, and three nitrogen levels (N1, N2, and N3) in the sub-sub plot at the Research Farm, Department of Climate Change and Agricultural Meteorology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana (Punjab), to record the dataset for the calibration (2020) and evaluation (2021) of these models. The statistical indices used for the evaluation of these models were R2, root mean square error (RMSE), normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), mean bias error (MBE), index of agreement (IoA), and coefficient of residual mass (CRM). The model output was evaluated for the individual and ensemble models (ENSEM). The results of the calibration process revealed that the NRMSE of the CERES-Maize model was below 9% for both cultivars, except for harvest index, whereas the NRMSE of the WOFOST model was below 10%, except for the grain yield of PMH1 and LAI-max of both cultivars. On the other hand, validation results revealed that the NRMSE of both models was below 9% for most parameters, except for LAI-max of the CERES-Maize model for both cultivars and grain yield and LAI-max of the WOFOST-Maize model of PMH2. In addition, the evaluation indices indicated excellent agreement between the observed and simulated results of CERES and WOFOST. However, the performance of the CERES-Maize model was slightly better than that of the WOFOST model, with a lower NRMSE (CERES: ranging from 3.83 to 6.02% and WOFOST: ranging from 3.58 to 8.63%), except for LAI-max. The maximum leaf area index was the least agreed-upon parameter for both models. The RMSE and MBE values confirmed these results. The most accurate results were obtained for the ensemble of models, which reduced the NRMSE of the anthesis dates, biomass yield, and LAI-max. The prediction accuracy of the ensemble of models was also improved for LAI-max by reducing the NRMSE to 5.80%. On the basis of these results, it was concluded that the CERES model is a more reliable tool for accurately estimating phenology and grain yield, whereas the ensemble of models improved the estimation accuracy of most parameters compared with any single model.
Read full abstract