The capability of a joint to transfer load from one side to the other plays a significant role in the performance of a jointed concrete pavement system. Among the available means to providing joint load transfer, the aggregate interlock mechanism is thought to have greater endurance than dowels with respect to load transfer related performance. In the current Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG), the concept of joint stiffness was adopted to represent the capability of a joint to transfer load through the dowel and aggregate interlock mechanisms. The use of linear springs to represent the behavior of concrete joint stiffness may be reasonable to investigate the global response of a concrete pavement joint to different levels of load transfer, but there is little guidance available to defining a level of joint stiffness for design analysis purposes in terms of measurable material properties. Therefore, it seems that a more fundamental way of charactering the complicated behaviors of aggregate interlock mechanisms is desirable. A constitutive relationship (i.e. shear stress vs. shear displacement) that considers geometric and micromechanical behavior of a crack interface and associated laboratory testing setups to calibrate the model coefficients may be needed to address such a challenge. This paper elaborates an approach of using the shear stress vs. shear displacement response curve predicted by the application of the well-known twophase model to calculate the shear capacity and load transfer efficiency of a joint. Although the well-known two-phase model provides good accuracy in matching experimental results, limitations still exists. Through extensive literature reviews, this paper also suggests other improvements to the micromechanics-based aggregate interlock model by taking into account the effects of boundary conditions, traffic loading and angularity of aggregate particles.
Read full abstract