Care Delivery Models Research Articles

A SYSTEMS APPROACH TO PRACTICE TRANSFORMATION FOR BRAIN HEALTH INTEGRATION INTO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER SERVICES

Abstract Community Health Centers are America’s largest and most successful primary care system, providing access to quality healthcare services to more than 30 million Americans through more than 14,000 service delivery locations regardless of patients’ ability to pay. The National Association of Community Health Centers (NACHC) provides the training and education that health centers need to advance practice transformation and improve care delivery models to succeed in value-based care and meet the needs of patient populations. Through the Value Transformation Framework (VTF), NACHC provides an approach to support health center systems change, organizes and distills evidence-based interventions, provides knowledge, tools and resources, and links performance to the Quintuple Aim – improved health outcomes, patient and staff experience, reduced costs, and equity. NACHC guides health centers in the application of the VTF through a nation-wide learning community, Elevate. Health center participation in Elevate is linked to improved performance on clinical quality measures, improved patient and staff experiences, and reduced costs. Within the Elevate, NACHC successfully implemented a learning track focused on brain health, offering health center-specific guidance on a clinical introduction to Dementia early detection/risk reduction; incorporating Dementia early detection/risk reduction into care management workflows and leveraging reimbursement opportunities; and strengthening community linkages and partnerships to support Dementia early detection/risk reduction. Evaluation data from this learning track indicates health center interest in continuing education related to brain health integration into health center services. This topic is especially relevant considering the increasing population segment of older adult patients that health centers serve.

The 2022 community-based integrated care reform in Italy: From desiderata to implementation

The Italian National Recovery and Resilience Plan allocated € 7 Bn for community care. In May 2022, the Italian government issued a Decree to define the strategy for the development of community-based integrated care. The reform aims to create uniformly a network of services close to where patients live, thus overcoming geographical disparities between regions. The strategy is based on a strong role of the central government in community care, but still leaves autonomy to regions. Levelling availability of services across territories, setting uniform targets with a short period horizon and disregarding starting points may create important implementation problems. Financial constraints will also hamper the implementation of the reform. Ultimately the development of Italian community care will depend on the institutional and managerial capabilities of regions and local health authorities. Firstly, they should shape the actual implementation of community care services by defining organizational arrangements, priority targets and models of care delivery. Secondly, they should develop strategies to face the lack of financial resources and the shortage of healthcare workforce. This contribution informs international readers about a major policy in a European country and its implementation challenges. It offers insights into inter-government relations in NHS-type healthcare systems (Nordic countries and Spain), showcasing the complexity of policymaking involving multiple political actors and resulting indeterminacy of policies and their implementation.

Best practice models for dental care delivery for people experiencing homelessness.

People experiencing homelessness have been encountering significant barriers in accessing healthcare services, including dental care services. There are several definitions for homelessness: it includes people sleeping rough but also people living in temporary accommodation. These categories are dynamic and individuals often find themselves on a continuum oscillating between sleeping rough and living in temporary accommodation. Their health-seeking behaviours are shaped by their living arrangements; therefore, one single model of dental care service delivery might not capture the needs of all those experiencing homelessness within an area. The service models presented in this paper are based on primary care delivery, mobile dental units and community clinics. Each of these models presents advantages and disadvantages and consideration should be given to delivering these on a complementary basis to maximise access to dental care, regardless of where patients are on the continuum between sleeping rough and living in temporary accommodation.

The Comprehensive Primary Care Plus Model and Health Care Spending, Service Use, and Quality

Implemented in 18 regions, Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+) was the largest US primary care delivery model ever tested. Understanding its association with health outcomes is critical in designing future transformation models. To test whether CPC+ was associated with lower health care spending and utilization and improved quality of care. Difference-in-differences regression models compared changes in outcomes between the year before CPC+ and 5 intervention years for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries attributed to CPC+ and comparison practices. Participants included 1373 track 1 (1 549 585 beneficiaries) and 1515 track 2 (5 347 499 beneficiaries) primary care practices that applied to start CPC+ in 2017 and met minimum care delivery and other eligibility requirements. Comparison groups included 5243 track 1 (5 347 499 beneficiaries) and 3783 track 2 (4 507 499 beneficiaries) practices, matched, and weighted to have similar beneficiary-, practice-, and market-level characteristics as CPC+ practices. Two-track design involving enhanced (higher for track 2) and alternative payments (track 2 only), care delivery requirements (greater for track 2), data feedback, learning, and health information technology support. The prespecified primary outcome was annualized Medicare Part A and B expenditures per beneficiary per month (PBPM). Secondary outcomes included expenditure categories, utilization (eg, hospitalizations), and claims-based quality-of-care process and outcome measures (eg, recommended tests for patients with diabetes and unplanned readmissions). Among the CPC+ patients, 5% were Black, 3% were Hispanic, 87% were White, and 5% were of other races (including Asian/Other Pacific Islander and American Indian); 85% of CPC+ patients were older than 65 years and 58% were female. CPC+ was associated with no discernible changes in the total expenditures (track 1: $1.1 PBPM [90% CI, -$4.3 to $6.6], P = .74; track 2: $1.3 [90% CI, -$5 to $7.7], P = .73), and with increases in expenditures including enhanced payments (track 1: $13 [90% CI, $7 to $18], P < .001; track 2: $24 [90% CI, $18 to $31], P < .001). Among secondary outcomes, CPC+ was associated with decreases in emergency department visits starting in year 1, and in acute hospitalizations and acute inpatient expenditures in later years. Associations were more favorable for practices also participating in the Medicare Shared Savings Program and independent practices. CPC+ was not associated with meaningful changes in claims-based quality-of-care measures. Although the timing of the associations of CPC+ with reduced utilization and acute inpatient expenditures was consistent with the theory of change and early focus on episodic care management of CPC+, CPC+ was not associated with a reduction in total expenditures over 5 years. Positive interaction between CPC+ and the Shared Savings Program suggests transformation models might be more successful when provider cost-reduction incentives are aligned across specialties. Further adaptations and testing of primary care transformation models, as well as consideration of the larger context in which they operate, are needed.

Nurse-Led, Telephone-Based Primary Palliative Care Intervention for Patients With Lung Cancer: Domains of Quality Care.

Palliative care is traditionally delivered by specialty-trained palliative care teams. Because of a national workforce shortage of palliative care specialists, there is an urgent need to explore alternative models of palliative care delivery to meet the needs of patients living with serious illness. As part of a multisite randomized controlled trial, 2 registered nurses without previous palliative care experience were trained to deliver a primary palliative care intervention to patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer. The intervention focused on assessing and managing symptoms, psychosocial needs, education, and initiating goals-of-care discussions. The primary outcome, improved symptom burden and quality of life, was not statistically significant. Despite this finding, nurses addressed 5 of the 8 National Consensus Project Guidelines domains of quality palliative care: structure and processes of care; physical, psychological, and social aspects of care; and ethical and legal aspects. Patients' engagement in goals-of-care discussions, a measure of high-quality palliative care, increased. Clinical recommendations offered by the nurses to the patients' clinicians were addressed and accepted on a timely basis. Most patients rated satisfaction with the intervention as "very or extremely" satisfied. These findings may inform future nurse-led palliative care interventions on the specific quality domains of palliative care.

Single-handed versus multiple-handed general practices: A cross-sectional study of quality outcomes in England.

As general practice increasingly moves towards large group practices, there is debate about the relative benefits, safety and sustainability of different care delivery models. This study investigates the performance of single-handed practices compared to practices with multiple doctors in England, UK. Practices in England with more than 1000 patients were included. Workforce data and a quality control process classified practices as single-handed or multiple-handed. Outcomes were (i) GP patient survey scores measuring access, continuity, confidence in health professional and overall satisfaction; (ii) reported diabetes and hypertension outcomes; and (iii) emergency department presentation rates and cancer detection (percentage of cancers diagnosed by a 2-week wait). Generalised linear models, controlling for patient and practice characteristics, compared outcomes in single and multiple-handed practices and assessed the effect of GP age in single-handed practices. Single-handed practices were more commonly found in areas of high deprivation (41% compared to 20% of multiple-handed practices). Single-handed practices had higher patient-reported access, continuity and overall satisfaction but slightly lower diabetes management and cancer detection rates. Emergency department presentations were higher when controlling for patient characteristics in single-handed practices but not when also controlling for practice rurality and size. Increased deprivation was associated with lower performance in seven out of eight outcomes. We found single-handed practices to be associated with high patient satisfaction while performing slightly less well on selected clinical outcomes. Further research is required to better understand the association between practice size, including increasing multidisciplinary working, on patient experience and outcomes.

Palliative care for infants with life-limiting conditions: integrative review

BackgroundInfants with life-limiting conditions are a heterogeneous population. Palliative care for infants is delivered in a diverse range of healthcare settings and by interdisciplinary primary healthcare teams, which may not...

Shifting models of team care delivery.

Shifting models of team care delivery.

Battlefield acupuncture for chronic musculoskeletal pain in cancer survivors: a novel care delivery model for oncology acupuncture.

Battlefield Acupuncture (BFA), a standardized auricular acupuncture protocol, is widely used for pain in the military but is not well-studied in oncology. This study examined cancer survivors who received BFA for pain. This is a secondary analysis of a randomized trial that compared the effectiveness of BFA and electroacupuncture vs. usual care for chronic musculoskeletal pain in cancer survivors. This study focused on participants randomized to BFA. Participants received 10 weekly treatments. Needles were placed until one of these stop conditions were satisfied: ten needles were administered; pain severity decreased to ≤1 out of 10; patient declined further needling, or vasovagal reaction was observed. Pain severity was assessed using Brief Pain Inventory. Responders were those with ≥30% pain severity reduction. We examined pain location, BFA stop reason, and pain reduction of participants during the first session. We also examined which factors predicted responder status after the first session (week 1) or the full treatment (week 12). Among 143 randomized to BFA, most common pain locations were lower back (30.8%) and knee/leg (18.2%). Of 138 who initiated treatment, 41 (30.0%) received ten needles; 81 (59.1%) achieved pain ≤1; 14 (10.2%) declined further needling; and 1 (0.7%) had vasovagal reaction. BFA reduced pain severity by 2.9 points (95% CI 2.6 to 3.2) after the first session (P < 0.001). After adjusting for baseline pain severity, responders at week 1 were 2.5 times more likely to be responders at week 12, compared to those who were non-responders at week 1 (AOR 2.5, 95% CI 1.02 to 6.11, P = 0.04). Among those who achieved pain ≤1, 74% were responders at week 12, a higher proportion compared to the proportion of responders among those who received ten needles (39.5%), those who declined further needling (50%), and those with vasovagal reaction (0.0%) (P = 0.001). Those with pain in proximal joints had a higher proportion of responders at week 12, compared to those with pain in distal joints (64.2% vs. 20%, P = 0.008). Specific factors may predict the likelihood of achieving meaningful pain reduction from BFA. Understanding these predictors could inform precision pain management and acupuncture delivery models.

Neuropsychiatric co‐morbidities and psychotropic medication use in Medicare beneficiaries with dementia

AbstractBackgroundNeuropsychiatric symptoms affect approximately 97% of patients with dementia. Prevalence of symptoms may be different dependent upon age, sex or race. Past studies report high rates of potentially inappropriate prescribing in the dementia population. We investigate differences in neuropsychiatric diagnoses and psychotropic medication prescribing in a local US cohort.MethodWe utilize Medicare claims and Medicare Part D prescription fill records in a cohort of 100% Medicare North and South Carolina fee‐for‐service beneficiaries ages 50 and above for the year 2017 with a dementia diagnosis. We identify dementia based on an ICD‐10‐CM diagnosis of dementia from an inpatient, outpatient, carrier, skilled nursing facility or home health claim, or a prescription claim for drug treatment between 1/1/2017 and 12/31/2017. We quantified neuropsychiatric diagnosis of anxiety, depression and psychosis using validated coding algorithms, searching inpatient, outpatient and physician 2017 claims. Demographic characteristics, including age, sex and race, as well as dual Medicare/Medicaid status were collected from the MSBF file for each individual. We search generic medication names in Medicare Part D claims for anti‐anxiety, antidepressant and antipsychotic medications to determine prescriptions filled during 2017.ResultProviders diagnosed anxiety and depression at higher rates in White patients; and psychosis at higher rates in Black patients. (P&lt;0.001) Providers diagnosed female patients with depression, anxiety and psychosis at higher rates than males. (P&lt;0.001) A provider diagnosis of anxiety, depression or psychosis is most prevalent in the age group 50‐59 and decreases with age to age 90+. Females with anxiety, depression and psychosis filled more anti‐anxiety and antidepressant medications than males. (P&lt;0.001) Black and Other race patients filled more antipsychotic medications for anxiety and depression than White patients. (P&lt;0.001)ConclusionOf concern is the high fill rate of anti‐anxiety (benzodiazepine) medications, especially in females. In patients with a neuropsychiatric diagnosis, consistently over half filled an antidepressant medication and over a quarter filled prescriptions for antipsychotics. These medications may have risks &gt; benefits in this population and lack efficacy. As alternatives, non‐pharmacologic treatment with patient/caregiver education about expectations and psychosocial interventions show promise. Innovative community outreach and care delivery models incorporating these methods may help decrease levels of medication use.

Application of telenursing as a nursing care delivery model in improving treatment adherence and glycemic control: A scoping review

Background: Diabetes mellitus is one of the chronic diseases that cause the highest mortality and high medical costs;, therefore medication adherence and glycemic control are important in disease management, one of which is through telenursing. Purpose: To determine the telenursing model to improve medication adherence and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: This study was designed a scoping review. The databases used are CINAHL, PubMed, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar. Articles published from 2016-2022 with appropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria. Thematic analysis was used based on study design, telenursing communication model, telenursing process, duration of telenursing and results. Results: There were 12 relevant articles out of 2112 articles. We found a telephone call follow up is the most common method used for delivery of telenursing intervention. Telenursing intervention is implemented from at least 3 months until 12 months, and includes the assessment of current disease conditions, assessment of adherence to the prescribed treatment plan, treatment plan information, and solutions or follow-up to current issue. Conclusion: Telenursing can be used as a nursing care delivery model in the diabetes mellitus type 2 patients because it is proven to reduce glycemic control, improve treatment adherence, reduce body mass index (BMI), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and cholesterol, and improve diet adherence, physical exercise and self-management.

Examining adaptive models of care implemented in hospital ICUs during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study

BackgroundThe emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic led to an increased demand for hospital beds, which in turn led to unique changes to both the organisation and delivery of patient care,...

Using Agile Science for Rapid Innovation and Implementation of a New Care Model.

As industry consolidation leads to a growing number of large new healthcare delivery networks, patients and their clinicians are losing the important human-centric and relationship-based nature of medical care. The leadership of Hackensack Meridian Health (HMH), a New Jersey-based network of hospitals, research center, and medical school, made an organizational commitment to reverse such loss and restore the social nature of medicine. To attain that goal, HMH engaged both clinicians and administrators to confirm the demand for change, foster a collaborative culture design, and address the unique nature of the individual components in the HMH network. Efforts to transform the HMH care delivery model illustrate the effectiveness of Agile science and its problem-solving methods.

The role of primary care providers in testing for sexually transmitted infections in the MassHealth Medicaid program.

The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and predictors of testing for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) under an accountable care model of health care delivery. Data sources were claims and encounter records from the Massachusetts Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program (MassHealth) for enrollees aged 13 to 64 years in 2019. This cross-sectional study examines the one-year prevalence of STI testing and evaluates social determinants of health and other patient characteristics as predictors of such testing in both primary care and other settings. We identified visits with STI testing using procedure codes and primary care settings from provider code types. Among 740,417 members, 55% were female, 11% were homeless or unstably housed, and 15% had some level of disability. While the prevalence of testing in any setting was 20% (N = 151,428), only 57,215 members had testing performed in a primary care setting, resulting in an 8% prevalence of testing by primary care clinicians (PCCs). Members enrolled in a managed care organization (MCO) were significantly less likely to be tested by a primary care provider than those enrolled in accountable care organization (ACO) plans that have specific incentives for primary care practices to coordinate care. Enrollees in a Primary Care ACO had the highest rates of STI testing, both overall and by primary care providers. Massachusetts' ACO delivery systems may be able to help practices increase STI screening with explicit incentives for STI testing in primary care settings.

Addressing Provider-Dependent Gaps in Sickle Cell Disease Care

Sickle cell disease (SCD) affects around 100,000 Americans and presents numerous health-related challenges thus necessitating effective management strategies. Educational initiatives on evidence-based intervention are known to play a crucial role in improving patient-related outcomes (PRO) and enhancing the quality of life (QOL) for individuals with SCD. Community-based hospitals face challenges in managing SCD patients. Patients who are unaffiliated with a comprehensive sickle cell center have increased healthcare utilization, readmissions, and patient dissatisfaction due to limited access to specialized services and discrepancies in care delivery. Addressing these disparities and expanding access to care is crucial in optimizing SCD management. The purpose of this exploratory observational study was to identify provider-related gaps in a community-based tertiary center. The survey assessed internal medicine trainees' and hospitalists' baseline knowledge and comfort level at a tertiary care center with a total of 304 yearly adult admissions related to SCD management. The survey was distributed through an online platform. Data was analyzed to identify trends and gaps in internal medicine providers. Our survey had a total of 30 respondents, the response rate was 39%. Most respondents (90%) had prior experience with SCD patients; however, many gaps were identified [Table 1]. 70-75% of physicians felt comfortable managing acute pain and chronic illnesses, yet only half of these providers were comfortable with managing SCD patients. While our study sample is small, similar results were noted in a study conducted in another community-based hospital in the Chicagoland area. Our study shows a similar provider-related gap in SCD care delivery. Dr. Kanter proposed a model of care delivery which is known as the “hub and spoke” model. It offers a promising solution, creating a networked system of care with a central hub and secondary spokes providing more limited services. Community-based hospital settings can serve as spokes, bringing specialized SCD care closer to patients in local areas. Hence, we propose that this model can be further modified to include provider education. This equips non-sickle cell specialists at various spokes with the necessary knowledge and skills through targeted education by sickle cell specialists at a centralized hub. Targeting provider gaps may significantly improve PRO. Our residency program hopes to establish an affiliation with the University of Illinois (UI) Health Sickle Cell Center (SCC) to help with educating trainees on SCD. The UI Health SCC was one of eight sites participating in the National Sickle Cell Disease Implementation Consortium (SCDIC) with the goal of helping patients access longitudinal care, increase hydroxyurea utilization when appropriate, and provide proper pain management in ED. They are also part of the Recruitment and Engagement in Care to Impact Practice Enhancement (RECIPE) project which focuses on patients with SCD that are unaffiliated with care centers and attempts to understand and eliminate their barriers to care. Future efforts should include implementing targeted provider education, within the context of a hub and spoke model. This may help bridge the gap in care delivery and ultimately enhance outcomes for SCD patients.

Improving care engagement for mobile people living with HIV in rural western Kenya.

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) assures major gains in health outcomes among people living with HIV, however, this benefit may not be realized by all due to care interruptions. Mobile populations comprise a subgroup that is likely to have sub-optimal care engagement, resulting in discontinuation of ART. We sought to evaluate the barriers to care engagement among highly mobile individuals living with HIV and explore options aimed at improving engagement in care for this group. Qualitative in-depth interviews were conducted in 2020 among a purposive sample of twelve persons living with HIV and eight health care providers in western Kenya, within a mixed methods study of mobility in communities participating in the SEARCH trial (NCT01864603). We explored the barriers to care engagement among mobile individuals living with HIV and explored different options aimed at enhancing care engagement. These included options such as a coded card containing treatment details, alternative drug packaging to conceal drug identity, longer refills to cover travel period, wrist bands with data storage capability to enable data transfer and "warm handoff" by providers to new clinics upon transfer. Data were inductively analyzed to understand the barriers and acceptability of potential interventions to address them. Stigma and lack of disclosure, rigid work schedules, and unpredictability of travel were major barriers to care engagement for highly mobile individuals living with HIV. Additionally, lack of flexibility in clinic schedules and poor provider attitude were identified as health-system-associated barriers to care engagement. Options that enhance flexibility, convenience and access to care were viewed as the most effective means of addressing the barriers to care by both patients and providers. The most preferred option was a coded card with treatment details followed by alternative drug packaging to conceal drug identity due to stigma and longer refills to cover travel periods. Highly mobile individuals living with HIV desire responsive, flexible, convenient and patient-centered care delivery models to enhance care engagement. They embraced simple health delivery improvements such as coded cards, alternative drug packaging and longer refills to address challenges of mobility.

Regionalization of pancreatic surgery in California: Benefits for preventing postoperative deaths and reducing healthcare costs

IntroductionPancreatic cancer (PC) surgery has been associated with improved outcomes and value when performed at high-volume centers (HVC; ≥20 surgeries annually) compared to low-volume centers (LVC). Some have used these differences to suggest that regionalization of PC surgery would optimize patient outcomes and expenditures. MethodsA Markov model was created to evaluate 30-day mortality, 30-day complications, and 30-day costs. The differences in these outcome measures between the current and future states were measured to assess the population-level benefits of regionalization. A sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of variations of input variables in the model. ResultsAmong 5958 new cases of pancreatic cancer in California in 2021, a total of 2443 cases (41 %) would be resectable; among patients with resectable PC, a total of 977 (40 %) patients would undergo surgery. In aggregate, HVC and LVC 30-day postoperative complications occurred in 364 patients, 30-day mortality in 35 patients, and healthcare costs expended managing complications were $6,120,660. In the predictive model of complete regionalization to only HVC in California, an estimated 29 fewer complications, 17 fewer deaths, and a cost savings of $487,635 per year would occur. Conclusions and relevancePancreatic cancer (PC) surgery has been associated with improved outcomes and value when performed at high-volume centers (HVC; ≥20 surgeries annually) compared to low-volume centers (LVC). Complete regionalization of pancreatic cancer surgery predicted benefits in mortality, complications and cost, though implementing this strategy at a population-level may require investment of resources and redesigning care delivery models.

Implementing Heart Plus: Design and Early Results of a Novel Comanagement Clinic for Patients With Stimulant-associated Cardiomyopathy

We describe the methodology, design, and early results of a novel multidisciplinary co management clinic model with Addiction Medicine and Cardiology providers using contingency management to engage patients with stimulant-associated cardiomyopathy (SA-CMP). Stimulant use, including methamphetamine and cocaine, is increasing in prevalence nationally and is associated with cardiovascular complications. People with SA-CMP have higher rates of mortality and acute care use (eg, emergency department visits, hospital admissions) and lower rates of outpatient care engagement than individuals with non–SA-CMP. This population also has disproportionately elevated rates of mental health and other medical comorbidities, challenges with social determinants of health, including housing and food insecurity, and representation from communities of color. This multidisciplinary comanagement care delivery model, called Heart Plus, was developed and funded as a quality improvement project. It led to a 5-fold increase in outpatient care engagement with a concomitant 53% decrease in acute care use. All participants reported a decrease in stimulant use. With increased clinical stability, patients were able to better engage with outpatient resources for social determinants of health, such as case management, social work, and housing and food service programs. Patients were also empowered to take control over their health while knowing that health care providers cared about their well-being.

Concurrent Hospice and Dialysis Care: Considerations for Implementation.

Hospice positively impacts care at the end of life for patients and their families. However, compared to the general Medicare population, patients on dialysis are half as likely to receive hospice. Concurrent hospice and dialysis care offers an opportunity to improve care for people living with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). We sought to (1) develop a conceptual model of the Program and (2) identify key components, resources, and considerations for further implementation. We conducted a template analysis of qualitative interviews and convened a community advisory panel (CAP) to get feedback on current concurrent care design and considerations for dissemination and implementation. Thirty-nine patients with late-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD), family caregivers, bereaved family caregivers, hospice clinicians, nephrology clinicians, administrators, and policy experts participated in interviews. A purposive subset of 19 interviewees composed the CAP. Qualitative feedback on concurrent care design refinements, implementation, and resources. Participants identified four themes that define an effective model of concurrent hospice and dialysis: it requires (1) timely goals-of-care conversations and (2) an interdisciplinary approach; (3) clear guidelines ensure smooth transitions for patients and families; and (4) hospice payment policy must support concurrent care. CAP participants provided feedback on the phases of an effective model of concurrent hospice and dialysis, and resources, including written and interactive educational materials, communication tools, workflow processes, and order sets. We developed a conceptual model for concurrent hospice and dialysis care and a corresponding resource list. In addition to policy changes, clinical implementation and educational resources can facilitate scalable and equitable dissemination of concurrent care. Concurrent hospice and dialysis care must be systematically evaluated via a hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial that includes the resources outlined herein, based on our conceptual model of concurrent care delivery.

High acceptability, convenience and reduced carbon emissions of tele-neurology outpatient services at a regional referral centre in Kenya

BackgroundThere is severe shortage of neurologists in sub-Saharan Africa. Tele-neurology consultations (TNC) can bridge this service gap, but there is very little published evidence on TNC in our setting, which we addressed through our study. MethodsWe prospectively enrolled patients at our neurology outpatients from October 2020 to October 2021. We administered a post-TNC questionnaire which captured satisfaction/acceptability using Likert scales. A sub-group of participants who also did in-person consultations (IPC) were additionally administered post-IPC questionnaires. Statistical comparisons were made using the paired student t-test, and descriptive data expressed as median (inter-quartile range). ResultsFrom 219 enrolled patients, 66.7% participants responded: 74.0% had both IPC and TNC; 63.0% were female; age was 40.9 (30.6–55.2) years; and 2.7% were from neighbouring countries. The commonest presentations were headache (30.8%), seizures (26.0%) and neurodegenerative disorders (15.1%). For TNC, >90% found it: (i) as comfortable as IPC (p = 0.35); (ii) didn't violate their privacy; (iii) saved time [3.0 (2.0–4.0) hours], travel [11.0 (7.2–21.1) km] and cost [$9.09 (4.55–18.18)]; and (iv) addressed their concerns satisfactorily such that they would use TNC again. Conversely, 15.1% didn't agree with TNC being as effective as IPC, and felt the neurologist did not satisfactorily identify all of their health problems (p = 0.03). In total, our TNC service saved our patients $6167, 1143 h, and 25,506 km of travel, translating to 3.5 t (equivalent to 21 newly-planted trees) of carbon dioxide emissions. ConclusionsOur study demonstrates that TNC is an acceptable, efficient, effective, and environmentally-sustainable care delivery model.