Model-based Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm Research Articles

Comparison of different iterative reconstruction algorithms with contrast-enhancement boost technique on the image quality of CT pulmonary angiography for obese patients

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of the contrast-enhancement-boost (CE-boost) postprocessing technique on improving the image quality of obese patients in computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) compared to hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) algorithms.MethodsThis prospective study was conducted on 100 patients who underwent CTPA for suspected pulmonary embolism. Non-obese patients with a body mass index (BMI) under 25 were designated as group 1, while obese patients (group 2) had a BMI exceeding 25. The CE-boost images were generated by subtracting non-contrast HIR images from contrast-enhanced HIR images to improve the visibility of pulmonary arteries further. The CT value, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were quantitatively assessed. Two chest radiologists independently reviewed the CT images (5, best; 1, worst) across three subjective characteristics including diagnostic confidence, subjective image noise, and vascular contrast. The Friedman test and Dunn-Bonferroni correction were used for statistical analysis.ResultsThe CE-boost had significantly higher CT values than HIR and MBIR in both groups (all p < 0.001). The MBIR yielded the lowest image noise compared with HIR and CE-boost (all p < 0.001). The SNR and CNR of main pulmonary artery (MPA) were significantly higher in CE-boost than in MBIR (all p < 0.05), with HIR showing the lowest values (all p < 0.001). Group 2 MBIR received significantly better subjective image noise scores, while the diagnostic confidence and vascular contrast scored highest with the group 2 CE-boost (all p < 0.05).ConclusionCompared to the HIR algorithm, both the CE-boost technique and the MBIR algorithm can improve the image quality of CTPA in obese patients. CE-boost had the greatest potential in increasing the visualization of pulmonary artery and its branches.

Resolution analysis of a volumetric coded aperture X-ray diffraction imaging system.

A coded aperture X-ray diffraction (XRD) imaging system can measure the X-ray diffraction form factor from an object in three dimensions -X, Y and Z (depth), broadening the potential application of this technology. However, to optimize XRD systems for specific applications, it is critical to understand how to predict and quantify system performance for each use case. The purpose of this work is to present and validate 3D spatial resolution models for XRD imaging systems with a detector-side coded aperture. A fan beam coded aperture XRD system was used to scan 3D printed resolution phantoms placed at various locations throughout the system's field of view. The multiplexed scatter data were reconstructed using a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm, and the resulting volumetric images were evaluated using multiple resolution criteria to compare against the known phantom resolution. We considered the full width at half max and Sparrow criterion as measures of the resolution and compared our results against analytical resolution models from the literature as well as a new theory for predicting the system resolution based on geometric arguments. We show that our experimental measurements are bounded by the multitude of theoretical resolution predictions, which accurately predict the observed trends and order of magnitude of the spatial and form factor resolutions. However, we find that the expected and observed resolution can vary by approximately a factor of two depending on the choice of metric and model considered. We observe depth resolutions of 7-16 mm and transverse resolutions of 0.6-2 mm for objects throughout the field of view. Furthermore, we observe tradeoffs between the spatial resolution and XRD form factor resolution as a function of sample location. The theories evaluated in this study provide a useful framework for estimating the 3D spatial resolution of a detector side coded aperture XRD imaging system. The assumptions and simplifications required by these theories can impact the overall accuracy of describing a particular system, but they also can add to the generalizability of their predictions. Furthermore, understanding the implications of the assumptions behind each theory can help predict performance, as shown by our data's placement between the conservative and idealized theories, and better guide future systems for optimized designs.

Image quality in CT thorax: effect of altering reconstruction algorithm and tube load.

Non-linear properties of iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms can alter image texture. We evaluated the effect of a model-based IR algorithm (advanced modelled iterative reconstruction; ADMIRE) and dose on computed tomography thorax image quality. Dual-source scanner data were acquired at 20, 45 and 65 reference mAs in 20 patients. Images reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and ADMIRE Strengths 3-5 were assessed independently by six radiologists and analysed using an ordinal logistic regression model. For all image criteria studied, the effects of tube load 20 mAs and all ADMIRE strengths were significant (p<0.001) when compared to reference categories 65 mAs and FBP. Increase in tube load from 45 to 65 mAs showed image quality improvement in three of six criteria. Replacing FBP with ADMIRE significantly improves perceived image quality for all criteria studied, potentially permitting a dose reduction of almost 70% without loss in image quality.

Feasibility of Low-Dose and Low-Contrast Media Volume Approach in Computed Tomography Cardiovascular Imaging Reconstructed with Model-Based Algorithm.

Aim: To evaluate the dose reduction and image quality of low-dose, low-contrast media volume in computed tomography (CT) examinations reconstructed with the model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) algorithm in comparison with the hybrid iterative (HIR) one. Methods: We prospectively enrolled a total of 401 patients referred for cardiovascular CT, evaluated with a 256-MDCT scan with a low kVp (80 kVp) reconstructed with an MBIR (study group) or a standard HIR protocol (100 kVp-control group) after injection of a fixed dose of contrast medium volume. Vessel contrast enhancement and image noise were measured by placing the region of interest (ROI) in the left ventricle, ascending aorta; left, right and circumflex coronary arteries; main, right and left pulmonary arteries; aortic arch; and abdominal aorta. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were computed. Subjective image quality obtained by consensus was assessed by using a 4-point Likert scale. Radiation dose exposure was recorded. Results: HU values of the proximal tract of all coronary arteries; main, right and left pulmonary arteries; and of the aorta were significantly higher in the study group than in the control group (p < 0.05), while the noise was significantly lower (p < 0.05). SNR and CNR values in all anatomic districts were significantly higher in the study group (p < 0.05). MBIR subjective image quality was significantly higher than HIR in CCTA and CTPA protocols (p < 0.05). Radiation dose was significantly lower in the study group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The MBIR algorithm combined with low-kVp can help reduce radiation dose exposure, reduce noise, and increase objective and subjective image quality.

Improving image quality with super-resolution deep-learning-based reconstruction in coronary CT angiography.

To evaluate the effect of super-resolution deep-learning-based reconstruction (SR-DLR) on the image quality of coronary CT angiography (CCTA). Forty-one patients who underwent CCTA using a 320-row scanner were retrospectively included. Images were reconstructed with hybrid (HIR), model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR), normal-resolution deep-learning-based reconstruction (NR-DLR), and SR-DLR algorithms. For each image series, image noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at the left main trunk, right coronary artery, left anterior descending artery, and left circumflex artery were quantified. Blooming artifacts from calcified plaques were measured. Image sharpness, noise magnitude, noise texture, edge smoothness, overall quality, and delineation of the coronary wall, calcified and noncalcified plaques, cardiac muscle, and valves were subjectively ranked on a 4-point scale (1, worst; 4, best). The quantitative parameters and subjective scores were compared among the four reconstructions. Task-based image quality was assessed with a physical evaluation phantom. The detectability index for the objects simulating the coronary lumen, calcified plaques, and noncalcified plaques was calculated from the noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF). SR-DLR yielded significantly lower image noise and blooming artifacts with higher CNR than HIR, MBIR, and NR-DLR (all p < 0.001). The best subjective scores for all the evaluation criteria were attained with SR-DLR, with significant differences from all other reconstructions (p < 0.001). In the phantom study, SR-DLR provided the highest NPS average frequency, TTF50%, and detectability for all task objects. SR-DLR considerably improved the subjective and objective image qualities and object detectability of CCTA relative to HIR, MBIR, and NR-DLR algorithms. The novel SR-DLR algorithm has the potential to facilitate accurate assessment of coronary artery disease on CCTA by providing excellent image quality in terms of spatial resolution, noise characteristics, and object detectability. • SR-DLR designed for CCTA improved image sharpness, noise property, and delineation of cardiac structures with reduced blooming artifacts from calcified plaques relative to HIR, MBIR, and NR-DLR. • In the task-based image-quality assessments, SR-DLR yielded better spatial resolution, noise property, and detectability for objects simulating the coronary lumen, coronary calcifications, and noncalcified plaques than other reconstruction techniques. • The image reconstruction times of SR-DLR were shorter than those of MBIR, potentially serving as a novel standard-of-care reconstruction technique for CCTA performed on a 320-row CT scanner.

Super-resolution model-based iterative reconstruction for lens-coupled micro-CT imaging

Lens-coupled high-resolution micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) uses a visible light magnification system behind the x-ray path to achieve higher resolution imaging than conventional micro-CT. However, the spatial resolution is theoretically limited by optical diffraction and mechanical control precision. As a result, the current system resolution is still insufficient for some applications, such as the imaging of biological materials whose structures are on the nanometer scale. To overcome this limitation, a super-resolution algorithm can be employed to improve the image resolution beyond the theoretical upper bound of the ideal spatial resolution of the system. In this work, a super-resolution model-based iterative reconstruction (SR-MBIR) algorithm is proposed based on a lens-coupled high-resolution micro-CT system and a high-precision nano-stage attached to the rotation stage of the system. The algorithm employs a scanning program that dithers the object via the nano-stage to obtain multiple sets of projection images with sub-pixel information. The blur and noise statistical models are introduced into the physical model for iterative reconstruction, allowing for super-resolution, deblurring, and noise suppression. The results of simulation data and actual data show that the SR-MBIR algorithm has a prominent effect in improving image resolution. The reconstructed images have sharper edges, better details, higher signal-to-noise ratio, and can effectively suppress the systematic blur and noise in the imaging process, thus achieving superior interior reconstruction quality.

X-ray Tomography Reconstruction Accelerated on FPGA through High-Level Synthesis Tools.

Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction (MBIR) algorithms iteratively use expensive computational operators of forward and backward projections. The irregular memory access pattern of these operators makes them a memory-bound application. Their computation time must be reduced to meet clinical routine constraints. This paper proposes a hardware accelerator architecture based on Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) through high-level language, as an alternative to GPU architecture. This acceleration is based on an offline memory access analysis to address the main bottleneck of the algorithm and maximize the data reuse rate. The offline analysis allows for the tuning of the architecture parameters so that they converge to an optimal solution. Then, the Berkeley Roofline model guides our optimization steps by iteratively analyzing the design performance. Our design flow significantly improved the algorithm's computational intensity and overcame the memory bottleneck. Thus, our architecture takes advantage of the FPGA local memory to achieve significant memory bandwidth and efficiently harness the pipeline without stalling the computation. Furthermore, we present the scaling-up strategy from mid-range FPGA to high-end FPGA and any concerns of portability. We used two Intel FPGA devices to implement the algorithm, and then we compared the results with our GPU implementation in terms of speedup and energy efficiency. Our experimental results show that our design has achieved better computational throughput than the works on FPGA architectures reported in the literature.

Deep learning-based reconstruction can improve the image quality of low radiation dose head CT.

To evaluate the image quality of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR), model-based (MBIR), and hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) algorithms for lower-dose (LD) unenhanced head CT and compare it with those of standard-dose (STD) HIR images. This retrospective study included 114 patients who underwent unenhanced head CT using the STD (n = 57) or LD (n = 57) protocol on a 320-row CT. STD images were reconstructed with HIR; LD images were reconstructed with HIR (LD-HIR), MBIR (LD-MBIR), and DLR (LD-DLR). The image noise, gray and white matter (GM-WM) contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at the basal ganglia and posterior fossa levels were quantified. The noise magnitude, noise texture, GM-WM contrast, image sharpness, streak artifact, and subjective acceptability were independently scored by three radiologists (1 = worst, 5 = best). The lesion conspicuity of LD-HIR, LD-MBIR, and LD-DLR was ranked through side-by-side assessments (1 = worst, 3 = best). Reconstruction times of three algorithms were measured. The effective dose of LD was 25% lower than that of STD. Lower image noise, higher GM-WM contrast, and higher CNR were observed in LD-DLR and LD-MBIR than those in STD (all, p ≤ 0.035). Compared with STD, the noise texture, image sharpness, and subjective acceptability were inferior for LD-MBIR and superior for LD-DLR (all, p < 0.001). The lesion conspicuity of LD-DLR (2.9 ± 0.2) was higher than that of HIR (1.2 ± 0.3) and MBIR (1.8 ± 0.4) (all, p < 0.001). Reconstruction times of HIR, MBIR, and DLR were 11 ± 1, 319 ± 17, and 24 ± 1s, respectively. DLR can enhance the image quality of head CT while preserving low radiation dose level and short reconstruction time. •For unenhanced head CT, DLR reduced the image noise and improved the GM-WM contrast and lesion delineation without sacrificing the natural noise texture and image sharpness relative to HIR. •The subjective and objective image quality of DLR was better than that of HIR even at 25% reduced dose without considerably increasing the image reconstruction times (24s vs. 11s). •Despite the strong noise reduction and improved GM-WM contrast performance, MBIR degraded the noise texture, sharpness, and subjective acceptance with prolonged reconstruction times relative to HIR, potentially hampering its feasibility.

Image quality comparison of lower extremity CTA between CT routine reconstruction algorithms and deep learning reconstruction

BackgroundTo evaluate the image quality of lower extremity computed tomography angiography (CTA) with deep learning–based reconstruction (DLR) compared to model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR), hybrid-iterative reconstruction (HIR), and filtered back projection (FBP).MethodsFifty patients (38 males, average age 59.8 ± 19.2 years) who underwent lower extremity CTA between January and May 2021 were included. Images were reconstructed with DLR, MBIR, HIR, and FBP. The standard deviation (SD), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), noise power spectrum (NPS) curves, and the blur effect, were calculated. The subjective image quality was independently evaluated by two radiologists. The diagnostic accuracy of DLR, MBIR, HIR, and FBP reconstruction algorithms was calculated.ResultsThe CNR and SNR were significantly higher in DLR images than in the other three reconstruction algorithms, and the SD was significantly lower in DLR images of the soft tissues. The noise magnitude was the lowest with DLR. The NPS average spatial frequency (fav) values were higher using DLR than HIR. For blur effect evaluation, DLR and FBP were similar for soft tissues and the popliteal artery, which was better than HIR and worse than MBIR. In the aorta and femoral arteries, the blur effect of DLR was worse than MBIR and FBP and better than HIR. The subjective image quality score of DLR was the highest. The sensitivity and specificity of the lower extremity CTA with DLR were the highest in the four reconstruction algorithms with 98.4% and 97.2%, respectively.ConclusionsCompared to the other three reconstruction algorithms, DLR showed better objective and subjective image quality. The blur effect of the DLR was better than that of the HIR. The diagnostic accuracy of lower extremity CTA with DLR was the best among the four reconstruction algorithms.

Multiple-scattering simulator-trained neural network for intensity diffraction tomography.

Recovering 3D phase features of complex biological samples traditionally sacrifices computational efficiency and processing time for physical model accuracy and reconstruction quality. Here, we overcome this challenge using an approximant-guided deep learning framework in a high-speed intensity diffraction tomography system. Applying a physics model simulator-based learning strategy trained entirely on natural image datasets, we show our network can robustly reconstruct complex 3D biological samples. To achieve highly efficient training and prediction, we implement a lightweight 2D network structure that utilizes a multi-channel input for encoding the axial information. We demonstrate this framework on experimental measurements of weakly scattering epithelial buccal cells and strongly scattering C. elegans worms. We benchmark the network's performance against a state-of-the-art multiple-scattering model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm. We highlight the network's robustness by reconstructing dynamic samples from a living worm video. We further emphasize the network's generalization capabilities by recovering algae samples imaged from different experimental setups. To assess the prediction quality, we develop a quantitative evaluation metric to show that our predictions are consistent with both multiple-scattering physics and experimental measurements.

Observer Sensitivity for Detection of Pulmonary Nodules in Ultra-Low Dose Computed Tomography Protocols Using a Third-Generation Dual-Source CT with Ultra-High Pitch—A Phantom Study

This study evaluates ultra-low-dose computed tomography (ULDCT) protocols concerning the detectability of pulmonary nodules. The influence of tube current settings, kernels, strength levels of third-generation iterative reconstruction algorithms, and pitch was investigated. A chest phantom with artificial spherical nodules of different densities and diameters was examined with a third-generation dual-source CT. Scanning and post-processing protocols, tube current levels, and ultra-high and non-high pitch modes were applied. Images were reconstructed with filtered back-projection (FBP) or advanced model-based iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE) algorithms. Sharp (Bl57) or medium-soft (Br36) convolution kernels were applied. The reading was performed by an experienced and an inexperienced reader. The highest observer sensitivity was found using a non-high pitch protocol at tube currents of 120 mAs and 90 mAs with the sharp kernel and iterative reconstruction level of 5. Non-high pitch protocols showed better detectability of solid nodules. Combinations with the medium-soft kernel achieved slightly higher observer sensitivity than with the sharp kernel. False positives (FP) occurred more often for subsolid nodules, at a tube current level of 120 mAs, and with the sharp kernel. A tube current level of 90 mAs combined with the highest iterative reconstruction level achieved the highest accuracy in lung nodule detection regardless of size, density, and reader experience.

Inter-observer agreement and image quality of model-based algorithm applied to the Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System score

PurposeTo evaluate the inter-observer agreement of the CAD-RADS reporting system and compare image quality between model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) and standard iterative reconstruction algorithm (IR) of low-dose cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA).MethodsOne-hundred-sixty patients undergone a 256-slice MDCT scanner using low-dose CCTA combined with prospective ECG-gated techniques were enrolled. CCTA protocols were reconstructed with both MBIR and IR. Each study was evaluated by two readers using the CAD-RADS lexicon. Vessels enhancement, image noise, signal-to-noise (SNR), and contrast-to-noise (CNR) were computed in the axial native images, and inter-observer agreement was assessed. Radiation dose exposure as dose–length product (DLP) and effective dose were finally reported.ResultsThe reliability analysis between the two readers was almost perfect for all CAD-RADS standard categories. Moreover, a significantly higher value of subjective qualitative analysis, SNR, and CNR in MBIR images compared to IR were found, due to a lower noise level (all p < 0.05). The mean DLP measured was 63.9 mGy*cm, and the mean effective dose was 0.9 mSv.ConclusionInter-observer agreement of CAD-RADS was excellent confirming the importance, the feasibility, and the reproducibility of the CAD-RADS scoring system for CCTA. Moreover, lower noise and higher image quality with MBIR compared to IR were found.Implications for practiceMBIR, by reducing noise and improving image quality, can help a better assessment of CAD-RADS, in comparison with standard IR algorithm.

Implications of computed tomography reconstruction algorithms on coronary atheroma quantification: Comparison with intravascular ultrasound

BackgroundAdvances in coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) reconstruction algorithms are expected to enhance the accuracy of CCTA plaque quantification. We aim to evaluate different CCTA reconstruction approaches in assessing vessel characteristics in coronary atheroma using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) as the reference standard. MethodsMatched cross-sections (n ​= ​7241) from 50 vessels in 15 participants with chronic coronary syndrome who prospectively underwent CCTA and 3-vessel near-infrared spectroscopy-IVUS were included. Twelve CCTA datasets per patient were reconstructed using two different kernels, two slice thicknesses (0.75 ​mm and 0.50 ​mm) and three different strengths of advanced model-based iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms. Lumen and vessel wall borders were manually annotated in every IVUS and CCTA cross-section which were co-registered using dedicated software. Image quality was sub-optimal in the reconstructions with a sharper kernel, so these were excluded. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and repeatability coefficient (RC) were used to compare the estimations of the 6 CT reconstruction approaches with those derived by IVUS. ResultsSegment-level analysis showed good agreement between CCTA and IVUS for assessing atheroma volume with approach 0.50/5 (slice thickness 0.50 ​mm and highest strength 5 ADMIRE IR) being the best (total atheroma volume ICC: 0.91, RC: 0.67, p ​< ​0.001 and percentage atheroma volume ICC: 0.64, RC: 14.06, p ​< ​0.001). At lesion-level, there was no difference between the CCTA reconstructions for detecting plaques (accuracy range: 0.64–0.67; p ​= ​0.23); however, approach 0.50/5 was superior in assessing IVUS-derived lesion characteristics associated with plaque vulnerability (minimum lumen area ICC: 0.64, RC: 1.31, p ​< ​0.001 and plaque burden ICC: 0.45, RC: 32.0, p ​< ​0.001). ConclusionCCTA reconstruction with thinner slice thickness, smooth kernel and highest strength advanced IR enabled more accurate quantification of the lumen and plaque at a segment-, and lesion-level analysis in coronary atheroma when validated against intravascular ultrasound. Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03556644)

Effects of contrast enhancement boost postprocessing technique in combination with different reconstruction algorithms on the image quality of abdominal CT angiography

ObjectivesTo investigate whether contrast-enhancement-boost (CE-boost) in combination with hybrid iterative reconstruction (Hybrid IR, also named HIR [AIDR 3D, adaptive iterative dose reduction three dimensional]) and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR [FIRST, forward projected model-based IR solution]) algorithms can improve the image quality of abdominal CT angiography (CTA). MethodsThis retrospective study included 50 patients who underwent abdominal CTA. Both arterial and portal phases were reconstructed using three different algorithms [filtered-back projection (FBP), AIDR 3D, and FIRST] separately. CE-boost was performed additionally to generate AIDR 3D-boost and FIRST-boost images. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the arteries and portal system were compared among the five datasets (FBP, AIDR 3D, FIRST, AIDR 3D-boost, FIRST-boost). In subjective analyses, two radiologists independently ordered images (5, best; 1, worst) based on the visual image quality of distal arterial or portal venous branches. The Friedman and the Dunn-Bonferroni post-hoc tests were used for statistical analysis. ResultsFIRST-boost arterial and portal images had the lowest noise compared with FBP, AIDR 3D, FIRST, and AIDR 3D-boost images (all P < 0.05), and significantly higher SNR and CNR than FBP, AIDR 3D, and FIRST images (all P < 0.05). AIDR 3D-boost images showed lower noise, and higher SNR and CNR than FBP and AIDR 3D images (all P < 0.05). FIRST-boost images had higher subjective grading scores than FBP, AIDR 3D, and AIDR 3D-boost images (all P < 0.05). ConclusionThe postprocessing technique CE-boost can improve the image quality of abdominal CTA images. MBIR in combination with CE-boost (FIRST-boost) images had the best image quality compared with the other four image datasets.

Impact of dose reduction and iterative model reconstruction on multi-detector CT imaging of the brain in patients with suspected ischemic stroke

Non-contrast cerebral computed tomography (CT) is frequently performed as a first-line diagnostic approach in patients with suspected ischemic stroke. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of hybrid and model-based iterative image reconstruction for standard-dose (SD) and low-dose (LD) non-contrast cerebral imaging by multi-detector CT (MDCT). We retrospectively analyzed 131 patients with suspected ischemic stroke (mean age: 74.2 ± 14.3 years, 67 females) who underwent initial MDCT with a SD protocol (300 mAs) as well as follow-up MDCT after a maximum of 10 days with a LD protocol (200 mAs). Ischemic demarcation was detected in 26 patients for initial and in 64 patients for follow-up imaging, with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirming ischemia in all of those patients. The non-contrast cerebral MDCT images were reconstructed using hybrid (Philips “iDose4”) and model-based iterative (Philips “IMR3”) reconstruction algorithms. Two readers assessed overall image quality, anatomic detail, differentiation of gray matter (GM)/white matter (WM), and conspicuity of ischemic demarcation, if any. Quantitative assessment included signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) calculations for WM, GM, and demarcated areas. Ischemic demarcation was detected in all MDCT images of affected patients by both readers, irrespective of the reconstruction method used. For LD imaging, anatomic detail and GM/WM differentiation was significantly better when using the model-based iterative compared to the hybrid reconstruction method. Furthermore, CNR of GM/WM as well as the SNR of WM and GM of healthy brain tissue were significantly higher for LD images with model-based iterative reconstruction when compared to SD or LD images reconstructed with the hybrid algorithm. For patients with ischemic demarcation, there was a significant difference between images using hybrid versus model-based iterative reconstruction for CNR of ischemic/contralateral unaffected areas (mean ± standard deviation: SD_IMR: 4.4 ± 3.1, SD_iDose: 3.5 ± 2.3, P < 0.0001; LD_IMR: 4.6 ± 2.9, LD_iDose: 3.2 ± 2.1, P < 0.0001). In conclusion, model-based iterative reconstruction provides higher CNR and SNR without significant loss of image quality for non-enhanced cerebral MDCT.

Manual kidney stone size measurements in computed tomography are most accurate using multiplanar image reformatations and bone window settings

Computed tomography in suspected urolithiasis provides information about the presence, location and size of stones. Particularly stone size is a key parameter in treatment decision; however, data on impact of reformatation and measurement strategies is sparse. This study aimed to investigate the influence of different image reformatations, slice thicknesses and window settings on stone size measurements. Reference stone sizes of 47 kidney stones representative for clinically encountered compositions were measured manually using a digital caliper (Man-M). Afterwards stones were placed in a 3D-printed, semi-anthropomorphic phantom, and scanned using a low dose protocol (CTDIvol 2 mGy). Images were reconstructed using hybrid-iterative and model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms (HIR, MBIR) with different slice thicknesses. Two independent readers measured largest stone diameter on axial (2 mm and 5 mm) and multiplanar reformatations (based upon 0.67 mm reconstructions) using different window settings (soft-tissue and bone). Statistics were conducted using ANOVA ± correction for multiple comparisons. Overall stone size in CT was underestimated compared to Man-M (8.8 ± 2.9 vs. 7.7 ± 2.7 mm, p < 0.05), yet closely correlated (r = 0.70). Reconstruction algorithm and slice thickness did not significantly impact measurements (p > 0.05), while image reformatations and window settings did (p < 0.05). CT measurements using multiplanar reformatation with a bone window setting showed closest agreement with Man-M (8.7 ± 3.1 vs. 8.8 ± 2.9 mm, p < 0.05, r = 0.83). Manual CT-based stone size measurements are most accurate using multiplanar image reformatation with a bone window setting, while measurements on axial planes with different slice thicknesses underestimate true stone size. Therefore, this procedure is recommended when impacting treatment decision.

Application of low-dose CT combined with model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm in oncologic patients during follow-up: dose reduction and image quality.

To compare image quality and radiation dose of CT images reconstructed with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) and hybrid-iterative (HIR) algorithm in oncologic patients. 125 oncologic patients underwent both contrast-enhanced low- (100 kV), and standard (120 kV) dose CT, were enrolled. Image quality was assessed by using a 4-point Likert scale. CT attenuation values, expressed in Hounsfield unit (HU), were recorded within a regions of interest (ROI) of liver, spleen, paraspinal muscle, aortic lumen, and subcutaneous fat tissue. Image noise, expressed as standard deviation (SD), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. Radiation dose were analyzed. Paired Student's t-test was used to compare all continuous variables. The overall median score assessed as image quality for CT images with the MBIR algorithm was significantly higher in comparison with HIR [4 (range 3-4) vs 3 (3-4), p = 0.017].CT attenuation values and SD were significantly higher and lower, respectively, in all anatomic districts in images reconstructed with MBIR in comparison with HIR ones (all p < 0.001). SNR and CNR values were higher in CT images reconstructed with MBIR, reaching a significant difference in all districts (all p < 0.001). Radiation dose were significantly lower in the MBIR group compared with the HIR group (p < 0.001). MBIR combined with low-kV setting allows an important dose reduction in whole-body CT imaging, reaching a better image quality both qualitatively and quantitatively. MBIR with low-dose approach allows a reduction of dose exposure, maintaining high image quality, especially in patients which deserve a longlasting follow-up.

Impact of dose reduction and the use of an advanced model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm on spectral performance of a dual-source CT system: A task-based image quality assessment

PurposeTo assess the impact of dose reduction and the use of an advanced modeled iterative reconstruction algorithm (ADMIRE) on image quality in low-energy monochromatic images from a dual-source dual energy computed tomography CT (DSCT) platform. Materials and methodsAcquisitions on an image-quality phantom were performed using DSCT equipment with 100/Sn150 kVp for four dose levels (CTDIvol: 20/11/8/5mGy). Raw data were reconstructed for six energy levels (40/50/60/70/80/100 keV) using filtered back projection and two levels of ADMIRE (A3/A5). Noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were calculated on virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs). Detectability index (d′) was computed to model the detection task of two enhanced iodine lesions as function of keV. ResultsNoise-magnitude was significantly reduced between 40 to 70 keV by −56±0% (SD) (range: −56%–−55%) with FBP; −56±0% (SD) (−56%–−56%) with A3; and −57±1% (SD) (range: −57%–−56%) with A5. The average spatial frequency of the NPS peaked at 70 keV and decreased as ADMIRE level increased. TTF values at 50% were greatest at 40 keV and shifted towards lower frequencies as the keV increased. The detectability of both lesions increased with increasing dose level and ADMIRE level. For the simulated lesion with iodine at 2mg/mL, d’ values peaked at 70 keV for all reconstruction types, except for A3 at 20 mGy and A5 at 11 and 20 mGy, where d’ peaked at 60 keV. For the other simulated lesion, d’ values were highest at 40 keV and decreased beyond. ConclusionAt low keV on VMIs, this study confirms that iterative reconstruction reduces the noise magnitude, improves the spatial resolution and increases the detectability of enhanced iodine lesions.

IMAGE QUALITY AND POTENTIAL DOSE REDUCTION USING ADVANCED MODELED ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION (ADMIRE) IN ABDOMINAL CT - A REVIEW.

Traditional filtered back projection (FBP) reconstruction methods have served the computed tomography (CT) community well for over 40 years. With the increased use of CT during the last decades, efforts to minimise patient exposure, while maintaining sufficient or improved image quality, have led to the development of model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) algorithms from several vendors. The usefulness of the advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE) (Siemens Healthineers) MBIR in abdominal CT is reviewed and its noise suppression and/or dose reduction possibilities explored. Quantitative and qualitative methods with phantom and human subjects were used. Assessment of the quality of phantom images will not always correlate positively with those of patient images, particularly at the higher strength of the ADMIRE algorithm. With few exceptions, ADMIRE Strength 3 typically allows for substantial noise reduction compared to FBP and hence to significant (≈30%) patient dose reductions. The size of the dose reductions depends on the diagnostic task.

Deep learning\u2013based reconstruction may improve non-contrast cerebral CT imaging compared to other current reconstruction algorithms

ObjectivesTo evaluate image quality and reconstruction times of a commercial deep learning reconstruction algorithm (DLR) compared to hybrid-iterative reconstruction (Hybrid-IR) and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) algorithms for cerebral non-contrast CT (NCCT).MethodsCerebral NCCT acquisitions of 50 consecutive patients were reconstructed using DLR, Hybrid-IR and MBIR with a clinical CT system. Image quality, in terms of six subjective characteristics (noise, sharpness, grey-white matter differentiation, artefacts, natural appearance and overall image quality), was scored by five observers. As objective metrics of image quality, the noise magnitude and signal-difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR) of the grey and white matter were calculated. Mean values for the image quality characteristics scored by the observers were estimated using a general linear model to account for multiple readers. The estimated means for the reconstruction methods were pairwise compared. Calculated measures were compared using paired t tests.ResultsFor all image quality characteristics, DLR images were scored significantly higher than MBIR images. Compared to Hybrid-IR, perceived noise and grey-white matter differentiation were better with DLR, while no difference was detected for other image quality characteristics. Noise magnitude was lower for DLR compared to Hybrid-IR and MBIR (5.6, 6.4 and 6.2, respectively) and SDNR higher (2.4, 1.9 and 2.0, respectively). Reconstruction times were 27 s, 44 s and 176 s for Hybrid-IR, DLR and MBIR respectively.ConclusionsWith a slight increase in reconstruction time, DLR results in lower noise and improved tissue differentiation compared to Hybrid-IR. Image quality of MBIR is significantly lower compared to DLR with much longer reconstruction times.Key Points• Deep learning reconstruction of cerebral non-contrast CT results in lower noise and improved tissue differentiation compared to hybrid-iterative reconstruction.• Deep learning reconstruction of cerebral non-contrast CT results in better image quality in all aspects evaluated compared to model-based iterative reconstruction.• Deep learning reconstruction only needs a slight increase in reconstruction time compared to hybrid-iterative reconstruction, while model-based iterative reconstruction requires considerably longer processing time.