Mobilization Of Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells Research Articles

Pulse Activation of Retinoic Acid Receptor Enhances Hematopoietic Stem Cell Homing by Controlling CXCR4 Membrane Presentation.

The interplay between metabolic signaling and stem cell biology has gained increasing attention, though the underlying molecular mechanisms remain incompletely elucidated. In this study, we identify and characterize the role of adapalene (ADA), a retinoic acid receptor (RAR) agonist, in modulating the migration behavior of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). Our initial findings reveal that ADA treatment suppresses hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) mobilization induced by AMD3100 and G-CSF. Furthermore, we demonstrate that ADA treatment upregulates the surface expression of CXCR4 on HSPCs, resulting in enhanced chemotaxis towards CXCL12. Mechanistically, our study suggests that ADA enhances CXCR4 surface presentation without increasing CXCR4 mRNA levels, pointing towards a non-canonical role of RAR signaling in regulating intracellular trafficking of CXCR4. In vivo experiments show that ADA administration significantly enhances HSC homing efficiency. Additionally, competitive transplantation assays indicate a marked increase in donor chimerism following ADA treatment. These findings highlight the critical role of retinoic acid signaling in regulating HSC homing and suggest its potential for advancing novel HSC-based therapeutic strategies.

Development of VLA4 and CXCR4 Antagonists for the Mobilization of Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells.

The treatment of patients diagnosed with hematologic malignancies typically includes hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) as part of a therapeutic standard of care. The primary graft source of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) for HSCT is mobilized from the bone marrow into the peripheral blood of allogeneic donors or patients. More recently, these mobilized HSPCs have also been the source for gene editing strategies to treat diseases such as sickle-cell anemia. For a HSCT to be successful, it requires the infusion of a sufficient number of HSPCs that are capable of adequate homing to the bone marrow niche and the subsequent regeneration of stable trilineage hematopoiesis in a timely manner. Granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is currently the most frequently used agent for HSPC mobilization. However, it requires five or more daily infusions to produce an adequate number of HSPCs and the use of G-CSF alone often results in suboptimal stem cell yields in a significant number of patients. Furthermore, there are several undesirable side effects associated with G-CSF, and it is contraindicated for use in sickle-cell anemia patients, where it has been linked to serious vaso-occlusive and thrombotic events. The chemokine receptor CXCR4 and the cell surface integrin α4β1 (very late antigen 4 (VLA4)) are both involved in the homing and retention of HSPCs within the bone marrow microenvironment. Preclinical and/or clinical studies have shown that targeted disruption of the interaction of the CXCR4 or VLA4 receptors with their endogenous ligands within the bone marrow niche results in the rapid and reversible mobilization of HSPCs into the peripheral circulation and is synergistic when combined with G-CSF. In this review, we discuss the roles CXCR4 and VLA4 play in bone marrow homing and retention and will summarize more recent development of small-molecule CXCR4 and VLA4 inhibitors that, when combined, can synergistically improve the magnitude, quality and convenience of HSPC mobilization for stem cell transplantation and ex vivo gene therapy after the administration of just a single dose. This optimized regimen has the potential to afford a superior alternative to G-CSF for HSPC mobilization.

Donor and recipient hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells mobilization in liver transplantation patients

BackgroundHematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) mobilize from bone marrow to peripheral blood in response to stress. The impact of alloresponse-induced stress on HSPCs mobilization in human liver transplantation (LTx) recipients remains under-investigated.MethodsPeripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples were longitudinally collected from pre- to post-LTx for one year from 36 recipients with acute rejection (AR), 74 recipients without rejection (NR), and 5 recipients with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). 28 PBMC samples from age-matched healthy donors were collected as healthy control (HC). Multi-color flow cytometry (MCFC) was used to immunophenotype HSPCs and their subpopulations. Donor recipient-distinguishable major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antibodies determined cell origin.ResultsBefore LTx, patients who developed AR after transplant contained more HSPCs in PBMC samples than HC, while the NR group patients contained fewer HSPCs than HC. After LTx, the HSPC ratio in the AR group sharply decreased and became less than HC within six months, and dropped to a comparable NR level afterward. During the one-year follow-up period, myeloid progenitors (MPs) biased differentiation was observed in all LTx recipients who were under tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive treatment. During both AR and GVHD episodes, the recipient-derived and donor-derived HSPCs mobilized into the recipient’s blood-circulation and migrated to the target tissue, respectively. The HSPCs percentage in blood reduced after the disease was cured.ConclusionsA preoperative high HSPC ratio in blood characterizes recipients who developed AR after LTx. Recipients exhibited a decline in blood-circulating HSPCs after transplant, the cells mobilized into the blood and migrated to target tissue during alloresponse.

AMPK-mediated regulation of endogenous cholesterol synthesis does not affect atherosclerosis in a murine Pcsk9-AAV model

Background and aimsDysregulated cholesterol metabolism is a hallmark of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases, yet our understanding of how endogenous cholesterol synthesis affects atherosclerosis is not clear. The energy sensor AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) phosphorylates and inhibits the rate-limiting enzyme in the mevalonate pathway HMG-CoA reductase (HMGCR). Recent work demonstrated that when AMPK-HMGCR signaling was compromised in an Apoe-/- model of hypercholesterolemia, atherosclerosis was exacerbated due to elevated hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell mobilization and myelopoiesis. We sought to validate the significance of the AMPK-HMGCR signaling axis in atherosclerosis using a non-germline hypercholesterolemia model with functional ApoE. MethodsMale and female HMGCR S871A knock-in (KI) mice and wild-type (WT) littermate controls were made atherosclerotic by intravenous injection of a gain-of-function Pcsk9D374Y-adeno-associated virus followed by high-fat and high-cholesterol atherogenic western diet feeding for 16 weeks. ResultsAMPK activation suppressed endogenous cholesterol synthesis in primary bone marrow-derived macrophages from WT but not HMGCR KI mice, without changing other parameters of cholesterol regulation. Atherosclerotic plaque area was unchanged between WT and HMGCR KI mice, independent of sex. Correspondingly, there were no phenotypic differences observed in hematopoietic progenitors or differentiated immune cells in the bone marrow, blood, or spleen, and no significant changes in systemic markers of inflammation. When lethally irradiated female mice were transplanted with KI bone marrow, there was similar plaque content relative to WT. ConclusionsGiven previous work, our study demonstrates the importance of preclinical atherosclerosis model comparison and brings into question the importance of AMPK-mediated control of cholesterol synthesis in atherosclerosis.

Survivors of polymicrobial sepsis are refractory to G-CSF-induced emergency myelopoiesis and hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell mobilization

Sepsis survivors exhibit immune dysfunction, hematological changes, and increased risk of infection. The long-term impacts of sepsis on hematopoiesis were analyzed using a surgical model of murine sepsis, resulting in 50% survival. During acute disease, phenotypic hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) were reduced in the bone marrow (BM), concomitant with increased myeloid colony-forming units and extramedullary hematopoiesis. Upon recovery, BM HSPCs were increased and exhibited normal function in the context of transplantation. To evaluate hematopoietic responses in sepsis survivors, we treated recovered sham and cecal ligation and puncture mice with a mobilizing regimen of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) at day 20 post-surgery. Sepsis survivors failed to undergo emergency myelopoiesis and HSPC mobilization in response to G-CSF administration. G-CSF is produced in response to acute infection and injury to expedite the production of innate immune cells; therefore, our findings contribute to a new understanding of how sepsis predisposes to subsequent infection.

Effect of voxelotor on murine bone marrow and peripheral blood with hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization for gene therapy of sickle cell disease

In preparation for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and collection, current ex vivo gene therapy protocols for sickle cell disease require patients to undergo several months of chronic red cell transfusion. For health care equity, alternatives to red cell transfusion should be available. We examined whether treatment with GBT1118, the murine analog of voxelotor, could be a safe and feasible alternative to red cell transfusion. We found that 3 weeks of treatment with GBT1118 increased the percentage of bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells and upon plerixafor mobilization, the percentage of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells. Our data suggest that voxelotor should be further explored for its potential safety and utility as preparation for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and collection.

Resource Utilization Analysis of Two Algorithms for Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma

Background: Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a standard of care after induction therapy for multiple myeloma (MM). A key step in this procedure is the mobilization and collection of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC). HPC mobilization typically uses G-CSF with or without the CXCR4 antagonist Plerixafor (P). Although P increases the effectiveness of mobilization and may reduce the number of apheresis sessions, it is associated with significantly increased cost per dose. There is significant heterogeneity to HPC collection algorithms across institutions and there is no clear standard. At the Cleveland Clinic, our HPC collection algorithm was updated in an effort to reduce the use and associated cost of P. The criteria for initiating P became more stringent and far fewer patients were initiated on P prior to their first session of HPC collection apheresis. Prior to October 2017, patients were initiated on P if any 1 of the following criteria were met: age>60 years, prior treatment with melphalan or other alkylating therapy, prior treatment with lenalidomide >2 cycles, extensive bone marrow disease, or platelet count <100K. Starting October 1, 2017, patients were preemptively initiated on P prior to first collection only if all 3 of the following criteria were met: age > 65 years, lenalidomide > 6 cycles, and platelet count < 100K. However, P was added after the first apheresis session if peripheral blood CD34+ cell count was <20/uL or HPC yield was unsatisfactory (<2 x 10^6 CD34+ cells). Furthermore, target CD34 yield was decreased from 5 to 4 x 10^6 CD34+ cells. Herein, we perform a comparative resource utilization analysis of HPC collection at our center. Methods: We retrospectively collected HPC mobilization data on patients undergoing HCT for MM from 1/12014 to 12/31/2020. We determined the number of P doses, number of apheresis sessions, and HPC collection totals per patient. Patient characteristics were summarized in median, interquartile range (IQR), or frequencies and percentages as appropriate. Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to compare variables in patients undergoing mobilization prior to versus after 10/1/2017. All tests were two-sided and p-values of 0.05 or less were considered statistically significant. Results: 219 patients underwent HPC mobilization from 1/1/2014 to 9/30/2017 and 251 patients underwent mobilization after algorithm change from 10/1/2017 to 12/31/2020. As anticipated, the protocol change decreased the number of patients receiving P prior to their first apheresis session. 91% received P prior to the first apheresis session before the change while 14% received this initial dose of P after the change. Prior to the change 51% of patients completed collection in 1 day, 30% completed in 2 days, 12 % completed in 3 days, and 7% completed in 4 days or more. These figures changed to 20%, 41%, 23%, and 17% respectively following the change (p<0.0001) Median day 1 peripheral blood CD34 count decreased from 63 to 19 cells/uL while median day 1 CD34 collection yield fell from 4.8 to 1.46 x 10^6 after the change (p<0.0001) (Table 1). Total CD34 collection yield also decreased from a median of 6.64 to 4.6 x 10^6 CD34+ cells (p<0.0001). However, the target yield was decreased from 5 to 4 x 10^6 CD34+ cells as described above. The number of doses of P per patient decreased after the change (pre-change median dose / patient = 1, IQR = 1-2) (post-change median dose / patient = 1, IQR = 0-2) (p=0.004). The average number of apheresis sessions required per patient increased following the change (pre-change median apheresis sessions = 1, IQR = 1-2) (median post change apheresis sessions = 2, IQR = 2-3) (p<0.0001) (Figure 1). Conclusion: Changes to our institutional HPC mobilization algorithm led to a substantial decrease in the use of preemptive P prior to day 1 of collection by design. The resulting decrease in total doses of P per patient was smaller than expected, although still statistically significant. However, this was offset by a concomitant significant increase in the number of apheresis sessions required per patient despite a lower collection target. Based on these results, a cost analysis is ongoing in order to re-evaluate our institutional algorithm.

Combination of Propranolol and a Novel CXCR4 Antagonist Burixafor (GPC-100) for Enhanced Hematopoietic Cell Mobilization

Burixafor (GPC-100), a novel CXCR4 antagonist, has shown safe and effective mobilization of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) in a phase I clinical study. In multiple myeloma patients, GPC-100 combined with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) elicited a significant increase in circulating HSPCs that was comparable with the historical results from G-CSF plus the CXCR4 antagonist plerixafor. GPC-100 is currently being investigated for HSPC mobilization in combination with the FDA-approved ß-adrenergic receptor (ß-AR) blocker propranolol in a phase II clinical trial for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in multiple myeloma. Here, we present preclinical findings indicating that the addition of propranolol to GPC-100 alone or GPC-100 and G-CSF combination can address the unmet needs of patients undergoing mobilization. Additionally, we show an enhanced and unique pattern of lymphoid cell mobilization that may have applications in adoptive cell therapies. Compared to chemotherapy, ASCT significantly improves survival in multiple myeloma patients. Because HSPCs constitute a very small fraction (~ 0.1%) of circulating mononuclear cells, it is critical to mobilize a sufficient number of HSPC into peripheral blood during the ASCT process. Current therapies for HSPC mobilization include G-CSF as a monotherapy or combined with plerixafor. However, mobilization failure is experienced by 15-50% patients, leading to potential loss of ASCT as a treatment option and significant toxicity from repeated mobilization attempts. Moreover, G-CSF is contraindicated in sickle cell disease and may exacerbate autoimmune diseases. Therefore, our goal is to identify novel strategies that will not only address the mobilization failure, but also explore non-G-CSF options for adequate mobilization. G protein-coupled receptors like CXCR4 can form heteromers with other receptors and result in altered signaling pathways. Using Proximity Ligation Assay in Namalwa (lymphoma) cells, we show that endogenously expressed CXCR4 and ß 2AR form heteromers, which are absent in CXCR4 knockout cells. In cell-based assays, co-activation of both receptors with their respective ligands, CXCL12 and epinephrine, leads to a synergistic increase in calcium flux (Figure 1) as well as ß-arrestin recruitment, indicating functional consequences of the heteromerization. Complete blockade of this enhanced signaling is only achieved with co-inhibition by both antagonists. Like CXCR4, ß 2AR is also expressed by HSPCs, and in lymph nodes was shown to heteromerize with CXCR4 to increase lymphocyte retention. In multiple myeloma patients, propranolol upregulated stem-cell like gene signature. Therefore, we sought to understand the effects of propranolol on HSPC mobilization by GPC-100. In mice, single injection of GPC-100 effectively mobilized hematopoietic stem cells characterized as Lin negSca1 +cKit +(LSK) cells as well as mature Lin negCD34 + progenitor cells by 2-4-fold, respectively. Seven-day pretreatment with propranolol enhanced LSK cell mobilization by GPC-100 resulting in a 4-fold increase in circulating HSPCs (Figure 2). Addition of propranolol to G-CSF and GPC-100 led to 8-17-fold increases in mobilization of long-term repopulating HSCs (CD34 negLSK and CD150 +LSK), which were greater than the 4-7-fold increases elicited by G-CSF and G-CSF with plerixafor. Additionally, propranolol enhanced GPC-100 induced mobilization of white blood cells, neutrophils, and lymphocytes (Figure 2). Immune cell subset analyses revealed that GPC-100 induced a 3-fold increase in circulating CD8 +T cells, which was increased to 7-fold when combined with propranolol (Figure 2). For comparison, plerixafor increased CD8 + T cell mobilization by only 2-fold. GPC-100 induced mobilization of NK and B cells was also improved by propranolol. These pre-clinical data support our phase II clinical trial currently in progress (NCT05561751). In the first arm of this two-arm trial, GPC-100 is combined with orally administered propranolol, and in the second arm, G-CSF is added to this combination. We anticipate that our clinical studies can fill the gap in the current standard of care without adding a significant financial burden or co-morbidities. Furthermore, enhanced mobilization of CD8+ T cells can provide extended opportunities for improved adoptive cell therapies.

EFFECTS OF TRAUMA PLASMA-DERIVED EXOSOMES ON HEMATOPOIETIC PROGENITOR CELLS.

Background: Severe trauma disrupts bone marrow function resulting in persistent anemia and immunosuppression. Exosomes are extracellular vesicles implicated in disease, cellular functions, and immunomodulation. The effects of trauma plasma-derived exosomes on bone marrow hematopoiesis are unstudied; we hypothesized that trauma plasma-derived exosomes suppress bone marrow hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) growth and contribute to increased inflammatory cytokines and HPC mobilization. Methods: Plasma was collected from a prospective, cohort study of trauma patients (n = 15) with hip and/or femur fractures and an ISS > 15 and elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients (n = 15). Exosomes were isolated from both groups using the Invitrogen Total Exosome Isolation Kit. Healthy bone marrow was cultured with 2% plasma, 50 μg, 100 μg, or 200 μg of exosomal protein and HPC (granulocyte, erythrocyte, monocyte, megakaryocyte colony-forming units [CFU-GEMM], erythroid burst-forming units [BFU-E], and macrophage colony-forming units [CFU-GM]) growth assessed. After culturing healthy bone marrow stroma with 100 μg of exosomal protein, expression of cytokines and factors influencing HPC mobilization were assessed by qPCR. Differences were compared using the ANOVA, with significance defined as P < 0.05. Results: The only demographic difference was age; trauma patients were significantly younger than THA (mean 44 vs. 63 years). In vitro exposure to trauma plasma significantly decreased growth of all HPCs. In vitro exposure to 100 μg or 200 μg of trauma exosomal protein significantly decreased growth of BFU-E and CFU-GM, whereas 50 μg had no effect. Culture of trauma exosomal protein with bone marrow stromal cells resulted in increased expression of IFN-γ, IL-1α, TNF-α, G-CSF, CXCR4, SDF-1, and VCAM-1 in bone marrow stroma. Conclusions: Both plasma and plasma-derived exosomes from trauma patients adversely affect bone marrow function. Plasma-derived exosomes may contribute to altered hematopoiesis after severe trauma; analysis of exosomal content may improve our understanding of altered bone marrow function.

Mobilization of Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells during Dengue Virus Infection.

Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) mobilization is the movement of HSPCs from the bone marrow to the peripheral blood or tissue induced by stress. HSPC mobilization is a well-known response to protect the host during infection through urgent differentiation of HSPCs to immune cells. Dengue virus (DENV) infection is known to cause stress in infected humans and the mobilizing capacity of HSPCs during DENV infection in affected patients has not been fully investigated. Here, we investigated whether DENV infection can induce HSPC mobilization and if the mobilized HSPCs are permissive to DENV infection. White blood cells (WBCs) were collected from dengue patients (DENV+) and healthy donors and analyzed by flow cytometry and plaque assay. Elevated HSPCs levels were found in the WBCs of the DENV+ group when compared to the healthy group. Mobilization of HSPCs and homing markers (skin and gut) expression decreased as the patients proceeded from dengue without symptoms (DWoWS) to severe dengue (SD). Mobilizing HSPCs were not only permissive to DENV infection, but infectious DENV could be recovered after coculture. Our results highlight the need for further investigation into HSPC mobilization or alterations of hematopoiesis during viral infections such as DENV in order to develop appropriate countermeasures.

Handling of Allogeneic HPC Grafts in European Transplant Centers during the COVID-19 Pandemic - a Survey from the Infectious Diseases and Cellular Therapy & Immunobiology Working Parties of the EBMT

Background: For more than two years, the COVID-19 pandemic has had detrimental impact on medical practices. Because of its intrinsic complexity, the delivery of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in this context represents an enormous challenge. Transplant centers have adapted promptly and developed strategies to enable safe HCT, by introducing significant changes in their procedures, e.g. through changes in donor types and an unprecedented use of cryopreservation for allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) grafts. Methods: To explore how centers modified their strategies in terms of donor selection and implementation of new procedures (e.g. SARS-CoV-2 test strategy, cryopreservation), a 14-item survey was developed by the Infectious Disease (IDWP) & Cellular Therapy & Immunobiology (CTIWP) working parties of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). The survey was sent to 509 EBMT-affiliated allogeneic HCT in Q2, 2011 and re-opened between January 31st and March 18th, 2022 to also cover changes during to the infection period with the Omicron variant. Results: One hundred thirty-five of 509 (27%) centers from 31countries responded. Seventy-four percent of centers introduced COVID-19 mitigation measures for their donors (e.g. physical and social distancing) to minimize the risk of infection. Thirty-four percent of centers changed their donor search strategy, and favored recruitment of related haploidentical donors over unrelated donors (URD). In addition, 33% and 50% of centers searched for a backup donor in the related and URD settings, respectively. Only 10 (7.4 %) of centers resorted to cord blood (CB) as an alternative source to URD. Of these, four centers where pediatric centers and three, pediatric and adult transplant centers. Before COVID-19, only ten of 135 centers (7.4%) were routinely cryopreserving HPC products, whereas this percentage increased to 90% (122/135) during the pandemic. In details, 84/122 (69%) of centers cryopreserved both related and URD grafts, 34 (28%) only URD and 4 (3%) related grafts only. One hundred twenty centers responded during the re-opening of the survey to cover the situation during the Omicron wave. Of those, 78% were still considering graft cryopreservation, whereas 18/26 (70%) of centers not using cryopreservation during the Omicron wave used it before that period. In the majority of centers, changes in policies were introduced based on EBMT recommendations (88/117; 75%) and/or national guidelines (73/117; 62%). Bone marrow (BM) grafts were avoided by 52 (39%) centers (possibly because of the notorious low recovery percentage of cryopreserved BM progenitor cells). In the study period, a total of 4,443 related and 4,586 URD transplants have been reported. Of these transplants, 62% (n=2,748) related and 71% (n=3,254) of URD grafts have been cryopreserved pre-emptively and infused in the vast majority of cases. Sixty-four (2.3 %) related and hundred-eight (3.3 %) URD cryopreserved products have not been infused during the observation period. Release criteria for cryopreserved products in terms of COVID-19 were based on a negative SARS-CoV-2 test (not further specified) in 58/121 (48%), interview of the donor (medical history) in 4/121 (3%), and both in 38/121 (31%) of centers. Eighty-eight centers reported on their test strategy for related donors (multiple answers possible). A SARS-CoV-2 test was performed during check-up in 43% (38/88), before HPC mobilization in 63% (55/88) and before HPC collection in 41% (36/88) centers. Test strategies for URD were not covered by the survey. Conclusions: These data are limited by the low number of respondents, but show a historical increase in cryopreservation of allogeneic HPC grafts during the first three waves of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, more in URD than in related donor grafts. The use of BM decreased, and CB grafts were not used as an alternative at most centers. A significant proportion of cryopreserved products (2.8%) were not infused. The reason for this is under investigation. The clinical impact of allogeneic cryopreserved HPCs has to be further analyzed in a larger cohort of patients.

Optimized Small Molecule VLA-4 Inhibitors for Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cell Mobilization

Optimized Small Molecule VLA-4 Inhibitors for Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cell Mobilization

A comparison of four leukapheresis methods to harvest an optimal dose of CD34+ cells: A single center experience

Chemokine receptor CXCR4 antagonist plerixafor (Px) as well as high volume (HV) leukapheresis have been shown to reduce hematopoietic stem progenitor cell (HSPC) mobilization failure rates. However, no direct comparisons of such methods currently exists. We compared the HSPC collection yield based on basal peripheral blood CD34+ cell numbers in patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation in a retrospective chart review. The leukapheresis methods used included HV versus regular volume (RV) with or without Px. There were 116 patients in the study group while the historical control group had 34 patients. Control group underwent RV leukapheresis without Px. Addition of Px or HV in the study group failed to display significant improvement in CD34+ cell collection yield; however, when basal CD34+ cell numbers were taken into account, both Px + RV and HV without Px increased CD34+ cell collection yield. The collection failure rates of HV without Px group were comparable to Px + RV when the basal CD34+ cell numbers were over 20/μl. Of interest, multivariate linear regression analysis did not detect any significant difference between HV versus Px + RV or other leukapheresis methods in CD34 yields or collection failure rates from a single collection after controlling for other factors (sex, age, or underlying disease). In multivariate analysis, pre apheresis CD34+ cell number was significantly and positively associated with the CD34+ cell yields from a single apheresis. In our studies, the majority of patients can be rescued without Px by HV alone as a potential cost saving approach. In summary, trend in our studies reflects that both Px and HV are capable of reducing the mobilization failure rates except the poorest mobilizers, which will need to be validated in larger studies.

Quantitative Analysis of Sympathetic and Nociceptive Innervation Across Bone Marrow Regions in Mice

Bone marrow (BM) innervation regulates the mobilization of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) from BM and stress hematopoiesis either by acting directly on HSPCs or by altering the niche function of mesenchymal and endothelial cells. However, the spatial distribution of BM innervation across bone regions is yet to be fully elucidated. Thus, we aimed to characterize the distribution of sympathetic and nociceptive nerves in each bone and BM region using three-dimensional quantitative microscopy. We discovered that sympathetic and nociceptive nerves were the major fibers throughout the BM. Compared with other femoral regions, central parts of the femoral BM were more densely innervated by both sympathetic and nociceptive nerves. Each region of the sternum was similarly innervated by sympathetic and nociceptive nerves. Further, the majority of sympathetic and nociceptive nerves in the BM ran parallel with arteries and arterioles, whereas the degree varied according to the bone type or BM region. In conclusion, this study provides spatial, topological, and functional information on BM innervation in a quantitative manner and illustrates that sympathetic and nociceptive nerves are two major components in BM innervation, mostly associated with arteries and arterioles.

Comparison Between Standard and High Dose of G-CSF for Mobilization of Hematopoietic Progenitors Cells in Patients and Healthy Donors.

A standard dose of 10 µg/kg/day granulocyte colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) is currently recommended for hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) mobilization. Our aim was to analyze whether certain patients or healthy donors could benefit from high dose of G-CSF.We performed a retrospective multicenter analysis of HPCs mobilization procedures (2015-2020) in patients and healthy donors. Those who received standard dose of G-CSF (10 µg/Kg/day for 4 days to patients and healthy donors) and those that received higher dose (24 µg/Kg/day for 4 days to patients and 16 µg/Kg/day for 4 days to healthy donors) were compared.496 individuals were included (201 standard dose and 295 higher dose). Between standard or higher dose, we did not find significant differences in median number of mobilized CD34+ cells/mL, neither among healthy donors (77 100 vs 75 500 respectively, P=.895), nor in patients (34 270 vs 33 704 respectively, P=.584). Additionally, among those with the same underlaying pathology the comparison between standard and higher dose did not showed differences. High G-CSF dose was not associated with a less frequent incidence of poor mobilizers (<20 000 CD34+ cells/mL) neither in healthy donors (1 [1.3%] vs 0; P=.218) nor patients (30 [24.4%] vs 32 [18.1%]; P=.165). Multivariate analysis showed that age, gender, and G-CSF dose did not influence median number of mobilized CD34+ cells/mL in healthy donors or patients. However, the underlying pathology among patients significantly influenced the CD34+ cells mobilization. In healthy donors, cellular blood count showed significantly higher leukocytes and platelets count with G-CSF high-dose, while in patients just a higher platelets count was found. To conclude, high dose of G-CSF compared to standard dose did not show significant benefit in terms of mobilization of CD34+ cells in healthy donors or in patients, also without a decrease in the incidence of poor mobilizers.

Mechanisms of improved erythroid progenitor growth with removal of chronic stress after trauma

BackgroundErythropoietic dysfunction after trauma and critical illness is associated with anemia, persistent inflammation, increased hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization from the bone marrow, and reduced erythroid progenitor growth. Yet the duration and reversibility of these postinjury bone marrow changes remain unknown. This study sought to determine whether removal of chronic postinjury stress could induce improvements in erythroid progenitor growth. MethodsSprague-Dawley rats (n = 8–11/group) were assigned to the following: naïve, lung contusion and hemorrhagic shock, lung contusion and hemorrhagic shock plus daily chronic stress for 7 days followed by 7 days of routine handling to allow recovery (lung contusion and hemorrhagic shock + chronic stress 7), or lung contusion and hemorrhagic shock plus chronic stress for 14 days (lung contusion and hemorrhagic shock + chronic stress 14). Circulating CD117+CD71+ erythroid progenitors were detected by flow cytometry. Rodents were killed on day 14, and bone marrow erythroid progenitor growth and erythroid transcription factors were assessed. Differences were assessed by analysis of variance (P < .05). ResultsCompared to lung contusion and hemorrhagic shock + chronic stress 14, lung contusion and hemorrhagic shock + chronic stress 7 rodents had improved hemoglobin (8% ± 10% increase vs 6% ± 10% decrease) with fewer mobilized erythroid progenitors (898 × vs 1,524 cells), lower granulocyte-colony stimulating factor levels (3.1 ± 1.1 × pg/mL vs 5.9 ± 1.8 pg/mL), and improved erythroid progenitor growth. Cessation of stress had no impact on erythroid transcription factors GATA-1, GATA-2, LMO2, or KLF1. ConclusionImprovements in erythroid progenitor growth and reduced hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization were seen 7 days after cessation of chronic stress and were associated with an improvement in hemoglobin. Early bone marrow erythropoietic functional recovery may result from resolution of hematopoietic progenitor mobilization rather than upregulation of pro-erythroid transcription factors. This study suggests that postinjury anemia is reversible and has the potential to improve with the cessation of stress.

Superior physical and mental health of healthy volunteers before and five\xa0years after mobilized stem cell donation

BackgroundSafety, tolerability and efficacy of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for mobilization of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) from healthy donors have been conclusively demonstrated. This explicitly includes, albeit for smaller cohorts and shorter observation periods, biosimilar G-CSFs. HSPC donation is non-remunerated, its sole reward being “warm glow”, hence harm to donors must be avoided with maximal certitude. To ascertain, therefore, long-term physical and mental health effects of HSPC donation, a cohort of G-CSF mobilized donors was followed longitudinally.MethodsWe enrolled 245 healthy volunteers in this bi-centric long-term surveillance study. 244 healthy volunteers began mobilization with twice-daily Sandoz biosimilar filgrastim and 242 underwent apheresis after G-CSF mobilization. Physical and mental health were followed up over a period of 5-years using the validated SF-12 health questionnaire.ResultsBaseline physical and mental health of HSPC donors was markedly better than in a healthy reference population matched for ethnicity, sex and age. Physical, but not mental health was sharply diminished at the time of apheresis, likely due to side effects of biosimilar G-CSF, however had returned to pre-apheresis values by the next follow-up appointment after 6 months. Physical and mental health slightly deteriorated over time with kinetics reflecting the known effects of aging. Hence, superior physical and mental health compared to the general healthy non-donor population was maintained over time.ConclusionsHSPC donors are of better overall physical and mental health than the average healthy non-donor. Superior well-being is maintained over time, supporting the favorable risk–benefit assessment of volunteer HSPC donation.Trial registration National Clinical Trial NCT01766934

Tumor-Associated Macrophages in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Pathogenesis, Prognosis and Therapy.

Simple SummaryHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) constitutes a major health burden, accounting for >80% of primary liver cancers globally. Inflammation has come into the spotlight as a hallmark of cancer, and it is evident that tumor-associated inflammation drives the involvement of monocytes in tumor growth and metastasis. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) actively participate in tumor-related inflammation, representing the main type of inflammatory cells in the tumor microenvironment, setting the crosstalk between tumor and stromal cells. Infiltrating TAMs exert either anti-tumorigenic (M1) or pro-tumorigenic (M2) functions. In most solid human tumors, increased TAM infiltration has been associated with enhanced tumor growth and metastasis, while other studies showcase that under certain conditions, TAMs exhibit cytotoxic and tumoricidal activity, inhibiting the progression of cancer. In this review, we summarize the current evidence on the role of macrophages in the pathogenesis and progression of HCC and we highlight their potential utilization in HCC prognosis and therapy.Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) constitutes a major health burden globally, and it is caused by intrinsic genetic mutations acting in concert with a multitude of epigenetic and extrinsic risk factors. Cancer induces myelopoiesis in the bone marrow, as well as the mobilization of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, which reside in the spleen. Monocytes produced in the bone marrow and the spleen further infiltrate tumors, where they differentiate into tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). The relationship between chronic inflammation and hepatocarcinogenesis has been thoroughly investigated over the past decade; however, several aspects of the role of TAMs in HCC development are yet to be determined. In response to certain stimuli and signaling, monocytes differentiate into macrophages with antitumor properties, which are classified as M1-like. On the other hand, under different stimuli and signaling, the polarization of macrophages shifts towards an M2-like phenotype with a tumor promoting capacity. M2-like macrophages drive tumor growth both directly and indirectly, via the suppression of cytotoxic cell populations, including CD8+ T cells and NK cells. The tumor microenvironment affects the response to immunotherapies. Therefore, an enhanced understanding of its immunobiology is essential for the development of next-generation immunotherapies. The utilization of various monocyte-centered anticancer treatment modalities has been under clinical investigation, selectively targeting and modulating the processes of monocyte recruitment, activation and migration. This review summarizes the current evidence on the role of TAMs in HCC pathogenesis and progression, as well as in their potential involvement in tumor therapy, shedding light on emerging anticancer treatment methods targeting monocytes.

3057 – HIGH SALT DIETS PROMOTE A TH17 CELL DRIVEN GUT-BONE AXIS TO REGULATE HAEMATOPOIESIS AND ATHEROSCLEROSIS

Salt intake is often associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease through its relationship with hypertension. However, a high salt diet (HSD) can directly modulate immune cells. We found that a HSD increases IL-17A-producing T helper (TH17) cells in the bone marrow (BM), which promotes hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) mobilization into the spleen, expanding the population of atherogenic monocytes to impact atherosclerosis. Next, we wanted to explore how a HSD increases TH17 cells in the BM. As salt is first sensed in the gut, we questioned if TH¬17 cells arose from the gut to influence the BM. We placed WT mice on a normal salt diet (NSD) or a HSD for 6 weeks and discovered that a HSD promotes gut permeability, increases gut TH17 cells and causes microbial dysbiosis. To explore how the HSD-induced effects in the gut influences HSPC mobilization, we first blocked TH17 cell migration from the gut with anti-CCL20. This resulted in a reduction in TH17 cells in the BM and HSPC mobilization. We then blocked intestinal permeability using AT-1001, demonstrating that dampening permeability prevented HSD-induced HSPC mobilization. Moreover, restoring the microbiome with prebiotics increased microbial diversity, decreased gut permeability and TH17 cell abundance, which was associated with a reduction in BM TH17 cells and HSPC mobilization. Finally, to determine how dampening gut inflammation influences HSD-induced atherosclerosis, we placed Apoe-/- mice on a NSD or HSD with or without prebiotics for 12 weeks. We found that supplementing HSD-fed mice with prebiotics not only decreased TH17 cells in the gut, blood, and BM, but also prevented HSPC mobilization from the BM to the blood and spleen, thereby reducing myelopoiesis and atherosclerosis. This suggests that targeting the gut using prebiotics can reduce TH17-driven myelopoiesis and atherosclerosis. Salt intake is often associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease through its relationship with hypertension. However, a high salt diet (HSD) can directly modulate immune cells. We found that a HSD increases IL-17A-producing T helper (TH17) cells in the bone marrow (BM), which promotes hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) mobilization into the spleen, expanding the population of atherogenic monocytes to impact atherosclerosis. Next, we wanted to explore how a HSD increases TH17 cells in the BM. As salt is first sensed in the gut, we questioned if TH¬17 cells arose from the gut to influence the BM. We placed WT mice on a normal salt diet (NSD) or a HSD for 6 weeks and discovered that a HSD promotes gut permeability, increases gut TH17 cells and causes microbial dysbiosis. To explore how the HSD-induced effects in the gut influences HSPC mobilization, we first blocked TH17 cell migration from the gut with anti-CCL20. This resulted in a reduction in TH17 cells in the BM and HSPC mobilization. We then blocked intestinal permeability using AT-1001, demonstrating that dampening permeability prevented HSD-induced HSPC mobilization. Moreover, restoring the microbiome with prebiotics increased microbial diversity, decreased gut permeability and TH17 cell abundance, which was associated with a reduction in BM TH17 cells and HSPC mobilization. Finally, to determine how dampening gut inflammation influences HSD-induced atherosclerosis, we placed Apoe-/- mice on a NSD or HSD with or without prebiotics for 12 weeks. We found that supplementing HSD-fed mice with prebiotics not only decreased TH17 cells in the gut, blood, and BM, but also prevented HSPC mobilization from the BM to the blood and spleen, thereby reducing myelopoiesis and atherosclerosis. This suggests that targeting the gut using prebiotics can reduce TH17-driven myelopoiesis and atherosclerosis.

DNA methylation is involved in the microRNA-886-3p gene expression and plays a potential role in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell mobilization through affecting SDF-1

The role of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) mobilization has been largely investigated. However, there is a critical need for the identification of the underlying contributing factors to improve HSPC yield for transplantation. It has been demonstrated that miR-886-3p targets stromal-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), the central mediator of mobilization, and therefore may play a part in this process. Besides, miR-886-3p expression can be epigenetically regulated through DNA methylation modifications inits gene promoter. Here, to assess the contribution of miR-886-3p and other epigenetic factors in HSPC mobilization, human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were treated with the β-adrenergic agonist of isoprenaline. The expression of miR-886-3p and SDF-1and the gene promoter methylation status of this miRNA were then respectively evaluated through the appropriate PCR techniques. As expected, despite a transient initial increase in SDF-1mRNA level, its expression reduced, and miR-886-3plevel remarkably increased 48 h following treatment. The gene promoter methylation pattern of miR-886-3p also changed from a full methylated state to a partially methylated one. Together, our findings suggest that miR-886-3p can be epigenetically regulated and through suppressing the expression of SDF-1 play an active role in the SNS-mediated HSPC mobilization.