Mobilization Intervention Research Articles

The Critical Role of the 4th “P”: Addressing the Impact of “Otherness” on Human Trafficking Prevention Efforts

ABSTRACT Prevention is the key to reducing human trafficking prevalence, and awareness-raising campaigns are the most common form of trafficking intervention; however, there is little evidence that these activities translate to actions that prevent human trafficking. The “otherness” issue – the belief that human trafficking is a problem for “other” communities but not a problem within one’s own community – has been identified as a potential barrier to effective human trafficking prevention interventions. In this article, we unpack the “otherness” issue and build on Todres (2009) “otherness-aware” framework to develop a theoretical model for understanding otherness within the context of human trafficking prevention interventions. Drawing on evidence from public health, we discuss the community mobilization intervention framework, which is centered on partnership and community engagement, as a potentially useful strategy for addressing the “otherness” issue and improving the effectiveness of human trafficking prevention interventions. We conclude that meaningful partnership with communities is a key to developing contextually relevant, community-empowering approaches to prevent human trafficking. This article has implications for achieving UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 16, which aims to support inclusive communities through targets such as reducing violence, ending human trafficking and amplifying developing countries’ participation in global decision-making.

Plantar massage or ankle mobilization do not alter gait biomechanics in those with chronic ankle instability: a randomized controlled trial

ABSTRACT Objectives Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is characterized by persistent neuromechanical impairments following an initial lateral ankle sprain. Ankle joint mobilization and plantar massage have improved the range of motion and static postural control in those with CAI. This study aimed to determine the impact of two-week joint mobilization and plantar massage interventions on gait kinematics and kinetics in individuals with CAI. Methods A single-blind randomized trial was conducted with 60 participants with CAI, randomized into three groups: joint mobilization (n = 20), plantar massage (n = 20), and control (n = 20). The two treatment groups received six 5-min sessions manual therapy over a 2-week, while the control group received no intervention. Gait biomechanics were assessed on an instrumented treadmill before and after the intervention using 3D kinematics and kinetics analysis. Analyses compared biomechanical outcomes from each treatment group to the control group individually using a 1-dimensional statistical parametric mapping. The alpha level was set at p < 0.05. Results Eighteen participants per group were part of the final analysis. No significant main or interactions effects were found for ankle sagittal or frontal plane positions following either intervention (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). COP location relative to the lateral border of the foot also did not change (p > 0.05). Conclusion The findings suggest that two-week joint mobilization and plantar massage interventions do not significantly alter gait biomechanics in individuals with CAI. These results support the need for gait-specific interventions to modify biomechanics in this population.

Immediate Effects of Kinesio Tape and Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization on Pain and Proprioception in Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to compare the immediate effects of single-session Kinesio Tape (KT) and instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) interventions on pain and proprioception in patients with chronic neck pain (CNP). MethodsForty patients with CNP aged 21 to 44 years were included in this study. The participants were divided into 2 groups as the IASTM and KT groups. The participants in the KT group took part in one session of KT application to the trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscles, while those in the IASTM group took part in one session of IASTM application to the same muscles. The pain levels of the participants during activity were recorded using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and their cervical region proprioception levels were assessed using the Cervical Range of Motion device. Pain severity and proprioception were assessed before and after the interventions. ResultsNo statistically significant difference was found between the pretreatment pain and proprioception values of the 2 groups (P > .05). After the treatments, there was a significant improvement in proprioception in both groups (P ≤ .001). Similarly, there was a significant improvement in VAS values in both groups after the treatments (P ≤ .001). The VAS and proprioception values of the 2 groups were not significantly different in the post-treatment measurements (P > .05). ConclusionIt was concluded that the IASTM and KT interventions had an immediate effect on pain and proprioception in the participants who had CNP, while neither intervention was superior to the other.

Randomized controlled trial on ankle biomechanics in the treatment of functional ankle instability with joint mobilization

Functional ankle instability (FAI) patients often experience restricted ankle dorsiflexion, increased inversion angle, and elevated ground reaction forces during walking, all related to altered kinematics of the talocrural and subtalar joints. This study aimed to investigate the potential positive impact of joint mobilization on FAI patients from a biomechanical perspective. The experimental group (EG, n = 17; Age: 20.06 ± 1.34 years; Height: 1.74 ± 0.07 m; Weight: 69.79 ± 11.20 kg; BMI:22.88 ± 2.63 kg/m2; CAIT:15.59 ± 2.58; M/F: 15/2) received joint mobilization + routine rehabilitation training, while the control group (CG, n = 16; Age: 20.50 ± 0.73 years; Height: 1.73 ± 0.09 m; Weight: 64.59 ± 7.21 kg; BMI: 21.65 ± 2.47 kg/m2; CAIT: 16.75 ± 2.21; M/F: 14/2) only received regular rehabilitation training. Biomechanical tests were performed in both groups after the 4-week intervention. The spatial parameters during walking (including step length, stride length, step width, step time, cadence, step speed, support time, and swing time), ankle flexion and dorsiflexion angle, inversion, and eversion angles, internal and external rotation angles, ankle torque, as well as the vertical ground reaction force were measured before and after the intervention. The results of the two-way ANOVA showed that the main effect of time was significant for step length (P < 0.001), stride length (P = 0.008), step speed (P < 0.001), the sagittal plane angle at touchdown (P < 0.001), maximum dorsiflexion angle (P = 0.005), sagittal plane toe off-ground angle (P < 0.001), peak flexion-dorsiflexion torque (P = 0.033), the first peak vGRF (P = 0.013), and second peak vGRF (P = 0.011). The main effect of Time * Group was significant for step speed (P = 0.044). The EG demonstrated significant improvements in step speed (P = 0.047), maximum dorsiflexion angle (P = 0.047), and the first peak vGRF (P = 0.028) compared to the CG. This study reveals that joint mobilization intervention enhances gait spatiotemporal parameters, kinematics, and kinetics, particularly in step speed, maximum dorsiflexion angle, and the first vGRF peak for the EG compared to the CG. Therefore, the rehabilitation strategy for patients with functional ankle instability should appropriately increase the use of joint movement to promote the functional recovery of FAI patients.

65. The source of dietary trace minerals influences the prevalence of postpartum dysgalactia syndrome, backfat mobilization and therapeutic interventions in sows exposed to high ambient temperatures

65. The source of dietary trace minerals influences the prevalence of postpartum dysgalactia syndrome, backfat mobilization and therapeutic interventions in sows exposed to high ambient temperatures

Knowledge, attitude, practices and treatment-seeking behaviour concerning cutaneous leishmaniasis among rural hyperendemic communities in western Yemen

Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), a neglected tropical disease (NTD), is a major public health problem in Yemen with widespread distribution in rural areas. Evaluating the knowledge and understanding of people’s beliefs towards the disease is essential to the implementation of effective control measures. This study aims to assess the knowledge, attitudes, practices (KAP) and treatment-seeking behaviour concerning CL among rural populations in the western highlands of Yemen. A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 289 household heads in four rural areas of the Utmah District. Data were collected using a pre-tested questionnaire. All the participants had heard about the disease; however, only 9.3% attributed it to sandflies. Nearly half (48.1%) of the participants could not mention any preventive measures for CL, and nearly two-thirds (65.4%) could not do so for sandflies. The overall ‘good’ knowledge about CL was found to be 51.2%, and it was 33.9% for sandflies. The participants’ attitude and prevention practices towards CL were not satisfactory, as only 38.1% and 16.3% had a positive attitude and good CL-related prevention practices, respectively. Moreover, 45.7% believed CL to be a stigmatising disease, and 50% had used traditional remedies to treat suspected CL lesions. Multivariate analyses showed that age, sex, presence of CL-confirmed cases in the same household, residency, occupation and monthly household income were the significant predictors associated with KAP concerning CL among the participants. The findings support an urgent need for integrated health education and community mobilisation interventions to improve awareness of these vulnerable populations about this devastating disease.

Impact of Early Mobilization Within the Intensive Care Unit After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Systematic Review

Purpose: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery treats complications from coronary artery diseases, and its recovery traditionally consisted of bedrest. Recent research emphasizes the benefits of early mobilization for hospitalized patients. However, the functional outcomes and effectiveness of early mobilization for persons within the intensive care units after CABG has not been investigated thus far. The objective of this review was to determine the effectiveness of early mobilization in reducing hospital and intensive care unit length of stay (LoS) and improving functional outcomes of persons after CABG. Methods: This study was registered with PROSPERO and followed PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PEDro databases were searched using MeSH terms. Studies with early mobilization interventions for adults in the intensive care unit after CABG that recorded outcomes of LoS or functioning were included. Methodological quality was measured using the PEDro scale and Oxford Level of Evidence. Results: This systematic review collectively addressed 2280 participants through 14 studies in 7 countries. The initiation time frames for early mobilization varied, with the majority beginning within 24 to 48 hours after surgery and interventions were heterogenous. Early mobility was found to be effective in reducing atelectasis, improving oxygen saturation, and decreasing time spent on mechanical ventilation. Among early mobilization participants, the LoS was reduced in all studies; intensive care unit LoS decreased by one day or greater in 6 of 14 studies, and hospital LoS decreased by one day or greater in 5 of 7 studies. Conclusions: Data analysis found that early mobilization achieved better functional outcomes. It was found that implementing early mobilization led to decreased intensive care and hospital lengths of stay, reduced atelectasis and pleural effusion, and improved functional and respiratory outcomes in persons who underwent CABG surgery.

The barriers to and facilitators of implementing early mobilisation for patients with delirium on intensive care units: A systematic review.

Early mobilisation of critically ill patients remains variable across practice. This study set out to determine barriers to and facilitators of early mobilisation for patients diagnosed with delirium in the intensive care unit (ICU). A mixed-methods descriptive systematic review. Electronic databases (AMED, BNI, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library, Medline and EMBASE) were searched for publications up to 22nd December 2021. Independent reviewers screened studies and extracted data using Covidence Systematic Review Management software. Data were summarised according to frequency (n/%) of barriers and facilitators. Thematic analysis of qualitative studies was carried out in order to address the secondary aim. Quantitative studies were assessed using the GRADE quality assessment tool. Qualitative studies were analysed according to the GRADE-CERQual quality assessment tool. This study was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD 42021227655). Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Quantitative findings demonstrated the presence of delirium was the most common reported barrier to early mobilisation. The most common facilitator was ICU staff experience of positive outcomes as a result of early mobilisation interventions. Thematic analysis identified six main themes that may describe potential meanings behind these findings: (1) knowledge, (2) personal preferences, (3) perceived burden of delirium, (4) perceived complexity, (5) decision-making and (6) culture. These findings highlight the reported need to further understand the impact and value of early mobilisation as a non-pharmacological intervention for patients diagnosed with delirium in ICU. Evaluation of early mobilisation interventions involving key stakeholders may address these concerns and provide effective implementation strategies.

Community mobilisation approaches to preventing adolescent multiple risk behaviour: a realist review

BackgroundAdolescent multiple risk behaviour (MRB) is a global health issue. Most interventions have focused on the proximal causes of adolescent MRB such as peer or family influence, with systematic reviews reporting mixed evidence of effectiveness. There is increasing recognition that community mobilisation approaches could be beneficial for adolescent health. There are gaps in the current literature, theory and implementation that would benefit from a realist approach. We use a theory-driven evidence synthesis to assess how and why community mobilisation interventions work/do not work to prevent adolescent MRB and in what contexts.MethodsThis realist review used a six-stage iterative process, guided by the RAMESES framework. We systematically searched PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL and Sociological s, from their inception to 2021. Studies were screened for relevance to the programme theory, assessed for rigour and included based on a priori criteria. Two independent reviewers selected, screened and extracted data from included studies. A realist logic of analysis was used to develop context-mechanism-outcome configurations that contributed to our programme theory.FindingsWe reviewed 35 documents describing 22 separate community mobilisation intervention studies. Most studies (n = 17) had a quality assessment score of three or four (out of four). We analysed the studies in relation to three middle range theories. To uphold our theory that these interventions work by creating a social environment where adolescents are less likely to engage in MRB, interventions should: (1) embed a framework of guiding principles throughout the community, (2) establish community readiness with population data and (3) ensure a diverse coalition with the support of intervention champions. Mechanisms such as empowerment through coalition ownership over the delivery of the intervention, cohesion across the community and motivation to work collaboratively to improve adolescent health are triggered to achieve social environment shifts. However, certain contexts (e.g. limited funding) restrict intervention success as these mechanisms are not fired.ConclusionsFor community mobilisation interventions to reduce adolescent MRB, the coalitions within them must seek to alter the social environment in which these behaviours occur. Mechanisms including empowerment, cohesion and motivation lead to this shift, but only under certain contexts.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42020205342

Adding the Neuromuscular Taping to Nerve Mobilization Interventions on the Hand Functional Abilities in Carpal Tunnel Syndrom

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a collection of symptoms and signs of disease caused by the squeezing of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel in the wrist. This CTS condition is one of the most common types of neuropathy. This syndrome arises with symptoms of pain, numbness, and weakness in the hands due to compression of the median nerve. Carpal tunnel syndrome is a syndrome associated with repetitive motion and a fixed position for a long duration so it affects the blood supply to the hands and causes pain. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of adding neuromuscular taping intervention to the nerve mobilization which was previously usually given to Hand Functional Ability in carpal tunnel syndrome. A case study with pre and post-test research a design that compares the Hand Functional Ability values before and after being measured with a measuring instrument Wrist hand Disability Index (WHDI) to provide additional Neuromuscular Taping intervention in conditions of carpal tunnel syndrome for 3 weeks. Analysis of differences scores with WHDI in the sample group with a significance value of 0.023 which shows &lt; 0.05, which means there is an effect of giving additions Neuromuscular Taping Intervention in Nerve Mobilization noted changes in Hand Functional Ability levels in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome patients.

Delirium is associated with low levels of upright activity in geriatric inpatients—results from a prospective observational study

BackgroundDelirium is common in geriatric inpatients and associated with poor outcomes. Hospitalization is associated with low levels of physical activity. Motor symptoms are common in delirium, but how delirium affects physical activity remains unknown.AimsTo investigate differences in physical activity between geriatric inpatients with and without delirium.MethodsWe included acutely admitted patients ≥ 75 years in a prospective observational study at a medical geriatric ward at a Norwegian University Hospital. Delirium was diagnosed according to the DSM-5 criteria. Physical activity was measured by an accelerometer-based device worn on the right thigh. The main outcome was time in upright position (upright time) per 24 h (00.00 to 23.59) on the first day of hospitalization with verified delirium status. Group differences were analysed using t test.ResultsWe included 237 patients, mean age 86.1 years (Standard Deviation (SD) 5.1), and 73 patients (30.8%) had delirium. Mean upright time day 1 for the entire group was 92.2 min (SD 84.3), with 50.9 min (SD 50.7) in the delirium group and 110.6 min (SD 89.7) in the no-delirium group, mean difference 59.7 minutes, 95% Confidence Interval 41.6 to 77.8, p value < 0.001.DiscussionLow levels of physical activity in patients with delirium raise the question if immobilization may contribute to poor outcomes in delirium. Future studies should investigate if mobilization interventions could improve outcomes of delirium.ConclusionsIn this sample of geriatric inpatients, the group with delirium had lower levels of physical activity than the group without delirium.

Community-based Advocacy Communication Social Mobilization (ACSM) intervention by empowering key community leaders: Evaluation using the RE-AIM framework.

Based on the theme of World Tuberculosis (TB) Day 2018-"Wanted Leaders for TB free world," various studies and country-level project have witnessed how training leaders on TB has helped enhance TB awareness in the community. This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of Advocacy Communication and Social Mobilization (ACSM) intervention strategy through key community leaders, using Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. This study was undertaken by the Department of Community Medicine, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital (SMVMCH), Puducherry, in the field practice area of Primary Health Centre (PHC), Thirubuvanai. The STOP TB, ENGAGE-TB, and National TB Elimination Program (NTEP) guidelines were used for interventions. Key community leaders (KCL) list (N = 117) was obtained from Mannadipet commune panchayat and PHC. The study was conducted in four phases: phase 1 (baseline): quantitative data: proportion of presumptive TB cases from notification register; phase 2 (intervention): training program for staff nurses, auxiliary nurse midwife (ANM), Accredited Social Health Activist (ASHA), and Anganwadi workers (group activity), participatory rural appraisal (PRA) activity for self-help group (SHG) leaders, and health education session for religious leaders and ex-panchayat leaders; phase 3: strengthening of ongoing activity: health education session and active case finding for TB; and phase 4: end line: outcome of the intervention, evaluated using the RE-AIM framework. As an outcome of the intervention, there was a marginal increase (21 cases) in the proportion of presumptive TB cases when comparing before (2018) and after (2019) intervention. The proportion of presumptive TB cases identified and referred by KCL was 312. A total of 77 presumptive TB cases were identified through community-based active case finding (ACF). Two sputum samples (on the spot early morning) were collected and sent for Cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification testing (CBNAAT), of which three cases were positive. This study was community led and involved leaders from diverse backgrounds, optimizing the chance of success. For sustainability, we have initiated TB support group.

Is blinding in studies of manual soft tissue mobilisation of the back possible? A feasibility randomised controlled trial with Swiss graduate students

Study designSingle-centre, two-parallel group, methodological randomised controlled trial to assess blinding feasibility.BackgroundTrials of manual therapy interventions of the back face methodological challenges regarding blinding feasibility and success. We assessed the feasibility of blinding an active manual soft tissue mobilisation and control intervention of the back. We also assessed whether blinding is feasible among outcome assessors and explored factors influencing perceptions about intervention assignment.MethodsOn 7–8 November 2022, 24 participants were randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to active or control manual interventions of the back. The active group (n = 11) received soft tissue mobilisation of the lumbar spine. The control group (n = 13) received light touch over the thoracic region with deep breathing exercises. The primary outcome was blinding of participants immediately after a one-time intervention session, as measured by the Bang blinding index (Bang BI). Bang BI ranges from –1 (complete opposite perceptions of intervention received) to 1 (complete correct perceptions), with 0 indicating ‘random guessing’—balanced ‘active’ and ‘control’ perceptions within an intervention arm. Secondary outcomes included blinding of outcome assessors and factors influencing perceptions about intervention assignment among both participants and outcome assessors, explored via thematic analysis.Results24 participants were analysed following an intention-to-treat approach. 55% of participants in the active manual soft tissue mobilisation group correctly perceived their group assignment beyond chance immediately after intervention (Bang BI: 0.55 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.25 to 0.84]), and 8% did so in the control group (0.08 [95% CI, −0.37 to 0.53]). Bang BIs in outcome assessors were 0.09 (−0.12 to 0.30) and −0.10 (−0.29 to 0.08) for active and control participants, respectively. Participants and outcome assessors reported varying factors related to their perceptions about intervention assignment.ConclusionsBlinding of participants allocated to an active soft tissue mobilisation of the back was not feasible in this methodological trial, whereas blinding of participants allocated to the control intervention and outcome assessors was adequate. Findings are limited due to imprecision and suboptimal generalisability to clinical settings. Careful thinking and consideration of blinding in manual therapy trials is warranted and needed.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05822947 (retrospectively registered)

Outcome of Early Active and Late Mobilization following Flexor Tendon Repair in Zone ΙΙ of Hand

The functional outcome of flexor tendon injury after repair depends on multiple factors. Postoperative rehabilitation protocol plays an important role after a good repair for better functional outcomes. The aim of this study is to compare the outcome between early active mobilizations versus late mobilizations after flexor tendon repair in zone-II of hand. This Quasi-experimental (Nonrandomized control trial) was conducted from July 2018 to June 2021. Total 30 patients of flexor tendon injury in Zone-II of hand presented within 3 weeks were divided into two equal groups according to envelope technique, late mobilization (No intervention group) group- A and early active mobilization (Intervention group) group-B. All the flexor tendons were repaired with polypropylene 4/0 double strand score sutures and 6/0 epitendinous continuous sutures. In group-A mobilization started after 3 weeks and in group–B, intervention was given by active mobilization which was started at the day of operation. Buck Gramcko functional criteria and Louisville system were used for assessment of final result after 6 months of surgery. Male was predominant, M: F ratio was 3.3:1. Mean age of the respondent was 32.53±9.86 years. Dominant (Right) hand involvement was 70%. Student and service holder were the common involved group. Nearly three fourth (73%) of them had sharp cutting injury. More than half (53.10%) of the injuries were found in ring and little fingers followed by index (20.30%), middle (20.30%) and thumb (6.30%). Mean time interval between injury and operation was 11 days. Adhesion formation was the commonest complication that was 40% in group A and 20% in group B. More satisfactory outcome (87.50%) was found in group- B (Intervention group), that is patients who received early active mobilization; where the level of satisfactory outcome was less (62.50%) in group-A (Non-intervention group), that is patients who received late mobilization (p-value was significant &lt;0.05). Early active mobilization following repair of flexor tendon in zone II of hand ensures better functional outcome with minimum complication compared to late mobilization. Bangladesh Med J. 2022 Sept; 51(3): 28-36

Effects of Early Mobilization on Pain Among Children Post Appendectomy at Children Hospital Lahore

Early mobilization means interval starting with initial physiologic mobilization and continuing through the hospital stay. Mobilization includes the activities that help critical patients to move, and ambulate with or without assistance using a walker and/or support from staff. Objective: To assess the effect of Early Mobilization on pain and wound healing among children post appendectomy. Methods: A randomized control study was conducted from December 2022 to August 2023 at the Children hospital Lahore. The target population consisted of children undergone appendectomy at Children hospital Lahore. A random sample of n=26 was recruited. Validated tool was used for data collection from participants to assess the pain in the control and interventional group. Initially, Pre-assessment was conducted to obtain pain scores, then the intervention as early mobilization was provided to the interventional group while the control group was observed with usual care. After the intervention in the post assessment, the data were collected from the control and interventional group to compare the effect of intervention. Results: The study results revealed that after the intervention, the assessment at 1st follow-up showed somewhat significant difference in control and interventional group scores of pains. A significant mean difference was found on pain between control and interventional group scores at the 2nd follow up where z (-2.056) =, p value=0.040. Conclusions: Overall, these findings suggest that early mobilization intervention has a positive and statistically significant impact on reducing mean pain scores.

Functional capacity in smoking patients after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a quasi-experimental study.

Coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG) is an important approach to treating coronary heart disease. However, patients undergoing open heart surgery are at risk of postoperative complications. Cigarette smoking is one of the preoperative risk factors that may increase postoperative complications. Studies show that early mobilization intervention may reduce these complications and improve functional capacity, but the impact of smoking on early outcomes after CABG has been controversial for the past two decades. This quasi-experimental study explored the effects of early mobilization on functional capacity among patients with different smoking histories undergoing CABG. The study involved 51 participants who underwent CABG surgery, divided into three groups: current smokers, former smokers, and non-smokers (n=17 each). A day before surgery, all groups underwent a six-minute walking test (6MWT). Every participant received the same intervention after surgery, including deep breathing exercises, an upper limb range of motion assessment, an incentive spirometer, and walking with and without assistance. Five days postoperatively, all outcomes - including the 6MWT, length of stay (LOS) in the ICU, and postoperative pulmonary complications - were assessed, and the 6MWT was repeated. There was a reduced functional capacity after CABG in ex-smokers (215.8±102 m) and current smokers (272.7±97m) compared to non-smokers (298.5±97.1m) in terms of 6MWT (p<0.05). Current smokers were more likely to have atelectasis after CABG than ex-smokers (76.5% vs. 52.9%), with non-smokers being the least likely to have atelectasis among the three groups (29.4%, p<0.05). Additionally, current smokers required longer ventilator support post-CABG (11.9±7.3 hours) compared to ex-smokers (8.3±4.3 hours) and non-smokers (7±2.5 hours, p<0.01). Smoking status significantly impacts functional capacity reduction after CABG, with current smokers being more susceptible to prolonged ventilator use and atelectasis.

Implementing early rehabilitation and mobilisation for children in UK paediatric intensive care units: the PERMIT feasibility study.

Early rehabilitation and mobilisation encompass patient-tailored interventions, delivered within intensive care, but there are few studies in children and young people within paediatric intensive care units. To explore how healthcare professionals currently practise early rehabilitation and mobilisation using qualitative and quantitative approaches; co-design the Paediatric Early Rehabilitation and Mobilisation during InTensive care manual of early rehabilitation and mobilisation interventions, with primary and secondary patient-centred outcomes; explore feasibility and acceptability of implementing the Paediatric Early Rehabilitation and Mobilisation during InTensive care manual within three paediatric intensive care units. Mixed-methods feasibility with five interlinked studies (scoping review, survey, observational study, codesign workshops, feasibility study) in three phases. United Kingdom paediatric intensive care units. Children and young people aged 0-16 years remaining within paediatric intensive care on day 3, their parents/guardians and healthcare professionals. In Phase 3, unit-wide implementation of manualised early rehabilitation and mobilisation. Phase 1 observational study: prevalence of any early rehabilitation and mobilisation on day 3. Phase 3 feasibility study: acceptability of early rehabilitation and mobilisation intervention; adverse events; acceptability of study design; acceptability of outcome measures. Searched Excerpta Medica Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, MEDLINE, PEDro, Open grey and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Narrative synthesis. In the scoping review we identified 36 full-text reports evaluating rehabilitation initiated within 7 days of paediatric intensive care unit admission, outlining non-mobility and mobility early rehabilitation and mobilisation interventions from 24 to 72 hours and delivered twice daily. With the survey, 124/191 (65%) responded from 26/29 (90%) United Kingdom paediatric intensive care units; the majority considered early rehabilitation and mobilisation a priority. The observational study followed 169 patients from 15 units; prevalence of any early rehabilitation and mobilisation on day 3 was 95.3%. We then developed a manualised early rehabilitation and mobilisation intervention informed by current evidence, experience and theory. All three sites implemented the Paediatric Early Rehabilitation and Mobilisation during InTensive care manual successfully, recruited to target (30 patients recruited) and followed up the patients until day 30 or discharge; 21/30 parents consented to complete additional outcome measures. The findings represent the views of National Health Service staff but may not be generalisable. We were unable to conduct workshops and interviews with children, young people and parents to support the Paediatric Early Rehabilitation and Mobilisation during InTensive care manual development due to pandemic restrictions. A randomised controlled trial is recommended to assess the effectiveness of the manualised early rehabilitation and mobilisation intervention. A definitive cluster randomised trial of early rehabilitation and mobilisation in paediatric intensive care requires selection of outcome measure and health economic evaluation. The study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019151050. The Phase 1 observational study is registered Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04110938 (Phase 1) (registered 1 October 2019) and the Phase 3 feasibility study is registered NCT04909762 (Phase 3) (registered 2 June 2021). This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 17/21/06) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 27. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Effect Of Neurodynamic Mobilization On Reducing Sensori neural Symptopms In Dawung Village Wood Craftsmen With The Risk Of Hand Arm Vibartion Syndrome (HAVS)

Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome (HAVS) is a disease caused by working with tools that produce vibrations that are transmitted to the arms and hands. Prolonged use of vibrating devices can cause sensorineural disturbances with complaints of numbness, tingling and decreased sensitivity. This is due to damage to the mechanoreceptors of myelinated A-? afferent nerve fibers due to exposure to vibration when working with vibrating tools. Neurodynamic mobilization functions to restore the plasticity of the nervous system and the ability of the nervous system. This study aims to determine the effect of neurodynamic mobilization on reducing sensorineural symptoms with the risk of HAVS in wood craftsmen in Dawung Village. The design of this study used a pre-experimental one group pretest-posttest design method. There are 15 samples of wood craftsmen who meet the criteria. The research instrument used the Stockholm workshop scale with data analysis using the Wilcoxon test. The results of the statistical test showed that the final result was p = 0.000, (p &lt;0.05) which means that the effect of neurodynamic mobilization on reducing sensorineural symptoms in wood craftsmen in Dawung Village is at risk of HAVS. These results indicate that the neurodynamic mobilization intervention has effectiveness in increasing blood circulation in the nerves. The conclusion obtained is that neurodynamic mobilization has an effect on reducing sensorineural symptoms in wood craftsmen in Dawung Village with the risk of HAVS.

EFFECTIVENESS OF LEVEL 1 PROGRESSIVE MOBILIZATION ON DECREASED INTRACRANIAL ADAPTIVE CAPACITY IN HEMORRHAGIC STROKE CASES

The prevalence of stroke diagnosed by doctors in Indonesia in 2018 was aged ≥ 15 years (10.9%) or an estimated 2,120,362 people. South Sulawesi has the highest prevalence of stroke based on diagnosis and symptoms reported by health workers. Hemorrhagic stroke is a stroke caused by rupture of a blood vessel in the brain, which results in downstream ischemia and hypoxia. One of the interventions that can be done to overcome the decrease in intracranial adaptive capacity is to perform stage progressive mobilization. The purpose of the case study was to carry out nursing care in hemorrhagic stroke patients with reduced intracranial adaptive capacity using level 1 progressive mobilization interventions in the ICU RSUP. Dr. Wahidin Sudirohusodo Makassar. The method used is a case study with data collection techniques through observation, interviews, physical examination and documentation. The results showed that level 1 progressive mobilization once a day for 3 days before and after the intervention found that level 1 progressive mobilization could be used to stabilize blood pressure, level of consciousness and oxygen saturation. The conclusion based on the results show that the implementation of level 1 progressive mobilization showed that on the first day to the third day of implementation there was an increasing in hemodynamic state, in this case the blood pressure improved, oxygen saturation increased and the level of consciousness increased. This indicates that level 1 progressive mobilization is effective in patients who have problems with decreased intracranial adaptive capacity&#x0D;

Effectiveness of community mobilisation and group-based interventions for preventing intimate partner violence against women in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a challenge affecting one in three women in their lifetime, and gender-transformative interventions have been identified as a promising prevention strategy. We systematically reviewed and meta-analysed randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of community-level or group-based interventions to prevent IPV in lower- and middle-income countries, seeking to answer the following research question: do community- or group-based gender-transformative interventions reduce IPV, compared to a control arm of status-quo programming? We conducted a systematic search from the inception of all databases employed until 20 July 2021. Eligible study outcomes included past-year experience of physical, sexual, emotional or economic IPV self-reported by women and perpetration of physical or sexual IPV self-reported by men. We assessed study risk of bias using the updated Cochrane tool for RCTs. We estimated the pooled odds ratio (OR) using a multilevel random-effects meta-analysis and also conducted a multilevel meta-regression to analyse how study characteristics moderated the effect size. After screening 7363 unique records, we included 30 studies on 27 unique RCTs. Our meta-analysis suggested that community-level or group-based interventions reduced the odds of women experiencing IPV in the past year: pooled adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.63-0.97. While there was significant heterogeneity in the effect sizes between trials (I2 = 83%), potentially reflecting the diverse contexts of the included trials, our meta-regression did not indicate a significant association between intervention effectiveness and intervention type or target population. There was evidence of significant associations between effectiveness and intervention components and duration. There is strong evidence that community-level and group-based interventions reduce IPV against women. Unpacking what intervention modalities are effective in which contexts can further inform prevention strategies. PROSPERO (CRD42021290193).