Mm Hg Cutoff Research Articles

Cutoffs for white-coat and masked blood pressure effects: an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring study.

The values used to define white-coat and masked blood pressure (BP) effects are usually arbitrary. This study aimed at investigating the accuracy of various cutoffs based on the differences (ΔBP) between office BP (OBP) and 24h-ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) to identify white-coat (WCH) and masked (MH) hypertension, which are phenotypes coupled with adverse prognosis. This cross-sectional study included 11,350 [Derivation cohort; 45% men, mean age = 55.1 ± 14.1 years, OBP = 132.1 ± 17.6/83.9 ± 12.5 mmHg, 24 h-ABPM = 121.6 ± 11.4/76.1 ± 9.6 mmHg, 25% using antihypertensive medications (AH)] and 7220 (Validation cohort; 46% men, mean age = 58.6 ± 15.1 years, OBP = 136.8 ± 18.7/87.6 ± 13.0 mmHg, 24 h-ABPM = 125.5 ± 12.6/77.7 ± 10.3 mmHg; 32% using AH) unique individuals who underwent 24 h-ABPM. We compared the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and area under the curve (AUC) of diverse ΔBP cutoffs to detect WCH (ΔsystolicBP/ΔdiastolicBP = 28/17, 20/15, 20/10, 16/11, 15/9, 14/9 mmHg and ΔsystolicBP = 13 and 10 mmHg) and MH (ΔsystolicBP/ΔdiastolicBP = -14/-9, -5/-2, -3/-1, -1/-1, 0/0, 2/2 mmHg and ΔsystolicBP = -5 and -3mmHg). The 20/15 mmHg cutoff showed the best AUC (0.804, 95%CI = 0.794-0.814) to detect WCH, while the 2/2 mmHg cutoff showed the highest AUC (0.741, 95%CI = 0.728-0.754) to detect MH in the Derivation cohort. Both cutoffs also had the best accuracy to detect WCH (0.767, 95%CI = 0.754-0.780) and MH (0.767, 95%CI = 0.750-0.784) in the Validation cohort. In secondary analyses, these cutoffs had the best accuracy to detect individuals with higher and lower office-than-ABPM grades in both cohorts. In conclusion, the 20/15 and 2/2 mmHg ΔBP cutoffs had the best accuracy to detect hypertensive patients with WCH and MH, respectively, and can serve as indicators of marked white-coat and masked BP effects derived from 24 h-ABPM.

Inverse salt sensitivity in normotensive adults: role of demographic factors.

Salt sensitivity and inverse salt sensitivity [ISS; a reduction in blood pressure (BP) on a high sodium diet] are each associated with increased incidence of hypertension. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the prevalence of ISS in normotensive adults and whether ISS is associated with any demographic characteristic(s). Healthy normotensive, nonobese adults [ n = 84; 43 women; age = 37 ± 13 years; baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP) = 89 ± 8 mmHg] participated in a controlled feeding study, consuming 7-day low-sodium (20 mmol sodium/day) and high-sodium (300 mmol sodium/day) diets. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory BP was assessed on the last day of each diet. ISS was defined as a reduction in 24-h MAP more than 5 mmHg, salt sensitivity as an increase in MAP more than 5 mmHg and salt resistance as a change in MAP between -5 and 5 mmHg from low sodium to high sodium. Using this cutoff, 10.7% were ISS, 76.2% salt resistant, and 13.1% salt sensitive. Prevalence of ISS was similar between sexes and age groups ( P > 0.05). However, ISS was more prevalent in those with normal BMI (15.8% ISS) compared with those with overweight BMI (0% ISS; P < 0.01). Interestingly, classification of participants using a salt sensitivity index (ΔMAP/Δ urinary sodium excretion) categorized 21.4% as ISS, 48.8% salt resistant, and 29.8% salt sensitive. Overall, we found that the prevalence of ISS was 10.7% (5 mmHg cutoff) or 21.4% (salt sensitivity index), and that ISS was associated with lower BMI. These results highlight the importance of future work to understand the mechanisms of ISS and to standardize salt sensitivity assessment.

Differences in prevalence of hypertension subtypes according to the 2018 Korean Society of Hypertension and 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines: The Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007\u20132017 (KNHANES IV-VII)

BackgroundThe significance of high systolic and diastolic blood pressure remains controversial. We assessed the differences in prevalence of hypertension and its subtypes according to the different hypertension diagnostic criteria embodied by the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (2017 ACC/AHA) and 2018 Korean Society of Hypertension (2018 KSH) guidelines.MethodsWe used the 2007–2017 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) data to calculate guideline-specific hypertension prevalence among untreated, adult participants. By the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline, a mean SBP ≥130 mmHg, DBP ≥80 mmHg, or currently using antihypertensive medications were considered to have hypertension. Isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH) was defined as DBP ≥80 mmHg and SBP <130 mmHg, isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) as SBP ≥130 mmHg and DBP <80 mmHg, and systolic diastolic hypertension (SDH) as SBP ≥130 mmHg and DBP ≥80 mmHg. In a similar manner, by the 2018 KSH guideline, all hypertension and its subtype prevalence were calculated using the 140/90 mmHg cutoff. The two versions of all hypertension and its corresponding subtype prevalence were calculated among all study participants and separately by sex and age then compared via analysis of variance.ResultsThe prevalence of all hypertension increased from 25.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 25.4–26.5) defined by the 2018 KSH guideline to 46.3% (95% CI 45.6–46.9) classified by the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline. Such increase was primarily manifested through substantial increase in IDH prevalence, from 5.2% (95% CI 4.9–5.4) defined by the 2018 KSH guideline to 17.9% (95% CI 17.4–18.3) defined by the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline, and was most notably observed in young age groups, 30-49 years. ISH prevalence showed minimal differences. SDH prevalence moderately increased from 3.5% (95% CI 3.3–3.7) defined by the 2018 KSH guideline to 11.1% (95% CI 10.7–11.4) defined by the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline, achieved primarily among participants aged 50 years or above.ConclusionsChanges in each subtype prevalence made differential contribution to additionally classified hypertension cases by the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline. Future studies should investigate the diastolic-associated cardiovascular risks and benefits of its long-term primary prevention in the young population.

Blood pressure cutoffs for white-coat and masked effects in a large population undergoing home blood pressure monitoring.

The values used to define the presence of white-coat or masked blood pressure (BP) effects are arbitrary. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of several cutoff points based on the difference between office and home BP (ΔBP) values to detect white-coat uncontrolled (WUCH) and masked uncontrolled (MUCH) hypertension, which are phenotypes with adverse prognoses, in a large cohort of treated hypertensive patients. This multicenter cross-sectional study included 6,049 treated hypertensive patients (40% males, mean age 59.1 ± 14.4 years) who underwent office and home BP monitoring. We compared the sensitivity, specificity, area under curve (AUC), and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of several ΔBP cutoffs to detect WUCH and MUCH. The 15/9 mmHg cutoff, which reflects a 1.0 standard deviation of the ΔBP, showed the best AUC (0.783, 95% CI = 0.772-0.794) for the detection of WUCH, particularly in individuals with office grade 1 hypertension (AUC = 0.811, 95% CI = 0.793-0.829). The -1/-1 mmHg cutoff, which considers all individuals who had lower systolic or diastolic BP levels in the office than at home, had the highest AUC (0.822, 95% CI = 0.808-0.836) for the detection of MUCH. Both cutoff values also had the best performances for identifying all patients with higher and lower office-than-home BP grades. In conclusion, the 15/9 and -1/-1 mmHg cutoffs showed the best performance for the detection of treated hypertensive patients with WUCH and MUCH, respectively, and therefore might be markers of significant white-coat and masked effects and could be useful for identifying preferential targets for more routine home BP measures.

LO67: Association between hypotension and mortality in critically ill patients with severe traumatic brain injury: experience at a single Canadian trauma center

Introduction: Hypotension is known to be associated with increased mortality in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) of &amp;lt;90 mmHg is the threshold for hypotension in consensus TBI treatment guidelines; however, evidence suggests hypotension should be defined at higher levels for these patients. Our objective was to determine the influence of hypotension on mortality in TBI patients requiring ICU admission using different thresholds of SBP on arrival at the emergency department (ED). Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients with severe TBI (Abbreviated Injury Scale Head score ≥3) admitted to ICU at the QEII Health Sciences Centre (Halifax, Canada) between 2002 and 2013. Patients were grouped by SBP on ED arrival ( &amp;lt;90 mmHg, &amp;lt;100 mmHg, &amp;lt;110 mmHg). We performed multiple logistic regression analysis with mortality as the dependent variable. Models were adjusted for confounders including age, gender, Injury Severity Score (ISS), injury mechanism, and trauma team activation (TTA). Results: A total of 1233 patients sustained a severe TBI and were admitted to the ICU during the study period. The mean age was 43.4 ± 23.9 years and most patients were male (919/1233; 74.5%). The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle collision (491/1233; 41.2%) followed by falls (427/1233; 35.8%). Mean length of stay in the ICU was 6.1 ± 6.4 days, and the overall mortality rate was 22.7%. SBP on arrival was available for 1182 patients. The &amp;lt;90 mmHg group had 4.6% (54/1182) of these patients; mean ISS was 20.6 ± 7.8 and mortality was 40.7% (22/54). The &amp;lt;100 mmHg had 9.3% (110/1182) of patients; mean ISS was 19.3 ± 7.9 and mortality was 34.5% (38/110). The &amp;lt;110 mmHg group had 16.8% (198/1182) of patients; mean ISS was 17.9 ± 8.0 and mortality was 28.8% (57/198). After adjusting for confounders, the association between hypotension and mortality was 2.22 (95% CI 1.19-4.16) using a &amp;lt;90 mmHg cutoff, 1.79 (95% CI 1.12-2.86) using a &amp;lt;100 mmHg cutoff, and 1.50 (95% CI 1.02-2.21) using a &amp;lt;110 mmHg cutoff. Conclusion: While we found that TBI patients with a SBP &amp;lt;90 mmHg were over 2 times more likely to die, patients with an SBP &amp;lt;110 mmHg on ED arrival were still 1.5 times more likely to die from their injuries compared to patients without hypotension. These results suggest that establishing a higher threshold for clinically meaningful hypotension in TBI patients is warranted.

Guidelines for the treatment of arterial insufficiency ulcers

1. Co-chaired panel 2. University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 3. University of Texas, San Antonio, TX 4. Sinai Hospital/Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 5. GKT School of Medicine, King’s College, London, UK 6. University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX 7. Sequoia Hospital, Redwood City, CA 8. Maricopa Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ 9. Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, MA 10. Southampton University Hospitals Trust NHS, Southampton, UK 11. Penrose–St. Francis Health Services, Colorado Springs, CO 12. Beverly Surgical Associates, Beverly, MA 13. Saint Francis Memorial Hospital, San Francisco, CA 14. Northbay Center for Wound Care, Vacaville, CA, and 15. University of California, San Francisco, CA

Mean arterial pressure and systolic blood pressure for detection of hypotension during hemapheresis: Implications for patients with baseline hypertension

Mean arterial pressure (MAP) has been characterized as a more sensitive and physiologically appropriate hemodynamic parameter in the detection of hemapheresis-related hypotension, resulting in a much closer correlation with the presence of symptomatic hypotension. Patients were enrolled over a 12-month period and data collected on any previous diagnosis of hypertension, antihypertensive therapy used, indication for apheresis, age decile, and gender. Baseline vital signs, any hypotensive signs or symptoms observed, and the patient's vital signs at the time of any hypotensive episode were recorded. Patients were assigned to a subgroup, sensitivity and specificity analysis performed, positive likelihood ratios calculated, receiver operating characteristic curves constructed, and ideal cutoff values identified. The incidence of hypotension among our study population was found to be 6.8%. Over all procedures, systolic blood pressure (SBP) was determined to be a "poor" test for detecting hypotension, while MAP demonstrated a "fair" capacity. A downward normalization was evident in the ideal cutoff value based upon a patient's hypertensive history. The currently accepted SBP less than 80 mmHg cutoff failed to detect hypotensive episodes among baseline hypertensive patients, raising questions about its sensitivity. Based upon physiologic principles and study findings, a MAP-based criterion is preferable in the diagnosis of hypotension during hemapheresis.