Mm In Superior-inferior Research Articles

Impact of belly board immobilization devices and body mass factor on setup displacement using daily cone-beam CT in rectal cancer radiotherapy.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of different belly board and daily changes in patient's body-mass factor (BMF) on setup displacement in radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Twenty-five patients were immobilized using the thermoplastic mask with belly board (TM-BB), and 30 used the vacuum bag cushion with belly board (VBC-BB), performing daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans 625 times and 750 times, respectively. Daily pretreatment CBCT scans were registered to the planned CT images for BMF change determination and setup displacement measurement. Independent t-tests compared setup displacement between the two groups in left-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI), and anterior-posterior (AP) directions, as well as the BMF changes. The impact of daily BMF changes on setup displacement was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression and 10-fold cross-validation. The setup displacement for TM-BB in the LR, SI, and AP directions were 0.31±0.25, 0.58±0.40, and 0.19±0.18cm, respectively, while VBC-BB showed 0.19±0.15, 0.26±0.22, and 0.36±0.29cm in the corresponding directions, respectively. Margins of planning target volume (PTV) for TM-BB were 8, 10, and 6mm in LR, SI, and AP directions, while VBC-BB showed margins of 5,7, and 8mm, respectively. The daily BMF changes for both groups were ranked in descending order as follows: sacral rotation angle (RS), hip lateral diameter (HLD), and hip anterior-posterior diameter (HAPD). HAPD was the main factor affecting setup displacement in both the AP and SI directions in TM-BB, while RS was the primary factor for setup displacement in the AP direction in VBC-BB. Compared with TM-BB, VBC-BB had a larger AP displacement but smaller in LR and SI displacement. Daily changes in BMF have distinct effects on setup displacement in different immobilization devices. Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) is highly recommended and BMF changes should be given consideration during radiotherapy.

A Framework for Assessing the Effect of Cardiac and Respiratory Motion for Stereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation Using a Digital Phantom With a 17-Segment Model: A STOPSTORM.eu Consortium Study

The optimal motion management strategy for patients receiving stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) for the treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT) is not fully known. We developed a framework using a digital phantom to simulate cardiorespiratory motion in combination with different motion management strategies to gain insight into the effect of cardiorespiratory motion on STAR. The 4-dimensional (4D) extended cardiac-torso (XCAT) phantom was expanded with the 17-segment left ventricular (LV) model, which allowed placement of STAR targets in standardized ventricular regions. Cardiac- and respiratory-binned 4D computed tomography (CT) scans were simulated for free-breathing, reduced free-breathing, respiratory-gating, and breath-hold scenarios. Respiratory motion of the heart was set to population-averaged values of patients with VT: 6, 2, and 1 mm in the superior-inferior, posterior-anterior, and left-right direction, respectively. Cardiac contraction was adjusted by reducing LV ejection fraction to 35%. Target displacement was evaluated for all segments using envelopes encompassing the cardiorespiratory motion. Envelopes incorporating only the diastole plus respiratory motion were created to simulate the scenario where cardiac motion is not fully captured on 4D respiratory CT scans used for radiation therapy planning. The average volume of the 17 segments was 6 cm3 (1-9 cm3). Cardiac contraction-relaxation resulted in maximum segment (centroid) motion of 4, 6, and 3.5 mm in the superior-inferior, posterior-anterior, and left-right direction, respectively. Cardiac contraction-relaxation resulted in a motion envelope increase of 49% (24%-79%) compared with individual segment volumes, whereas envelopes increased by 126% (79%-167%) if respiratory motion also was considered. Envelopes incorporating only the diastole and respiration motion covered on average 68% to 75% of the motion envelope. The developed LV-segmental XCAT framework showed that free-wall regions display the most cardiorespiratory displacement. Our framework supports the optimization of STAR by evaluating the effect of (cardio)respiratory motion and motion management strategies for patients with VT.

Real-Time Motion Monitoring Using Orthogonal Cine MRI during MR-Guided Radiation Therapy for Liver Cancer

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> This work investigates the feasibility of real-time motion monitoring (MM) using orthogonal cine MRI during MR guided Adaptative Radiation Therapy (MRgART) for liver tumors that are normally invisible on cine MRI with no contrast agent. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> An investigational package, Motion Monitoring Research Package (MMRP), was developed to measure real-time target motion between orthogonal cine MRI and the daily baseline 3D MRI. The MMRP package was evaluated on 8 liver cancer patients treated on a 1.5T MR-Linac. For all patients, a 3D mid-position (MidP) image derived from a daily 4D MRI was used to delineate a sub-liver volume (SLV) encompassing the tumor. During the same session, real-time 2D T2/T1-weighted bFFE cine MRI were collected with free breathing during MRgART. The cine images were acquired with a temporal resolution of 200 ms interleaved between coronal and sagittal orientations. MMRP workflow included two steps: (1) creating a 2D template in each orientation using cine data acquired over the first 12 s, followed by a rigid registration between the combined templates and the MidP image over the SLV region; (2) measuring the SLV motion by registering the rest of the 2D cine series with the corresponding template. To evaluate the MM accuracy from MMRP, the ground-truth contours on cine MRI were created manually. Common visible vessels and segments of liver boundaries in proximity to the tumor were used as anatomical landmarks for reproducible delineations on both the 3D and cine images. MM accuracy was measured using the standard deviation of the error (SDE) to compare the center of mass position of the ground-truth and the monitored motion. Maximum of tumor motion was assessed on 4D MRI. <h3>Results</h3> In 6 of the 8 cases, the assessed mean (range) centroid motions were 8.8 (4.6-13.8), 1.5 (0.7-2.8) and 3.2 (1.5-5) mm with mean SDE (range) values of 1.2 (0.7-1.6), 0.94 (0.4-1.7), and 1 (0.4-1.4) mm in superior inferior (SI), left right, and anterior posterior (AP) directions, respectively. The mean (range) of the maximum tumor motion from the 4D MRI was 8 (5-11) mm in SI direction, smaller than the centroid MM, indicating the importance of motion capture using the MM in real-time. For the remaining two cases, quantitative MM was challenging due to target deformation and large through-plane motion in the AP direction. <h3>Conclusion</h3> We have demonstrated the feasibility of accurate real-time MM of a liver tumor using a sub-liver volume as a tumor surrogate, based on real-time orthogonal cine MRI during MRgART. The approach overcomes difficulty due to the invisibility of liver tumor on the T2/T1-w 2D cine without using a contrast agent and the need of implanting radio-opaque clips or the approximation of the whole liver motion as the tumor motion. With further investigation with more patient data, the real-time MM technique may be implemented in MRgART to manage intrafraction liver motion.

Initial Experience with Real-Time Gated Proton Therapy (RGPT) in the Definitive Treatment of Prostate Cancer

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> RGPT has the potential to provide instantaneous feedback for intrafraction target motion to maximize patient safety and inform optimal treatment planning. Our purpose was to report our early experience with RGPT and to summarize intrafraction target motion and implications on treatment delivery, including added time, for a pilot population of prostate cancer patients before expansion to other sites with greater motion. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> RGPT with a proton beam therapy system was commissioned and implemented at our proton center, representing the first experience in the United States. Patients being treated definitively with proton therapy to the prostate ± seminal vesicles-only and who had successful placement of platinum fiducial markers and hydrogel spacer were assessed on a prospective IRB-approved registry. Orthogonal fluoroscopic imaging was taken at a pulse rate of one image per second during fractionated proton therapy to assess positioning of a pre-selected fiducial marker. Thresholds to guide beam-on and beam-off gating were determined for a matching score component (based on quality of the image tracking and the guiding template) and for a shift tolerance component (based on our typical set-up uncertainty robustness of 3mm). The shift tolerances were defined as 2mm for left-right and anterior-posterior, and 3mm for superior-inferior. Each patient was treated with single-field optimization planning and a two lateral beam setup. <h3>Results</h3> To date, 8 prostate cancer patients have been treated with a total of 152 RGPT-guided fields. The table details the mean, maximum, standard deviation, and estimated upper 90^th percentile of directional shifts for the entire dataset for 1) the total RGPT-tracked treatment time and 2) the beam-on time as gated by RGPT tracking. On average, the initial imaging to set up the RGPT system required 2.5 seconds per field. The average total treatment time during RGPT guidance, including periods of both "on" and "off" gating, was 41.3 seconds per field. RGPT tracking triggered "beam-off" for an average of 7.8 seconds per field, increasing the total treatment delivery time by 20.2% across the 152 fields. <h3>Conclusion</h3> RGPT successfully tracked intrafraction fiducial marker motion during proton therapy for prostate cancer, while having minimal impact on total treatment time. Further aggregated RGPT-derived data may help to inform optimal treatment planning parameters such as robust optimization.

Factors Affecting Isocenter Displacement and Planning Target Volume Margin for Patients With Rectal Cancer Receiving Radiation Therapy

PurposeSetup errors are inherent in the process of daily radiation therapy (RT) delivery. Pelvic RT for rectal cancer is one of the body sites associated with the largest shift among other body sites. This study aimed to evaluate interfraction random and systematic errors and hence propose the optimum planning target volume (PTV) in patients with rectal cancer. Methods and MaterialsTranslational and angular isocenter displacements were retrospectively collected for 189 patients. Random and systematic errors were determined, and then the PTV margin was computed. Effect of positioning, body mass index (BMI), and type of immobilization were studied. Portal images before and after online correction were used to define PTV for no-daily image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and daily IGRT respectively. ResultsBefore the online correction, the systematic errors were 2.5, 2.8, and 3.0 mm for superior-inferior (SI), right-left (RL), and anterior-posterior (AP) directions, respectively, compared with 2.1, 1.7, and 1.8 mm after online correction. The random errors were 6.2, 7.4, and 8.2 mm in SI, RL, and AP, respectively, before online correction, compared with 4, 4.2, and 4.5 mm after online correction. The recommended PTV margin was 0.7 and 1.0 cm for daily IGRT and no-daily IGRT, respectively. The prone position and BMI >30 kg/m2 warrant higher margins in no-daily IGRT cases, 1.2 and 1.4 cm, respectively. ConclusionsThe prone position, BMI >30 kg/m2, and belly board device are associated with larger daily setup errors warranting higher PTV margins for no-daily IGRT; however, that can be avoided by using daily IGRT.

Multi-contrast four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (MC-4D-MRI): Development and initial evaluation in liver tumor patients.

To develop a novel multi-contrast four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (MC-4D-MRI) technique that expands single image contrast 4D-MRI to a spectrum of native and synthetic image contrasts and to evaluate its feasibility in liver tumor patients. The MC-4D-MRI technique integrates multi-parametric MRI fusion, 4D-MRI, and deformable image registration (DIR) techniques. The fusion technique consists of native MRI as input, image pre-processing, fusion algorithm, adaptation, and fused multi-contrast MRI as output. Four-dimensional deformation vector fields (4D-DVF) were generated from an original T2/T1-w 4D-MRI by deforming end-of-inhalation (EOI) to nine other phase volumes via DIR. The 4D-DVF were applied to multi-contrast MRI to generate a spectrum of 4D-MRI in different image contrasts. The MC-4D-MRI technique was evaluated in five liver tumor patients on tumor contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), internal target volume (ITV) contouring consistency, diaphragm motion range, and tumor motion trajectory; and in digital anthropomorphic phantoms on 4D-DIR introduced errors in tumor motion range, centroid location, extent, and volume. MC-4D-MRI consisting of 4D-MRIs in native image contrasts (T1-w, T2-w, and T2/T1-w) and synthetic image contrasts, such as tumor-enhanced contrast (TEC) were generated in five liver tumor patients. Patient tumor CNR increased from 2.6±1.8 in the T2/T1-w MRI, to -4.4±2.4, 6.6±3.0, and 9.6±3.9 in the T1-w, T2-w, and TEC MRI, respectively. Patient ITV inter-observer mean Dice similarity coefficient (mDSC) increased from 0.65±0.10 in the original T2/T1-w 4D-MRI, to 0.76±0.14, 0.77±0.12, and 0.86±0.05 in the T1-w, T2-w, and TEC 4D-MRI, respectively. Patient diaphragm motion range absolute differences between the three new 4D-MRIs and original T2/T1-w 4D-MRI were 1.2±1.3, 0.3±0.7, and 0.5±0.5mm, respectively. Patient tumor displacement phase-averaged absolute differences between the three 4D-MRIs and the original 4D-MRI were 0.72±0.33, 0.62±0.54, and 0.74±0.43mm in the superior-inferior (SI) direction, and 0.59±0.36, 0.51±0.30, and 0.50±0.24mm in the anterior-posterior (AP) direction, respectively. In the digital phantoms, phase-averaged absolute tumor centroid shift caused by the 4D-DIR were at or below 0.5mm in SI, AP, and left-right (LR) directions. We developed an MC-4D-MRI technique capable of expanding single image contrast 4D-MRI along a new dimension of image contrast. Initial evaluations in liver tumor patients showed enhancements in image contrast variety, tumor contrast, and ITV contouring consistencies using MC-4D-MRI. The technique might offer new perspectives on the image contrast of MRI and 4D-MRI in MR-guided radiotherapy.

Geometric uncertainty analysis of MLC tracking for lung SABR

Purpose. The purpose of this work was to report on the geometric uncertainty for patients treated with multi-leaf collimator (MLC) tracking for lung SABR to verify the accuracy of the system. Methods. Seventeen patients were treated as part of the MLC tracking for lung SABR clinical trial using electromagnetic beacons implanted around the tumor acting as a surrogate for target motion. Sources of uncertainties evaluated in the study included the surrogate-target positional uncertainty, the beam-surrogate tracking uncertainty, the surrogate localization uncertainty, and the target delineation uncertainty. Probability density functions (PDFs) for each source of uncertainty were constructed for the cohort and each patient. The total PDFs was computed using a convolution approach. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to quantify these uncertainties. Results. For the cohort, the surrogate-target positional uncertainty 95% CIs were ±2.5 mm (−2.0/3.0 mm) in left-right (LR), ±3.0 mm (−1.6/4.5 mm) in superior–inferior (SI) and ±2.0 mm (−1.8/2.1 mm) in anterior–posterior (AP). The beam-surrogate tracking uncertainty 95% CIs were ±2.1 mm (−2.1/2.1 mm) in LR, ±2.8 mm (−2.8/2.7 mm) in SI and ±2.1 mm (−2.1/2.0 mm) in AP directions. The surrogate localization uncertainty minimally impacted the total PDF with a width of ±0.6 mm. The target delineation uncertainty distribution 95% CIs were ±5.4 mm. For the total PDF, the 95% CIs were ±5.9 mm (−5.8/6.0 mm) in LR, ±6.7 mm (−5.8/7.5 mm) in SI and ±6.0 mm (−5.5/6.5 mm) in AP. Conclusion. This work reports the geometric uncertainty of MLC tracking for lung SABR by accounting for the main sources of uncertainties that occurred during treatment. The overall geometric uncertainty is within ±6.0 mm in LR and AP directions and ±6.7 mm in SI. The dominant uncertainty was the target delineation uncertainty. This geometric analysis helps put into context the range of uncertainties that may be expected during MLC tracking for lung SABR (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT02514512).

Evaluation Of Intra-Fraction Motion Of Prostate Gland During Moderately Hypofractionated External Beam Radiotherapy Using Four Dimensional Trans Perineal Ultrasound (TPUS)

The purpose of the study is to monitor the intra fraction movements of prostate during hypo fractionated EBRT in real time using noninvasive 4D trans perineal ultra sound (Elekta clarity TPUS auto scan system). A total of 1986 trans perineal ultrasound sound (TPUS) monitorings were studied. We analyzed TPUS monitoring data of 100 treatment sessions from five of our patients treated with 60Gy/20 fractions over four weeks. Planning CT scan and reference TPUS was acquired in same position. Bladder and rectal protocols were reproduced in all treatment sessions. Treatment was delivered with VMAT technique under TPUS guidance with Gating. During treatment continuous monitoring of prostate motion is done with TPUS in three direction Superior- Inferior (SI), Right-Left (RL), Anterior-Posterior (AP). The treatment time for each session ranged from 220 to 660 seconds. The prostate displacement in every 20 second interval was taken for evaluation in this study. The mean, median, maximum displacements in each direction were calculated. Percentage of time the prostate moved within 1mm, 3mm, 6mm, 10mm, >10mm and percentage of time prostate moved in SI, RL, AP direction were assessed for each patient. The treatment was automatically stopped (gating) if the displacement of prostate is more than 3mm for more than 3 seconds. The mean prostate displacement of (1.14±0.80) mm, (-1.77±2.57) mm, (-1.96±1.46) mm were observed in SI, RL, AP directions. The prostate moved within 3mm in 88.58%, 90.16% ,75.76% and within 6 mm in 98.94%, 97.24%, 92.96% of treatment time in SI, RL, AP directions respectively. Prostate displacement was noted in inferior: superior (86%:13.9%); right: left (47.02%:52.98%); anterior: posterior (11.64%:88.36%) directions respectively. The maximum duration of prostate displacement was seen in posterior and inferior direction. Maximum displacement up to 13.65 mm was detected. Deviations more than 10mm in SI, RL, AP directions were 0%, 0.2% and 3.5% respectively. Maximum displacement was seen in AP direction. Maximum duration of prostate displacement was seen in inferior and superior direction. Real time monitoring of prostate motion during treatment is warranted during hypo fractionated radiotherapy while using tight margins.

Adaptive radiotherapy and the dosimetric impact of inter- and intrafractional motion on the planning target volume for prostate cancer patients

PurposeTo investigate the dosimetric influence of daily interfractional (inter) setup errors and intrafractional (intra) target motion on the planning target volume (PTV) and the possibility of an offline adaptive radiotherapy (ART) method to correct larger patient positioning uncertainties in image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PCa).Materials and methodsA CTV (clinical target volume)-to-PTV margin ranging from 15 mm in LR (left-right) and SI (superior-inferior) and 5–10 mm in AP (anterior-posterior) direction was applied to all patients. The dosimetric influence of this margin was retrospectively calculated by analysing systematic and random components of inter and intra errors of 31 consecutive intermediate- and high-risk localized PCa patients using daily cone beam computed tomography and kV/kV (kilo-Voltage) imaging. For each patient inter variation was assessed by observing the first 4 treatment days, which led to an offline ART-based treatment plan in case of larger variations.Results:Systematic inter uncertainties were larger (1.12 in LR, 2.28 in SI and 1.48 mm in AP) than intra systematic errors (0.44 in LR, 0.69 in SI and 0.80 mm in AP). Same findings for the random error in SI direction with 3.19 (inter) and 2.30 mm (intra), whereas in LR and AP results were alike with 1.89 (inter) and 1.91 mm (intra) and 2.10 (inter) and 2.27 mm (intra), respectively. The calculated margin revealed dimensions of 4–5 mm in LR, 8–9 mm in SI and 6–7 mm in AP direction. Treatment plans which had to be adapted showed smaller variations with 1.12 (LR) and 1.72 mm (SI) for Σ and 4.17 (LR) and 3.75 mm (SI) for σ compared to initial plans with 1.77 and 2.62 mm for Σ and 4.46 and 5.39 mm for σ in LR and SI, respectively.ConclusionThe currently clinically used margin of 15 mm in LR and SI and 5–10 mm in AP direction includes inter and intra uncertainties. The results show that offline ART is feasible which becomes a necessity with further reductions in PTV margins.

Large field of view distortion assessment in a low-field MR-linac.

MR-guided radiation therapy (RT) offers unparalleled soft tissue contrast for localization and target tracking. However, MRI distortions may be detrimental to high precision RT. This work characterizes the gradient nonlinearity (GNL) and total distortions over the first year of clinical operation of a 0.35T MR-linac. For GNL characterization, an in-house large field of view (FOV) phantom (60 × 42.5 × 55 cm3 , >6000 spherical landmarks) was configured and scanned at four timepoints with forward/reverse read polarities (Gradient Echo sequence, FA/TR/TE = 28°/30 ms/6 ms). GNL was measured in Anterior-Posterior (AP), Left-Right (LR), and Superior-Inferior (SI) frequency-encoding directions based on deviation of the auto-segmented landmark centroids between rigidly registered MR and CT images and assessed based on radial distance from magnet isocenter. Total distortion was assessed using a 30 × 30 cm2 grid phantom oriented along the cardinal axes over >1 year of operation. The scanner's spatial integrity within the first ~10 months was stable (maximum total distortion variation = 10/6/8%, maximum distortion = 1.41/0.99/1.56 mm in Axial/Coronal/Sagittal planes, respectively). GNL distortions measured during this time period <10 cm from isocenter were (-0.74, 0.45), (-0.67, 0.53), and (-0.86, 0.70) mm in AP/LR/SI directions. In the 10-20 cm range, <1.5% of the distortions exceeded 2 mm in the AP and LR axes while <4% of the distortions exceeded 2 mm for SI. After major repairs and magnet re-shim, detectable changes were observed in total and GNL distortions (20% reduction in AP and 36% increase in SI direction in the 20-25 cm range). Across all timepoints and axes, 38-53% of landmarks in the 20-25 cm range were displaced by >1 mm. GNL distortions were negligible within a 10 cm radius from isocenter. However, in the periphery, non-negligible distortions of up to ~7 mm were observed, which may necessitate GNL corrections for MR-IGRT for treatment sites distant from magnet isocenter.

Localization accuracy of two electromagnetic tracking systems in prostate cancer radiotherapy: A comparison with fiducial marker based kilovoltage imaging

The aim of this study was to evaluate the localization accuracy of electromagnetic (EM) tracking systems RayPilot (Micropos Medical AB) and Calypso (Varian Medical Systems) in prostate cancer radiotherapy. The accuracy was assessed by comparing couch shifts obtained with the EM methods to the couch shifts determined by simultaneous fiducial marker (FM) based orthogonal kilovoltage (kV) imaging. Agreement between the methods was compared using Bland-Altman analysis. Interfractional positional stability of the FMs, RayPilot transmitters and Calypso transponders was investigated. 582 fractions from 22 RayPilot patients and 335 fractions from 26 Calypso patients were analyzed. Mean (± standard deviation (SD)) differences between RayPilot and kV imaging were 0.3 ± 2.2, −2.2 ± 2.4 and −0.0 ± 1.0 mm in anterior-posterior (AP), superior-inferior (SI) and left-right (LR) directions, respectively. Corresponding 95% limits of agreement (LOA) were ±4.3, ±4.7 and ±2.1 mm around the mean. Mean (±SD) differences between Calypso and kV imaging were −0.2 ± 0.6, 0.1 ± 0.5 and −0.1 ± 0.4 mm in AP, SI and LR directions, respectively, and corresponding LOAs were ±1.3, ±1.0 and ±0.8 mm around the mean. FMs and transponders were stable: SD of intermarker and intertransponder distances was 0.5 mm. Transmitters were unstable: mean caudal transmitter shift of 1.8 ± 2.0 mm was observed. Results indicate that the localization accuracy of the Calypso is comparable to kV imaging of fiducials and the methods could be used interchangeably. The localization accuracy of the RayPilot is affected by transmitter instability and the positioning of the patient should be verified by other setup techniques. The study is part of clinical trial NCT02319239.

A Correlation Study of Clinical Outcomes by Quantification of Fatty Degeneration of the Subscapularis: Partial vs. Whole Cross-section.

BackgroundFatty degeneration of rotator cuff is a well-known predictor of postoperative outcome. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical features of rotator cuff tears involving subscapularis, and investigate whether fatty degeneration quantified from only the upper subscapularis correlates better with clinical outcomes than quantified from the whole subscapularis.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 315 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic repair for rotator cuff tears involving subscapularis with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Preoperative and postoperative visual analogue score for pain, range of motion and functional scores were assessed. Integrity of the repaired tendon was assessed at the 1-year follow-up with either magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasonography.ResultsThe mean Goutallier grade of whole cross-section was significantly lower than that of upper cross-section (1.59 vs. 1.71, p<0.05), but significantly higher than that of lower cross-section (1.59 vs. 1.01, p<0.05). In analysis of 37 re-tears, the occupancy of severe fatty degeneration in upper cross-section was 86.5%, which was significantly higher than that seen in whole cross-section (56.8%, p<0.05). We calculated the cut-off tear size for prediction of re-tears as 19.0 mm for retraction and 11.0 mm for superior-inferior. The cut-off Goutallier grade was 2.5 for both whole and upper cross-sections, but area under the curve was greater in the upper cross-section than the whole (0.911 vs. 0.807).ConclusionsAs fatty degeneration of upper subscapularis demonstrated a more distinct spectrum than whole subscapularis, we suggest that measuring fatty degeneration of upper subscapularis can be a more useful method to predict clinical prognosis.

A Pilot Study: The Role of Radio-Opaque Hydrogel Tissue Marker in the Treatment of Postprostatectomy Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy

It is well documented that the prostate bed is highly susceptible to inter-fraction motion leading to larger treatment planning margins to account for daily treatment set up uncertainties when matching to bony anatomy. The use of fiducial markers in the prostate bed has significantly improved accuracy of treatment delivery. This pilot study aims to investigate the role and benefits of radio-opaque hydrogel tissue marker in the treatment of post prostatectomy intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Twenty patients treated with IMRT to a dose of 70.2Gy in 39 fractions between Jan 2016 to Jan 2017 were included in this study. All patients underwent transperineal injection of hydrogel tissue marker at the level of vesico-urethral anastomosis and cystoscopically into the posterior bladder wall. Instructions for bladder and bowel preparation to be followed during CT simulation and daily treatments were provided to the patients. Daily on-line cone beam CT matching to the hydrogel tissue marker was performed prior to each treatment and off-sets relative to skin tattoos were recorded in 3 directions: left-right (LR); superior-inferior (SI) and anterio-posterior (AP). Daily image registration using bony matching was then assessed off-line and off-sets relative to skin tattoos were again recorded. The mean and standard deviation of the differences between the hydrogel tissue markers and bony off-sets were calculated for all fractions for each patient; then the overall mean and systematic (Σ) and random errors (σ) for the entire cohort were calculated. The planning target volume (PTV) margin required for bony matching was estimated using van Herk's formula of 2.5Σ + 0.7σ, which is designed to ensure a minimum dose of 95% of prescribed dose to the clinical target volume (CTV) in 90% of patients. These margins are relative to the hydrogel tissue markers which are assumed to be in the target tissue. A total of 1520 images were analysed. The overall mean shift differences between the hydrogel tissue markers and bones for the entire cohort were LR: 0.13mm (Σ 0.38mm, σ 1.35mm); SI: 0.92mm (Σ 1.40mm, σ 2.50mm) and AP: 0.40mm (Σ 1.98mm, σ 3.18mm). The calculated PTV margins for bony matching relative to hydrogel tissue markers were 1.90mm in LR, 5.25mm in SI and 7.17mm AP directions. Prostate bed motion is independent of pelvic bone anatomy and soft tissue matching has shown to be superior compared with pelvic bone matching. With a required PTV margin of 7.17mm in the AP direction, the use of hydrogel tissue marker can significantly improve treatment set up accuracy even in patients with optimal bowel and bladder preparations who undergo image guidance with pelvic bone matching. This will provide the best CTV coverage whilst minimising the current PTV margin and mitigating bladder and rectal toxicities.

Auto-Contour Guided Prostate Patient Positioning

To use contours automatically generated on the pre-treatment cone-beam CT (CBCT) to improve the registration with the plan CT for prostate image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT). 10 patients, each with 10 to 28 daily kV-CBCTs, had their prostate manually contoured on the plan CT and daily CBCTs. Prostate contours were also automatically generated on the CBCTs. Auto-contours are produced by deformably registering prior CBCTs (atlases) to the current CBCT and deforming the prior contours with the resulting deformation field. This set of deformed prostate contours on the current CBCT is then combined using the STAPLE algorithm. The optimal IGRT shift is determined by comparing the centroid of the manual prostate contour in the CBCT and plan CT. This shift is compared both to the clinical shift that was based on qualitative alignment of the images, and to a centroid shift based on auto-contours. The dosimetric impact of the different shift methods is estimated by overlaying the plan prescription isodose line on the CBCT according to the shifts, and then determining the coverage of the manual prostate and PTV contours. On average there is a 2.3±1.5 mm difference in the superior/inferior (SI) direction between the clinical and centroid shifts. The difference is 0.9±0.7 mm in the left/right (LR) and 1.8±1.5 mm in the anterior/posterior (AP) directions. Using the clinical shifts gave on average 98.7±2.6% coverage of the prostate, and 89.6±3.8% coverage of the PTV by the prescription dose. Centroid based shifts gave significantly better coverage of 99.5±1.1% (P=0.0013) and 92.7±2.4% (P<0.00001) for the prostate and PTV respectively. The reduction in standard deviation also implies more consistent coverage day to day with the centroid shifts. The average dice similarity coefficient of prostate auto-contours to manual contours is 0.91, which equals our intra-observer error. The average time for auto-contouring was 90 seconds on a Tesla K20c GPU. Using auto-contours to determine the centroid produces equivalent shifts to the manual contour centroid shifts, with average differences of 0.8±0.6, 0.4±0.3 and 0.8±0.7 mm in SI, LR and AP directions, respectively. This is to be expected given the consistency of the manual and auto-contours. There are >2 mm differences between our new centroid based shifts and the current clinical, image based shifts, with centroid based shifts providing significantly higher prostate coverage. Auto-contouring provides equivalent shifts to manual centroid based shifts. IGRT can thus be fully automated, resulting in improved prostate coverage.

Subsecond and Submillimeter Resolution Positional Verification for Stereotactic Irradiation of Spinal Lesions

Spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) requires highly accurate positioning. We report our experience with markerless template matching and triangulation of kilovoltage images routinely acquired during spine SBRT, to determine spine position. Kilovoltage images, continuously acquired at 7, 11 or 15 frames/s during volumetric modulated spine SBRT of 18 patients, consisting of 93 fluoroscopy datasets (1 dataset/arc), were analyzed off-line. Four patients were immobilized in a head/neck mask, 14 had no immobilization. Two-dimensional (2D) templates were created for each gantry angle from planning computed tomography data and registered to prefiltered kilovoltage images to determine 2D shifts between actual and planned spine position. Registrations were considered valid if the normalized cross correlation score was ≥0.15. Multiple registrations were triangulated to determine 3D position. For each spine position dataset, average positional offset and standard deviation were calculated. To verify the accuracy and precision of the technique, mean positional offset and standard deviation for twenty stationary phantom datasets with different baseline shifts were measured. For the phantom, average standard deviations were 0.18 mm for left-right (LR), 0.17 mm for superior-inferior (SI), and 0.23 mm for the anterior-posterior (AP) direction. Maximum difference in average detected and applied shift was 0.09 mm. For the 93 clinical datasets, the percentage of valid matched frames was, on average, 90.7% (range: 49.9-96.1%) per dataset. Average standard deviations for all datasets were 0.28, 0.19, and 0.28 mm for LR, SI, and AP, respectively. Spine position offsets were, on average, -0.05 (range: -1.58 to 2.18), -0.04 (range: -3.56 to 0.82), and -0.03 mm (range: -1.16 to 1.51), respectively. Average positional deviation was <1 mm in all directions in 92% of the arcs. Template matching and triangulation using kilovoltage images acquired during irradiation allows spine position detection with submillimeter accuracy at subsecond intervals. Although the majority of patients were not immobilized, most vertebrae were stable at the sub-mm level during spine SBRT delivery.

TU‐F‐CAMPUS‐J‐01: Inference of Prostate PTV Margins in VMAT Delivery From Intra‐Fraction Prostate Motion During SBRT Delivery

Purpose:To retrospectively quantify the intra‐fraction prostate motion during stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment using CyberKnife's target tracking system, which may provide insight into expansion margins from GTV to PTV used in gantry‐based treatments. CyberKnife is equipped with an active tracking system (InTempo) that tracks the four fiducials placed in the prostate gland. The system acquires intra‐fraction orthogonal kV images at 45° and 315° in a sequential fashion.Methods:A total of 38 patients treated with SBRT using CyberKnife between 2011 and 2013 were studied. Dose‐regime was 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions (7.25 Gy/fraction, twice per week) as per RTOG 0938 guidelines. The CyberKnife image tracking logs for all SBRT treatments using InTempo were examined. A total of 13663 images were examined for the superior/inferior (SI), anterior/posterior (AP) and left/right (LR) translation as well as roll, pitch and yaw rotations for the target position relative to the last known model position.Results:The mean ± 2 SD of intra‐fraction motion was contained within 3 mm for SI and LR and 4.5 mm for AP directions at 5 minutes into the treatment delivery. It was contained within 4 mm for SI and LR and 5 mm for AP at 10 minutes. At 15 minutes into delivery, all translations were contained within 5 mm. The mean ± 2 SD of prostate roll, pitch and yaw increased with time but were contained within 5 degree at 5, 10 and 15 minutes into treatment. Additionally, target translations and rotations were within ± 1 mm and ± 1 degree for 90% and 78% of the time.Conclusion:The organ motion component of PTV margin for 10 minute VMAT delivery is contained within 4 mm in SI and LR direction and within 5 mm in the AP direction.

SU-C-210-04: Considerable Pancreatic Tumor Motion During Breath-Hold Measured Using Intratumoral Fiducials On Fluoroscopic Movies

Purpose: Using a breath hold (BH) technique during radiotherapy of pancreatic tumors is expected to reduce intra-fractional motion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the tumor motion during BH. Methods: In this pilot study, we included 8 consecutive pancreatic cancer patients. All had 2– 4 intratumoral gold fiducials. Patients were asked to perform 3 consecutive 30-second end-inhale BHs on day 5, 10 and 15 of their three-week treatment. During BH, airflow through a mouthpiece was measured using a spirometer. Any inadvertent flow of air during BH was monitored for all patients. We measured tumor motion on lateral fluoroscopic movies (57 in total) made during BH. In each movie the fiducials as a group were tracked over time in superior-inferior (SI) and anterior-posterior (AP) direction using 2-D image correlation between consecutive frames. We determined for each patient the range of intra-BH motion over all movies; we also determined the absolute means and standard deviations (SDs) for the entire patient group. Additionally, we investigated the relation between inadvertent airflow during BH and the intra-BH motion. Results: We found intra-BH tumor motion of up to 12.5 mm (range, 1.0–12.5 mm) in SI direction and up to 8.0 mm (range, 1.0–8.0 mm)more » in AP direction. The absolute mean motion over the patient population was 4.7 (SD: 3.0) mm and 2.8 (SD: 1.2) mm in the SI and AP direction, respectively. Patients were able to perform stable consecutive BHs; during only 20% of the movies we found very small airflows (≤ 65 ml). These were mostly stepwise in nature and could not explain the continuous tumor motions we observed. Conclusion: We found substantial (up to 12.5 mm) pancreatic tumor motion during BHs. We found minimal inadvertent airflow, seen only during a minority of BHs, and this did not explain the obtained results. This work was supported by the foundation Bergh in het Zadel through the Dutch Cancer Society (KWF Kankerbestrijding) project No. UVA 2011-5271.« less

Potential systematic uncertainties in IGRT when FBCT reference images are used for pancreatic tumors.

The purpose of this study was to quantify the systematic uncertainties resulting from using free breathing computed tomography (FBCT) as a reference image for image‐guided radiation therapy (IGRT) for patients with pancreatic tumors, and to quantify the associated dosimetric impact that resulted from using FBCT as reference for IGRT. Fifteen patients with implanted fiducial markers were selected for this study. For each patient, a FBCT and an average intensity projection computed tomography (AIP) created from four‐dimensional computed tomography (4D CT) were acquired at the simulation. The treatment plan was created based on the FBCT. Seventy‐five weekly kilovoltage (kV) cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) images (five for each patient) were selected for this study. Bony alignment without rotation correction was performed 1) between the FBCT and CBCT, 2) between the AIP and CBCT, and 3) between the AIP and FBCT. The contours of the fiducials from the FBCT and AIP were transferred to the corresponding CBCT and were compared. Among the 75 CBCTs, 20 that had >3 mm differences in centers of mass (COMs) in any directions between the FBCT and AIP were chosen for further dosimetric analysis. These COM discrepancies were converted into isocenter shifts in the corresponding planning FBCT, and dose was recalculated and compared to the initial FBCT plans. For the 75 CBCTs studied, the mean absolute differences in the COMs of the fiducial markers between the FBCT and CBCTs were 3.3 mm±2.5 mm,3.5 mm±2.4 mm, and 5.8 mm±4.4 mm in the right–left (RL), anterior–posterior (AP), and superior–inferior (SI) directions, respectively. Between the AIP and CBCTs, the mean absolute differences were 3.2 mm±2.2 mm,3.3 mm±2.3 mm, and 6.3 mm±5.4 mm. The absolute mean discrepancies in these COMs shifts between FBCT/CBCT and AIP/CBCT were 1.1 mm±0.8 mm,1.3 mm±0.9 mm, and 3.3 mm±2.6 mm in RL, AP, and SI, respectively. This represented a potential systematic error. For the 20 CBCTs that had COM discrepancies >3 mm in any direction, the average reduction in planning target volume (PTV) coverage (PTV volume receiving 100% of prescription dose) was 5.3%±3.1% (range: 0.7%–12.8%). Using FBCT as a reference for IGRT may introduce potential interfractional systematic COM shifts if the FBCT is acquired at a different breathing phase than the average breathing phase. The potential systematic error could be significant in the SI direction and varied among patients for the other directions. AIP is a better choice of reference image set for IGRT in order to correct interfractional variations due to respiratory motion and nonrespiratory organ displacement.PACS numbers: 87.55.D, 87.55.dk, 87.55.km

Clinical experience using a video-guided spirometry system for deep inhalation breath-hold radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer.

The purpose was to report clinical experience of a video‐guided spirometry system in applying deep inhalation breath‐hold (DIBH) radiotherapy for left‐sided breast cancer, and to study the systematic and random uncertainties, intra‐ and interfraction motion and impact on cardiac dose associated with DIBH. The data from 28 left‐sided breast cancer patients treated with spirometer‐guided DIBH radiation were studied. Dosimetric comparisons between free‐breathing (FB) and DIBH plans were performed. The distance between the heart and chest wall measured on the digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR) and MV portal images, dDRR(DIBH) and dport(DIBH), respectively, was compared as a measure of DIBH setup uncertainty. The difference (Δd) between dDRR(DIBH) and dport(DIBH) was defined as the systematic uncertainty. The standard deviation of Δd for each patient was defined as the random uncertainty. MV cine images during radiation were acquired. Affine registrations of the cine images acquired during one fraction and multiple fractions were performed to study the intra‐ and interfraction motion of the chest wall. The median chest wall motion was used as the metric for intra‐ and interfraction analysis. Breast motions in superior–inferior (SI) direction and “AP” (defined on the DRR or MV portal image as the direction perpendicular to the SI direction) are reported. Systematic and random uncertainties of 3.8 mm and 2 mm, respectively, were found for this spirometer‐guided DIBH treatment. MV cine analysis showed that intrafraction chest wall motions during DIBH were 0.3 mm in “AP” and 0.6 mm in SI. The interfraction chest wall motions were 3.6 mm in “AP” and 3.4 mm in SI. Utilization of DIBH with this spirometry system led to a statistically significant reduction of cardiac dose relative to FB treatment. The DIBH using video‐guided spirometry provided reproducible cardiac sparing with minimal intra‐ and interfraction chest wall motion, and thus is a valuable adjunct to modern breast treatment techniques.PACS number: 87.55.kh, 87.55.ne, 87.55.tg

Semiautomatic registration of 3D transabdominal ultrasound images for patient repositioning during postprostatectomy radiotherapy.

The aim of the present work is to propose and evaluate registration algorithms of three-dimensional (3D) transabdominal (TA) ultrasound (US) images to setup postprostatectomy patients during radiation therapy. Three registration methods have been developed and evaluated to register a reference 3D-TA-US image acquired during the planning CT session and a 3D-TA-US image acquired before each treatment session. The first method (method A) uses only gray value information, whereas the second one (method B) uses only gradient information. The third one (method C) combines both sets of information. All methods restrict the comparison to a region of interest computed from the dilated reference positioning volume drawn on the reference image and use mutual information as a similarity measure. The considered geometric transformations are translations and have been optimized by using the adaptive stochastic gradient descent algorithm. Validation has been carried out using manual registration by three operators of the same set of image pairs as the algorithms. Sixty-two treatment US images of seven patients irradiated after a prostatectomy have been registered to their corresponding reference US image. The reference registration has been defined as the average of the manual registration values. Registration error has been calculated by subtracting the reference registration from the algorithm result. For each session, the method has been considered a failure if the registration error was above both the interoperator variability of the session and a global threshold of 3.0 mm. All proposed registration algorithms have no systematic bias. Method B leads to the best results with mean errors of -0.6, 0.7, and -0.2 mm in left-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI), and anterior-posterior (AP) directions, respectively. With this method, the standard deviations of the mean error are of 1.7, 2.4, and 2.6 mm in LR, SI, and AP directions, respectively. The latter are inferior to the interoperator registration variabilities which are of 2.5, 2.5, and 3.5 mm in LR, SI, and AP directions, respectively. Failures occur in 5%, 18%, and 10% of cases in LR, SI, and AP directions, respectively. 69% of the sessions have no failure. Results of the best proposed registration algorithm of 3D-TA-US images for postprostatectomy treatment have no bias and are in the same variability range as manual registration. As the algorithm requires a short computation time, it could be used in clinical practice provided that a visual review is performed.