MCB-binding Factor Research Articles

Deletion of the MBP1 Gene, Involved in the Cell Cycle, Affects Respiration and Pseudohyphal Differentiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

ABSTRACTMbp1p is a component of MBF (MluI cell cycle box binding factor, Mbp1p-Swi6p) and is well known to regulate the G1–S transition of the cell cycle. However, few studies have provided clues regarding its role in fermentation. This work aimed to recognize the function of the MBP1 gene in ethanol fermentation in a wild-type industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. MBP1 deletion caused an obvious decrease in the final ethanol concentration under oxygen-limited (without agitation), but not under aerobic, conditions (130 rpm). Furthermore, the mbp1Δ strain showed 84% and 35% decreases in respiration intensity under aerobic and oxygen-limited conditions, respectively. These findings indicate that MBP1 plays an important role in responding to variations in oxygen content and is involved in the regulation of respiration and fermentation. Unexpectedly, mbp1Δ also showed pseudohyphal growth, in which cells elongated and remained connected in a multicellular arrangement on yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) plates. In addition, mbp1Δ showed an increase in cell volume, associated with a decrease in the fraction of budded cells. These results provide more detailed information about the function of MBP1 and suggest some clues to efficiently improve ethanol production by industrially engineered yeast strains.IMPORTANCE Saccharomyces cerevisiae is an especially favorable organism used for ethanol production. However, inhibitors and high osmolarity conferred by fermentation broth, and high concentrations of ethanol as fermentation runs to completion, affect cell growth and ethanol production. Therefore, yeast strains with high performance, such as rapid growth, high tolerance, and high ethanol productivity, are highly desirable. Great efforts have been made to improve their performance by evolutionary engineering, and industrial strains may be a better start than laboratory ones for industrial-scale ethanol production. The significance of our research is uncovering the function of MBP1 in ethanol fermentation in a wild-type industrial S. cerevisiae strain, which may provide clues to engineer better-performance yeast in producing ethanol. Furthermore, the results that lacking MBP1 caused pseudohyphal growth on YPD plates could shed light on the development of xylose-fermenting S. cerevisiae, as using xylose as the sole carbon source also caused pseudohyphal growth.

The LAMMER kinase is involved in morphogenesis and response to cell wall- and DNA-damaging stresses in Candida albicans.

Dual specificity LAMMER kinase has been reported to be conserved across species ranging from yeasts to animals and has multiple functions. Candida albicans undergoes dimorphic switching between yeast cells and hyphal growth forms as its key virulence factors. Deletion of KNS1, which encodes for LAMMER kinase in C. albicans, led to pseudohyphal growth on YPD media and defects in filamentous growth both on spider and YPD solid media containing 10% serum. These cells exhibited expanded central wrinkled regions and specifically reduced peripheral filaments. Among the several stresses tested, the kns1Δ strains showed sensitivity to cell-wall and DNA-replicative stress. Under fluorescent microscopy, an increase in chitin decomposition was observed near the bud necks and septa in kns1Δ cells. When the expression levels of genes for cell wall integrity (CWI) and the DNA repair mechanism were tested, the kns1 double-deletion cells showed abnormal patterns compared to wild-type cells; The transcript levels of genes for glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins were increased upon calcofluor white (CFW) treatment. Under DNA replicative stress, the expression of MluI-cell cycle box binding factor (MBF)-targeted genes, which are expressed during the G1/S transition in the cell cycle, was not increased in the kns1 double-deletion cells. This strain showed increased adhesion to the surface of an agar plate and zebrafish embryo. These results demonstrate that Kns1 is involved in dimorphic transition, cell wall integrity, response to DNA replicative stress, and adherence to the host cell surface in C. albicans.

Nutritional cell cycle reprogramming reveals that inhibition of Cdk1 is required for proper MBF-dependent transcription.

In nature, cells and in particular unicellular microorganisms are exposed to a variety of nutritional environments. Fission yeast cells cultured in nitrogen-rich media grow fast, divide with a large size and show a short G1 and a long G2. However, when cultured in nitrogen-poor media, they exhibit reduced growth rate and cell size and a long G1 and a short G2. In this study, we compared the phenotypes of cells lacking the highly conserved cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) inhibitor Rum1 and the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) activator Ste9 in nitrogen-rich and nitrogen-poor media. Rum1 and Ste9 are dispensable for cell division in nitrogen-rich medium. However, in nitrogen-poor medium they are essential for generating a proper wave of MluI cell-cycle box binding factor (MBF)-dependent transcription at the end of G1, which is crucial for promoting a successful S phase. Mutants lacking Rum1 and Ste9 showed premature entry into S phase and a reduced wave of MBF-dependent transcription, leading to replication stress, DNA damage and G2 cell cycle arrest. This work demonstrates how reprogramming the cell cycle by changing the nutritional environment may reveal new roles for cell cycle regulators.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSA1 mRNA has a sequence for localization at the bud tip.

MSA1 mRNA encodes Msa1p, a protein associated with the SCB-binding factor (SBF) and MCB-binding factor (MBF) complex. Msa1p promotes the transcription of G1 phase-specific genes, and is subjected to cell cycle-dependent regulation for its abundance and subcellular localization. MSA1 mRNA and Msa1p levels oscillate in the cell cycle with peaks at the late M/early G1 phase and early G1 phase, respectively. Phosphorylation by CDK1 negatively regulates the nuclear localization of Msa1p. In the present study, we identified MSA1 mRNA as a bud tip-localized mRNA in screening using a Tag-GFP system. A fragmentation analysis revealed a sequence of ~145 bases for the bud tip localization. Endogenous MSA1 mRNA localized at the bud tip in a manner that depended on SHE2. Msa1p levels were also affected by SHE2 in cells constitutively expressing MSA1 mRNA. These results suggest the existence of a regulatory mechanism for Msa1p through the localized control of MSA1 mRNA.

Set2 Methyltransferase Facilitates DNA Replication and Promotes Genotoxic Stress Responses through MBF-Dependent Transcription

SummaryChromatin modification through histone H3 lysine 36 methylation by the SETD2 tumor suppressor plays a key role in maintaining genome stability. Here, we describe a role for Set2-dependent H3K36 methylation in facilitating DNA replication and the transcriptional responses to both replication stress and DNA damage through promoting MluI cell-cycle box (MCB) binding factor (MBF)-complex-dependent transcription in fission yeast. Set2 loss leads to reduced MBF-dependent ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) expression, reduced deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) synthesis, altered replication origin firing, and a checkpoint-dependent S-phase delay. Accordingly, prolonged S phase in the absence of Set2 is suppressed by increasing dNTP synthesis. Furthermore, H3K36 is di- and tri-methylated at these MBF gene promoters, and Set2 loss leads to reduced MBF binding and transcription in response to genotoxic stress. Together, these findings provide new insights into how H3K36 methylation facilitates DNA replication and promotes genotoxic stress responses in fission yeast.

Gad8 Protein Is Found in the Nucleus Where It Interacts with the MluI Cell Cycle Box-binding Factor (MBF) Transcriptional Complex to Regulate the Response to DNA Replication Stress

The target of rapamycin (TOR) kinase is found at the core of two evolutionarily conserved complexes known as TOR complexes 1 and 2 (TORC1 and TORC2). In fission yeast, TORC2 is dispensable for proliferation under optimal growth conditions but is required for starvation and stress responses. We have previously reported that loss of function of TORC2 renders cells highly sensitive to DNA replication stress; however, the mechanism underlying this sensitivity is unknown. TORC2 has one known direct substrate, the kinase Gad8, which is related to AKT in human cells. Here we show that both TORC2 and its substrate Gad8 are found in the nucleus and are bound to the chromatin. We also demonstrate that Gad8 physically interacts with the MluI cell cycle box-binding factor (MBF) transcription complex that regulates the G1/S progression and the response to DNA stress. In mutant cells lacking TORC2 or Gad8, the binding of the MBF complex to its cognate promoters is compromised, and the induction of MBF target genes in response to DNA replication stress is reduced. Consistently, the protein levels of Cdt2 and Cig2, two MBF target genes, are reduced in the absence of TORC2-Gad8 signaling. Taken together, our findings highlight critical functions of TORC2 in the nucleus and suggest a role in surviving DNA replication stress via transcriptional regulation of MBF target genes.

The MluI cell cycle box (MCB) motifs, but not damage-responsive elements (DREs), are responsible for the transcriptional induction of the rhp51+ gene in response to DNA replication stress.

DNA replication stress induces the transcriptional activation of rhp51 +, a fission yeast recA homolog required for repair of DNA double strand breaks. However, the mechanism by which DNA replication stress activates rhp51 + transcription is not understood. The promoter region of rhp51 + contains two damage-responsive elements (DREs) and two MluI cell cycle box (MCB) motifs. Using luciferase reporter assays, we examined the role of these elements in rhp51 + transcription. The full-length rhp51 + promoter and a promoter fragment containing MCB motifs only, but not a fragment containing DREs, mediated transcriptional activation upon DNA replication stress. Removal of the MCB motifs from the rhp51 + promoter abolished the induction of rhp51 + transcription by DNA replication stress. Consistent with a role for MCB motifs in rhp51 + transcription activation, deletion of the MBF (MCB-binding factor) co-repressors Nrm1 and Yox1 precluded rhp51 + transcriptional induction in response to DNA replication stress. Using cells deficient in checkpoint signaling molecules, we found that the Rad3-Cds1/Chk1 pathway partially mediated rhp51 + transcription in response to DNA replication stress, suggesting the involvement of unidentified checkpoint signaling pathways. Because MBF is critical for G1/S transcription, we examined how the cell cycle affected rhp51 + transcription. The transcription of rhp51 + and cdc18 +, an MBF-dependent G1/S gene, peaked simultaneously in synchronized cdc25-22 cells. Furthermore, DNA replication stress maintained transcription of rhp51 + similarly to cdc18 +. Collectively, these results suggest that MBF and its regulators mediate rhp51 + transcription in response to DNA replication stress, and underlie rhp51 + transcription at the G1/S transition.

3,6-Epidioxy-1,10-bisaboladiene inhibits G1 -specific transcription through Swi4/Swi6 and Mbp1/Swi6 via the Hog1 stress pathway in yeast.

•Swi4 physically interacts with Swi6 by anti tag coimmunoprecipitation (View interaction).

Protein Kinase CK2 Holoenzyme Promotes Start-Specific Transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the entrance into S phase requires the activation of a specific burst of transcription, which depends on SBF (SCB binding factor, Swi4/Swi6) and MBF (MCB binding factor, Mbp1/Swi6) complexes. CK2 is a pleiotropic kinase involved in several cellular processes, including the regulation of the cell cycle. CK2 is composed of two catalytic subunits (α and α') and two regulatory subunits (β and β'), both of which are required to form the active holoenzyme. Here we investigate the function of the CK2 holoenzyme in Start-specific transcription. The ckb1Δ ckb2Δ mutant strain, bearing deletions of both genes encoding CK2 regulatory subunits, shows a delay of S-phase entrance due to a severe reduction of the expression of SBF- and MBF-dependent genes. This transcriptional defect is caused by an impaired recruitment of Swi6 and Swi4 to G1 gene promoters. Moreover, CK2 α and β' subunits interact with RNA polymerase II, whose binding to G1 promoters is positively regulated by the CK2 holoenzyme. Collectively, these findings suggest a novel role for the CK2 holoenzyme in the activation of G1 transcription.

Regulation of Histone Gene Expression in Budding Yeast

We discuss the regulation of the histone genes of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These include genes encoding the major core histones (H3, H4, H2A, and H2B), histone H1 (HHO1), H2AZ (HTZ1), and centromeric H3 (CSE4). Histone production is regulated during the cell cycle because the cell must replicate both its DNA during S phase and its chromatin. Consequently, the histone genes are activated in late G1 to provide sufficient core histones to assemble the replicated genome into chromatin. The major core histone genes are subject to both positive and negative regulation. The primary control system is positive, mediated by the histone gene-specific transcription activator, Spt10, through the histone upstream activating sequences (UAS) elements, with help from the major G1/S-phase activators, SBF (Swi4 cell cycle box binding factor) and perhaps MBF (MluI cell cycle box binding factor). Spt10 binds specifically to the histone UAS elements and contains a putative histone acetyltransferase domain. The negative system involves negative regulatory elements in the histone promoters, the RSC chromatin-remodeling complex, various histone chaperones [the histone regulatory (HIR) complex, Asf1, and Rtt106], and putative sequence-specific factors. The SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex links the positive and negative systems. We propose that the negative system is a damping system that modulates the amount of transcription activated by Spt10 and SBF. We hypothesize that the negative system mediates negative feedback on the histone genes by histone proteins through the level of saturation of histone chaperones with histone. Thus, the negative system could communicate the degree of nucleosome assembly during DNA replication and the need to shut down the activating system under replication-stress conditions. We also discuss post-transcriptional regulation and dosage compensation of the histone genes.

The SBF- and MBF-associated Protein Msa1 Is Required for Proper Timing of G1-specific Transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, cell cycle initiation is prompted during G(1) phase by Cln3/cyclin-dependent protein kinase-mediated transcriptional activation of G(1)-specific genes. A recent screening performed to reveal novel interactors of SCB-binding factor (SBF) and MCB-binding factor (MBF) identified, in addition to the SBF-specific repressor Whi5 and the MBF-specific corepressor Nrm1, a pair of homologous proteins, Msa1 and Msa2 (encoded by YOR066w and YKR077w), as interactors of SBF and MBF, respectively. MSA1 is expressed periodically during the cell cycle with peak mRNA levels occurring at the late M/early G(1) phase and peak protein levels occurring in early G(1). Msa1 associates with SBF- and MBF-regulated target promoters consistent with a role in G(1)-specific transcriptional regulation. Msa1 affects cell cycle initiation by advancing the timing of transcription of G(1)-specific genes. Msa1 binds to SBF- and MBF-regulated promoters and binding is maximal during the G(1) phase. Binding depends upon the cognate transcription factor. Msa1 overexpression advances the timing of SBF-dependent transcription and budding, whereas depletion delays both indicators of cell cycle initiation. Similar effects on MBF-regulated transcription are observed. Based upon these results, we conclude that Msa1 acts to advance the timing of G(1)-specific transcription and cell cycle initiation.

High Functional Overlap Between MluI Cell-Cycle Box Binding Factor and Swi4/6 Cell-Cycle Box Binding Factor in the G1/S Transcriptional Program in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In budding yeast, many genes are induced early in the cell cycle. Induction of these genes has been predominantly attributed to two transcription factors, Swi4-Swi6 (SBF) and Mbp1-Swi6 (MBF). Swi4 and Mbp1 are related DNA-binding proteins with dissimilar target sequences. For most G1/S-regulated genes that we tested in a cdc20 block-release protocol for cell-cycle synchronization, removal of both Swi4 and Mbp1 was necessary and sufficient to essentially eliminate cell-cycle-regulated expression. Detectable SBF or MBF binding sites (SCBs or MCBs) in the promoters or available genome-wide promoter occupancy data do not consistently explain this functional overlap. The overlapping ability of these transcription factors to regulate many promoters with very similar cell-cycle kinetics may provide robustness to the G1/S transcriptional response, but poses a puzzle with respect to promoter-transcription factor specificity. In addition, for some genes, deletion of Mbp1 or Swi4 enhances transcription, suggesting that these factors can also function as transcriptional repressors. Finally, we observe residual G1/S transcriptional regulation in the absence of Swi4 and Mbp1.

Evidence That Spt10 and Spt21 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Play Distinct Roles in Vivo and Functionally Interact With MCB-Binding Factor, SCB-Binding Factor and Snf1

Mutations in SPT10 and SPT21 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae have been previously shown to cause two prominent mutant phenotypes: (1) defects in transcription of particular histone genes and (2) suppression of Ty and delta-insertion mutations (Spt(-) phenotype). The requirement for Spt10 and Spt21 for transcription of particular histone genes suggested that they may interact with two factors previously shown to be present at histone loci, SBF (Swi4 and Swi6) and MBF (Mbp1 and Swi6). Therefore, we have studied swi4Delta, mbp1Delta, and swi6Delta mutants with respect to histone gene transcription and for interactions with spt10Delta and spt21Delta. Our results suggest that MBF and SBF play only modest roles in activation of histone gene transcription. In addition, we were surprised to find that swi4Delta, mbp1Delta, and swi6Delta mutations suppress the spt21Delta Spt(-) phenotype, but not the spt21Delta defect in histone gene transcription. In contrast, both swi4Delta and mbp1Delta cause lethality when combined with spt10Delta. To learn more about mutations that can suppress the spt21Delta Spt(-) phenotype, we performed a genetic screen and identified spt21Delta suppressors in seven additional genes. Three of these spt21Delta suppressors also cause lethality when combined with spt10Delta. Analysis of one spt21Delta suppressor, reg1, led to the finding that hyperactivation of Snf1 kinase, as caused by reg1Delta, suppresses the Spt(-) phenotype of spt21Delta. Taken together, these genetic interactions suggest distinct roles for Spt21 and Spt10 in vivo that are sensitive to multiple perturbations in transcription networks.

Meiosis-Specific Regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae S-Phase Cyclin CLB5 Is Dependent on MluI Cell Cycle Box (MCB) Elements in Its Promoter but Is Independent of MCB-Binding Factor Activity

In proliferating S. cerevisiae, genes whose products function in DNA replication are regulated by the MBF transcription factor composed of Mbp1 and Swi6 that binds to consensus MCB sequences in target promoters. We find that during meiotic development a subset of DNA replication genes exemplified by TMP1 and RNR1 are regulated by Mbp1. Deletion of Mbp1 deregulated TMP1 and RNR1 but did not interfere with premeiotic S-phase, meiotic recombination, or spore formation. Surprisingly, deletion of MBP1 had no effect on the expression of CLB5, which is purportedly controlled by MBF. Extensive analysis of the CLB5 promoter revealed that the gene is largely regulated by elements within a 100-bp fragment containing a cluster of MCB sequences. Surprisingly, induction of the CLB5 promoter requires MCB sequences, but not Mbp1, implying that another MCB-binding factor may exist in cells undergoing meiosis. In addition, full activation of CLB5 during meiosis requires Clb5 activity, suggesting that CLB5 may be regulated by a positive feedback mechanism. We further demonstrate that during meiosis MCBs function as effective transcriptional activators independent of MBP1.

Cell cycle-regulated transcription in fission yeast.

A fundamental process in biology is the mechanism by which cells duplicate and divide to produce two identical daughter cells. The fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, has proved to be an excellent model organism to study the role that gene expression plays in this process. The basic paradigm emerging is that a number of groups of genes are expressed in successive waves at different cell cycle times. Transcription of a particular group is controlled by a common DNA motif present in each gene's promoter, bound by a transcription factor complex. Each motif and transcription factor complex is specific to the time in the cell cycle when the group of genes is expressed. Examples of this are the MBF (MCB-binding factor)/MCB (MluI cell cycle box) system controlling gene expression at the start of S-phase, and PBF (PCB-binding factor)/PCB (Pombe cell cycle box) regulation of transcription at the end of mitosis. In some cases, these transcription control systems also operate during the alternative form of cell division, meiosis.

Cell cycle-regulated transcription in fission yeast

A fundamental process in biology is the mechanism by which cells duplicate and divide to produce two identical daughter cells. The fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, has proved to be an excellent model organism to study the role that gene expression plays in this process. The basic paradigm emerging is that a number of groups of genes are expressed in successive waves at different cell cycle times. Transcription of a particular group is controlled by a common DNA motif present in each gene's promoter, bound by a transcription factor complex. Each motif and transcription factor complex is specific to the time in the cell cycle when the group of genes is expressed. Examples of this are the MBF (MCB-binding factor)/MCB (MluI cell cycle box) system controlling gene expression at the start of S-phase, and PBF (PCB-binding factor)/PCB (Pombe cell cycle box) regulation of transcription at the end of mitosis. In some cases, these transcription control systems also operate during the alternative form of cell division, meiosis.

Regulation of cell cycle transcription factor Swi4 through auto-inhibition of DNA binding.

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, two transcription factors, SBF (SCB binding factor) and MBF (MCB binding factor), promote the induction of gene expression at the G(1)/S-phase transition of the mitotic cell cycle. Swi4 and Mbp1 are the DNA binding components of SBF and MBF, respectively. The Swi6 protein is a common subunit of both transcription factors and is presumed to play a regulatory role. SBF binding to its target sequences, the SCBs, is a highly regulated event and requires the association of Swi4 with Swi6 through their C-terminal domains. Swi4 binding to SCBs is restricted to the late M and G(1) phases, when Swi6 is localized to the nucleus. We show that in contrast to Swi6, Swi4 remains nuclear throughout the cell cycle. This finding suggests that the DNA binding domain of Swi4 is inaccessible in the full-length protein when not complexed with Swi6. To explore this hypothesis, we expressed Swi4 and Swi6 in insect cells by using the baculovirus system. We determined that partially purified Swi4 cannot bind SCBs in the absence of Swi6. However, Swi4 derivatives carrying point mutations or alterations in the extreme C terminus were able to bind DNA or activate transcription in the absence of Swi6, and the C terminus of Swi4 inhibited Swi4 derivatives from binding DNA in trans. Full-length Swi4 was determined to be monomeric in solution, suggesting an intramolecular mechanism for auto-inhibition of binding to DNA by Swi4. We detected a direct in vitro interaction between a C-terminal fragment of Swi4 and the N-terminal 197 amino acids of Swi4, which contain the DNA binding domain. Together, our data suggest that intramolecular interactions involving the C-terminal region of Swi4 physically prevent the DNA binding domain from binding SCBs. The interaction of the carboxy-terminal region of Swi4 with Swi6 alleviates this inhibition, allowing Swi4 to bind DNA.

Crystal structure of the DNA-binding domain of Mbp1, a transcription factor important in cell-cycle control of DNA synthesis

During the cell cycle, cells progress through four distinct phases, G1, S, G2 and M; transcriptional controls play an important role at the transition between these phases. MCB-binding factor (MBF), a transcription factor from budding yeast, binds to the so-called MCB (MluI cell-cycle box) elements found in the promoters of many DNA synthesis genes, and activates the transcription of those at the G1-->S phase transition. MBF is comprised of two proteins, Mbp1 and Swi6. The three-dimensional structure of the N-terminal DNA-binding domain of Mbp1 has been determined by multiwavelength anomalous diffraction from crystals of the selenomethionyl variant of the protein. The structure is composed of a six-stranded beta sheet interspersed with two pairs of alpha helices. The most conserved core region among Mbp1-related transcription factors folds into a central helix-turn-helix motif with a short N-terminal beta strand and a C-terminal beta hairpin. Despite little sequence similarity, the structure within the core region of the Mbp1 N-terminal domain exhibits a similar fold to that of the DNA-binding domains of other proteins, such as hepatocyte nuclear factor-3gamma and histone H5 from eukaryotes, and the prokaryotic catabolite gene activator. However, the structure outside the core region defines Mbp1 as a larger entity with substructures that stabilize and display the helix-turn-helix motif.

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Start-Specific Transcription Factor Swi4 Interacts through the Ankyrin Repeats with the Mitotic Clb2/Cdc28 Kinase and through Its Conserved Carboxy Terminus with Swi6

At a point in late G1 termed Start, yeast cells enter S phase, duplicate their spindle pole bodies, and form buds. These events require activation of Cdc28 kinase by G1 cyclins. Swi4 associates with Swi6 to form the SCB-binding factor complex which activates G1 cyclin genes CLN1 and CLN2 in late G1. In G2 and M phases, the transcriptional activity of SCB-binding factor is repressed by the mitotic Clb2/Cdc28 kinase. Mbp1, a transcription factor related to Swi4, forms the MCB-binding factor complex with Swi6, which activates DNA synthesis genes and S-phase cyclin genes CLB5 and CLB6 in late G1. Clb2/Cdc28 kinase is not required for the repression of MCB-binding factor transcriptional activity in G2 and M phase. We show here that the Swi4 carboxy terminus is sufficient for interaction with Swi6 in vitro. A carboxy-terminal domain of Swi6 is required and sufficient for interaction with Swi4. The carboxy terminus of Mbp1 is sufficient for interaction with Swi6, and the carboxy terminus of Swi6 is required for interaction with Mbp1. By coimmunoprecipitation, we show that Swi4 but not Mbp1 interacts with Clb2/Cdc28 kinase in vivo during the G2 and M phases of the cell cycle. We demonstrate that the ankyrin repeats of Swi4 mediate the interaction with Clb2/Cdc28 kinase. The ankyrin repeats constitute a domain by which a cell cycle-specific transcription factor can interact with cyclin-dependent kinase complexes, thus enabling it to link its transcriptional activity to cell cycle progression.