ML Type Inference Research Articles

Improving Type Error Messages in OCaml

Cryptic type error messages are a major obstacle to learning OCaml or other ML-based languages. In many cases, error messages cannot be interpreted without a sufficiently-precise model of the type inference algorithm. The problem of improving type error messages in ML has received quite a bit of attention over the past two decades, and many different strategies have been considered. The challenge is not only to produce error messages that are both sufficiently concise and systematically useful to the programmer, but also to handle a full-blown programming language and to cope with large-sized programs efficiently. In this work, we present a modification to the traditional ML type inference algorithm implemented in OCaml that, by significantly reducing the left-to-right bias, allows us to report error messages that are more helpful to the programmer. Our algorithm remains fully predictable and continues to produce fairly concise error messages that always help making some progress towards fixing the code. We implemented our approach as a patch to the OCaml compiler in just a few hundred lines of code. We believe that this patch should benefit not just to beginners, but also to experienced programs developing large-scale OCaml programs.

From ML type inference to stratified type inference

Hindley and Milner's type system, in its purest form, allows what one might call full type inference. Even when a program contains no explicit type information, its very structure gives rise to a conjunction of type equations (or, more generally, to a constraint) whose resolution allows reconstructing the type of every variable and of every sub-expression. Actual programming languages based on this type system, such as Standard ML, Objective Caml, and Haskell, do allow users to provide explicit type information via optional type annotations. Yet, this extra information does not make type inference any easier: it simply gives rise to extra equations, leading to a more specific constraint.There are extensions of Hindley and Milner's type system where full type inference becomes undecidable or intractable. Then, it is common to require explicit type information, via mandatory type annotations. Polymorphic recursion is a simple and well-known instance of this phenomenon. This talk presents two more elaborate instances, commonly known as arbitrary-rank polymorphism and generalized algebraic data types.In both cases, type inference is made tractable thanks to mandatory type annotations. There is a twist, though: these required annotations are often numerous and redundant. So, it seems desirable to make them optional again, and to set up a distinct mechanism to guess some of the elided annotations. This mechanism, referred to as elaboration, can be heuristic. It must be predictable. In the two cases considered in this talk, it is a form of local type inference.This approach leads to a so-called stratified type inference system, where type information is propagated first in a local, ad hoc manner during elaboration, then in a possibly nonlocal, but well-specified manner during constraint solving. This appears to be one of the less displeasing ways of describing type inference systems that are able to exploit optional type annotations to infer better (or different) types.

Certification of a Type Inference Tool for ML: Damas–Milner within Coq

We develop a formal proof of the ML type inference algorithm, within the Coq proof assistant. We are much concerned with methodology and reusability of such a mechanization. This proof is an essential step toward the certification of a complete ML compiler. In this paper we present the Coq formalization of the typing system and its inference algorithm. We establish formally the correctness and the completeness of the type inference algorithm with respect to the typing rules of the language. We describe and comment on the mechanized proofs.

Quantifier elimination and parametric polymorphism in programming languages

AbstractWe present a simple and easy-to-understand explanation of ML type inference and parametric polymorphism within the framework of type monomorphism, as in the first order typed lambda calculus. We prove the equivalence of this system with the standard interpretation using type polymorphism, and extend the equivalence to include polymorphic fixpoints. The monomorphic interpretation gives a purely combinatorial understanding of the type inference problem, and is a classic instance of quantifier elimination, as well as an example of Gentzen-style cut elimination in the framework of the Curry-Howard propositions-as-types analogy.