P-772 Introduction: In the mid-1940s, the United States built numerous facilities for the production of atomic weapons. A project is underway to evaluate historical radioactive and non-radioactive use and environmental releases at one large facility to ultimately reconstruct doses received by surrounding communities. While radioactive monitoring began in the late-1940s, uses of non-radioactive materials were poorly tracked and documented until the 1970s. The purpose of this paper is to describe methods used to prioritize radioactive and non-radioactive materials based upon their potential to pose a health risk to the public. Methods: Estimates of historical uses and releases were based on an extensive review of available records. Radioactive and non-radioactive materials were evaluated separately. Both airborne and liquid-borne radionuclide releases were considered. Each airborne radionuclide was ranked by calculating a priority index (PI) based on the air volume required to dilute the annual activity released to be equal to the worst-case non-occupational Maximum Permissible Concentration (MPC). Six groups of radionuclides were evaluated: plutonium, uranium, tritium, radioactive lanthanum, mixed fission products, and mixed activation products (MAP). For liquid-borne releases, PIs (based on water volumes required to reach MPCs) were calculated for total plutonium, 238Pu, 239Pu, 89Sr, 90Sr, tritium, gross alpha, and gross beta radioactivity. Non-radioactive materials identified as being present onsite in large quantities were ranked based upon highest annual usage and USEPA toxicity factors. Ranking was based on annual usage multiplied by either the non-cancer reference dose or the inverse of the cancer potency slope factor. If both were available, the more conservative toxicity factor was used. Results: Airborne releases of plutonium and uranium were of primary concern until the early 1980s, after which MAPs were the most significant. Application of the PI approach to beryllium indicated that airborne releases of the metal also warrant high priority. Plutonium was of highest concern among liquid-borne radionuclides. Historical releases of explosives and volatile organic chemicals appear to have the greatest potential for producing off-site health effects, with methylene chloride, TNT (2,4,6-trinitrotoluene), tetrachloroethylene, chlorodifluoromethane, and trichloroethylene ranking highest. Discussion and Conclusions: Prioritization methods were used to indicate which radioactive and non-radioactive materials used in facility operations warranted highest priority in retrospective studies of public exposures. Additional data will be sought for these materials to support detailed dose reconstruction. These methods can be applied to other sites where multiple hazards are present.
Read full abstract